Click on any date to go to the Thought for that Day
| Liturgical Season | Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
| 26th Week in Ordinary Time B/I | 1 |
2
or Guardian Angels |
3 | ||||
| 27th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 28th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 29th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 |
18 orSt Luke or World Mission Sunday |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 30th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28
or Simon and Jude |
29 | 30 | 31 |

Thursday of the twenty sixth week in Ordinary Time
(October 1) Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, Carmelite nun
and doctor of the Church (1873-1897)
"I
prefer the monotony of obscure sacrifice to all ecstasies. To pick up a pin
for love can convert a soul." These are the words of Theresa
of
the Child Jesus, a Carmelite nun called the "Little Flower," who lived a
cloistered life of obscurity in the convent of Lisieux, France. [In
French-speaking areas, she is known as Thérèse of Lisieux.] And her
preference for hidden sacrifice did indeed convert souls. Few saints of God
are more popular than this young nun. Her autobiography, The Story of a
Soul, is read and loved throughout the world. Thérèse Martin entered the
convent at the age of 15 and died in 1897 at the age of 24. Life in a
Carmelite convent is indeed uneventful and consists mainly of prayer and
hard domestic work. But Thérèse possessed that holy insight that redeems the
time, however dull that time may be. She saw in quiet suffering redemptive
suffering, suffering that was indeed her apostolate. Thérèse said she came
to the Carmel convent "to save souls and pray for priests." And shortly
before she died, she wrote: "I want to spend my heaven doing good on earth."
On October 19, 1997, Pope John Paul II proclaimed her a Doctor of the
Church, the third woman to be so recognized in light of her holiness and the
influence of her teaching on spirituality in the Church. All her life St.
Thérèse suffered from illness. As a young girl she underwent a three-month
malady characterized by violent crises, extended delirium and prolonged
fainting spells. Afterwards she was ever frail and yet she worked hard in
the laundry and refectory of the convent. Psychologically, she endured
prolonged periods of darkness when the light of faith seemed all but
extinguished. The last year of her life she slowly wasted away from
tuberculosis. And yet shortly before her death on September 30 she murmured,
"I would not suffer less."
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Nehemiah 8:1-4a,
5-6, 7b-12; Psalm 19:8-11; Luke 10:1-12
After this the Lord appointed
seventy-two others and sent them two by two ahead of him to every town and
place where he was about to
go.
He told them, The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the
Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field.
Go! I am sending you out like lambs among wolves. Do not take a purse or bag
or sandals; and do not greet anyone on the road. When you enter a house,
first say, 'Peace to this house.' If a man of peace is there, your peace
will rest on him; if not, it will return to you. Stay in that house, eating
and drinking whatever they give you, for the worker deserves his wages. Do
not move around from house to house. When you enter a town and are welcomed,
eat what is set before you. Heal the sick who are there and tell them, 'The
kingdom of God is near you.' But when you enter a town and are not welcomed,
go into its streets and say, 'Even the dust of your town that sticks to our
feet we wipe off against you. Yet be sure of this: The kingdom of God is
near.' I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for
that town. (Luke 10: 1-12)
Drama of dramas
Literature is able to capture human
drama, and this drama has varied with the times. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
has a scene in which Caesar is solemnly warned to beware the Ides of March.
So much hung in the balance for the Republic, for the liberty of the Senate
and for the future of Rome. The day came, and in a meeting of the Senate,
Caesar fell. All kinds of drama have featured in human history — I speak now
not of drama as a genre of literature, but of that drama that is the stage
of human history. We may think of
the
rise of Cromwell and the execution of King Charles. We may think of the
attack on Vienna by the Islamic forces in July 1682, and of how so much hung
in the balance, resolved in the great defeat of the Islamic armies by
Sobieski. We may think of the drama of anti-Christian rationalism in
eighteenth century France and its eruption in the French Revolution. Amid
the Terror and the cutting down of the Church, the goddess Reason,
represented by an actress, was worshipped in Paris’s Cathedral and the
Convention decreed the religion of Reason as the religion of France. We may
think of the drama of the Russian Revolution more than a century later and
the triumph of atheistic communism. There have been so many dramatic moments
with awesome consequences. But there is a greater drama still. The stream of
human history proceeds like, we might say, a mighty Amazon. Onward it flows,
but it is not just a vast, moving mass. Every little thing within it is
engaged in its own great drama. Every life has a unique significance. Man is
not just a number, not just an unimportant part of a mass. He is an
individual involved in a contest with eternal consequences. What is the
drama of dramas — the conflict that is, as we might say, the mother of all
conflicts? It is the acceptance or otherwise of God and his will. Amid the
astonishing variety characterising human life, this is one thing all mankind
has in common. Hanging in the balance of every human life is the acceptance
of God and his holy will. This is the drama of dramas.
In our Gospel passage today our Lord
sends his disciples out two by two — there were seventy-two of them — to go
ahead of him. We sense the urgency of the task. “Go! I am sending you out
like lambs among wolves. Do not take a purse or bag or sandals; and do not
greet anyone on the road.” All that matters is that people hear and accept
in faith and repentance the news of the Kingdom, the Kingdom of God that has
come in the person of Jesus. For Christ’s disciples, the drama includes
their proclamation of this event. For those to whom Christ’s disciples are
sent, the drama involves their acceptance or otherwise of it. Will Jesus
Christ be recognized for who he really is, the Saviour of the world, the Son
of God become truly man, man’s brother and his Lord and God? There is no
drama in human history that compares with this, for eternity is at stake.
Consider what our Lord says of the rejection of this message. “When you
enter a town and are welcomed, eat what is set before you. Heal the sick who
are there and tell them, 'The kingdom of God is near you.' But when you
enter a town and are not welcomed, go into its streets and say, 'Even the
dust of your town that sticks to our feet we wipe off against you. Yet be
sure of this: The kingdom of God is near.' I tell you, it will be more
bearable on that day for Sodom than for that town”
(Luke 10: 1-12). The disciple of Christ, the member of Christ’s
Church, and the entire Church herself, have a solemn responsibility to bear
witness in life and word to the person and message of Jesus Christ. If this
responsibility is not fulfilled in everyday life, then the drama has had a
tragic issue. For its part, the world has a solemn responsibility to hear
this word, to receive it and to put it into practice. If this responsibility
to hear and accept the word of Christ is not fulfilled, then again, the
drama has had a tragic issue. The words of our Lord ought ring in our ears.
We must not take them lightly. “Be sure of this: The kingdom of God is near.
I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for that
town.”
There are basic and simple facts
that every person must keep constantly before him. There is a God. We depend
on him constantly. He has become one of us to save us from our sins and to
bring us to eternal glory. We must hear his word, and his word comes to us
in various ways but supremely in his Son Jesus Christ, conveyed and
proclaimed by his Church. Let us understand the drama of dramas in our life,
which is to hear the word of God and to put it into practice.
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Did our hearts not burn within us as he talked to us on the road?'
If you are an apostle, these words of the disciples of Emmaus should rise
spontaneously to the lips of your professional companions when they meet you
along the ways of their lives.
(The Way, no.917)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Thirty-Eighth Chapter THE
RIGHT ORDERING OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS; RECOURSE TO GOD IN DANGERS
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
If, likewise, in every happening you are not content simply with outward
appearances, if you do not regard with carnal eyes things which you see and
hear, but whatever be the affair, enter with Moses into the tabernacle to
ask advice of the Lord, you will sometimes hear the divine answer and return
instructed in many things present and to come. For Moses always had recourse
to the tabernacle for the solution of doubts and questions, and fled to
prayer for support in dangers and the evil deeds of men. So you also should
take refuge in the secret chamber of your heart, begging earnestly for
divine aid.
(Continuing)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supposing there be otherwise good reason for saying that the Papal Supremacy
is part of Christianity, there is nothing in the early history of the Church
to contradict it.
JHN, from An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine
(1845)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the twenty-sixth week in Ordinary Time B-2
click on centre arrow
Scripture today:
Job 38: 1.12-21;40:3-5; Psalm 138; Luke
10:13-16
Jesus
said to them, “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty
deeds done in your midst had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would long ago
have repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more tolerable for
Tyre and Sidon at the judgment than for you. And as for you, Capernaum, ‘Will
you be exalted to heaven? You will go down to hell.’ Whoever listens to you
listens to me. Whoever rejects you rejects me. And whoever rejects me rejects
the one who sent me.” (Luke 10:13-16)
Religious truth
One of the signs of the seriousness with which religion
has traditionally been viewed in human societies is the persecution which has
visited those who are not, in the view of the prevailing authority, orthodox.
When Christianity first came to the notice of the Roman Empire as a following,
there was something about it that those who represented the Empire did not like.
It was not just one more of the many religions of the peoples which the Imperial
administration tolerated for the sake of civil order and as a means
of
social and political unity. Christianity began to appear subversive ― not in
terms of ordinary crime, but in terms of its threat to the religious principles
on which the Empire rested. The Empire would allow other religions provided, of
course, it did not pretend to challenge piety to the gods on which the Empire
depended. But this is what the Christian sect presumed to do. It held that their
Jesus was Lord ― meaning, Lord of all. All other religions were as nothing,
indeed worse than nothing if they were a barrier to the recognition of the full
authority of Jesus Christ. All depended on him. This was intolerable, and the
Empire came down on it accordingly. The point, though, is that at least this
showed that, for Roman civilization, what you believed in religion was
important. What you thought of the gods mattered. Of course, the paganism of
Roman civilization passed away and was replaced by the victorious Christian
religion, but still, the instinctive sense continued on that what you believed
in religion mattered enormously. The Catholic religion formed, and in a sense,
even created European civilization ― and its religion mattered. When the
cataclysm of the Protestant Reformation occurred, religion was seen to matter on
all sides. What you thought in respect to religion mattered, and your life was
at risk if what you thought was at odds with the prevailing orthodoxy. This is
not to comment on the question of truth in religion ― it is only to point out
that generally in human culture and society religion matters. It is very
important that you see as being true what is true. If you do not, it is a
morally serious matter. This is the human instinct, without going into the
determination of what is actually true. Traditionally, there is no relativism
there.
In this sense, Christ’s insistence on the great seriousness of faith is all of a
piece with the natural instinct of man. It is most serious, in Christ’s
teaching, if you do not change and accept him for who he is. The truth about him
just must be accepted ― though of course you are free to refuse. But if you
refuse then it has enormous moral implications. So we read in today’s Gospel
passage: “Jesus said to them, “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For
if the mighty deeds done in your midst had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they
would long ago have repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be
more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment than for you. And as for you,
Capernaum, ‘Will you be exalted to heaven? You will go down to hell’”
(Luke 10:13-16). That was said during his
public ministry. Risen from the dead, and soon to ascend into heaven, his
parting words are similar ― as reported in the Gospel of St Mark. Appearing to
his disciples on the evening of the day he rose from the dead, he upbraided them
for their lack of faith in the testimony of those who had seen him that day. So
serious is what you believe! He then commands them to go to the whole world to
preach the good news to every creature. “He who believes and is baptized will be
saved. But he who does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:16). This is no
morally neutral matter. Now, this is especially important for our day, in the
era of human rights when we all appreciate the right to religious freedom and
conscientious belief. It is a great gain that we now understand that no
religious belief can be imposed on another ― and gradually the world is coming
to see this due to pressure from Western culture, supported by Christian
teaching on the dignity of the human being. But a new danger is well in place,
that of thinking that right and true religious belief, like truth itself, just
does not matter. All that matters is that you be subjectively “sincere” ― or
rather, that you think you are sincere. This philosophical assumption can
undermine the teaching of Jesus Christ that he who is the Truth saves. I am the
Way, the Truth and the Life, he taught. It is the acceptance of this, and living
life according to it, which takes us to God and heaven. Let us be alert to a
serious enemy: the notion that there is no objective Truth. All there is, is
subjective opinion.
Jesus Christ was not just a very nice man. He was not just a very understanding
person who forgave everyone, whatever bad things they might have done. There is
no prophet in the history of Israel who spoke with such strident clarity about
the fact, the evil and the reality of sin and its terrible consequences in
eternity. High among the sins vigorously condemned by Christ ― and our Gospel
passage today is but one instance ― is the deliberate refusal to accept him as
Lord, and his teachings as true. What you believe matters. It is imperative that
you take pains to ensure you believe what is the truth. Let us never settle for
being merely “a sincere person.” We must be persons in possession of the Truth.
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
(October 2) The Guardian Angels
Perhaps
no aspect of Catholic piety is as comforting to parents as the belief that
an angel protects their little ones from dangers real and imagined. Yet
guardian angels are not just for children. Their role is to represent
individuals before God, to watch over them always, to aid their prayer and
to present their souls to God at death. The concept of an angel assigned to
guide and nurture each human being is a development of Catholic doctrine and
piety based on Scripture Matthew 18:10 indicates this teaching: "See that
you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that their
angels in heaven always look upon the face of my heavenly Father." Devotion
to the angels began to develop with the birth of the monastic tradition. St.
Benedict (July 11) gave it impetus and Bernard of Clairvaux (August 20), the
great 12th-century reformer, was such an eloquent spokesman for the guardian
angels that angelic devotion assumed its current form in his day. A feast in
honour of the guardian angels was first observed in the 16th century. In
1615, Pope Paul V added it to the Roman calendar.
"May the angels lead you into paradise; may the martyrs come to welcome you
and take you to the holy city, the new and eternal Jerusalem." (Rite for
Christian Burial) (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Baruch 1:15-22; Psalm
79:1b-5, 8, 9; Matthew 18:1-5, 10
At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, Who is the greatest in
the kingdom of heaven? He called a little child and had him stand among
them. And he said: I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like
little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore,
whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of
heaven. And whoever welcomes a little child like this in my name welcomes
me. See that you do not look down on one of these little ones. For I tell
you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.
(Matthew 18: 1-5, 10)
Guardian Angel
There
are many ways of looking at and interpreting human history. For instance,
one obvious theme taken up by some thinkers is that of conflict. It is
common experience that conflict characterises much of human life — be it the
life of families, the life of communities, the life of nations, the life of
the world. The German philosopher Hegel proposed conflict as the key to
human history. He saw in history the recurring pattern of the existing
situation or idea being challenged by its opposite, and the conflict
resolving in a new
situation or idea which then calls forth its opposite.
Thus the pattern of conflict recurs. Karl Marx took up the idea and in his
work, Das Kapital (1848) applied it to history in his own way,
seeing economic forces as fundamental. The ultimate resolution of the
recurring conflict among classes of society was to be a classless society of
the proletariat. The trouble with any idea that places some law or pattern
at the heart of history is that the role of free persons can be lost sight
of. Be that as it may, another way of looking at history is to consider it
as the rise and fall of kingdoms and regimes. Indeed, this perspective appears
prominently in Sacred Scripture. Consider the Book of Daniel in the Old
Testament, and in particular his visions of the four kingdoms (chapter 7).
One kingdom rises, then it falls under pressure of another kingdom. History
culminates in the coming on the clouds of heaven One like a son of man. To
him is given the everlasting kingdom. Consider the vision of the Ram and the
He-Goat of chapter 8. It is a vision of human history and the rise and fall
of kingdoms is central to the vision. Well then, as we think of many of the
kings and the kingdoms of recorded history — say, Alexander the Great and
his successors, Julius Caesar and Octavian and their successors, right
through to say, Bonaparte, and the dictators of the twentieth century — what
is it that marks the rule of so many (though not all, of course)? It is
pride, self-exaltation and a large dose of cruelty. The desire to be great
has driven much of history.
The Christian revelation has declared that the final and ultimate Kingdom
has already arrived. It is now with us, though not apparent in its glory.
The one whom Daniel predicted has come. To him has been given the kingdom
that shall never end, and that kingdom is present in the Church which he
founded. He, the king, is Jesus Christ, present in his body the Church, and
is constantly accessible in and through his Church. But while the kingdoms
and regimes of the world which rise and fall and come and go are driven by
the desire to be great, the eternal King is marked by the opposite. Those in
his kingdom are called to be humble. Let us listen once again to our Lord’s
words: “At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, Who is the
greatest in the kingdom of heaven? He called a little child and had him
stand among them. And he said: I tell you the truth, unless you change and
become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.
Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the
kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18: 1-5, 10).
The quest of life, then, for someone who a citizen of the eternal kingdom
and who follows the eternal King is not power, self-exaltation and any
domination over others, but Christ-like service and humility. His goal is to
be like his King who came not to be served like the other kings of the earth
but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for the many. Today, the
memorial of the guardian angels, we are reminded that we have heavenly
friends to help us to be like our King and to promote his Kingdom. The
Church teaches that God has assigned his angels to aid us in following
Christ who is our King. We have an angel of heaven to guide and to guard us
along our way of service and humility, building up the Kingdom of Christ and
assisting in its triumph of love. Our Lord refers to our guardian angels in
our Gospel text today: “See that you do not look down on one of these little
ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my
Father in heaven.” May I suggest that every day we pray to our guardian
angel, asking for his aid in the great work of following the King of kings
and Lord of lords.
Angel of God, my guardian dear! To whom God’s love commits me here!
Ever this day be at my side, to light and to guard, to rule and to guide.
Amen. Why not give to your guardian angel a name so that you readily
address him in prayer. We read in the Gospel that at the end of our Lord’s
encounter with Satan in the wilderness on the threshold of his public
ministry, the angels came and ministered to him. We also read that during
his agony in the Garden at the threshold of his Passion, an angel came to
our Lord to comfort and support him. We have, each of us, an angel to guard
and help us. Let us make of him our friend and use him to help us on the way
of the King.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go to apostolate to give everything, and not to seek any earthly reward.
(The Way, no.918)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Thirty-Eighth Chapter
THE RIGHT ORDERING OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS; RECOURSE TO GOD IN DANGERS
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
For this reason, as we read, Joshua and the children of Israel were deceived
by the Gibeonites because they did not first seek counsel of the Lord, but
trusted too much in fair words and hence were deceived by false piety.
(Concluded)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each part of the Catholic Church has excellences of its own which other
parts have not, and is as distinct from the rest in genius and in temper as
it is in place.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Tree beside the Waters’ (1859)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the twenty sixth week in Ordinary Time
(October 3) St. Mother Theodore Guérin (1798-1856)
Trust in God’s Providence enabled Mother Theodore to
leave her homeland, sail halfway around the world and to found a new
religious
congregation. Born in Etables, France, Anne-Thérèse’s life was shattered by
her father’s murder when she was 15. For several years she cared for her
mother and younger sister. She entered the Sisters of Providence in 1823,
taking the name Sister St. Theodore. An illness during novitiate left her
with lifelong fragile health; that did not keep her from becoming an
accomplished teacher. At the invitation of the bishop of Vincennes, she and
five sisters were sent in 1840 to Saint Mary-of-the-Woods, Indiana, to teach
and to care for the sick poor. She was to establish a motherhouse and
novitiate. Only later did she learn that her French superiors had already
decided the sisters in the United States should form a new religious
congregation under her leadership. She and her community persevered despite
fires, crop failures, prejudice against Catholic women religious,
misunderstandings and separation from their original religious congregation.
She once told her sisters, “Have confidence in the Providence that so far
has never failed us. The way is not yet clear. Grope along slowly. Do not
press matters; be patient, be trustful.” Another time, she asked, “With
Jesus, what shall we have to fear?” She is buried in the Church of the
Immaculate Conception in Saint Mary-of-the-Woods, Indiana, and was beatified
in 1998. Eight years later she was canonized.
During his homily at the beatification Mass, Pope John Paul
II said that Blessed Mother Theodore “continues to teach Christians to
abandon themselves to the providence of our heavenly Father and to be
totally committed to doing what pleases him. The life of Blessed Theodore
Guérin is a testimony that everything is possible with God and for God.”
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Baruch 4:5-12, 27-29; Psalm
69:33-37; Luke 10:17-24
The seventy-two returned with joy
and said, Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name. He replied, I saw
Satan fall like lightning
from
heaven. I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to
overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you. However, do not
rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are
written in heaven. At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit,
said, I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have
hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little
children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure. All things have been
committed to me by my Father. No-one knows who the Son is except the Father,
and no-one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son
chooses to reveal him. Then he turned to his disciples and said privately,
Blessed are the eyes that see what you see. For I tell you that many
prophets and kings wanted to see what you see but did not see it, and to
hear what you hear but did not hear it. (Luke 10:
17-24)
All authority is his
St Paul writes in one of his Letters that five hundred of the disciples saw
the risen Jesus on one occasion. This passing information gives us an
inkling of the following our Lord had during his public ministry. It is also
clear that many followed our Lord with varying degrees of commitment. For
instance, the Gospel of St John tells us that when our Lord announced the
doctrine of the Eucharist in the synagogue of Capernaum, many of his
disciples left him. It is precisely at that point that there is the first
reference to the
defection of Judas. In our Gospel passage today our Lord
sends out six dozen — seventy two — of his disciples to prepare the way
ahead of him. We notice that when Luke lists the Twelve (6:14-16), they are
listed broadly in pairs. Presumably when the Twelve were sent out they went
two by two, so there were six parties of the Apostles sent out on mission in
pairs. Here in our Gospel today there were six dozen of his disciples sent
out. I wonder whether this figure somehow related to the six teams of
Apostles when they were on mission. At least it can remind us of the link in
mission between all Christ’s disciples and the Twelve — and their
successors. So they went out and discovered the power of the name of Jesus.
We read that “The seventy-two returned with joy and said, Lord, even the
demons submit to us in your name.” We do not read of anything like this in
the work of the prophets of the Old Testament. They do not invest their
disciples with power over the underworld. We even read elsewhere of some of
the Twelve encountering a person not of their company — not one of Christ’s
disciples — who was using the name of Jesus to cast out demons. Jesus of
Nazareth was being seen as a great power for good. Our Lord confirms his
power over Satan. “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven,” he told
them. This may refer to his having witnessed Satan being cast out of heaven
at the beginning. It may refer to his witnessing in his mind’s eye the
present and future work of his disciples combating the demons. It could
refer to the very end when God will be all in all.
What matters, though, and what they ought rejoice in, is that their names
are written in heaven. This comes from their being Christ’s disciples and
from being united with him in his mission. They are beloved of the Father,
and the Father has chosen to reveal to them, the little ones, the person and
mission of Jesus of Nazareth. We read that “At that time Jesus, full of joy
through the Holy Spirit, said, I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and
earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and
revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good
pleasure.” Then our Lord speaks directly of himself: “All things have been
committed to me by my Father.” This is a simple statement but full of
momentous significance. Is there any other person in all the Scriptures
about whom such a thing is said? It is not said of Abraham, nor of Moses,
nor of David, nor of any of the prophets. When in the wilderness at the
threshold of his public ministry our Lord had been promised by Satan that he
would entrust the world to him provided he, Jesus, worshipped him. Our Lord
told Satan to be gone. Here our Lord tells his disciples that all things has
been entrusted to him by the Father. The kingdom of heaven was his. He was
the King of kings and the Lord of lords. When our Lord rose from the dead he
said to his disciples that all authority in heaven and on earth had been
given to him. They were to go, then, to the whole world and make disciples
of all the nations. Here the seventy-two — representing, we might say, the
body of our Lord’s disciples — are being introduced to the Church’s mission.
Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of all that was promised and expected.
“No-one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no-one knows who the
Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.
Then he turned to his disciples and said privately, Blessed are the eyes
that see what you see. I tell you that many prophets and kings wanted to see
what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear
it.
(Luke 10: 17-24)
In Christ, St Paul writes, is found every heavenly blessing.
In him dwells the fulness of the godhead bodily. If we wish to plumb the
depths of the universe and attain its key, all this will be found in a
specific person, the person of Jesus Christ. In encountering him we
encounter the Ultimate, the Absolute, the Final, the Deepest. We reach our
term in him and there is no further to go when we gain him. The one thing
that matters is to know Christ Jesus and become his friend and disciple.
This great blessing is granted by the Father, and he grants it not to those
who deem themselves wise and clever, but to little children. Let us pray for
this blessing, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By calling you to be an apostle, our Lord has reminded you, so that you will
never forget it, that you are a 'son of God.'
(The Way, 919)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Thirty-Ninth Chapter
A MAN SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY SOLICITOUS ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, always commit your cause to Me. I will dispose of it rightly in
good time. Await My ordering of it and it will be to your advantage.
THE DISCIPLE
Lord, I willingly commit all things to You, for my anxiety can profit me
little. But I would that I were not so concerned about the future, and
instead offered myself without hesitation to Your good pleasure.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Civilization is that state to which man’s nature points and tends; it is the
systematic use, improvement, and combination of those faculties which are
his characteristic; and, viewed in its idea, it is the perfection, the
happiness of our mortal state.
JHN, from Lectures on the History of the Turks in their Relation to
Europe (1853)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Twenty seventh Sunday of Ordinary Time B
Prayers this week:
O Lord, you have
given everything its place in the world, and no one can make it otherwise.
For it is your creation, the heavens and the earth and the stars: You are
the Lord of all.
(Esther 13: 9-11).
Father, your love for us surpasses all our hopes and desires.
Forgive our failings, keep us in your peace and lead us in the way of
salvation.
We ask
this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God for ever and ever.
(October 4) St. Francis of Assisi (1182-1226)
Francis of Assisi was a poor little man who astounded and inspired the
Church by taking the gospel literally—not in a narrow fundamentalist sense,
but by actually following all that Jesus said and did, joyfully, without
limit and without a mite of self-importance.
Serious
illness brought the young Francis to see the emptiness of his frolicking
life as leader of Assisi's youth. Prayer—lengthy and difficult—led him to a
self-emptying like that of Christ, climaxed by embracing a leper he met on
the road. It symbolized his complete obedience to what he had heard in
prayer: "Francis! Everything you have loved and desired in the flesh it is
your duty to despise and hate, if you wish to know my will. And when you
have begun this, all that now seems sweet and lovely to you will become
intolerable and bitter, but all that you used to avoid will turn itself to
great sweetness and exceeding joy." From the cross in the neglected
field-chapel of San Damiano, Christ told him, "Francis, go out and build up
my house, for it is nearly falling down." Francis became the totally poor
and humble workman. He must have suspected a deeper meaning to "build up my
house." But he would have been content to be for the rest of his life the
poor "nothing" man actually putting brick on brick in abandoned chapels. He
gave up every material thing he had, piling even his clothes before his
earthly father (who was demanding restitution for Francis' "gifts" to the
poor) so that he would be totally free to say, "Our Father in heaven." He
was, for a time, considered to be a religious "nut," begging from door to
door when he could not get money for his work, bringing sadness or disgust
to the hearts of his former friends, ridicule from the unthinking. But
genuineness will tell. A few people began to realize that this man was
actually trying to be Christian. He really believed what Jesus said:
"Announce the kingdom! Possess no gold or silver or copper in your purses,
no traveling bag, no sandals, no staff" (see Luke 9:1-3). Francis' first
rule for his followers was a collection of texts from the Gospels. He had no
idea of founding an order, but once it began he protected it and accepted
all the legal structures needed to support it. His devotion and loyalty to
the Church were absolute and highly exemplary at a time when various
movements of reform tended to break the Church's unity. He was torn between
a life devoted entirely to prayer and a life of active preaching of the Good
News. He decided in favour of the latter, but always returned to solitude
when he could. He wanted to be a missionary in Syria or in Africa, but was
prevented by shipwreck and illness in both cases. He did try to convert the
sultan of Egypt during the Fifth Crusade. During the last years of his
relatively short life (he died at 44) he was half blind and seriously ill.
Two years before his death, he received the stigmata, the real and painful
wounds of Christ in his hands, feet and side. On his deathbed, he said over
and over again the last addition to his Canticle of the Sun, "Be praised, O
Lord, for our Sister Death." He sang Psalm 141, and at the end asked his
superior to have his clothes removed when the last hour came and for
permission to expire lying naked on the earth, in imitation of his Lord.
"We adore you and we bless you, Lord Jesus Christ, here and in all the
churches which are in the whole world, because by your holy cross you have
redeemed the world" (St. Francis). (AmericanCatholic.org)
For more on St
Francis
(click here)
Scripture: Genesis 2:18-24; Psalm 128:1-2,
3, 4-5, 6; Hebrews 2:9-11; Mark 10:2-16 or 10: 2-12.
The Pharisees approached Jesus and
asked, "Is it lawful for a husband to divorce his wife?" They were testing
him. He said to them in
reply,
"What did Moses command you?" They replied, "Moses permitted a husband to
write a bill of divorce and dismiss her." But Jesus told them, "Because of
the hardness of your hearts he wrote you this commandment. But from the
beginning of creation, God made them male and female. For this reason a man
shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two
shall become one flesh. So they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore
what God has joined together, no human being must separate." In the house
the disciples again questioned Jesus about this. He said to them, "Whoever
divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if
she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery."
(Mark 10:2-12)
Marriage
There have
been philosophical systems the central idea of which is absurdity. That is
to say, they propose that reality is discovered to lack purpose and ultimate
worth. Ultimately, life is not worth living. At its centre, life is harsh,
dark and ugly. One ought not too glibly dismiss this because this is
precisely the experience of many. Without a sure conviction of a good God
and, perhaps, of a divine Revelation, it may not be easy to see or show how
meaningfulness carries the day. Cardinal Newman wrote in his great
Apologia (1864)
that were it not for his inescapable sense of God
present in his conscience, the evil of the world would have driven him into
some from of unbelief. Revelation confirms that sin has stuck the world as
lightning might strike a tree, causing grievous damage. Nevertheless, the
tree was not destroyed. It survived and, though crippled, continued to bear
some foliage while awaiting a new blossoming that would come to it from on
high. And so the world is, with all its pain, still a beautiful world.
Nature films bear witness to its astonishing beauty — the fields, the
mountains, the falls, the birds and the animals. Most beautiful of all is
man, man and woman who rise and fall in their grandeur. One of the most
beautiful things about man is his love for the other, and in particular his
love for his spouse. There are few things of greater beauty than the married
love of the newly betrothed who have entrusted themselves in love to one
another till death, and to this our Lord alludes in today's Gospel passage
(Mark 10:2-12). When the Church and when
family and friends look on them at the start of their life’s course, they
instinctively think that for all the shadows it is still a beautiful world.
Literature extols the beauty of married and family love, and this is
absolutely confirmed by divine revelation. In fact, God spoke of himself as
a husband and bridegroom. His chosen people are his spouse. He has made
married love, one of the most beautiful things in the world, a principal
image of his relationship with us his children. In its turn married love
looks to Christ’s love for his Church as its truest model, and it will
retain and grow in its characteristic beauty the more it mirrors and
pulsates with this love.
Man and woman have been created by God in equal dignity, for they are each
equally at the summit of the world. They each are human persons and stand
together as lord and lady of the garden that is creation. At the same time,
while being equal in dignity they are made to complement one another
reciprocally. God has willed them one for the other to form a communion of
persons. In that communion they transmit human life by forming in matrimony
a oneness with each other. Together as one flesh they are called to bring
forth new life and to be God’s stewards of the earth. This marital
relationship, which man easily takes for granted and easily abuses, has, in
the case of the Church’s members, been sanctified and made one of the seven
Sacraments. Christian marriage is a Sacrament. It is the sign and channel of
Christ’s love. If they remain in Christ, his love becomes the soul and
support of their marriage. The Church teaches that there is a more noble
vocation still — that which sets aside marriage and for love of God offers
one’s heart and life to Christ directly. But the world depends on marriage
as God intended it to be, and in particular on the Sacrament of matrimony. A
couple who live their married life in accord with the teaching of Christ and
his Church are on a grand and beautiful, if difficult, road. It leads to
life here, and everlasting life hereafter. It is a road that excludes
adultery, contraception, all forms of polygamy, and the ending of their own
indissoluble bond. For all the darkness and sin that lurks in every corner
of this beautiful house, ever ready to burst into a conflagration, the grace
of God is present to sustain, fortify and overcome. God means marriage to be
the iconic communion of life, life’s lasting and best joy, issuing in new
life. It has the mission to be the image here on earth of the life of the
Holy Trinity and to bear witness to the love of Christ for his Church and
for mankind. The whole of culture and society ought make it its business to
hold marriage and family aloft as a beacon and as its most precious
possession.
The Church takes a very strong stand on marriage and in particular on
Christian marriage. It will resist any pressure in society to lessen its
status or to allow it to be confused with other relationships, be they good
or bad. It resists laws and institutions that do not support one or other of
the essential features of marriage. These essential characteristics of
marriage are revealed by God in the teaching of Christ and in the natural
law — and the natural law is illuminated by the teaching of Christ. Let us
sing the grandeur of marriage, and let the song be heard everywhere.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no. 1643-1654, 369-373.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each one of you must try to be an apostle of apostles
(The Way, no.920)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Thirty-Ninth Chapter
A
MAN SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY SOLICITOUS ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
My child, it often happens that a man seeks ardently after something he
desires and then when he has attained it he begins to think that it is not
at all desirable; for affections do not remain fixed on the same thing, but
rather flit from one to another. It is no very small matter, therefore, for
a man to forsake himself even in things that are very small.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the following passage taken from the sermon
‘The Mystery of Godliness’ (1837),
John Henry Newman speaks of what it means for Christ to have
taken human nature on himself:
“Both
He that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which
cause He is not ashamed to call them brethren.” [Heb. 2: 11] Our Saviour’s
birth in the flesh is an earnest, and, as it were, beginning of our birth in
the Spirit. It is a figure, promise, or pledge of our new birth, and it
effects what it promises. As He was born, so are we born also; and since He
was born, therefore we too are born. As He is the Son of God by nature, so
are we sons of God by grace; and it is He who has made us such. This is what
the text says; He is the “Sanctifier,” we the “sanctified.” Moreover, He and
we, says the text, “are all of one.” God sanctifies the Angels, but there
the Creator and the creature are not of one. But the Son of God and we are
of one; He has become “the firstborn of every creature;” [Col. 1: 15] He has
taken our nature, and in and through it He sanctifies us. He is our brother
by virtue of His incarnation, and, as the text says, “He is not ashamed to
call us brethren;” and, having sanctified our nature in Himself, He
communicates it to us.
(Reference: John Henry Newman, Parochial and Plain Sermons Vol 5
(1840) Sermon no. 7, p. 86)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time
(October 5) St. Maria Faustina Kowalska (1905-1938)
Mary Faustina's name is forever linked to the annual
feast of the Divine Mercy (celebrated on the Second Sunday of Easter), the
divine mercy chaplet and the divine mercy prayer recited each day by many
people at 3 p.m. Born in what is now west-central Poland (part of Germany
before World War I), Helena was the third of 10 children. She worked as a
housekeeper in three cities before joining the Congregation of the Sisters
of Our Lady of Mercy in 1925. She worked as a cook, gardener and porter in
three of their houses. In
addition
to carrying out her work faithfully, generously serving the needs of the
sisters and the local people, she also had a deep interior life. This
included receiving revelations from the Lord Jesus, messages that she
recorded in her diary at the request of Christ and of her confessors. At a
time when some Catholics had an image of God as such a strict judge that
they might be tempted to despair about the possibility of being forgiven,
Jesus chose to emphasize his mercy and forgiveness for sins acknowledged and
confessed. “I do not want to punish aching mankind,” he once told St. Maria
Faustina, “but I desire to heal it, pressing it to my merciful heart” (Diary
1588). The two rays emanating from Christ's heart, she said, represent the
blood and water poured out after Jesus' death (Gospel of John 19:34) Because
Sister Maria Faustina knew that the revelations she had already received did
not constitute holiness itself, she wrote in her diary: “Neither graces, nor
revelations, nor raptures, nor gifts granted to a soul make it perfect, but
rather the intimate union of the soul with God. These gifts are merely
ornaments of the soul, but constitute neither its essence nor its
perfection. My sanctity and perfection consist in the close union of my will
with the will of God” (Diary 1107). Sister Maria Faustina died of
tuberculosis in Krakow, Poland, on October 5, 1938. Pope John Paul II
beatified her in 1993 and canonized her seven years later.
Four years after Faustina's beatification, Pope John Paul II
visited the Sanctuary of Divine Mercy at Lagiewniki (near Krakow) and
addressed members of her congregation. He said: “The message of divine mercy
has always been very close and precious to me. It is as though history has
written it in the tragic experience of World War II. In those difficult
years, this message was a particular support and an inexhaustible source of
hope, not only for those living in Krakow, but for the entire nation. This
was also my personal experience, which I carried with me to the See of Peter
and which, in a certain sense, forms the image of this pontificate. I thank
divine providence because I was able to contribute personally to carrying
out Christ's will, by instituting the feast of Divine Mercy. Here, close to
the remains of Blessed Faustina, I thank God for the gift of her
beatification. I pray unceasingly that God may have 'mercy on us and on the
whole world' (Quote from the Chaplet of Divine Mercy).”
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Jonah 1:1-2:2, 11; Jonah
2:3, 4, 5, 8; Luke 10:25-37
On one occasion an expert in the law
stood up to test Jesus. Teacher, he asked, what must I do to inherit eternal
life? What is written in the Law? he replied. How do you read it? He
answered: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul
and with all
your
strength and with all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbour as yourself.'
You have answered correctly, Jesus replied. Do this and you will live. But
he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, And who is my neighbour? In
reply Jesus said: A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he
fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him
and went away, leaving him half-dead. A priest happened to be going down the
same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too,
a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other
side. But a Samaritan, as he travelled, came where the man was; and when he
saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds,
pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him
to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two silver coins
and gave them to the innkeeper. 'Look after him,' he said, 'and when I
return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.' Which of
these three do you think was a neighbour to the man who fell into the hands
of robbers? The expert in the law replied, The one who had mercy on him.
Jesus told him, Go and do likewise. (Luke 10:
25-37)
What man must do
There are many things that are very distinctive about that
body of ancient writing which we call the Old Testament, apart from its
being the inspired record of supernatural revelation. If we set it next to,
say, the works of Plato or Aristotle, one obvious feature about it is its
distinctive concern for right and holy living: what man must do in order to
please God and gain life. But there is another feature which is closely
aligned to this, and that is its need for interpretation. Any body of
writing needs to be interpreted,
but the order and structure of the Old
Testament presents special challenges. It is made up of a wide variety of
literary genres from different eras and settings, all in one way or another
setting forth what God had done and said, and what man must do in response.
A fundamental order in respect to what man must do is offered in the Ten
Commandments of the book of Exodus. But, for instance, the books of
Leviticus and Deuteronomy contain numerous prescriptions of varied
importance, chapter after chapter. The prophets condemn sins of different
kinds and uphold the range of God’s laws. The entire Scriptures required
interpretation and in fact what characterized the life of the chosen people
were the markedly distinct interpretations of the Scriptures propounded by
the Pharisees, the Sadducees and others besides. One aspect of Christ’s
mission was to reveal the true meaning of the Scriptures in the midst of
this plethora. The New Testament, in setting forth the mystery and person of
Jesus Christ, was laying down the definitive meaning of the Scriptures and
pronouncing on the value of other interpretations. God’s revelation was
being given its true meaning and this was itself a revelation from on high
in the person and teaching of Jesus Christ. We see this process being played
out on a smaller scale in our Gospel today, yet in a way that is immensely
illuminating. A teacher and expert in the law rises to test Jesus. He asks
him a fundamental question requiring a knowledge of the Scriptures that
pinpointed its heart and soul.
That question was, what must I do to gain eternal life
(Luke 10: 25-37)? It is the question of questions, and
it is precisely this that sets the Hebrew Scriptures so much above the
literature of ancient times. The answer was not difficult. When our Lord
asked his questioner to answer from the Law, the lawyer had no difficulty in
replying. He immediately cited two sentences from the Old Testament. The
first was from Deuteronomy chapter 6 verse 5, and it gave the most
magnificent statement of man’s vocation in ancient literature: The Lord is
our God, the Lord alone. Therefore you shall love the Lord you God with all
your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength. We may notice
that the lawyer adds, and with all your mind. The lawyer may have been
forgetting the implication of loving God with all your mind. Loving God with
all our minds involves striving to know him and his will as perfectly as
possible. We remember that on one occasion our Lord told the Sadducees that
they understood neither the meaning of the Scriptures nor the power of God,
and that they were very much mistaken. He was continually telling the
scribes and the Pharisees that in their opposition to him — such as in the
interpretation of the Sabbath — they were very much mistaken. It is not
enough to love God with all our heart, our soul and all our strength if, in
fact, we are in error about him and his will, when the truth of the matter
is available to us. God wants us to be right in our understanding of what he
has revealed, and of course it is for this very purpose that he has bestowed
on us his revelation. This light of understanding comes in the person of
Jesus Christ. The lawyer completes his answer by citing another key sentence
in the Old Testament, from Leviticus, chapter 19:18. You shall love your
neighbour as yourself. Our Lord confirms what the lawyer has said, and in
response to a further query proceeds to tell his famous parable of the Good
Samaritan — a heretic in religious belief and a foreigner, but who outshines
the priest and the Levite in his love for his neighbour in need.
It is love for God in practical action which our Lord highlights in his
answer to the lawyer. The lawyer knew the answer to his own question — he
was attempting to test and trap Jesus. Our Lord uses the occasion to place
at the forefront of divine revelation the imperative of helping our brother
in need. As our Lord will explain elsewhere (Matthew 25), at the Last
Judgment we shall be judged on whether we have been like the Good Samaritan.
Our Lord himself is supremely the Good Samaritan for the entire human race.
Let us strive to be like him, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are salt, apostolic soul. 'Salt is a useful thing', we read in the holy
Gospel; but if the salt loses its taste, it is good for nothing, neither for
the land nor for the manure heap; it is thrown out as useless.
You are salt, apostolic soul. But if you lose your taste...
(The Way, no.921)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Thirty-Ninth Chapter
A
MAN SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY SOLICITOUS ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
A man's true progress consists in denying himself, and the man who has
denied himself is truly free and secure. The old enemy, however, setting
himself against all good, never ceases to tempt them, but day and night
plots dangerous snares to cast the unwary into the net of deceit. "Watch ye
and pray," says the Lord, "that ye enter not into temptation."
(Concluded)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though Faith is the characteristic of the Gospel, and Faith is the simple
lifting of the mind to the Unseen God, without conscious reasoning or formal
argument, still the mind may be allowably, nay, religiously engaged, in
reflecting upon its own Faith; investigating the grounds and the Object of
it, bringing it out into words, whether to defend, or recommend, or teach it
to others.
JHN, from the university Sermon ‘Implicit and Explicit Reason’ (1840)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time
(October 6) St. Bruno (1030?-1101)
This saint has the honour of having founded a religious order
which, as the saying goes, has never had to be reformed because it was never
deformed. No doubt both the founder and the members would reject such high
praise, but it is an indication of the saint's intense love of a penitential
life in solitude. He was born in Cologne, Germany, became a famous teacher
at Rheims and was appointed chancellor of the archdiocese at the age of 45.
He supported Pope Gregory VII (May 25) in his fight against the decadence of
the clergy and took part in the removal of his own scandalous archbishop,
Manasses. Bruno suffered the plundering of his house for his pains. He had a
dream of living in solitude and prayer, and persuaded a few friends to join
him in a hermitage. After a while he felt the place unsuitable and, through
a friend, was given some land which was to become famous for his foundation
"in the Chartreuse" (from which comes the word Carthusians). The climate,
desert, mountainous terrain and inaccessibility guaranteed silence, poverty
and small numbers. Bruno and his friends built an oratory with small
individual cells at a distance from each other. They met for Matins and
Vespers each day, and spent the rest of the time in solitude, eating
together only on great feasts. Their chief work was copying manuscripts. The
pope, hearing of Bruno's holiness, called for his assistance in Rome. When
the pope had to flee Rome, Bruno pulled up stakes again, and spent his last
years (after refusing a bishopric) in the wilderness of Calabria. He was
never formally canonized, because the Carthusians were averse to all
occasions of publicity. Pope Clement extended his feast to the whole Church
in 1674.
“Members of those communities which are totally dedicated to
contemplation give themselves to God alone in solitude and silence and
through constant prayer and ready penance. No matter how urgent may be the
needs of the active apostolate, such communities will always have a
distinguished part to play in Christ's Mystical Body...” (Decree on the
Renewal of Religious Life, 7)
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Jonah 3:1-10;
Psalm 130:1b-2, 3-4ab, 7-8; Luke 10:38-42
As Jesus and his disciples were on their way, he came to a village where a
woman named Martha opened her home to him. She had a sister called Mary, who
sat at the Lord's feet listening to what he said. But Martha was distracted
by all the preparations that had to be made. She came to him and asked,
Lord, don't you care that my sister has left me to do the work by myself?
Tell her to help me! Martha, Martha, the Lord answered, you are worried and
upset about many things, but only one thing is needed. Mary has chosen what
is better, and it will not be taken away from her.
(Luke 10:38-42)
Being busy
I know of
an outstanding two volume life of Christ (entitled The Mystery of
Jesus) which, in its treatment of this Gospel passage today, places
Mary the sister of Martha at the centre of the scene. Yes, Mary’s action of
sitting at the Lord’s feet listening to what he said is held up as more
important than being worried and upset about many other things, such as the
serving. But the focus is surely on Martha. Decades after the event the
scene was
recorded by Luke for the sake of the Church. In the Gospel of St John,
Martha and
Mary together with their brother Lazarus have an entire chapter
devoted to them, and in it Martha’s example of faith in our Lord is an
instance of the faith that the Gospel is designed to produce. Martha
professed before Jesus that he was the Messiah and the Son of God, and this
profession was followed by Christ’s raising of her brother Lazarus from the
dead. Luke also knew of Martha, and in our scene today it is she who
welcomes Jesus into her home. She takes the initiative in giving this
welcome, and showers upon him the service she desires to give to him. We
read elsewhere in the Gospel that the apostolic band with Jesus at their
centre was, in their travelling, assisted by some women who supported them
out of their means and attended to what was needed. Martha was of this
stamp. She loved our Lord, recognized him for who he was, and wished to
serve him with all her heart. We ought also remember that Martha is
celebrated in the Church’s Liturgical Year as a saint. The Evangelist, in
presenting her loving service to the Christian reader, wished also to record
a correction our Lord was remembered to have given. Do not get distracted
away from Christ by all the business that is part and parcel of serving him
in the life of the Church. Martha was an image of the one who serves Christ
and his Church. This work of service can lead to irritation, anxiety and
even annoyance with others. The one thing necessary can, on occasion, be
forgotten.
What is the one thing necessary which the Christian must always be doing? It
is to have one’s heart focussed on the person of Jesus and to be listening
to his word with the desire to put it into practice. On another occasion in
the Gospel our Lord was teaching a group of disciples before a crowd, and
word came through that his mother and his relatives were outside desirous of
seeing him. His response was to point to the ones before him and say, here
are my mother and my brothers. Whoever does the will of my Father is my
mother and my sister and my brother. What matters to our Lord is that we
listen to him in love with the resolve to put his word into practice. We
remember how, at the beginning of his public ministry, our Lord and his
disciples attended the wedding feast of Cana where the wine ran out. Mary
the mother of Jesus, having informed her son that the wine had run out, told
the servants to do whatever he tells them. The changing of the water into
wine followed, but the words of Mary are what is important. The Christian
must listen to Christ and do whatever he says. On another occasion our Lord,
using the example of building a house, said that it is the man who hears his
words and puts them into practice who is building on rock. In our Gospel
scene today (Luke 10:38-42) Mary’s
action is held up before Martha — Martha, the example of loving welcome and
service of Christ — as something she must always remember. Do not get lost
in the service of Christ to the point of partially forgetting Christ
himself. The one thing necessary and which Christ himself desires, is that
we keep the attention of our hearts on him and on his will. In the
particular circumstance of our Gospel passage today, it is this which, Mary
the sister of Martha, was doing. Our Lord wishes Martha to take advantage of
Mary’s example, and Luke holds it up for the benefit of all of Christ’s
faithful. Perhaps Luke saw this event as particularly instructive for him
and his companions who were so much part of the grand and very busy
missionary enterprise of St Paul.
Let us who are followers of Jesus Christ every day keep before our minds our
primary ambition. It is to love Jesus with all our heart, for he is our
Redeemer and our God. We must not let our work of serving Jesus with its
possible distraction, worry and irritation cloud our hearts and diminish his
presence in our souls. The cares of life can distract us away. Rather, in
the midst of these cares, the one thing necessary is that we keep our mind,
our heart and our soul focussed on Jesus. This requires a regime of prayer,
spiritual reading, sacraments and general recollection. We must be
contemplative in action and be persons whose vision is ever on Christ,
whatever be our particular calling.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My son, if you love your apostolate, be certain that you love God.
(The Way, no.922)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Fortieth Chapter
MAN
HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING
THE DISCIPLE
LORD, what is man that You are mindful of him, or the son of man that You
visit him? What has man deserved that You should give him Your grace? What
cause have I, Lord, to complain if You desert me, or what objection can I
have if You do not do what I ask? This I may think and say in all truth:
"Lord, I am nothing, of myself I have nothing that is good; I am lacking in
all things, and I am ever tending toward nothing. And unless I have Your
help and am inwardly strengthened by You, I become quite lukewarm and lax."
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us be far more set upon alluring souls into the right way than on
forbidding them the wrong.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Fellowship of the Apostles’ (1839)
---------------Back to
index for this month---------------------------Back to
index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time
(October
7) Our Lady of the Rosary
Pope St. Pius V established this feast in 1573. The purpose was to
thank God for the victory of Christians over the Turks at Lepanto — a victory
attributed to the praying of the rosary. Clement XI extended the feast to
the universal Church in 1716. The development of the rosary has a long
history. First, a practice developed of praying 150 Our Fathers in imitation
of the 150 Psalms. Then there was a parallel practice of praying 150 Hail
Marys. Soon a mystery of Jesus' life was attached to each Hail Mary. Though
Mary's giving the rosary to St. Dominic is recognized as a legend, the
development of this prayer form owes much to the followers of St. Dominic.
One of them, Alan de la Roche, was known as "the apostle of the rosary." He
founded the first Confraternity of the Rosary in the 15th century. In the
16th century the rosary was developed to its present form — with the 15
mysteries (joyful, luminous and glorious). In 2002, Pope John Paul II added
the five Mysteries of Light to this devotion.
“The rosary, though clearly Marian in character, is at a heart a
Christ-centred prayer. It has all the depth of the gospel message in its
entirety. It is an echo of the prayer of Mary, her perennial Magnificat for
the work of the redemptive Incarnation which began in her virginal womb...It
can be said that the rosary is, in some sense, a prayer-commentary on the
final chapter of the Vatican II Constitution Lumen Gentium, a chapter that
discusses the wondrous presence of the Mother of God in the mystery of
Christ and the Church" (Pope John Paul II, apostolic letter The Rosary
of the Virgin Mary). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Jonah 4:1-11; Psalm 86:3-6,
9-10; Luke 11:1-4
One
day Jesus was praying in a certain place. When he finished, one of his
disciples said to him, Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his
disciples. He said to them, When you pray, say: 'Father, hallowed be your
name, your kingdom come. Give us each day our daily bread. Forgive us our
sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us. And lead us not into
temptation.' (Luke 11: 1-4)
Our Father!
Many things that Jesus said and did
caused mounting hostility towards him on the part of the leaders of the
Jews. There was his observance of and pronouncements on the Sabbath. There
were his utterances on the traditions of the elders. Above and beyond all,
there was his attitude to Yahweh God and, consequently, his claims about
himself. God was his very own father, in an absolutely unique sense. We read
in the Gospel of St John that on one occasion the “Jews” — which is to say
some of the leaders of the Jews — took
up
stones with which to stone him because he claimed that God was his father.
They grasped the point exactly and correctly: his claim implied that he
himself was equal to God, for as God’s own son he must share with God the
divine nature. “I and the Father are one,” he said elsewhere. “Before
Abraham ever was, I am.” “He who sees me sees the Father.” No prophet of
God’s chosen people had spoken like this. It is in this context that we must
consider the prayer which the Lord taught his disciples, and which in
shorter form is given to us by St Luke in our Gospel today. It begins most
significantly. It addresses God as Father! St Matthew’s version gives the
fuller expression of it: our Father! St Paul writes that in the Spirit we
address God as Abba! Father! In turning to God we say, Father — dear, dear
Father! So it is that among the many distinctive features of the Christian
religion is to be counted the character of its prayer. The Christian regards
the most high God as his Father — not his Father by nature as
does Christ, but by virtue of an “adoption.” God is the Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ, and because of his death and resurrection the baptized
Christian is granted the grace of a share in Christ’s divine sonship. We are
not God’s natural children who possess by nature his divine life. Rather, we
have been granted a share in the divine life by the gift of grace making us
adopted children of God.
Christ is the second divine person made man and is the Father's natural and only begotten son.
This is not allowed by our Jewish
brethren. For them, God is Father and Husband to his chosen people by
special choice, ratified by the covenant of Moses and spelt out by the
prophets. So God is indeed very close to his people. But for those who are
privileged to be members of this people there is no question of a sharing in
the very life of God. We remain his creatures and nothing more by nature.
Such is the revealed monotheism of Judaism and within that tradition one
could not pray the Lord’s prayer as Christ meant it. Islam will not have it
that Allah, the one and only God, is Father and Husband to a chosen people.
God, the Lord of Mercy and of the Worlds, Master of Judgment, is the One man
worships. He is great and he is beyond. This, of course, is manifestly a
different teaching on the one God from that of Moses and the Prophets. But
far more so does it differ from that of Jesus Christ. Mahomet absolutely
rejects that Allah could have a natural divine Son, who — to crown all — became man and even died on a cross, rising then in glory as man again! For
Islam this contradicts monotheism. All this shows the ineffable and
wondrously distinct character of the Christian revelation, and therefore of
Christian prayer. In Christ, God has granted a revelation of himself that is
far beyond what nature and man's natural powers will suggest. The most
exalted conceptions of God will not attain to it. The Christian, because of
the gift of grace, is an adopted child of God enjoying a share in his divine
life. He is thus empowered to address God as his father — not, of course, in
the unique and natural sense in which Christ does, but by the special gift
of being “adopted” by God. This gift of adoption is granted at baptism and
involves a new birth in the soul. As St Paul writes, this new birth makes of
the Christian a new creature able to call God his Father: Abba, dear Father!
The prayer of the Christian is different from that of his brother the Jew
because the Christian shares in the life of Christ. Far more so is it
different from the prayer of Islam.
Let us treasure the Lord’s prayer,
always praying it with the doctrine of God revealed by Jesus Christ in mind.
The one God in three persons has offered us the grace of being his adopted
children. We address the most high God as our Father. Let us live as his
children, striving to be like his only-begotten Son. 'Father, hallowed be
your name, your kingdom come. Give us each day our daily bread. Forgive us
our sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us. And lead us not
into temptation.' (Luke 11: 1-4)
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The day you really 'get the feel' of your apostolate, that apostolate will serve
you as a shield with which to resist all the attacks of your enemies of this
earth and of hell.
(The Way, no.923)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Fortieth Chapter MAN HAS NO GOOD IN
HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING
THE DISCIPLE
But You, Lord, are always the same. You remain forever, always good, just,
and holy; doing all things rightly, justly, and holily, disposing them
wisely. I, however, who am more ready to go backward than forward, do not
remain always in one state, for I change with the seasons. Yet my condition
quickly improves when it pleases You and when You reach forth Your helping
hand. For You alone, without human aid, can help me and strengthen me so
greatly that my heart shall no more change but be converted and rest solely
in You. Hence, if I knew well how to cast aside all earthly consolation,
either to attain devotion or because of the necessity which, in the absence
of human solace, compels me to seek You alone, then I could deservedly hope
for Your grace and rejoice in the gift of new consolation.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The matter of revelation is not a mere collection of
truths, not a philosophical view, not a religious sentiment or spirit, not a
special
morality,—poured
out upon mankind as a stream might pour itself into the sea, mixing with the
world’s thought, modifying, purifying, invigorating it;—but an authoritative
teaching, which bears witness to itself and keeps itself together as one, in
contrast to the assemblage of opinions on all sides of it, and speaks to all
men, as being ever and everywhere one and the same, and claiming to be
received intelligently, by all whom it addresses, as one doctrine,
discipline, and devotion directly given from above.
JHN, from An Essay in aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time
(October 8) St. John Leonardi (1541?-1609)
"I
am only one person! Why should I do anything? What good would it do?" Today,
as in any age, people seem plagued with the dilemma
of getting involved. In
his own way John Leonardi answered these questions. He chose to become a
priest. After his ordination, he became very active in the works of the
ministry, especially in hospitals and prisons. The example and dedication of
his work attracted several young laymen who began to assist him. They later
became priests themselves. John lived after the Protestant Reformation and
the Council of Trent. He and his followers projected a new congregation of
diocesan priests. For some reason the plan, which was ultimately approved,
provoked great political opposition. John was exiled from his home town of
Lucca, Italy, for almost the entire remainder of his life. He received
encouragement and help from St. Philip Neri [whose feast is May 26], who
gave him his lodgings—along with the care of his cat! In 1579, John formed
the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, and published a compendium of
Christian doctrine that remained in use until the 19th century. Father
Leonardi and his priests became a great power for good in Italy, and their
congregation was confirmed by Pope Clement in 1595. He died at the age of 68
from a disease caught when tending those stricken by the plague. By the
deliberate policy of the founder, the Clerks Regular of the Mother of God
have never had more than 15 churches and today form only a very small
congregation. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Malachi 3:13-20b;
Psalm 1:1-4 and 6; Luke 11:5-13
Then Jesus said to them, Suppose one
of you has a friend, and he goes to him at midnight and says, 'Friend, lend
me three loaves of
bread,
because a friend of mine on a journey has come to me, and I have nothing to
set before him.' Then the one inside answers, 'Don't bother me. The door is
already locked, and my children are with me in bed. I can't get up and give
you anything.' I tell you, though he will not get up and give him the bread
because he is his friend, yet because of the man's boldness he will get up
and give him as much as he needs. So I say to you: Ask and it will be given
to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.
For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks,
the door will be opened. Which of you fathers, if your son asks for a fish,
will give him a snake instead? Or if he asks for an egg, will give him a
scorpion? If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to
your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit
to those who ask him! (Luke 11: 5-13)
Ask!
I remember
attending a lunchtime lecture by a staff member of the department of
Philosophy at Sydney University. The lecture was on prayer, and at one point
he said that if a person prays for rain and rain comes very soon afterwards,
it will naturally be thought that the rain was an answer to prayer. There
were persons who criticised his example, saying that while it might be
natural to think this, the mere fact that rain came soon after the prayer
does not prove that it was due to the prayer. It could have been a
coincidence. The
Christian, though, begins not with an example of that kind,
but with the person and word of Jesus Christ. He accepts that the Gospels
are inspired and are therefore a true record of the deeds and sayings of
Jesus Christ. The Catholic Christian also, very importantly, accepts that
the Church is his creation and has by his gift the assistance of the same
Spirit who inspired the Scriptures. He therefore relies on Christ’s
guarantee in the Gospels and confirmed by the Church’s teaching on the power
of prayer. As with the rest of Christian teaching, Christ’s teaching on
prayer is expressed not just in one passage of the Scriptures but in the
sweep of the Scriptures. Our Gospel passage today is not the only passage in
the Gospels that relates to prayer. Furthermore, the Scriptures themselves
must be interpreted according to the mind of the Church who is their
guardian and divinely appointed interpreter. All this having been said, we
have before us in today’s passage some wonderful words about prayer to God
our Father in heaven. There is no avoiding it — Christ says that our prayers
will be answered, if we persist. He is manifestly insistent: Ask and it will
be given to you. St James makes the point in his Letter that if our faith is
not shown in deeds, our faith is shown to be dead (2:17). If in our heart of
hearts we do not think there is much use in praying for what we think we or
others truly need, what is to be said of our faith in the person of Christ
and his word?
Therefore we must pray for what we need. St Alphonsus Ligouri in one of his
works makes the point that the reason why we do not receive more from God is
that we ask very little from him. Would this be the case if we had a truly
lively faith in his reality and presence, most especially in the person of
Jesus his Son? Do we believe that God as our Father wants to give us what we
need? “For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who
knocks, the door will be opened.” St Alphonsus says elsewhere that the
prayer of petition is perhaps the most important prayer of all and our
salvation in a sense depends on it. Our receiving the divine help we need to
grow in goodness and holiness of life and to reach our eternal homeland, to
a degree depends on our asking for it. “If you then, though you are evil,
know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father
in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!”
(Luke 11: 5-13). Of course, the test of our faith will come
when we do not receive in a short time what we have asked for. A further
test of our faith will come when we do not receive what we have been asking
for even over a period of quite some time. Many give up on the prayer of
petition at this point, and it represents a decline in faith. A further test
still will come if we do not ever receive precisely what we have been asking
for. A dear relative — a parent or child — falls with terminal cancer, and
prayers ascend to God for that person’s full recovery. The decline continues
and the sufferer dies. What is to be made of it? As with all hard facts,
such a fact as this summons the Christian to a deeper understanding of God’s
word in its fullness. Christ himself asked his Father that the chalice be
taken away from him, but it was not. Rather, his prayer brought strength to
his humanity and it served to attain the full objective of the redemption of
the world. All that is promised to us is to be situated within the divine
plan. God cannot promise to do what opposes his plan for our welfare. It is
not difficult to understand this point, and it must not lessen our resolve
to pray constantly, never losing heart. “Thy will be done” must be the first
of our petitions.
At the very beginning of his public ministry our Lord and his disciples
attended the wedding feast at Cana. Mary his mother was there. As St John
tells us, during the feast, the wine ran out and she came to him and simply
said, “They have no wine.” It must not have been the intention of Jesus to
begin at that point to show his glory, for he said to her, “Woman, what is
that to me? My hour has not yet come.” But her petition stood, and she
simply said to the stewards, “Do whatever he tells you.” She had no doubt
that something would be done. And so it was. Let us unhesitatingly pray for
what we need, provided it seems that what we are asking for is in accord
with the will of God. Let us pray, and keep on praying, asking withal that
the will of God be done.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pray always for perseverance for yourself and your companions in the
apostolate. Our adversary, the devil, knows only too well that you are his
great enemies,... and when he sees a fall in your ranks how pleased he is!
(The Way, no.924)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Fortieth Chapter
MAN HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING
THE DISCIPLE
Thanks be to You from Whom all things come, whenever it is well with me. In
Your sight I am vanity and nothingness, a weak, unstable man. In what,
therefore, can I glory, and how can I wish to be highly regarded? Is it
because I am nothing? This, too, is utterly vain. Indeed, the greatest
vanity is the evil plague of empty self-glory, because it draws one away
from true glory and robs one of heavenly grace. For when a man is pleased
with himself he displeases You, when he pants after human praise he is
deprived of true virtue. But it is true glory and holy exultation to glory
in You and not in self, to rejoice in Your name rather than in one's own
virtue, and not to delight in any creature except for Your sake.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There have been ages of the world, in which men have thought too much of
Angels, and paid them excessive honour; honoured them so perversely as to
forget the supreme worship due to Almighty God. This is the sin of a dark
age. But the sin of what is called an educated age, such as our own, is just
the reverse: to account slightly of them, or not at all; to ascribe all we
see around us, not to their agency, but to certain assumed laws of nature.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Powers of Nature’ (1831)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time
(October 9) St. Denis and Companions (d. 258?)
This martyr and patron of France is regarded as the first
bishop of Paris. His popularity is due to a series of legends, especially
those connecting him with the great abbey church of St. Denis in Paris. He
was for a time confused with the writer now called Pseudo-Dionysius. The
best hypothesis contends that Denis was sent to Gaul from Rome in the third
century and beheaded in the persecution under Valerius in 258. According to
one of the legends, after he was martyred on Montmartre (literally,
"mountain of martyrs") in Paris, he carried his head to a village northeast
of the city. St. Genevieve built a basilica over his tomb at the beginning
of the sixth century.
"Martyrdom is part of the Church's nature since it manifests
Christian death in its pure form, as the death of unrestrained faith, which
is otherwise hidden in the ambivalence of all human events. Through
martyrdom the Church's holiness, instead of remaining purely subjective,
achieves by God's grace the visible expression it needs. As early as the
second century one who accepted death for the sake of Christian faith or
Christian morals was looked on and revered as a 'martus' (witness). The term
is scriptural in that Jesus Christ is the 'faithful witness' absolutely
(Revelations 1:5; 3:14)" (Karl Rahner, Theological Dictionary).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Joel 1:13-15; 2:1-2;
Psalm 9:2-3, 6 and 16, 8-9; Luke 11:15-26
Some people said of Jesus, It is by
Beelzebub, the prince of demons, that he is driving out demons. Others
tested him by asking for a sign from heaven. Jesus knew their thoughts and
said to them: Any kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and a house
divided against
itself
will fall. If Satan is divided against himself, how can his kingdom stand? I
say this because you claim that I drive out demons by Beelzebub. Now if I
drive out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your followers drive them out? So
then, they will be your judges. But if I drive out demons by the finger of
God, then the kingdom of God has come to you. When a strong man, fully
armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe. But when someone
stronger attacks and overpowers him, he takes away the armour in which the
man trusted and divides up the spoils. He who is not with me is against me,
and he who does not gather with me, scatters. When an evil spirit comes out
of a man, it goes through arid places seeking rest and does not find it.
Then it says, 'I will return to the house I left.' When it arrives, it finds
the house swept clean and put in order. Then it goes and takes seven other
spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and live there. And the
final condition of that man is worse than the first.
(Luke 11: 15-26)
Satan
In the Old Testament — the Hebrew Scriptures
— we find various references to
the good angels. When God expelled Adam from the Garden “he stationed the
cherubim and the fiery revolving sword, to guard the way to the tree of
life” (Genesis 3:24). Angels appear to Abraham. An angel appears to Gideon.
The book of Tobit is largely concerned with the guidance given by the angel
Raphael to Tobias. The most important revelation about Satan is in the book
of Genesis where he engineers the Fall of man. Another important reference
to
Satan is found in the book of Job, in which he is the initiator of Job’s
afflictions. He does not appear much elsewhere. When it comes to the angelic
world, it is the angels, the good spirits, who feature much more. Now, the
angels have an important place in the New Testament, especially though not
exclusively in the narratives of Matthew and Luke about the infancy of
Christ. They feature in our Lord’s public ministry, in his passion (in the
Garden of Gethsemane) and in the resurrection. But what is especially
noteworthy is — at least when set against the Old Testament- the sudden
prominence of Satan in the Gospels. In his teaching our Lord refers to Hell
and the demonic far often than is found anywhere in the Old Testament. He
reveals the prospect of an eternity in Hell for the sinner who does not
repent, and it was to save us from the fires of Hell that he became man.
Salvation comes from union in faith and baptism with him. Our Lord’s public
ministry, beginning with his temporary withdrawal to the wilderness
following his baptism, is marked by an encounter with the prince of Hell,
Satan. It began a battle to the death. From the outset Christ is in direct
conflict with the demons who have in numbers made their abode in the lives
of very many unfortunates of God’s chosen people. We do not get the
impression that this was wholly the fault of those possessed. We read of a
young boy possessed by a demon. One of Christ’s most ardent disciples, Mary
Magdalene, had had seven demons cast out of her by him.
Christ’s public ministry was in large measure dominated by his conflict with
Satan. Appointing Simon to be the rock of his Church and giving to him the
keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, Christ promises that the powers of Hell will
not prevail. At the Last Supper he spoke to his disciples of his Passion as
the moment when the Prince of this world was on his way. In our Gospel today
our Lord speaks specifically of Satan’s kingdom. The demonic world, our Lord
implies, is organized and well thought through. It is “a kingdom” and “a
household,” suggesting a unity and a strategy. “Any kingdom divided against
itself will be ruined, and a house divided against itself will fall. If
Satan is divided against himself, how can his kingdom stand? I say this
because you claim that I drive out demons by Beelzebub.” The only victor
over Satan is Jesus Christ because he is far the stronger. He despoils Satan
who has been in possession, and shares out the spoils — and this was the
upshot of our Lord’s ministry and death and resurrection. “When a strong
man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe. But when
someone stronger attacks and overpowers him, he takes away the armour in
which the man trusted and divides up the spoils. He who is not with me is
against me, and he who does not gather with me, scatters” (Luke 11: 15-26).
Christ warns all to be vigilant. It is not enough to have been freed by
God’s power of the influence of this spirit, for this enemy seeks to return.
“When an evil spirit comes out of a man, it goes through arid places seeking
rest and does not find it. Then it says, 'I will return to the house I
left.' When it arrives, it finds the house swept clean and put in order.
Then it goes and takes seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they
go in and live there. And the final condition of that man is worse than the
first” (Luke 11: 15-26). I remember
watching a contest shot on film between a crocodile and a lion. The more
nimble lion forced the crocodile away back into the river. But then,
becoming distracted, the lion remained on the shore and ceased to be on
guard. The crocodile suddenly returned and, rushing from the water, took the
lion.
Let us beware, as our first parents did not beware. Their archetypal example
has been replicated time and time again in the history of our race.
Wellington did not underestimate the genius of Bonaparte as a military
commander, but prepared for the final encounter at Waterloo with great care.
Were it not for the arrival of Blucher, he would have probably lost.
Bonaparte, on the other hand, underestimated Wellington and underperformed.
Should we underestimate Satan — and our age tends to regard the demons as a
joke — it will lead to a downfall. Let us take our stand with Christ,
carrying his banner to victory. That banner is the sign Constantine saw in
the skies: it is the Cross. Let us follow Jesus as he carries the cross.
That is our weapon, and by it we win.
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just as observant religious are eager to know how the first of their order
or congregation lived, so as to have their model to follow you too,
Christian gentleman, should also seek to know and imitate the lives of the
disciples of Jesus, who knew Peter and Paul and John, and all but witnessed
the Death and Resurrection of the Master.
(The Way, no.925)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Fortieth Chapter
MAN
HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING
THE DISCIPLE
Let Your name, not mine, be praised. Let Your work, not mine, be magnified.
Let Your holy name be blessed, but let no human praise be given to me. You
are my glory. You are the joy of my heart. In You I will glory and rejoice
all the day, and for myself I will glory in nothing but my infirmities.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The body of the faithful is one of the witnesses to the fact of the
tradition of revealed doctrine.
JHN, from ‘On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine’ (1859)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time
(October 10) St. Francis Borgia (1510-1572)
Today's
saint grew up in an important family in 16th-century Spain, serving in the
imperial court and quickly advancing in his career. But a series of
events—including the death of his beloved wife—made Francis Borgia rethink
his priorities. He gave up public life, gave away his possessions and joined
the new and little-known Society of Jesus. Religious life proved to be the
right choice. He felt drawn to spend time in seclusion and prayer, but his
administrative talents also made him a natural for other tasks. He helped in
the establishment of what is now the Gregorian University in Rome. Not long
after his ordination he served as political and spiritual adviser to the
emperor. In Spain, he founded a dozen colleges. At 55, Francis was elected
head of the Jesuits. He focused on the growth of the Society of Jesus, the
spiritual preparation of its new members and spreading the faith in many
parts of Europe. He was responsible for the founding of Jesuit missions in
Florida, Mexico and Peru. Francis Borgia is often regarded as the second
founder of the Jesuits. He died in 1572 and was canonized 100 years later.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Joel 4:12-21;
Psalm 97:1-2, 5-6, 11-12; Luke 11:27-28
As
Jesus was saying these things, a woman in the crowd called out, Blessed is
the mother who gave you birth and nursed you. He replied, Blessed rather are
those who hear the word of God and obey it. (Luke
11: 27-28)
Blessedness
Our brief
gospel passage today is from St Luke, and Luke — the companion of St Paul
and one of the principal writers of the New Testament — includes various
tributes to Mary the mother of Jesus. The first comes directly from a great
angel. Gabriel is one of three angels who feature in the Old Testament and
whose names we are given. He addresses Mary with profound respect, and adds
(in various manuscripts), “blessed are you among women” (Luke 1:28). He
tells her that she will bring forth a superlative son. This, then,
was the
pronouncement of heaven. Mary’s kinswoman Elizabeth, speaking under
inspiration of the Holy Spirit, utters the same praise: “Blessed are you
among women, and blessed is the one to be born of you” (1:42). Mary herself
in response, praises God for what he has done for her and acknowledges the
same, “for behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed” (1:48).
The Greek word varies, but the sense is similar and consistent. Luke means
to be clear: Mary is the most “blessed” among women. Again, in our Gospel
passage today which is later in Luke’s Gospel, Mary is pronounced to be
“blessed among women”. As we read, “As Jesus was saying these things, a
woman in the crowd called out, Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and
nursed you” (Luke 11:27). This, then, is
the teaching of the Scriptures, that Mary is the blessed one among God’s
creatures. She is the “blessed” one, and as the angel Gabriel made clear, as
did Elizabeth her kinswoman, and as did the woman in the crowd today, her
blessedness comes from her being the mother of Jesus her divine Son. During
his dying moments on the Cross, Christ bestowed on his beloved disciple this
blessing that was his mother. “Behold your mother!” he said to him. “Behold
your son!” he said to her. John did not include these last words of Christ
as a mere curiosity. They were meant to indicate to us that the Church now
has a most “blessed” mother and model.
Christ does not rebuff this praise for his mother
— it is above all praise
for himself. The woman is overcome with admiration for him, and as a mother
she cannot help but acknowledge the blessedness of the one who bore and
nurtured him. But our Lord — humbly deflecting what is really praise of
himself — points to a deeper blessedness. Man is indeed blessed because of
what God gives to him, but he is especially blessed if he hears the word of
God and obeys it. This is what his own mother did, and it is what he himself
always did so supremely. “Can any of you convict me of sin?” he challenged
his enemies. “I always do what pleases him,” he says elsewhere. “Not my
will, but yours be done” he prayed in agony in the Garden. The supreme
blessing of life is not to have abundance of material goods, nor an
abundance of goods of any kind. It is not to have been successful in one’s
career, or to have an especially wide circle of friends and to enjoy
consequent popularity. We do not see this in the life of Mary the mother of
Jesus. What we see in her is perfect faith and obedience — humble and hidden
withal. The greatest blessing of life is to have found the path to
obedience. The supreme success is to have made great headway in true
religion, which, as John Henry Newman once wrote, is in essence recognizing
God’s authority and obeying it. This is precisely what our Lord tells us in
today’s Gospel. The essential thing in life is that we hear the word of God
and obey it. Every day we ought rise and immediately make that our ambition
for the day. It is often said that we must develop a very positive attitude
to life. The most positive thing we can do, and which is attainable for
every person whatever be his talents or lack of them, is to strive to know
the will of God, to hear his word, and assiduously to obey it. His will and
his word is presented in the Scriptures, explicated by the Church, and made
concrete in the dictates of conscience and the duties of our state in life.
Let us accept our Lord’s simple and very clear teaching. It is the path to
true success, whatever be the poverty of our circumstances and achievements.
In this we ought be ever starting again. Every day, let us begin all over
again to attend with a full heart to the person and word of Jesus Christ.
Hearing his word, let us make it our entire business to put it into
practice, for “blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey
it” (Luke 11: 27-28).
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You ask me, and I answer: your perfection consists in living perfectly in
the place, occupation and position that God, through those in authority, has
assigned to you.
(The Way, no.926)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Fortieth Chapter
MAN
HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING
THE DISCIPLE
Let the Jews seek the glory that comes from another. I will seek that which
comes from God alone. All human glory, all temporal honour, all worldly
position is truly vanity and foolishness compared to Your everlasting glory.
O my Truth, my Mercy, my God, O Blessed Trinity, to You alone be praise and
honour, power and glory, throughout all the endless ages of ages.
(Concluded)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We must bear in mind what is meant by perfection. It does not mean any
extraordinary service, anything out of the way, or especially heroic—not all
have the opportunity of heroic acts, of sufferings—but it means what the
word perfection ordinarily means. By perfect we mean that which has no flaw
in it, that which is complete, that which is consistent, that which is
sound—we mean the opposite to imperfect. As we know well what imperfection
in religious service means, we know by the contrast what is meant by
perfection.
JHN, from Meditations and Devotions (1893)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Twenty eighth Sunday in Ordinary Time B
Prayers this week: If you, O Lord,
laid bare our guilt, who could endure it? But you are forgiving, God of
Israel.
(Ps. 129:3-4)
Lord, our help and guide, make your love the foundation of our lives.
May our love for you express itself in our eagerness to do good for others.
We ask
this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God for ever and ever.
(October 11) Blessed Angela Truszkowska (1825-1899)
Today
we honour a woman who submitted to God's will throughout her life—a life
filled with pain and suffering. Born in 1825 in central Poland and baptized
Sophia, she contracted tuberculosis as a young girl. The forced period of
convalescence gave her ample time for reflection. Sophia felt called to
serve God by working with the poor, including street children and the
elderly homeless in Warsaw's slums. In time, her cousin joined her in the
work. In 1855, the two women made private vows and consecrated themselves to
the Blessed Mother. New followers joined them. Within two years they formed
a new congregation, which came to be known as the Felician Sisters. As their
numbers grew, so did their work, and so did the pressures on Mother Angela
(the new name Sophia took in religious life). Mother Angela served as
superior for many years until ill health forced her to resign at the age of
44. She watched the order grow and expand, including missions to the United
States among the sons and daughters of Polish immigrants. Pope John Paul II
beatified her in 1993. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 7:7-11; Psalm
90:12-17; Hebrews 4:12-13; Mark 10:17-30
As Jesus started on his way, a man
ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. Good teacher, he asked, what
must I do to inherit eternal life? Why do you call me good? Jesus answered.
No-one is good— except God alone. You know the commandments: 'Do not murder,
do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, do not
defraud, honour your father and mother.' Teacher, he
declared, all these I
have kept since I was a boy. Jesus looked at him and loved him. One thing
you lack, he said. Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and
you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me. At this the man's
face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth. Jesus looked
around and said to his disciples, How hard it is for the rich to enter the
kingdom of God! The disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said
again, Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier
for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter
the kingdom of God. The disciples were even more amazed, and said to each
other, Who then can be saved? Jesus looked at them and said, With man this
is impossible, but not with God; all things are possible with God. Peter
said to him, We have left everything to follow you! I tell you the truth,
Jesus replied, no-one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or
father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a
hundred times as much in this present age (homes, brothers, sisters,
mothers, children and fields— and with them, persecutions) and in the age to
come, eternal life. (Mark 10: 17-30)
Material goods
Our
Gospel scene today presents us with a situation of great promise. A man whom
our Lord quickly came to regard with a special love presented himself to
him. With ardour and respect, he asked from our Lord the direction that
leads to heaven. Our Lord appears reserved before this enthusiasm, but
immediately learns from the man that this keenness is of a piece with his
past life. He has kept God’s commandments from his earliest years. On a
separate occasion our Lord said that he counted the one who hears the word
of God and keeps it as his brother and sister. Our Lord looked on this man
and loved him. He then extended to him a precious invitation which meant so
much to our Lord. If you wish to be perfect in the love and service of God,
sell all your many possessions and give to the poor, then come and follow me
(Mark 10: 17-30). This direct following
of Christ in the way indicated would have set him on the path to perfection.
But the man, in a terrible sadness, refused. The stumbling block was his
attachment to his many possessions. He loved material wealth in a way that
led him to turn away from the word and the person of Christ. The thought of
this good young man’s material possessions ought lead us to consider the
place in life of the material goods we use and own and seek to own. As St
Ignatius Loyola states in the foundation meditation of his Spiritual
Exercises, man was created to know, love and serve God his Creator.
The love and service of God is the objective to which God means the heart of
man to be totally attached, and man’s happiness will be found therein. All
that the Creator bestows, including material goods, is intended to help man
attain this all-encompassing goal. Inasmuch as man is a member of this
material world, the material goods which in the providence of God come his
way and which he owns, obviously have a fundamental place in his life. But
their place must be that given to them by God. In his use of material goods,
man must be on guard lest they turn his heart away from the service of God.
Rather, they must help him grow in the love of God.
Material goods are not to be used, and are not to have a place in human
life, which is at the whim or ambition of man alone. He must in all things
be subject to the will of God our Creator as revealed by Jesus Christ his
Son, and Christ’s teaching is explained and applied by the Church speaking
in his name. The Church has an entire social doctrine involving the correct
way of acting in economic, social and political life, as well as the right
and duty of human labour, of justice and solidarity among nations, and of
love for the poor. From the Encyclical Rerum Novarum of Pope
Leo XIII in 1891 to the Encyclical Populorum Progressio of
Pope Paul VI in 1967 and on to the Encyclical Caritas in Veritate
of Pope Benedict in 2009, the Church has pronounced on the proper use of
material goods in personal, social and international life. This
authoritative teaching may be said to stem from the Seventh Commandment, You
shall not steal. That commandment requires firstly, respect for the fact
that the goods of the earth are meant for the benefit of all. At the same
time, it requires respect for the principle of private ownership of them, as
well as respect for persons, for their property and the integrity of
creation. By nature we desire property and this natural desire comes from
the Creator. The purpose of private ownership is to guarantee our freedom
and dignity, to meet our own basic needs and the needs of those who depend
on us, as well as the needs of all. If we own little or nothing it is very
difficult to meet these needs. But our property must be acquired and
received and used in a just way, and the right of all to the satisfaction of
their basic needs takes a certain precedence. If the Seventh Commandment is
to be observed in individual and social life, the principle of private
ownership and the principle that the goods of the earth are intended for all
must both be respected by all and kept in balance. The tragic lessons of the
past two centuries of capitalist and socialist regimes should be kept
vividly in mind, and all ought make it their business to listen to the
Church’s social doctrine.
That rich young man who had so much promise allowed material possessions to
assume a place in his life which proved to be tragic. That is not to say he
lost his soul — we do not know his future. But he failed to gain the pearl
of great price, the treasure of all treasures hidden in the field. That
pearl, that treasure is union with Jesus Christ and the fulfilment of God’s
will. Material goods can help us to please God, or they can lead our hearts
astray. Let us for love of God preserve in our hearts a healthy detachment
from them so as to be able to grow in a total attachment to God.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no.2402-2406 (goods and property)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pray for each other. One is wavering?... And another?...
Keep on praying, without losing your peace. Some are going? Some are being
lost?... God has you all numbered from eternity!
(The Way, no.927)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-First Chapter
CONTEMPT FOR ALL EARTHLY HONOUR
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, do not take it to heart if you see others honoured and advanced,
while you yourself are despised and humbled. Lift up your heart to Me in
heaven and the contempt of men on earth will not grieve you.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He truly is a
rare and marvellous work of heavenly grace, who when he comes into the din
and tumult of the world, can view things just as he calmly contemplated them
in the distance, before the time of action came.
JHN, from the university sermon ‘Contest between Faith and Sight’ (1832)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time
(October 12) St. Seraphin of Montegranaro
(1540-1604)
Born into a poor Italian family, young Seraphin lived the life of a shepherd
and spent much of his time in prayer. Mistreated for a time by his older
brother after the two of them had been orphaned, Seraphin became a Capuchin
Franciscan at age 16 and impressed everyone with his humility and
generosity. Serving as a lay brother, Seraphin imitated St. Francis in
fasting, clothing and courtesy to all. He even mirrored Francis' missionary
zeal, but Seraphin's superiors did not judge him to be a candidate for the
missions. Faithful to the core, Seraphin spent three hours in prayer before
the Blessed Sacrament daily. The poor who begged at the friary door came to
hold a special love for him. Despite his uneventful life, he reached
impressive spiritual heights and has had miracles attributed to him.
Seraphin died on October 12, 1604, and was canonized in 1767.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 1:1-7;
Psalm 98:1-4; Luke 11:29-32
As the crowds increased, Jesus said, This is a wicked generation. It asks
for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah.
For as Jonah was a sign to the Ninevites, so also will the Son of Man be to
this generation. The Queen of the South will rise at the judgment with the
men of this generation and condemn them; for she came from the ends of the
earth to listen to Solomon's wisdom, and now one greater than Solomon is
here. The men of Nineveh will stand up at the judgment with this generation
and condemn it; for they repented at the preaching of Jonah, and now one
greater than Jonah is here. (Luke 11: 29-32)
The Answer
I do not think that any instance can be found in the Old
Testament of a prophet claiming to be greater than the prophets before him.
Moses did not claim to be greater than Abraham, and Abraham did not claim to
be greater than those who would come after him. Any such comparisons were
out of the question. Elijah did not claim to be greater than Elisha, his
future successor, nor did Elisha claim to be greater than Elijah. Jeremiah
did not claim to be the greatest prophet, nor did any other make such a
claim. The one figure in
all of the Scriptures who did make a claim of this
kind was Jesus of Nazareth, and we have an instance of it in our Gospel
passage today. The Queen of the South came from Sheba to “listen to the
wisdom of Solomon, and now one greater than Solomon is here.” Our Lord says
that in his wisdom he is greater than Solomon. The men of Nineveh “repented
at the preaching of Jonah, and now one greater than Jonah is here.” Our Lord
is a far greater prophet than Jonah. Christ is serenely aware that all who
went before him, all the prophets and kings of which Jonah and Solomon were
examples, pointed to him and were transcended by him. On one occasion our
Lord said to his disciples in private that blessed were their eyes to see
what they were seeing, and their ears to hear what they were hearing,
because many prophets and kings sought to see and hear what they had before
them, and it was denied them. It is yet another indication of the uniqueness
of Jesus Christ, and of his own clear consciousness of this. The Scriptures
pointed to the One who was coming, and to what God would do for man by means
of his coming, but in fact the event proved to be a far greater blessing
than was promised. The Messiah, greater than any of the prophets or priests
or kings before him, was the Son of God himself. He was one of us, and yet
he was God. He was far more than God’s all-holy Servant. He was God’s own
Son, equal to the Father.
Despite this, the people were demanding a sign from heaven by way of proof.
Our Lord had given many proofs, and John in his Gospel calls them “signs.”
He had cured the lepers, healed all kinds of sickness and disease, raised
the dead to life, calmed the storms, fed multitudes with a handful of food,
cast out intractable demons with a mere word. No prophet or king displayed
such constant and effortless power at the service of good. It ought to have
been enough, and for this reason our Lord said that “this is a wicked
generation. It asks for a miraculous sign” (Luke
11: 29-32). All that was really needed was to gaze on him and on
the holiness of his life, and listen to his word in faith and obedience. The
pagan city of Nineveh looked on Jonah and heard his preaching. They
recognized in him a prophet and repented. Far more, then, ought all listen
to Jesus of Nazareth and repent. The problem is that we do not want to
listen to Jesus, or at least we do not care. We are not interested. We are
content to live as if God does not exist — and we do not care if he does.
This, I think, is the characteristic posture of modern secular man. His
reason has been set adrift from religious faith, and the reason for this is
perhaps that he does not recognize sin and its odiousness. Christ is not
deemed to be needed. Christ is just one of many religious phenomena in
history and a matter more of curiosity than of life and death. His
uniqueness is dismissed. The pressing need, then, is to resolve to gaze on
Jesus of Nazareth with a consciousness of our need. We must ask God to give
us a sense of our true condition and place ourselves in the presence of
Jesus, contemplating his person and the blessing of redemption he brings. I
once watched an interview with a fine Catholic mother of a large family. She
was a convert from Islam. When asked what led her to the Catholic religion,
she said it was the thought of Christ the Redeemer, and the thought of our
need for redemption. Islam has no recognition of a need to be redeemed.
Every day let us place ourselves in the presence of Jesus Christ, with the
conviction that he lives now, risen from the dead and in glory, but present
to each of us. He is worthy of our constant contemplation, our constant
gaze. Let us resolve to come to know him as our living Friend and Lord,
placing our faith in him and resolving to follow him in the ordinary course
of our daily life. We must place all our faith in him, a faith based on a
vivid awareness of our need and on an intimate knowledge of the One who
answers our need.
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are right. 'The peak' — you told me — 'dominates the country for miles
around, and yet there is not a single plain to be seen: just one mountain
after another. At times the landscape seems to level out, but then the mist
rises and reveals another range that had been hidden.'
So it is, so it must be with the horizon of your apostolate: the world has
to be crossed. But there are no ways made for you. You yourselves will make
them through the mountains with the impact of your feet.
(The Way, no.928)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-First Chapter
CONTEMPT FOR ALL EARTHLY HONOUR
THE DISCIPLE
Lord, we are blinded and quickly misled by vanity. If I examine myself
rightly, no injury has ever been done me by any creature; hence I have
nothing for which to make just complaint to You. But I have sinned often and
gravely against You; therefore is every creature in arms against me.
Confusion and contempt should in justice come upon me, but to You due
praise, honour, and glory. And unless I prepare myself to be willingly
despised and forsaken by every creature, to be considered absolutely
nothing, I cannot have interior peace and strength, nor can I be enlightened
spiritually or completely united with You.
(Concluded)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The idea of disbelieving, or criticizing the great doctrines of the faith,
from the nature of the case, would scarcely occur to the primitive
Christians.
JHN, from The Arians of the Fourth Century (1833)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time
(October 13) St. Margaret Mary Alacoque (1647-1690)
(Picture on left: face of St Margaret Mary)
Margaret Mary was chosen by Christ to arouse the Church to a
realization of the love of God symbolized by the heart of Jesus. Her early
years were marked by sickness and a painful home situation. "The heaviest of
my crosses was that I could do nothing to lighten the
cross
my mother was suffering." After considering marriage for some time, Margaret
entered the Order of Visitation nuns at the age of 24. A Visitation nun was
"not to be extraordinary except by being ordinary," but the
young
nun was not to enjoy this anonymity. A fellow novice (shrewdest of critics)
termed Margaret humble, simple and frank, but above all kind and patient
under sharp criticism and correction. She could not meditate in the formal
way expected, though she tried her best to give up her "prayer of
simplicity." Slow, quiet and clumsy, she was assigned to help an infirmarian
who was a bundle of energy. On December 21, 1674, three years a nun, she
received the first of her revelations. She felt "invested" with the presence
of God, though always afraid of deceiving herself in such matters. The
request of Christ was that his love for humankind be made evident through
her. During the next 13 months he appeared to her at intervals. His human
heart was to be the symbol of his divine-human love. By her own love she was
to make up for the coldness and ingratitude of the world—by frequent and
loving Holy Communion, especially on the first Friday of each month, and by
an hour's vigil of prayer every Thursday night in memory of his agony and
isolation in Gethsemane. He also asked that a feast of reparation be
instituted.
Like all saints, Margaret had to pay for her gift of holiness. Some of her
own sisters were hostile. Theologians who were called in declared her
visions delusions and suggested that she eat more heartily. Later, parents
of children she taught called her an impostor, an unorthodox innovator. A
new confessor, Blessed Claude de la Colombiere, a Jesuit, recognized her
genuineness and supported her. Against her great resistance, Christ called
her to be a sacrificial victim for the shortcomings of her own sisters, and
to make this known. After serving as novice mistress and assistant superior,
she died at the age of 43 while being anointed. "I need nothing but God, and
to lose myself in the heart of Jesus."
Christ speaks to St. Margaret Mary: "Behold this Heart which has so
loved men that it has spared nothing, even to exhausting and consuming
itself, in order to testify its love. In return, I receive from the greater
part only ingratitude, by their irreverence and sacrileges, and by the
coldness and contempt they have for me in this sacrament of love.... I come
into the heart I have given you in order that through your fervour you may
atone for the offences which I have received from lukewarm and slothful
hearts that dishonour me in the Blessed Sacrament" (Third apparition).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 1:16-25; Psalm
19:2-5; Luke 11:37-41
When Jesus had finished speaking, a
Pharisee invited him to eat with him; so he went in and reclined at the
table. But the Pharisee, noticing that Jesus did not first wash before the
meal, was surprised. Then the Lord said to him, Now then, you Pharisees
clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside you are full of greed and
wickedness. You foolish people! Did not the one who made the outside make
the inside also? But give what is inside the dish to the poor, and
everything will be clean for you. (Luke 11:37-41)
Material means
Our Lord’s indictment of the scribes, the Pharisees and the Sadducees is
manifest in the Gospels. But we must not think that all the scribes and all
the Pharisees were the object of our Lord’s denunciation. Nicodemus was one
of the Pharisees, and though fearful of the censure of his colleagues, he
visited Jesus by night to be taught by him. He defended Jesus among his
peers when their hostility was mounting, and he assisted Joseph of Arimathea
when the moment came for Christ’s burial. Moreover, at the time of his
visits to Jesus by night he said that “we know” that you are a teacher from
God — implying that there were others apart from himself who recognized
this. At the time of the trial of the Apostles before the Sanhedrin, Gamaliel, a doctor of the law and leading Pharisee solemnly urged restraint
and a certain liberality in respect to the new persuasion. Moreover, Paul,
though of the party of the Pharisees and intent on destroying the Christian
sect, was upright and a true man of conscience. He was a good man though
profoundly mistaken. All this is to say that not all the Pharisees were
guilty of what our Lord says here. That having been said, our Lord’s words
are clear that many were indeed guilty. Let us notice a detail in our Lord’s
denunciation of them. We read that when he had finished speaking, he was
invited by a Pharisee to dine at his house. We gain the impression,
incidentally, that the Pharisees were well off. They were men of means. We
notice that our Lord criticizes them for what they do not do with their
means — they do not assist the poor. He says in our text that “you Pharisees
clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside you are full of greed and
wickedness”. The externals of their religion — those religious observances
that were to be seen by others — are clean and polished and present a bright
spectacle. But “inside” they are “full” — “full”, let us notice — of both
greed and evil. Greed was a principal feature of their moral decay.
Our Lord repeats his point in the same passage when he tells his host what
he and his colleagues must do. “Give what is inside the dish to the poor,
and everything will be clean for you” (Luke
11:37-41). They must give of their means to the poor and the
effect will be great for their own spiritual condition. It is yet another
example of the Christian insistence on the Christ-like service of the poor.
Our Lord was filled with compassion for the poor, and he exercised his
divine power time and again for their benefit. We read that when Judas left
the Last Supper, some thought that, having the care of the common fund, he
was being directed by our Lord to give to the poor. This implies that part
and parcel of the use of monies that came for the sustenance of the
Apostolic body was almsgiving to the poor. When Paul eventually came up to
Jerusalem well after his conversion to meet with the Apostles, he was
assigned by them to work among the Gentiles, with the request that he have a
constant concern for the poor. It is an essential feature of the Christian
religion that the poor be cared for and that, to the extent possible, we use
our means in their service. In our Lord’s description of the Last Judgment
(Matthew 25), the Judge will say, I was naked and you clothed me — going on
to explain that whatever is done to the least he counts as having been done
to him. But of course this is not just a command of supernatural revelation
— that revelation granted to man by Christ and by the prophetic tradition
prior to him. It is clearly a command of the natural law to which the
conscience of the prudent and good man will bear witness. When disaster
hits, aid agencies appeal for generous donations, and the conscience of man
sanctions their request. Each person hears the voice of conscience dictating
to him that he assist the poor. It is the voice of God being naturally
revealed, which is clearer still when supernaturally revealed. The poor have
a right to sufficient goods of the earth to meet their legitimate needs, and
it is, in effect, stealing from them to leave them in their abject poverty.
As the Second Vatican Council states in its decree on The Church in the
Modern World, “in his use of things man should regard the external goods
he legitimately owns not merely as exclusive to himself but common to others
also, in the sense that they can benefit others as well as himself” (GS, 69,
1). Our ownership of goods makes us a steward of God’s fatherly Providence,
with the task of making it fruitful and communicating its benefits to others
— first of all, of course, to those for which one is directly responsible,
but also for all those in need. Let us resolve to use the good things God
has given us for the benefit not only of ourselves, but for all those in
need.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Cross on your breast?... Very good. But the Cross on your shoulders, the
Cross in your flesh, the Cross in your mind. Only then will you live for
Christ, with Christ and in Christ; only then will you be an apostle.
(The Way, no.929)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Second Chapter
PEACE IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN MEN
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, if you place your peace in any creature because of your own
feeling or for the sake of his company, you will be unsettled and entangled.
But if you have recourse to the ever-living and abiding Truth, you will not
grieve if a friend should die or forsake you. Your love for your friend
should be grounded in Me, and for My sake you should love whoever seems to
be good and is very dear to you in this life. Without Me friendship has no
strength and cannot endure. Love which I do not bind is neither true nor
pure.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberty of thought is in itself a good; but it gives an opening to false
liberty. Now by Liberalism I mean false liberty of thought, or the exercise
of thought upon matters, in which, from the constitution of the human mind,
thought cannot be brought to any successful issue, and therefore is out of
place.
JHN, from the Apologia pro Vita Sua (1865)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time
(October14) St. Callistus I (d. 223?)
The most reliable information about this saint comes from his
enemy St. Hippolytus, an early antipope, later a martyr for the Church. A
negative principle is used: If some worse things had happened, Hippolytus
would surely have mentioned them. Callistus was a slave in the imperial
Roman household. Put in charge of the bank by his master, he lost the money
deposited, fled and was caught. After serving time for a while, he was
released to make some attempt to recover the money. Apparently he carried
his zeal too far, being arrested for brawling in a Jewish synagogue. This
time he was condemned to work in the mines of Sardinia. He was released
through the influence of the emperor's mistress and lived at Anzio (site of
a famous World War II beachhead). After winning his freedom, Callistus was
made superintendent of the public Christian burial ground in Rome (still
called the cemetery of St. Callistus), probably the first land owned by the
Church. The pope ordained him a deacon and made him his friend and adviser.
He was elected pope by a majority vote of the clergy and laity of Rome, and
thereafter was attacked by the losing candidate, St. Hippolytus, who let
himself be set up as the first antipope in the history of the Church. The
schism lasted about 18 years. Hippolytus is venerated as a saint. He was
banished during the persecution of 235 and was reconciled to the Church. He
died from his sufferings in Sardinia. He attacked Callistus on two
fronts—doctrine and discipline. Hippolytus seems to have exaggerated the
distinction between Father and Son (almost making two gods) possibly because
theological language had not yet been refined. He also accused Callistus of
being too lenient, for reasons we may find surprising: (1) Callistus
admitted to Holy Communion those who had already done public penance for
murder, adultery, fornication; (2) he held marriages between free women and
slaves to be valid—contrary to Roman law; (3) he authorized the ordination
of men who had been married two or three times; (4) he held that mortal sin
was not a sufficient reason to depose a bishop; (5) he held to a policy of
leniency toward those who had temporarily denied their faith during
persecution. Callistus was martyred during a local disturbance in Trastevere,
Rome, and is the first pope (except for Peter) to be commemorated as a
martyr in the earliest martyrology of the Church. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 2:1-11; Psalm
62:2-3, 6-7, 9; Luke 11:42-46
Jesus said, Woe to you Pharisees,
because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue and all other kinds of garden
herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have
practised the latter without leaving the former undone. Woe to you
Pharisees, because you love the most important seats in the synagogues and
greetings in the market-places. Woe to you, because you are like unmarked
graves, which men walk over without knowing it. One of the experts in the
law answered him, Teacher, when you say these things, you insult us also.
Jesus replied, And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load
people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not
lift one finger to help them. (Luke 11:42-46)
Justice
Our Lord begins his words in today’s passage with a woe. There are
four woes (Greek: ouai). The woe suggests a grieving because of the
judgment to come. Our Lord uses this word earlier in the Gospel when, having
designated the Twelve, the whole multitude gathers before him. In that
earlier chapter (ch.6), our Lord utters his beatitudes and his woes, a much
briefer form of what St Matthew reports at the beginning of his presentation
of the Sermon on the Mount. He speaks to his disciples (Luke 6:20), telling
them that they are
blessed when they are poor, when they hunger, when they
are sorrowful and when they are hated because of him. Then he turns to those
whose life consists of seeking riches, being full of all they want, having a
life of pleasure and laughter and being adulated by the world. Woe to you,
he repeats four times: ouai! You are living to yourselves. You are
heading towards the judgment of God. Having pronounced this multiple woe,
our Lord then goes on immediately to command a loving service of others. To
you who hear, he continues, love your enemies, bless them, offer the other
cheek, give to all who ask, do to others as you would want done to you. Be
merciful and do not judge. It is clear that the woe pronounced by our Lord
is a terrible warning to those who do not love God and serve their
neighbour. In our Gospel today, which is from a later chapter (ch.11), our
Lord again pronounces a woe. Three times he lays a woe on the Pharisees and
once on the lawyers — but two more woes are to be pronounced on the lawyers
in following passages of this chapter. Let us consider, then, the woe
pronounced on the Pharisees of our Gospel passage today. You Pharisees
fiddle and tinker with mint, rue and all kinds of garden herbs and make such
things the centrepiece of your religion. Yet you neglect the judgment and
the love of God. Notice the word, “judgment” (Greek: krisin) — in
many versions rendered as “justice.” Our Lord is referring to what the
judgment (krisin) will be all about: man’s practice of justice. Our
Lord is saying that they neglect both the practice of justice towards others
and love for God.
This concise statement by our Lord sets before us how central to the divine
judgment will be the practice of justice. The Pharisees neglected the
judgment, which is to say, what will dominate the judgment of God. In the
twenty fifth chapter of St Matthew, our Lord describes in grand and vivid
detail the General Judgment on mankind. It is remarkable how much will
depend on our practice of justice during life. One of the most notable
features of religion in the history of mankind is the degree to which the
observance of ceremony has dominated religion. The gods are placated and won
over by the due and careful observance of the ceremonies. Thereby they feel
honoured. But revealed religion has a remarkable stress on justice. The
prophets are singular in their denunciation of a religion of ceremonies that
neglects the needs and the rights of others, most especially the poor. This,
of course, must in no way to be understood as a dismissal of formal and
wholehearted worship, for the prophets and the entire Scriptures stress in
great detail the centrality of worship. Our Lord vigorously cleansed the
Temple. It is the focus of the Third Commandment. But worship and ceremony
is utterly vitiated when there is a callous indifference to those in need.
If we aspire to love God — as we must, for it is the very first commandment
— then we must aspire to love and serve others. The implication of much of
our Lord’s teaching is that it is justice which is in constant danger of
being neglected. So important is this that at the General Judgment, Christ
our Judge will say to us that when we served the least we were serving him,
when we neglected the least we were neglecting him. The Pharisees were
neglecting the judgment, because they were neglecting the practice of
justice which will be the centrepiece of the divine judgment. In this, they
were neglecting the love of God. “These,” — the judgment and the love of God
— “you ought to have done, while not leaving the other undone”
(Luke 11:42-46).
The first three of the ten commandments direct our lives to the love and
veneration of God, both individually and together as God’s family. The
remaining seven commandments direct our lives to the practice of justice
towards others and towards ourselves. The love of God must be shown in the
practice of justice. There will be no love without justice. Nor, of course,
will there be true justice without love and mercy. Let us beware of being
like the Pharisees in our religion, for God wants a religion of the heart, a
heart given over to him and manifested in our love for those around us.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apostolic soul: first of all, yourself. Our Lord has said, through Saint
Matthew: 'When the day of Judgment comes, many will say to me: "Lord, Lord,
did we not prophesy in your name, work many miracles in your name?" Then I
shall tell them to their faces: "I have never known you; away from me, you
evil men"'.
God forbid — says Saint Paul — that I, who have preached to others should
myself be rejected.
(The Way, no.930)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Second Chapter PEACE
IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN MEN
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
You ought, therefore, to be so dead to such human affections as to wish as
far as lies within you to be without the fellowship of men. Man draws nearer
to God in proportion as he withdraws farther from all earthly comfort. And
he ascends higher to God as he descends lower into himself and grows more
vile in his own eyes. He who attributes any good to himself hinders God's
grace from coming into his heart, for the grace of the Holy Spirit seeks
always the humble heart.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While, then, Reason and Revelation are consistent in fact, they often are
inconsistent in appearance; and this seeming discordance acts most keenly
and alarmingly on the Imagination, and may suddenly expose a man to the
temptation, and even hurry him on to the commission, of definite acts of
unbelief, in which reason itself really does not come into exercise at all.
JHN, from The Idea of a University Part II (1858)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time
(October 15) Saint Teresa of Jesus, virgin and
doctor of the Church (1515-1582)
Teresa lived in an age of exploration as well as political, social
and religious upheaval. It was the 16th century, a time of turmoil and
reform. She was born before the Protestant Reformation and died almost 20
years after the closing of the Council of Trent. The gift of
God
to Teresa in and through which she became holy and left her mark on the
Church and the world is threefold: She was a woman; she was a contemplative;
she was an active reformer. As a woman, Teresa stood on her own two feet,
even in the man's world of her time. She was "her own woman," entering the
Carmelites despite strong opposition from her father. She is a person
wrapped not so much in silence as in mystery. Beautiful, talented, outgoing,
adaptable, affectionate, courageous, enthusiastic, she was totally human.
Like Jesus, she was a mystery of paradoxes: wise, yet practical;
intelligent, yet much in tune with her experience; a mystic, yet an
energetic reformer. A holy woman, a womanly woman. Teresa was a woman "for
God," a woman of prayer, discipline and compassion. Her heart belonged to
God. Her ongoing conversion was an arduous lifelong struggle, involving
ongoing purification and suffering. She was misunderstood, misjudged,
opposed in her efforts at reform. Yet she struggled on, courageous and
faithful; she struggled with her own mediocrity, her illness, her
opposition. And in the midst of all this she clung to God in life and in
prayer. Her writings on prayer and contemplation are drawn from her
experience: powerful, practical and graceful. A woman of prayer; a woman for
God. Teresa was a woman "for others." Though a contemplative, she spent much
of her time and energy seeking to reform herself and the Carmelites, to lead
them back to the full observance of the primitive Rule. She founded over a
half-dozen new monasteries. She travelled, wrote, fought—always to renew, to
reform. In her self, in her prayer, in her life, in her efforts to reform,
in all the people she touched, she was a woman for others, a woman who
inspired and gave life.
Her writings, especially the Way of Perfection and The Interior
Castle, have helped generations of believers. In 1970, the Church gave
her the title she had long held in the popular mind: doctor of the Church.
She and St. Catherine of Siena were the first women so honoured.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 3:21-30;
Psalm 130:1b-6ab; Luke 11:47-54
Jesus said to
the experts in the
law, Woe to you, because you build tombs for the prophets, and it was your
forefathers who killed them. So you testify that you approve of what your
forefathers did; they killed the prophets, and you build their tombs.
Because of this, God in
his wisdom said, 'I will send them prophets and
apostles, some of whom they will kill and others they will persecute.'
Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the
prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world, from the blood
of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between the altar and the
sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, this generation will be held responsible for it
all. Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to
knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who
were entering. When Jesus left there, the Pharisees and the teachers of the
law began to oppose him fiercely and to besiege him with questions, waiting
to catch him in something he might say. (Luke 11:
47-54)
Judgment
In his diagnosis of the religious life of
the England of his time, John Henry Newman made a point he often repeated.
People had little fear of God. We might put it more colloquially — they
viewed God as being fairly harmless. In all things, God is assumed to be
benevolent in the sense that only pleasant things are to be expected of him.
We could say that this is very much the modern Western image of God, except
that now the prevailing image of God is faint anyway. The world is what
commands the attention of modern man.
Newman urged that the intimations of
God the Judge prompted by our conscience be attended to, as well as the
manifest warnings of Revelation. Related to this common and very modern
impression of God, is the notion that while the Old Testament presents a
wrathful God, the New has done away with this and offered a truly kindly
God. Talk of terrible punishments both immediate and ultimate is deemed to
be inappropriate. Satan is often depicted as something of a goblin — a
mischief, it is true, but also not to be taken very seriously. Of course,
these are generalizations and there are exceptions without number, but the
point is that the real Christ and his preaching is absolutely relevant to
the spiritual emptiness of modern Western secular man. Set the preaching of
Christ next to any of the prophets and it will be seen that Christ speaks
far more of eternal punishment than they. Our Lord repeatedly accuses people
of wrongdoing and sin and warns of the judgment of God and divine
punishment. He speaks with thunder and lightning, as it were. He means his
audience to change their lives, for their result will be terrible. Consider
our Gospel passage today: “Therefore this generation will be held
responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the
beginning of the world, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah,
who was killed between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, this
generation will be held responsible for it all”
(Luke 11: 47-54).
What is our Lord saying here? He is warning those who are rejecting him that
the consequences will be terrible, and that the opposition they are mounting
towards him is all of a piece with all that has gone before. The prophets
were rejected and this pattern of rejection has been at work from the very
beginning, as evidenced in the biblical figure of Abel and his murder by
Cain. It seems that our Lord is pointing to a coming catastrophe which will
be the fruit of the numerous rejections of God and his servants, the
prophets. I referred earlier to Newman — the acknowledged leader of the
Oxford Movement during the third decade of the nineteenth century. In a work
he wrote later in life he speaks of the fall of the Roman Empire under the
weight of its own gradual decay and the irresistible Barbarian invasions. In
that particular work he sees the invasions as (at least in part) the
judgment of God on the Roman persecutions of the Christian Church. That is a
view that one may accept or not, but it illustrates the general point that
while God is indeed a God of love, his is a holy love and he judges sin. God
is not just a kindly and harmless pie-in-the-sky. He is the very moral Ruler
and Judge of the world, and all creation derives its being, moment by
moment, from his creative will. Sin is the one thing God hates. Ultimate and
confirmed sin will be punished. Now, we must never attribute sin to those
who suffer. Nevertheless the hardships of this life can serve as an
illustration of the consequences of sin and of God’s call to repent. Great
catastrophes and mass hardships can also at least illustrate the
consequences of sin. It is surely the case that accumulated sins and
rejection of God do have their historical consequences — consequences which
will also affect the innocent. There have been terrible moments in history
following long periods of moral decline. I cannot help but think that the
carnage of the French Revolution and the vast loss of life of the Napoleonic
wars were a consequence of the moral and religious decay of the century
prior to it. It may have been — at least partially — a judgment.
We ought have a holy fear of offending God. He is our Father and our Judge.
In ordinary experience we see many things without noticing them, or to put
it differently, we look at things and not see them. Then we look back at
them and we see. The same thing can happen in our reading and hearing the
word of God in holy Scripture. We can read the words of Christ and never
notice many of the things he says and the force with which he says them. Let
us notice and take to heart that he warns us that God will judge and punish
sin — so we must repent to avoid this judgment. He pronounces harsh woes on
the lawyers of today’s Gospel. Let us take these woes to heart, and resolve
to live in union with Jesus our Lord.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The military mind of Saint Ignatius has left us a picture of the devil
calling up innumerable demons and scattering them through nations,
provinces, towns and villages, after a 'sermon' in which he exhorts them to
fasten their chains and fetters on the world, leaving not a single person
unbound...
You have told me that you want to be a leader; and what good is a leader in
chains?
(The Way, 931)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Second Chapter
PEACE IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN MEN
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
If you knew how to annihilate yourself completely and empty yourself of all
created love, then I should overflow in you with great grace. When you look
to creatures, the sight of the Creator is taken from you. Learn, therefore,
to conquer yourself in all things for the sake of your Maker. Then will you
be able to attain to divine knowledge. But anything, no matter how small,
that is loved and regarded inordinately keeps you back from the highest good
and corrupts the soul.
(Concluded)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are those, not a few, who would be Catholics, if their conscience
would let them; for they see in the Catholic Religion a great
substance and
earnest of truth; a depth, strength, coherence, elasticity, and life, a
nobleness and grandeur … ; a glorious history, and a promise of perpetual
youthfulness; and they already accept without scruple or rather joyfully
feed upon its solemn mysteries, which are a trial to others; but they
cannot, as a matter of duty, enter its fold on account of certain great
difficulties which block their way, and throw them back, when they would
embrace that faith which looks so like what it professes to be.
JHN, from the ‘Preface to the Third Edition’ of the Prophetical Office of
the Church (1877)
---------------Back to
index for this month---------------------------Back to
index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time
(October 16) St. Marguerite d’Youville (1701-1771)
We learn compassion from allowing our lives to be influenced by
compassionate people, by seeing life from their perspective and
reconsidering our own values. Born in Varennes, Canada, Marie Marguerite
Dufrost de Lajemmerais had to interrupt her schooling at the age of 12 to
help her widowed mother. Eight years later she married Francois d'Youville;
they had six children, four of whom died young. Despite the fact that her
husband gambled, sold liquor illegally to Native Americans and treated her
indifferently, she cared for him compassionately before his death in 1730.
Even though she was caring for two small children and running a store to
help pay off her husband's debts, Marguerite still helped the poor. Once her
children were grown, she and several companions rescued a Quebec hospital
that was in danger of failing. She called her community the Institute of the
Sisters of Charity of Montreal; the people called them the "Grey Nuns"
because of the colour of their habit. In time, a proverb arose among the
poor people of Montreal, "Go to the Grey Nuns; they never refuse to serve."
In time, five other religious communities traced their roots to the Grey
Nuns. The General Hospital in Montreal became known as the Hotel Dieu (House
of God) and set a standard for medical care and Christian compassion. When
the hospital was destroyed by fire in 1766, she knelt in the ashes, led the
Te Deum (a hymn to God's providence in all circumstances) and began the
rebuilding process. She fought the attempts of government officials to
restrain her charity and established the first foundling home in North
America.
Pope John XXIII, who beatified her in 1959, called her the "Mother
of Universal Charity." She was canonized in 1990. "More than once the work
which Marguerite undertook was hindered by nature or people. In order to
work to bring that new world of justice and love closer, she had to fight
some hard and difficult battles" (John Paul II, at canonization).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 4:1-8; Psalm
32:1b-2, 5, 11; Luke 12:1-7
Meanwhile,
when a crowd of many thousands had gathered, so that they were
trampling on one another, Jesus began to speak first to his
disciples,
saying: Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is
hypocrisy. There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden
that will not be made known. What you have said in the dark will be heard in
the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will
be proclaimed from the roofs. I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of
those who kill the body and after that can do no more. But I will show you
whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power
to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. Are not five sparrows
sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. Indeed, the
very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don't be afraid; you are worth
more than many sparrows.
(Luke 12:1-7)
In God’s presence
It is a
commonplace observation that religion is all too often a matter of mere
religious observances. In making such a critique of the religion of very
many people, it is not being suggested that religious observances are not
necessary for religion. Rather, the criticism is that in such a case
religion consists in little more than religious observances. A person goes
to church or to synagogue or to mosque on the designated days, but his life
for the rest of the time is lived as if God had altogether receded from the
scene of life. It is
akin to an official religion which keeps the gods happy
by fulfilling their basic requirements of ritual. As all know, or as all
ought know, religion is not this. True religion is a religion present in,
and springing from, the heart of man. It flows out into the duties of his
daily life and is manifested in a special way by the heartfelt observance of
that worship which God wants. True religion is not merely — though it most
certainly includes — the fulfilment of the duty to worship God publicly and
privately. It is also the fulfilment of the duties of everyday life for love
of him. Religion should pervade all of life — indeed it ought pervade all of
social and political and international life. The significant feature of the
modern world when set against the background of previous eras is that life
is separated from religion, whereas life has characteristically been
pervaded by religion — even if the religion itself has been profoundly
faulty. So the question before every person whose religious instincts are
alive and seeking to be respected is, how am I to live a life that is
genuinely religious? What is the key to a life pervaded by religion rather
than a life that turns to religion only on occasion? The key to it is to
discover the presence of God and then, by deliberate resolve and policy, to
live in it. God is present to man because man constantly draws his life and
being from him. But man must turn his attention to the divine presence,
discover it, and then abide daily in it with obedient awareness.
We must learn to live in the presence of God. The Christian knows that God
has become man and has united us to himself by the grace of faith and
baptism. In our Gospel today our Lord warns his disciples against hypocrisy,
which is to say, living with the appearance of religious practice while
one’s heart is far from God. “Be on your guard against the yeast of the
Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.” In essence this means living in the presence
of men and seeking their favour while living out of the presence of God and
being without regard for his favour. It means having little sense of the
presence of God who sees all. Our Lord continues by reminding his disciples
that God sees all and that all will be disclosed before his unerring gaze
and judgment. Nothing is, nor will be, hidden from him. “There is nothing
concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.
What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you
have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the
roofs.” We must abide constantly in the presence of God, knowing that his
favour alone matters, for in him all will be brought to light and rewarded
accordingly. “Abide in my love,” Christ told his disciples on another
occasion. It is the one who abides in his love profoundly and consistently
who has the wherewithal to withstand the pressures and the threats of all
that is contrary to God and the moral law. “I tell you, my friends, do not
be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. But I
will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the
body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him”
(Luke 12:1-7). Do not be afraid, Christ
commands us. It was a refrain repeated time and again during the pontificate
of John Paul II, and its basis is the resolve to abide in the loving
presence of God and Christ. The only one ultimately to fear is God our
Father whose love and favour must be the constant basis of our life. All
other fears pale before the fear of offending him. As St Thomas More,
one-time chancellor of England said as he approached the scaffold, “Though I
lose my head I’ll come to no harm.”
Our fear of offending God is the fear of offending one who loves us with a
fatherly and everlasting love. He knows every element of our being, for he
sustains us moment by moment. “Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies?
Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. Indeed, the very hairs of your head
are all numbered. Don't be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.”
On the one hand we fear offending him, but on the other, if we live in his
presence ultimately we may fear nothing and no one. Living in the presence
of God is the basis of religion.
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look: the apostles, for all their evident and undeniable defects, were
sincere, simple... transparent.
You too have evident and undeniable defects. May you not lack simplicity.
(The Way, no.932)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, do not let the fine-sounding and subtle words of men deceive you.
For the kingdom of heaven consists not in talk but in virtue. Attend,
rather, to My words which enkindle the heart and enlighten the mind, which
excite contrition and abound in manifold consolations. Never read them for
the purpose of appearing more learned or more wise. Apply yourself to
mortifying your vices, for this will benefit you more than your
understanding of many difficult questions.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The arguments for religion do not compel any one to believe, just as
arguments for good conduct do not compel any one to obey. Obedience is the
consequence of willing to obey, and faith is the consequence of willing to
believe; we may see what is right, whether in matters of faith or obedience,
of ourselves, but we cannot will what is right without the grace of God.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Faith and Doubt‘ (1849)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time
Prayers this week: If you, O Lord,
laid bare our guilt, who could endure it? But you are forgiving, God of
Israel.
(Ps. 129:3-4)
Lord, our help and guide, make your love the foundation of our lives.
May our love for you express itself in our eagerness to do good for others.
We ask
this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God for ever and ever.
(October
17) Saint Ignatius of Antioch, bishop and
martyr (d. 107?)
Born in Syria, Ignatius converted to Christianity and eventually
became bishop of Antioch. In the year 107, Emperor Trajan visited Antioch
and forced the Christians there to choose between death and apostasy.
Ignatius would not deny Christ and thus was condemned to be put to death in
Rome. Ignatius is well known for the seven letters he wrote on the long
journey from Antioch to Rome. Five of these letters are to Churches in Asia
Minor; they urge the Christians there to remain faithful to God and to obey
their superiors. He warns them against heretical doctrines, providing them
with the solid truths of the Christian faith. The sixth letter was to
Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna, who was later martyred for the faith. The final
letter begs the Christians in Rome not to try to stop his martyrdom. "The
only thing I ask of you is to allow me to offer the libation of my blood to
God. I am the wheat of the Lord; may I be ground by the teeth of the beasts
to become the immaculate bread of Christ." Ignatius bravely met the lions in
the Circus Maximus.
"I greet you from Smyrna together with the Churches of God present
here with me. They comfort me in every way, both in body and in soul. My
chains, which I carry about on me for Jesus Christ, begging that I may
happily make my way to God, exhort you: persevere in your concord and in
your community prayers" (Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Church at
Tralles). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 4:13, 16-18; Psalm
105:6-9, 42-43; Luke 12:8-12
Jesus
said, I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will
also acknowledge him before the angels of God. But he who disowns me before
men will be disowned before the angels of God. And everyone who speaks a
word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes
against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. When you are brought before
synagogues, rulers and authorities, do not worry about how you will defend
yourselves or what you will say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that
time what you should say. (Luke 12: 8-12)
Bearing witness
Alexis de Tocqueville in his Democracy in America (1835 and
1840) wrote of the tendency for the majority of a democracy to provide
opinions to individuals who then feel freed from the necessity to formulate
their own. One instance of this is the influence of the democratic press and
mass media. While often being a manifestation of the culture and the view of
the majority, the media forms the opinions of the mass of individuals who
too often take little trouble to assess what they read or hear. One result
of this can be the lack of true argument in social discourse. For example,
in response to a question by a journalist during his flight to Africa in
2009, the Pope, observed that condoms are not the true way to deal with the
scourge of AIDS. In fact, it sets the problem back. The Western media and
European government officials erupted. There was no space for true argument.
The few experts in the field vainly tried to counter the prevailing clamour
by presenting the statistical facts which greatly support the Pope. The very
successful papal visit to Africa proceeded, Africans supported him,
demographic experts gradually made their views known, and for those
following the argument carefully the Pope was quietly vindicated. But what
was been lacking was the opportunity for true argument. Now this is vitally
important for the modern democracy. But — and this is most important — if
there is to be true argument and an advance in the standard of national
conversation, the argument must bring forward and revolve around first
principles. A democracy above all else ought be a regime in which the first
principles of life and thought are able to be argued out in freedom and
respect. These first principles are the starting points, the fundamental
positions, from which flow the opinions of individuals and communities. One
widely held first principle which in the West emerged from the
Enlightenment is that life and the world runs on its own terms. It is a
weakness to depend on God. What is real is what is to be seen and
empirically verified. This is assumed, and the assumption has practical
results.
Other assumptions could be mentioned, but the point I am making here is that
a society depends for its health on public conversation involving argument.
The argument must be characterised by civility and it ought be argument that
involves the discussion of first principles. This brings us to our Gospel
passage today. Our Lord in effect speaks of the contribution which the
Christian should make to the public conversation among men and in society.
Indeed, the Christian is absolutely obliged for love of Christ himself and
for love of his fellow man to engage in the argument and to strive to do so
at the level of first principles. The first principle of the Christian which
he considers to be the first principle of life and the world, is the person
and status of Christ. Christ is the linchpin of the world and the source of
its true life. Without him man dies an ultimate death. It is of critical
importance for the world that it hear the argument for this, and it is the
Christian alone who can initiate and sustain the conversation. Let us
consider Christ’s words. “I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men,
the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God. But he
who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God.” The
disciple of Christ is bound to acknowledge before men the person and mission
and teaching of Jesus Christ. If he does not, Christ will not acknowledge
him before the angels in heaven. The world depends on this acknowledgement.
A second thing is revealed by Jesus Christ, and it is that the world will
not be ready to discuss it. It is predisposed against the subject. In fact,
it will make life difficult for those who argue for, and live by, the basic
principle that Jesus Christ is Lord — indeed, Lord of lords and King of
kings, the one who has all authority in heaven and on earth. But the aid of
God is promised to the disciple who bears this witness. So it is that our
Lord continues, “When you are brought before synagogues, rulers and
authorities, do not worry about how you will defend yourselves or what you
will say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what you should
say” (Luke 12: 8-12).
Let the Christian regard himself as an agent of change. Let him readily
engage with his times. Let him enter into it and be part of the tide,
endeavouring to change its course. While he does in a sense act alone, as a
guerrilla, we might say, he is not really alone. He is a member of Christ’s
Church and all his fellows in belief are living and acting in Christ the
head. Thus society can be changed in accord with the true first principles.
But the argument — ever civil — must be sustained. The conversation must not
be allowed to fall silent, for evil flourishes when good people say and do
nothing. In our hearts we must ever be shouting, may Jesus Christ reign!
(E.J.Tyler)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a story of a soul who, on saying to our Lord in prayer, 'Jesus, I
love you', heard this reply from heaven: 'Love means deeds, not sweet
words.'
Think if you also could deserve this gentle reproach.
(The Way, no.933)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
Though you shall have read and learned many things, it will always be
necessary for you to return to this one principle: I am He who teaches man
knowledge, and to the little ones I give a clearer understanding than can be
taught by man. He to whom I speak will soon be wise and his soul will
profit. But woe to those who inquire of men about many curious things, and
care very little about the way they serve Me.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this day especially it is very easy for men to be benevolent, liberal,
and dispassionate. It costs nothing to be dispassionate when you feel
nothing, to be cheerful when you have nothing to fear, to be generous or
liberal when what you give is not your own, and to be benevolent and
considerate when you have no principles and no opinions. Men nowadays are
moderate and equitable, not because the Lord is at hand, but because they do
not feel that He is coming. Quietness is a grace, not in itself, only when
it is grafted on the stem of faith, zeal, self-abasement, and diligence.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Equanimity’ (1839)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
St. Luke the
Evangelist (October 18)
Entrance Antiphon Is 52:7
How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings glad tidings of
peace, bearing good news, announcing salvation! Gloria in excelsis.
Collect
Lord God, who chose Saint Luke to reveal by his preaching and writings the
mystery of your love for the poor, grant that those who already glory in your
name may persevere as one heart and one soul and that all nations may merit to
see your salvation. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and
reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever.
(October 18) St. Luke the Evangelist
Luke wrote one of the major portions of the New Testament, a
two-volume work comprising the third Gospel and the Acts of the
Apostles.
In the two books he shows the parallel between the life of Christ and that
of the Church. He is the only Gentile Christian among the Gospel writers.
Tradition holds him to be a native of Antioch, and Paul calls him "our
beloved physician" (Colossians 4:14). His Gospel was probably written
between A.D. 70 and 85. Luke appears in Acts during Paul’s second journey,
remains at Philippi for several years until Paul returns from his third
journey, accompanies Paul to Jerusalem and remains near him when he is
imprisoned in Caesarea. During these two years, Luke had time to seek
information and interview persons who had known Jesus. He accompanied Paul
on the dangerous journey to Rome where he was a faithful companion. "Only
Luke is with me," Paul writes (2 Timothy 4:11).
Luke wrote as a Gentile for Gentile Christians. This Gospel
reveals Luke's expertise in classic Greek style as well as his knowledge of
Jewish sources. The character of Luke may best be seen by the emphases of
his Gospel, which has been given a number of subtitles: (1) The Gospel of
Mercy: Luke emphasizes Jesus' compassion and patience with the sinners and
the suffering. He has a broadminded openness to all, showing concern for
Samaritans, lepers, publicans, soldiers, public sinners, unlettered
shepherds, the poor. Luke alone records the stories of the sinful woman, the
lost sheep and coin, the prodigal son, the good thief. (2) The Gospel of
Universal Salvation: Jesus died for all. He is the son of Adam, not just of
David, and Gentiles are his friends too. (3) The Gospel of the Poor: "Little
people" are prominent—Zechariah and Elizabeth, Mary and Joseph, shepherds,
Simeon and the elderly widow, Anna. He is also concerned with what we now
call "evangelical poverty." (4) The Gospel of Absolute Renunciation: He
stresses the need for total dedication to Christ. (5) The Gospel of Prayer
and the Holy Spirit: He shows Jesus at prayer before every important step of
his ministry. The Spirit is bringing the Church to its final perfection. (6)
The Gospel of Joy: Luke succeeds in portraying the joy of salvation that
permeated the primitive Church. (Luke 24:50-53). (AmericanCatholic.org)
click on centre arrow
Scripture today: 2 Timothy
4:10-17b; Psalm 145; Luke 10:1-9
The Lord Jesus appointed seventy-two
disciples whom he sent ahead of him in pairs to every town and place he intended
to visit. He
said
to them, “The harvest is abundant but the labourers are few; so ask the master
of the harvest to send out labourers for his harvest. Go on your way; behold, I
am sending you like lambs among wolves. Carry no money bag, no sack, no sandals;
and greet no one along the way. Into whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace
to this household.’ If a peaceful person lives there, your peace will rest on
him; but if not, it will return to you. Stay in the same house and eat and drink
what is offered to you, for the labourer deserves payment. Do not move about
from one house to another. Whatever town you enter and they welcome you, eat
what is set before you, cure the sick in it and say to them, ‘The Kingdom of God
is at hand for you.’” (Luke 10:1-9)
The mission
There are two features to be noticed in the
history of God’s chosen people before the coming of Jesus Christ. The first is
that the chosen people had a universal mission. This note is decisively struck
in the Book of Genesis at the appearance of Abram and his call by God. “I will
make you a great nation ... All the tribes of the earth shall bless themselves
because of you” (Genesis 12:2-3). This promise that the chosen people, the
children of Israel, would bear along with them a blessing for the world flickers
here and there
throughout
the Old Testament, at times flaring out in the Prophets, such as in Isaiah.
Somehow, salvation would come from the Jews. What this meant was, of course,
disputed, but it was the Messiah who would bring this blessing not only to the
children of Israel, but to all the tribes of the earth. At the same time, the
constant effort was to preserve Israel in the faith amid all its temptations to
infidelity and amid all its reversals. That is to say, the universal impetus
never took flight. The preoccupation of the prophets and of the religious
leaders was to hold the people to the Law and to all that God had spoken. It was
as if this was as much as could be managed in that dispensation―but things
would change when the Messiah arrived. It was then that the world would know the
difference. Now, among the many differences between Jesus and the prophets prior
to him, including John the Baptist, was precisely this universal thrust. From
the outset, Jesus Christ was engaged in a very missionary activity. He did not
simply attract disciples―he sought them. He drew his disciples not only into
the acceptance of his teaching, but into an active participation in his mission
to the whole of the House of Israel, particularly its lost and wandering sheep.
Twelve were established as the future foundation, as it were, and were to be his
special companions. They were apostles―his envoys. Follow me, he said to Simon
and his companions, and I will make you fishers of men. It was a missionary
business, and other disciples―72 of them―were sent out, two by two. From the
appearance of Jesus Christ, first Israel, then the world, was the great target
of action.
So it is that the “Church” which Christ built, and in which he lodged the “keys
of the Kingdom of Heaven” (which he had so incessantly preached), was “catholic”
(or universal) and “apostolic.” It was “apostolic” in that it was founded on the
Apostles with Simon at their head and as the Rock, and in that it was enlivened
by the missionary spirit of Christ and the Apostles. Importantly, it was
universal (or “catholic”). It was not primarily a national Church, as the
religion of the Jews had primarily been a religion of the children of Israel. It
was “catholic,” universal. It possessed an inherent impulse (derived from the
presence of the Holy Spirit, with Christ at her head) to take root everywhere,
and to make disciples of all the nations. Christ’s parting command to his
disciples was that they go to the whole world and make disciples of all the
nations. The very first step taken by the infant Church―after it received the
gift of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost bringing it into birth―gave to it its
universal character. That first step was the preaching of Simon Peter. As a
result, a large number were baptized―the Acts of the Apostles tells us that
some 3000 were added to their number (Acts 2: 41), and these were drawn from all
over the known world (Acts 2: 8-12). That is to say, from the first, immediately
after its birth at Pentecost, the Church was catholic, universal. Its impulse
was to take Christ not only to the House of Israel, but to the ends of the
earth. The blessing promised in Genesis for all the tribes of the earth was now
being brought to them by the Church Christ founded on the Apostles. These are
some of the things we think of when we think of St Luke the Evangelist. Luke was
not an Apostle, but was a member of the Church founded on the Apostles. He was
not what we would now call a “bishop”―one with the fullness of the ministerial
priesthood (like his companion Paul), nor was he a “presbyter”―a ministerial
priest. He was a layman―a doctor, and as it turned out, an inspired writer.
Luke’s Gospel has distinctive feature―one of the most obvious being his rich
accounts of the infancy of Jesus Christ and his portrayal of the virgin Mary.
All of this was part of the dedicated service he gave to the Church in its
indefatigable mission.
It is especially through his Gospel that St Luke will shape the Church till the
end of the world. He was privileged to be an instrument of the Holy Spirit in
his account of the birth, the childhood, the ministry, the Passion, the Death,
the Resurrection and the Ascension of Jesus Christ our Lord. It is a beautiful
Gospel that he has written. I would propose that St Luke could be regarded as a
model Christian layman for the Church till the end of history. His love for
Jesus Christ and for his blessed Mother is manifest. Let us love and venerate
this saint, and learn to imitate him.
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
World Mission Sunday (Second-last Sunday in October)
click on centre arrow
A possible Gospel: Matthew 28: 16-20
The
eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to
go. When they saw him, they worshipped him; but some doubted. Then Jesus came to
them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of
the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey
everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very
end of the age. (Matthew 28: 16-20)
The Church's
Mission One of the many gains of modern
Scriptural studies is a new appreciation of the distinctive approach of each of
the four Gospels. The differences among them are not simply a matter of
discrepancies, but of different perspectives and preoccupations. Two Gospels may
report the same event, but while one may include a certain detail, another may
not. For example, one Gospel’s narration
of
the confrontation between our Lord and the Pharisees in the Synagogue includes
our Lord looking around on them in anger, grieved at the hardness and blindness
of their hearts, while another (Luke) drops the mention of his anger. Of
interest are the different ways the four Gospels conclude. The last chapter of
St Mark’s Gospel is of uncertain composition―our received text is made up of
different manuscripts. This need not concern us here, but as it stands the Angel
in the empty tomb orders the women to go and tell the “disciples and Peter that
he goes before you into Galilee: there you shall see him, as he said to you”
(Mark 16:7). But there is no formal mention of their going to Galilee. The
post-resurrection scene remains in Jerusalem (16:8-15.19). What is stressed in
Mark’s final chapter is the encounter with the risen Jesus and his command that
his disciples go “to the whole world and preach the Gospel to every creature”
(Mark 16:15), crowned by his Ascension and their going forth everywhere (Mark
16:19-20). Luke’s entire post-Resurrection scene is in the Jerusalem area (Luke
24: 13-53; Acts 1:4-2:4), with no mention of Galilee. Christ’s command to bear
witness to him “in Jerusalem, in all Judea, and in Samaria, and to the ends of
the earth” is stressed. He then ascends into heaven, having directed them to
await the Holy Spirit (Acts 1: 8-9). In John’s Gospel, which seems originally to
have concluded at chapter 20: 28-31, there is no mention of a sojourn in Galilee
till the later addition of chapter 21. In this original conclusion (chapter 20),
there is the conferral of the Holy Spirit on the Apostles and Christ’s granting
to them of their share in the mission Christ had received from his Father (John
20: 21-22). There is this stress on mission. Chapter 21 is especially concerned
with Christ’s relationship with Peter and his giving to Peter his special
mission in the Church.
What is common to the accounts by Mark, Luke and John is an emphasis on the
mission of the Church to bring the Gospel to mankind. This is a particularly
notable feature of the Christian religion, just as it was the notable feature of
the public life of Jesus Christ himself. He did not stay in one place attracting
disciples, as did John. He went out to the entire land of the House of Israel,
attracting disciples not merely to his teaching, but to his person. To the rich
young man he said that if he wished to be perfect, he should sell all and follow
him. Christ was a missionary, and discipleship involved a share in this
missionary existence. The Christian religion involved the love, adoration and
company of the person of Jesus Christ but importantly, it also involved bringing
others into his company as his disciples. It would not do, as far as Jesus
Christ was concerned, simply to be with him and to be unconcerned with whether
or not others were with him. One had to be up and doing in some sense, and
participating in our Lord’s own quest to bring all others into his circle of
disciples―indeed the whole wide world. The matter was critical because entry
into the Kingdom of Heaven was gained precisely by becoming a disciple of Jesus
Christ, and this one did by becoming a member of his Church by faith and
baptism. Each of Christ’s disciples had to understand that love for him―which
is the soul of Christianity―includes striving to bring all to the knowledge
and love of him. Now, our chosen Gospel passage for World Mission Sunday today
is from the end of the Gospel of St Matthew (Matthew
28: 16-20). It is plain that Matthew wishes to conclude his Gospel
with the proclamations of the Resurrection, of Jesus Christ as possessing “all
authority in heaven and on earth” (Matthew 28:18), and of the mission of the
Church. Christ’s disciples were to go “and teach all nations, baptizing them in
the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to
observe all I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:19). Christ promises to be with
them till the end of the world. There is no mention of the Ascension, no mention
of the appearances in the Jerusalem area, no mention of the coming of the Holy
Spirit. What Matthew chooses to stress is the Fact of the risen Christ and the
mission of the Church to bring him to the nations.
The Catholic Church, the Church founded by Jesus Christ, may be said to be a
sleeping giant. The militant British atheist of the early years of this century,
Richard Dawkins, chose to attack and protest what he calls the power of the
Catholic Church. Such a characterisation is laughable. But it does suggest to
the Church’s members the responsibility they have to take up the mission of
Jesus Christ in which they share by baptism, and to prosecute it. One of the
great gains of the Second Vatican Council was the reclaiming of the vocation of
all members of Christ’s faithful to holiness and to mission. Let each of
Christ’s faithful see every day as a share in the adventure that is Christ’s
mission to make disciples of the whole world. Therein lies the world’s salvation.
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Twenty ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time B
Prayers this week: I call upon you,
God, for you will answer me; bend your ear and hear my prayer. Guard me as
the pupil of your eye; hide me in the shade of your wings.
(Psalm 16: 6.8)
Almighty and ever-living God, our source of power and inspiration,
give us strength and joy in serving your as followers of Christ.
We ask
this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God for ever and ever.
Scripture: Isaiah 53:10-11; Ps 33:4-5,
18-20, 22; Heb 4:14-16; Mk 10:35-45 or 10:42-45
Then James and John, the sons of
Zebedee, came to him. Teacher, they said, we want you to do for us whatever
we ask. What do you want me to do for you? he asked. They replied, Let one
of us sit at your right and the other at your left in your glory. You don't
know
what
you are asking, Jesus said. Can you drink the cup I drink or be baptised
with the baptism I am baptised with? We can, they answered. Jesus said to
them, You will drink the cup I drink and be baptised with the baptism I am
baptised with, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These
places belong to those for whom they have been prepared. When the ten heard
about this, they became indignant with James and John. Jesus called them
together and said, You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the
Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials impose authority over
them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must
be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. For
even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his
life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10: 35-45)
The common good
I once watched a Vietnamese movie
portraying the terrible sufferings of many Vietnamese in communist
re-education camps. At great threat to their lives many attempted to escape,
at times succeeding. Once scene showed a conversation between the young and
brutal commander and a badly treated inmate. The commander accused the
inmate of not appreciating the freedom and liberation that communism had
brought to the country. The weakened inmate replied that he had no freedom
at all — and,
with
that perceived insult, the commander proceeded to beat him savagely.
Powerful and aggressive ideologies of the last couple of centuries have had
as their goal the improvement of society — that is, the common good. Robert
Owen (1771–1858) was one of the founders of the socialist movement and had
as his aim the alleviation of poverty. He laid it down that no one is
responsible for his own will and behaviour, and is entirely formed by his
external factors. So, he decided, the common good of society involved shaping individuals
by a properly constructed environment. Of course, in such a view of the
common good it is a short step towards tyranny. With the appearance of Karl
Marx’s master work, Das Kapital (1848), the sad story of
communism began. The common good — in its Marxist understanding — was the prize ahead, and untold
suffering for untold numbers resulted. But there was at this time a very different notion
of the common good. Capitalism understood itself as based on full freedom,
especially in the use of one’s goods. It held that each person has the right to own and use his
property as he deems fit and the state ought desist from interference. Adam
Smith (1723 – 1790) held that rational self-interest in a free-market
economy leads to economic well-being. Economic development was best fostered
in an environment of free competition. But so bad did the practical result
of this view become during the Industrial Revolution, that untold numbers of
workers lived lives of terrible misery. They were at the mercy of those who
had complete freedom in the use of their capital. All that mattered was
production and profit. The great papal Encyclical
Rerum Novarum (1891) was in large measure a rebuttal of this
laissez-faire capitalism.
I say all this as an introduction to
what our Lord teaches in today’s Gospel, for it has direct implications for
our understanding of the common good and the way society is to attain it.
The result of so much of social and economic theory and practice of the last
two and a half centuries has been the denial of the proper fulfilment of
very many groups and individuals. It has resulted in tremendous abuses of
authority and power, bringing misery and the denial of rights to those
groups and individuals. Indeed, those groups have at times constituted the
majority of the state. Russia was a religious nation, and nearly a century
ago the Bolsheviks, with their notion of what was good for society — the
common good, that is — seized power and over the course of decades wreaked
great violence on the adherents of religion. We read that Jesus called his
disciples together and said, “You know that those who are regarded as rulers
of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials impose authority
over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you
must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all.”
The common good is attained by a profound spirit of service. By the common
good is meant the total of those conditions of social life which allow
people as groups and individuals to reach their proper fulfilment. It
involves respect for and promotion of the fundamental rights of the person,
the development of the spiritual and temporal goods of persons and of
society, and it involves the peace and security of all. All men and women
according to the place that they occupy participate in promoting this common
good. They do this by respecting just laws and taking charge of the areas
for which they have personal responsibility — such as the care of their own
family and the commitment to their own work. They are also called, and
should be free to, take an active part in public life as far as possible.
All of this constitutes the true common good. For all of this, society needs
a proper understanding of man and a model of service to man.
Now, where is this understanding and
this model to be found? Jesus Christ is the model for every man of what it
is to live a life of service. As we heard in the Gospel, “The Son of Man did
not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for
many. (Mark 10: 35-45). How far from the
example of Jesus Christ have been very many theories of society and of the
common good! Let us take Jesus Christ and what he has revealed of the nature
and destiny of man as our inspiration for our service to society and our
understanding of the common good. The implications for the common good of
Christ’s person and teaching are
extensively developed in the Church’s great social teaching, extending from
Rerum Novarum already mentioned, through the various social
Encyclicals since then, and including Caritas in Veritate of
Benedict XVI. In our concern for the common good of society let us make it our business to be imbued with the person and
example of Jesus Christ and nourished by the Church’s teaching.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no. 1905-1917 (common good)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apostolic zeal is a divine craziness I want you to have. Its symptoms are:
hunger to know the Master; constant concern for souls; perseverance that nothing
can shake.
(The Way, no.934)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The
Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE
VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
The time will come when Christ, the Teacher of teachers, the Lord of angels,
will appear to hear the lessons of all -- that is, to examine the conscience
of everyone. Then He will search Jerusalem with lamps and the hidden things
of darkness will be brought to light and the arguings of men's tongues be
silenced.
(Continuing)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a passage from John Henry Newman’s
sermon ‘Unreal Words.’ Here, Newman analyses
what it means to speak
in an ‘unreal’ way, and shows how this can apply to religious beliefs. Do
we, like the Apostles sometimes ‘not know what we are asking’ (cf. Mark 10:
38)?
Of course it is very common in all matters, not only in religion, to speak
in an unreal way; viz., when we speak on a subject with which our minds are
not familiar. If you were to hear a person who knew nothing about military
matters, giving directions how soldiers on service should conduct
themselves, or how their food and lodging, or their marching, was to be duly
arranged, you would be sure that his mistakes would be such as to excite the
ridicule and contempt of men experienced in warfare. … If a dim-sighted man
were to attempt to
decide
questions of proportion and colour, or a man without ear to judge of musical
compositions, we should feel that he spoke on and from general principles,
on fancy, or by deduction and argument, not from a real apprehension of the
matters which he discussed. His remarks would be theoretical and unreal.
This unsubstantial way of speaking is instanced in the case of persons who
fall into any new company among strange faces and amid novel occurrences.
They sometimes form amiable judgments of men and things, sometimes the
reverse,—but whatever their judgments be, they are to those who know the men
and the things strangely unreal and distorted. They feel reverence where
they should not; they discern slights where none were intended; they
discover meaning in events which have none; they fancy motives; they
misinterpret manner; they mistake character; and they form generalizations
and combinations which exist only in their own minds.
Again, persons who have not attended to the subject of morals, or to
politics, or to matters ecclesiastical, or to theology, do not know the
relative value of questions which they meet with in these departments of
knowledge. They do not understand the difference between one point and
another. The one and the other are the same to them. They look at them as
infants gaze at the objects which meet their eyes, in a vague unapprehensive
way, as if not knowing whether a thing is a hundred miles off or close at
hand, whether great or small, hard or soft. They have no means of judging,
no standard to measure by,—and they give judgment at random, saying yea or
nay on very deep questions, according as their fancy is struck at the
moment, or as some clever or specious argument happens to come across them.
Consequently they are inconsistent; say one thing one day, another the
next;—and if they must act, act in the dark; or if they can help acting, do
not act; or if they act freely, act from some other reason not avowed. All
this is to be unreal. [...]
And in like manner as regards religious emotions. Persons are aware from the
mere force of the doctrines of which the Gospel consists, that they ought to
be variously affected, and deeply and intensely too, in consequence of them.
The doctrines of original and actual sin, of Christ’s Divinity and
Atonement, and of Holy Baptism, are so vast, that no one can realize them
without very complicated and profound feelings. Natural reason tells a man
this, and that if he simply and genuinely believes the doctrines, he must
have these feelings; and he professes to believe the doctrines absolutely,
and therefore he professes the correspondent feelings. But in truth he
perhaps does not really believe them absolutely, because such absolute
belief is the work of long time, and therefore his profession of feeling
outruns the real inward existence of feeling, or he becomes unreal. Let us
never lose sight of two truths,—that we ought to have our hearts penetrated
with the love of Christ and full of self-renunciation; but that if they be
not, professing that they are does not make them so.
(Reference: John Henry Newman,
Parochial and Plain Sermons Vol 5 (1840) Sermon no. 3, p. 34-36,
38-39)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time
(October 19) Saint John de Brébeuf and Saint Isaac
Jogues, priests and martyrs, and their companions, martyrs
Isaac Jogues (1607-1646): Isaac Jogues and his companions were the
first martyrs of the North American continent officially recognized by the
Church. As a young Jesuit, Isaac Jogues, a man of learning and culture,
taught literature in France. He gave up that career to work
among
the Huron Indians in the New World, and in 1636 he and his companions, under
the leadership of John de Brébeuf, arrived in Quebec. The Hurons were
constantly warred upon by the Iroquois, and in a few years Father Jogues was
captured by the Iroquois and imprisoned for 13 months. His letters and
journals tell how he and his companions were led from village to village,
how they were beaten, tortured and forced to watch as their Huron converts
were mangled and killed. An unexpected chance for escape came to Isaac
Jogues through the Dutch, and he returned to France, bearing the marks of
his sufferings. Several fingers had been cut, chewed or burnt off. Pope
Urban VIII gave him permission to offer Mass with his mutilated hands: "It
would be shameful that a martyr of Christ be not allowed to drink the Blood
of Christ." Welcomed home as a hero, Father Jogues might have sat back,
thanked God for his safe return and died peacefully in his homeland. But his
zeal led him back once more to the fulfillment of his dreams. In a few
months he sailed for his missions among the Hurons. In 1646 he and Jean de
Lalande, who had offered his services to the missioners, set out for
Iroquois country in the belief that a recently signed peace treaty would be
observed. They were captured by a Mohawk war party, and on October 18 Father
Jogues was tomahawked and beheaded. Jean de Lalande was killed the next day
at Ossernenon, a village near Albany, New York.
The first of the Jesuit missionaries to be martyred was René Goupil
who, with Lalande, had offered his services as an oblate. He was
tortured
along with Isaac Jogues in 1642, and was tomahawked for having made the Sign
of the Cross on the brow of some children. Jean de Brébeuf (1593-1649): Jean
de Brébeuf was a French Jesuit who came to Canada at the age of 32 and
laboured there for 24 years. He went back to France when the English captured
Quebec (1629) and expelled the Jesuits, but returned to his missions four
years later. Although medicine men blamed the Jesuits for a smallpox
epidemic among the Hurons, Jean remained with them. He composed catechisms
and a dictionary in Huron, and saw 7,000 converted before his death. He was
captured by the Iroquois and died after four hours of extreme torture at
Sainte Marie, near Georgian Bay, Canada. Father Anthony Daniel, working
among Hurons who were gradually becoming Christian, was killed by Iroquois
on July 4, 1648. His body was thrown into his chapel, which was set on fire.
Gabriel Lalemant had taken a fourth vow—to sacrifice his life to the
Indians. He was horribly tortured to death along with Father Brébeuf. Father
Charles Garnier was shot to death as he baptized children and catechumens
during an Iroquois attack. Father Noel Chabanel was killed before he could
answer his recall to France. He had found it exceedingly hard to adapt to
mission life. He could not learn the language, the food and life of the
Indians revolted him, plus he suffered spiritual dryness during his whole
stay in Canada. Yet he made a vow to remain until death in his mission.
These eight Jesuit martyrs of North America were canonized in 1930.
"My confidence is placed in God who does not need our help for
accomplishing his designs. Our single endeavour should be to give ourselves
to the work and to be faithful to him, and not to spoil his work by our
shortcomings" (from a letter of Isaac Jogues to a Jesuit friend in France,
September 12, 1646, a month before he died). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 4:20-25; Luke
1:69-75; Luke 12:13-21
Someone in the crowd said to Jesus,
Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me. Jesus replied,
Man, who appointed me a
judge
or an arbiter between you? Then he said to them, Watch out! Be on your guard
against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the
abundance of his possessions. And he told them this parable: The ground of a
certain rich man produced a good crop. He thought to himself, 'What shall I
do? I have no place to store my crops.' Then he said, 'This is what I'll do.
I will tear down my barns and build bigger ones, and there I will store all
my grain and my goods. And I'll say to myself, You have plenty of good
things laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be merry.' But
God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from
you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?' This is how it
will be with anyone who stores up things for himself but is not rich towards
God. (Luke 12: 13-21)
Material possessions
A professorship of political economy at Oxford was established in 1825, with
Nassau William Senior as the first professor. He was followed by his old
university tutor, Richard Whately who shortly afterwards was appointed
Anglican Archbishop of Dublin. That founding of the Oxford professorship we
may take as symbolic of the modern rise of the discipline of economics. With
its foundations in moral philosophy, political economy originally was the
term for the study of production, buying and selling, and their
relations
with law, custom, and government. It developed in the 18th century as the
study of the economies of states — hence “political economy.” Karl Marx
understood history to consist of the struggle between opposing classes over
mastery of the economy. In the late nineteenth century, the term "political
economy" was generally replaced by the term “economics,” often used by those
seeking to place the study of economy upon mathematical bases, rather than
the relationships of production and consumption. So it is that economics is
a principal discipline of the modern age. Business Studies is a popular
elective at the final level of Secondary School, while Economics and
Commerce remains ever strong at Universities. The combined Law/Economics
degree has a high entrance requirement. The principal minister of Government
after the Prime Minister is often the Treasurer or his equivalent, and a
dominant Government department is the Treasury. The world pulsates with the
importance of the economy — which is to say, with the importance of
maximizing the availability of money and material goods for the short and
long term. An observer of the modern world would be forgiven for gaining the
impression that what matters most in the lives of human beings is
money-making and the possession or control of material goods. But a little
philosophical reflection ought dispel any conviction that this is as it
should be, widespread though it might be. The fact is that money and
material goods are manifestly ephemeral and profoundly vulnerable.
Yes, indeed. If an individual’s life and work has been directed towards
economic goals alone or principally, he has spent his efforts on what can
and (ultimately) will pass uncontrollably through his fingers. As it has
always been said, you cannot take it with you. Because of divine revelation
we know that there is a Hereafter, and we know a good deal about it.
Ordinary common sense would suggest that our lives ought be spent working
for what we will be able to retain — forever. Our economic interests and
goals ought be sought only within this ultimate perspective. This common
sense consideration brings us to our Gospel today, in which our Lord is
asked a very practical question by a person in his audience. “Teacher, tell
my brother to divide the inheritance with me.” How common is this problem,
the matter of the Will! The point here, though, is that our Lord uses the
occasion to drive home a few simple and central points for human life.
“Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does
not consist in the abundance of his possessions.” Many have made their life
to consist in the abundance of possessions, so as even to lead them into a
variety of forms of theft on a massive scale. It has been argued that the
great economic problem of 2009 was ultimately an ethical failure due to a
rapacious desire for profits. A man’s life does not consist simply in
possessions, let alone an abundance of possessions. He must have the use of
some things, but those things ought be oriented towards the truly central
goals of human flourishing. At the heart of the flowering of the human
person is love — loving and being loved — and ultimately this is achieved in
the love of God. Material goods and prosperity ought support and assist the
attainment of the love and service of God. This applies to the life of the
individual as well as to the life of society. It is this which a man takes with him,
and if he cannot take this, he takes nothing. For all his labour and his
talents, he goes from this life with everything having slipped through his
fingers.
Our Lord tells the parable of the man who built large barns for his abundant
possessions. But it was all so very vulnerable. He was about to lose it all,
for “God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded
from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?' This is
how it will be with anyone who stores up things for himself but is not rich
towards God”(Luke 12: 13-21). Let us
heed our Lord’s words and make the love and service of God the great goal of
every day, with the business of material security and prosperity serving
that one all-important aim.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't rest on your laurels. If, humanly speaking, that attitude is neither
comfortable nor becoming, what will it be when — as now — the laurels are
not really yours, but God's?
(The Way, no.935)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
am He Who in one moment so enlightens the humble mind that it comprehends
more of eternal truth than could be learned by ten years in the schools. I
teach without noise of words or clash of opinions, without ambition for
honour or confusion of argument.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Church is to be regal, a witness for Heaven, unchangeable amid
secular changes, if in every age she is to hold her own, and proclaim as
well as profess the truth, if she is to thrive without or against the civil
power, if she is to be resourceful and self-recuperative under all fortunes,
she must be more than Holy and Apostolic; she must be Catholic.
JHN, from the ‘Preface to the Third Edition’ of the Prophetical Office of
the Church (1877)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time
(October 20) St. Maria Bertilla
Boscardin (1888-1922)
If
anyone knew rejection, ridicule and disappointment, it was today’s saint. But
such trials only brought Maria Bertilla Boscardin closer to God and more
determined to serve him. Born in Italy in 1888, the young girl lived in fear
of her father, a violent man prone to jealousy and drunkenness. Her schooling
was limited so that she could spend more time helping at home and working in
the fields. She showed few talents and was often the butt of jokes. In 1904
she joined the Sisters of St. Dorothy and was assigned to work in the kitchen,
bakery and laundry. After some time Maria received nurses’ training and began
working in a hospital with children suffering from diphtheria. There the young
nun seemed to find her true vocation: nursing very ill and disturbed children.
Later, when the hospital was taken over by the military in World War I, Sister
Maria Bertilla fearlessly cared for patients amidst the threat of constant air
raids and bombings. She died in 1922 after suffering for many years from a
painful tumor. Some of the patients she had nursed many years before were
present at her canonization in 1961. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 5:12, 15b, 17-19, 20b-21; Psalm 40:7-10, 17; Luke 12:35-38
Jesus said, Be
dressed ready for service and keep your lamps burning, like men waiting for
their master to return from a wedding banquet, so that when he comes and
knocks they can immediately open the door for him. It will be good for those
servants whose master finds them watching when he comes. I tell you the truth,
he will dress himself to serve, will have them recline at the table and will
come and wait on them. It will be good for those servants whose master finds
them ready, even if he comes in the second or third watch of the night.
(Luke 12: 35-38)
Personal convictions
Consider some of the great figures of history and ask, what would society and
the world have been like had they not appeared on the scene and gained the
power they wielded? Napoleon Bonaparte dazzled Europe by his military prowess
following his rise from utter obscurity, and, having attained the title of
Emperor, proceeded virtually to march on all Europe, with great designs on
England too. The prodigy from Corsica brought fire and sword, smoking cities,
untold carnage of human life — some two
million dead — and the greatest
European war to that point. Now, let us ask, what was the mind within him that
led to all this? Obviously personal ambition drove him — his vision was a
lasting empire in Europe ruled by the French, with the Church and indeed the
papacy itself subject to him and his dynasty. But what was the seed-ground of
his notions? Born into a Catholic Corsican family, as a boy he entered the
military school of Brienne, and in 1783 the military school of Paris. In 1785,
when he was in garrison at Valence as a lieutenant, he occupied his leisure by
reading many of the philosophers of his time, particularly Rousseau. This
reading left him in a kind of Deism, a mere admirer of the personality of
Jesus and with no observance of religious practices. He imbibed and
represented the anti-Christian rationalism of the Revolutionary leaders. He
married civilly. He eschewed the religion of Christian revelation. Christ as
the living Lord meant little or nothing to him. How different would Europe
have been if Napoleon had discovered by true conviction the person of Christ
and the Church his body. Imagine if he had discovered the truth of his native
Catholicism! The fundamental convictions of this one man made an enormous
difference to Europe, as had the rationalism of many who spearheaded the
Revolution before him. They were agents of great change. The change that was
effected was the fruit of convictions. I use all this as an example to
illustrate the immense importance of basic personal convictions.
In our Gospel passage today our Lord says, "Be dressed ready for service and keep your lamps burning, like men waiting for their master to return from a wedding banquet, so that when he comes and knocks they can immediately open the door for him." Firstly, then, we are to be "dressed ready for service" — which is to say, busy about our work in life whatever that may be. We must be coming to grips with our responsibilities. We must keep our "lamps burning." We must be people of our work in life. That "work" in life may even be the "work" of being sick. St Bernadette Soubiroux (who received the appearances of Our Lady at Lourdes in 1858) spoke of her last sickness as a nun as being her last "job." She was resolved to do it well, and she died a very holy death. Each individual and all of society depend on the fulfilment of responsibility through work. Bonaparte worked — and worked furiously, and his fundamental convictions shaped the tenor and direction of his work. Our fundamental convictions will shape the tenor and direction of our work, and in our Gospel today our Lord speaks of what ought be those fundamental convictions. We must be convinced that this life is no more than a pilgrimage. We are on our way to our true homeland, and what we do here ought be done with the thought of Christ our Lord and Judge before us. So it is that the parable of today’s Gospel (Luke 12: 35-38) refers also to the conviction underlying our work. Christ tells us that our work and our service must be such as to leave us constantly ready for the arrival of him, our Master. Of course, this was the last thing that Bonaparte bothered himself with. We must so work that at a moment’s notice — such as if we were suddenly to succumb to a terminal condition — we would with joy open the door to the Master’s arrival. All this will depend on our convictions — which is to say, on our acceptance of Jesus Christ as Master, Lord and Judge. With such a conviction we will work day by day in a way which is according to the will and revelation of God. Let us then build the house of our life on rock, the rock of Christ our Redeemer.
Napoleon’s life ended in ruins. There is evidence that he
came to a greater religious belief during these last years. Gaoled on the
far-flung island of St Helena, treated harshly by his guards, he died 1821 of
bowel cancer (like his father before him) and probably of poisoning. The humble
and dedicated disciple of Christ may also come to temporal ruin, but his
fidelity will pay off. He has a wonderful assurance from his beloved Master.
"It will be good for those servants whose master finds them watching when he
comes. I tell you the truth, he will dress himself to serve, will have them
recline at the table and will come and wait on them. It will be good for those
servants whose master finds them ready, even if he comes in the second or
third watch of the night."
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have come to the apostolate to submit, to annihilate
yourself: not to impose your own personal viewpoints.
(The Way, no.936)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuing The
Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
I am He Who teaches man to despise earthly possessions and
to loathe present things, to ask after the eternal, to hunger for heaven, to
fly honours and to bear with scandals, to place all hope in Me, to desire
nothing apart from Me, and to love Me ardently above all things. For a certain
man by loving Me intimately learned divine truths and spoke wonders. He
profited more by leaving all things than by studying subtle questions.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God sees every one of us; He creates every soul, He lodges
it in the body, one by one, for a purpose. He needs, He deigns to need, every
one of us. He has an end for each of us; we are all equal in His sight, and we
are placed in our different ranks and stations, not to get what we can out of
them for ourselves, but to labour in them for Him. As Christ has His work, we
too have ours; as He rejoiced to do His work, we must rejoice in ours also.
JHN, from the discourse ‘God’s Will the End of Life’ (1849)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time
(October 21) St. Hilarion (c. 291-371)
Despite his best efforts to live in prayer and solitude, today’s saint found
it difficult to achieve his deepest desire. People were naturally drawn to
Hilarion as a source of spiritual wisdom and peace. He had reached such fame
by the time of his death that his body had to be secretly removed so that a
shrine would not be built in his honour. Instead, he was buried in his home
village. St. Hilarion the Great, as he is sometimes called, was born in
Palestine. After his conversion to Christianity he spent some time with St.
Anthony of Egypt, another holy man drawn to solitude. Hilarion lived a life
of hardship and simplicity in the desert, where he also experienced
spiritual dryness that included temptations to despair. At the same time,
miracles were attributed to him. As his fame grew, a small group of
disciples wanted to follow Hilarion. He began a series of journeys to find a
place where he could live away from the world. He finally settled on Cyprus,
where he died in 371 at about age 80. Hilarion is celebrated as the founder
of monasticism in Palestine. Much of his fame flows from the biography of
him written by St. Jerome. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 6:12-18; Psalm
124:1b-8; Luke 12:39-48
Jesus said, Understand this: If the
owner of the house had known at what hour the thief was coming, he would not
have let his house be broken into. You also must be ready, because the Son
of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. Peter asked, Lord,
are
you telling this parable to us, or to everyone? The Lord answered, Who
then is the faithful and wise manager, whom the master puts in charge of his
servants to give them their food allowance at the proper time? It will be
good for that servant whom the master finds doing so when he returns. I tell
you the truth, he will put him in charge of all his possessions. But suppose
the servant says to himself, 'My master is taking a long time in coming,'
and he then begins to beat the menservants and maidservants and to eat and
drink and get drunk. The master of that servant will come on a day when he
does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to
pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers. That servant who knows
his master's will and does not get ready or does not do what his master
wants will be beaten with many blows. But the one who does not know and does
things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. From everyone who
has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been
entrusted with much, much more will be asked. (Luke
12: 39-48)
Divine judgment
A great difference to the policing
of traffic was made when speed cameras began to be installed. Now cameras
are commonplace on our roads, and the issue facing motorists is to remember
to watch for them. The likelihood of not noticing the camera surely induces
the motorist to be very careful to observe the rules of the road. It was
once canvassed in the New South Wales Parliament the possibility of
installing numerous camera look-alikes all across the states, thus having
the effect without having the expense. The aim
was to educate the motorist
to observe the law for fear of being caught. In a few countries the
possession of certain drugs attracts capital punishment, and it is said that
this law has had a dramatic effect on drug dealing there. The point I am
making here is that the fear of being suddenly caught can induce a policy of
compliance. The same pattern is present in other areas of life. For example,
health authorities urge a universal screening for bowel cancer, for the
disease can silently advance like a serpent approaching its prey. Then it
strikes with deadly effect, the victim is caught unawares and his life is
lost. Again, great efforts are made to establish warning systems for certain
regions of the world against tsunamis. Those who manage the systems are on
constant alert lest populations be caught unawares. Or again, whole nations
build up a readiness against terrorist threats, for experience has shown
that the innocent can be engulfed in sudden horror. The point is the same:
if at all possible we must stand ready and not be caught off guard against
the known threat. The threat is to life, for life is the dearest possession.
But now, it is obvious that whatever man may do to protect his life from
threats, he cannot ward off the coming of death, and he cannot ensure that
death will not be sudden. The issue is, if death comes suddenly, will he be
prepared for what follows death? This is the greatest question of all
because the revealed fact is that what follows death is the divine judgment.
No matter how advanced civilization
becomes in a technological sense, the fact of threats and sudden death
cannot be eliminated. At any point we can die. A person with the cleanest
bill of health begins his walk in the tracks of New Guinea and on the way
suddenly dies of a heart attack. No test predicted this eventuality. This
pattern applies to every time and every place. So we do not know — as our
Lord says in our Gospel today — at what hour the Son of Man is coming. What
we must do is so live as to be ready, were the Son of Man to come suddenly.
That is to say, we must live in the light of the Last Things which every man
and woman will most assuredly face: death and the divine judgment. There is
not very much about the future that we can be absolutely sure of. I am sure
that if the average person who is well on in life were to look back to his
childhood and youth, he would admit that he could never have predicted his
future course. No, there is little of the future we can predict. But there
are a few things that are absolutely certain. The first thing is that we
shall die, and every passing second brings us closer to that most certain of
future events. The second great certainty is that we shall face the awesome
judgment of God our Creator and Redeemer. His searching gaze will bring to
light in an instant all that we have thought, said and done. The books will
be opened and the judgment made. Our Lord tells us in simple and figurative
language the upshot of this single pivotal event in the existence of every
person. “But suppose the servant says to himself, 'My master is taking a
long time in coming,' and he then begins to beat the menservants and
maidservants and to eat and drink and get drunk. The master of that servant
will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not
aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the
unbelievers” (Luke 12: 39-48). The wise
and prudent person lives in the light of this tremendous reality.
There is the glorious promise of
heaven to those who love and serve God in the fulfilment of their duties in
life. In our passage today our Lord speaks of God’s judgment and the threat
of divine punishment. St Teresa of Avila, doctor of the Church on the
spiritual life, was shown her place in hell were she to fail to serve God
and turn away from him. What Christ says in today’s Gospel must be borne in
mind. Let his words prompt us to keep close to God and to do all we can to
save others from the risk of eternal damnation.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Never be men or women of long action and short prayer.
(The Way, no.937)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE
VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
Though you shall have read and learned many things, it will always be
necessary for you to return to this one principle: I am He who teaches man
knowledge, and to the little ones I give a clearer understanding than can be
taught by man. He to whom I speak will soon be wise and his soul will
profit. But woe to those who inquire of men about many curious things, and
care very little about the way they serve Me.
(Continuing)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faith has no leisure to act the busy politician, to bring the world’s
language into the sacred fold, or to use the world’s jealousies in a divine
polity, to demand rights, to flatter the many, or to court the powerful.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Submission to Church Authority’ (1829)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time
(October 22) St. Peter of Alcantara (1499-1562)
Peter was a contemporary of well-known 16th-century
Spanish saints, including Ignatius of Loyola and John of the Cross. He
served as confessor to St. Teresa of Avila. Church reform was a major issue
in Peter’s day, and he directed most of his energies toward that
end.
His death came one year before the Council of Trent ended. Born into a noble
family (his father was the governor of Alcantara in Spain), Peter studied
law at Salamanca University and, at 16, joined the so-called Observant
Franciscans (also known as the discalced, or barefoot, friars). While he
practised many penances, he also demonstrated abilities which were soon
recognized. He was named the superior of a new house even before his
ordination as a priest; at the age of 39, he was elected provincial; he was
a very successful preacher. Still, he was not above washing dishes and
cutting wood for the friars. He did not seek attention; indeed, he preferred
solitude. Peter’s penitential side was evident when it came to food and
clothing. It is said that he slept only 90 minutes each night. While others
talked about Church reform, Peter’s reform began with himself. His patience
was so great that a proverb arose: "To bear such an insult one must have the
patience of Peter of Alcantara." In 1554, Peter, having received permission,
formed a group of Franciscans who followed the Rule of St. Francis with even
greater rigor. These friars were known as Alcantarines. Some of the Spanish
friars who came to North and South America in the 16th, 17th and 18th
centuries were members of this group. At the end of the 19th century, the
Alcantarines were joined with other Observant friars to form the Order of
Friars Minor. As spiritual director to St. Teresa, Peter encouraged her in
promoting the Carmelite reform. His preaching brought many people to
religious life, especially to the Secular Franciscan Order, the friars and
the Poor Clares. He was canonized in 1669.
“I do not praise poverty for poverty's sake; I praise only
that poverty which we patiently endure for the love of our crucified
Redeemer and I consider this far more desirable than the poverty we
undertake for the sake of poverty itself; for if I thought or believed
otherwise, I would not seem to be firmly grounded in faith" (Letter of
Peter to Teresa of Avila). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 6:19-23;
Psalm 1:1-4 and 6; Luke 12:49-53
Jesus said, I have come to bring
fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a
baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is completed! Do you
think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. From now
on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three
against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son
and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother,
mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against
mother-in-law. (Luke 12: 49-53)
The truth
It is often thought that philosophy is a discipline of the
university alone. By that I mean that philosophical issues and a
philosophical consideration of those issues is considered to be the business
of departments of philosophy or those who are their products. It is deemed
that the ordinary person, the ordinary family man, the ordinary worker or
professional, is scarcely caught up in such matters.
In fact, the
establishment of departments of philosophy in Anglo-Saxon universities
considerably postdated the rise of the discipline itself. Philosophers were
writing in England who had little connection with the universities. This was
to be expected, for philosophical questions underpin every position the
ordinary person takes. One of the most characteristic issues of the modern
mind is that of the status of his knowledge and, especially, of his basic
convictions: are they, and can they be said to be, objective? If all are
agreed on something, the question scarcely arises. Let us say that the whole
country is agreed that an economic downturn or upturn is in process as the
case may be. In such a setting, no one would think of asking whether man’s
opinions and convictions can be properly regarded as objective. But consider
matters of religion, where there is no such agreement. The community of
nations includes a vast spectrum of religious belief, and in the typical
secular society every man’s street includes those of deeply divergent
religious convictions. A courteous tolerance is imperative for social order
and if the rights of others are to be respected. But the ordinary man in
this pluralist setting can be induced to think that all talk of objective
truth is a fruitless fancy. By this I mean, not that he thinks that it is
merely difficult to attain to religious truth (which it is), but that there
is no such thing as objective truth. All there can be said to be is,
personal opinion. As theologian Cardinal Avery Dulles once said, Religion
tends to be regarded as a purely subjective preference, a mere matter of
taste or custom, incapable of making objective truth-claims.
This is one of the challenges the proclamation of the person and teaching of
Christ faces in the modern world. The baptized Christian, and the Church of
which he is called to be a member, will not allow that “truth” is relative
to each person and that therefore it does not represent a moral obligation
on the one to whom it appeals. This is an illustration of the fact that the
Christian religion does indeed involve fundamental philosophical positions
which are opposed to certain other philosophical positions. The Church has
in the past condemned various philosophical views and systems because
ultimately they endanger man’s salvation. The famous Syllabus of
Errors (1864) of Pope Pius IX (now beatified), a document much
lampooned at the time and even now, included condemnations of certain
philosophical positions. The implicit and scarcely conscious view of many
that truth in religion is a phantom must be confronted, if Christ and his
Church is to be known and accepted by modern man. This is a direct
implication of our Gospel today, in which our Lord warns that he and his
revelation will be a cause of profound discomfort in society. “Do you think
I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. From now on
there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against
two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son
against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother,
mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against
mother-in-law” (Luke 12: 49-53). Our
Lord was saying to his disciples that central to their mission is the
conviction and the teaching that the truth (about him) is absolutely
objective and that it imposes a moral obligation of assent. They must expect
that the proclamation of this as the objective truth will arouse the ire of
many in society. Our Lord warns explicitly of the division that the Truth
about him will cause, even, at times, within the family circle.
During the early stages of his Passion, Christ came face to face with the
Empire as represented by Pilate. We may say it was a confrontation with the
gentile world. As one having worldly power, Pilate questioned him about his
identity and mission. Christ replied by referring to the objective truth.
For this was I born, he said to Pilate, to bear witness to the truth and
those who are of the truth listen to my voice. He had said to his own
disciples that he was the way, the truth and the life. Pilate responded with
a rhetorical question: “What is truth?” Let us proclaim it in our hearts
and, to the extent our circumstances allow, from the housetops: Christ is
the truth!
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try to live in such a way that you can voluntarily deprive yourself of the
comfort and ease you wouldn't like to see in the life of another man of God.
Remember that you are the grain of wheat the Gospel speaks of. If you don't
bury yourself and die, there will be no harvest.
(The Way, no.938)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE
VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
The time will come when Christ, the Teacher of teachers, the Lord of angels,
will appear to hear the lessons of all -- that is, to examine the conscience
of everyone. Then He will search Jerusalem with lamps and the hidden things
of darkness will be brought to light and the arguings of men's tongues be
silenced.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have we any right to take it strange, if, in this English land, the
spring-time of the Church should turn out to be an English spring, an
uncertain, anxious time of hope and fear, of joy and suffering,—of bright
promise and budding hopes, yet withal, of keen blasts, and cold showers, and
sudden storms?
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Second Spring’ (1852)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time
(October 23) St. John of Capistrano (1386-1456)
It has been said the Christian saints are the world’s greatest optimists.
Not blind to the existence and consequences of evil, they base their
confidence on the power of Christ’s redemption. The power of conversion
through Christ extends not only to sinful people but also to calamitous
events. Imagine being born in the fourteenth century. One-third of the
population and nearly 40 percent of the clergy were wiped out by the bubonic
plague. The Western Schism split the Church with two or three claimants to
the Holy See at one time. England and France were at war. The city-states of
Italy were constantly in conflict. No wonder that gloom dominated the spirit
of the culture and the times. John Capistrano was born in 1386. His
education was thorough. His talents and success were great. When he was 26
he was made governor of Perugia. Imprisoned after a battle against the
Malatestas, he resolved to change his way of life completely. At the age of
30 he entered the Franciscan novitiate and was ordained a priest four years
later. His preaching attracted great throngs at a time of religious apathy
and confusion. He and 12 Franciscan brethren were received in the countries
of central Europe as angels of God. They were instrumental in reviving a
dying faith and devotion. The Franciscan Order itself was in turmoil over
the interpretation and observance of the Rule of St. Francis. Through John’s
tireless efforts and his expertise in law, the heretical Fraticelli were
suppressed and the "Spirituals" were freed from interference in their
stricter observance. He helped bring about a reunion with the Greek and
Armenian Churches, unfortunately only a brief arrangement. When the Turks
captured Constantinople in 1453, he was commissioned to preach a crusade for
the defense of Europe. Gaining little response in Bavaria and Austria, he
decided to concentrate his efforts in Hungary. He led the army to Belgrade.
Under the great General John Junyadi, they gained an overwhelming victory,
and the siege of Belgrade was lifted. Worn out by his superhuman efforts,
Capistrano was an easy prey to the infection bred by the refuse of battle.
He died October 23, 1456. On the saint's tomb in the Austrian town of
Villach, the governor had this message inscribed: "This tomb holds John, by
birth of Capistrano, a man worthy of all praise, defender and promoter of
the faith, guardian of the Church, zealous protector of his Order, an
ornament to all the world, lover of truth and religious justice, mirror of
life, surest guide in doctrine; praised by countless tongues, he reigns
blessed in heaven." That is a fitting epitaph for a real and successful
optimist. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 7:18-25a; Psalm
119:66, 68, 76, 77, 93, 94; Luke 12:54-59
Jesus said to the crowd: When you
see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, 'It's going to rain,'
and it does. And when the south wind blows, you say, 'It's going to be hot,'
and it is. Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of the earth
and the sky. How is it that you don't know how to interpret this present
time? Why don't you judge for yourselves what is right? As you are going
with your adversary to the magistrate, try hard to be reconciled to him on
the way, or he may drag you off to the judge, and the judge turn you over to
the officer, and the officer throw you into prison. I tell you, you will not
get out until you have paid the last penny. (Luke
12: 54-59)
The great sign
In his book, A History of Apologetics, Cardinal
Avery Dulles speaks with praise of the Christian apologetics mounted by some
Anglican authors against the prevailing deism during the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries. Deism typically allowed a religion based on rational
consideration of the world of Nature. Nature was the voice of its creator,
and reason was the instrument that attains its religious meaning. Nature
constituted a natural revelation and was a reliable basis of religion,
whereas supernatural and historical
revelation was ultimately doubtful. Its
basis was faith, and faith in the final analysis was not reasonable. There
were various answers to this, but one famous one — noted by Dulles in his
historical survey — was that of Anglican Bishop Joseph Butler (1692-1752),
entitled The Analogy of Religion. The work had a considerable
influence on John Henry Newman, later Cardinal, during the height of his
Anglican years. Butler’s pivotal point is that there is a likeness between
the course and constitution of the world and the doctrines of religion — suggesting that the Author of nature is the same as the Author of the
doctrines of religion, both natural and revealed. This is not the place to
discuss this as an argument supporting revealed religion — in any case it
assumes that the audience accepts a creator God who is the author of nature.
My point is to highlight the analogy Butler sees between the course and
constitution of the world and the doctrines revealed by God. I believe this
very point is implied in so many of our Lord’s parables. The same God, who
reveals himself and his plan above all in Christ and his teaching, is the
God who rules the world — and the world can be thus seen as illustrating
certain of revealed doctrines. Our Lord himself draws on what happens in the
world to illustrate the doctrines he is revealing. There is something of a
likeness there that we can advert to, which will help us realize with
greater effect the doctrine being considered.
Consider the doctrine of the judgment of God. In our Gospel today our Lord
says that people can see the signs of a coming change in the weather, but do
not notice the signs given by God of his coming judgment. “Jesus said to the
crowd: When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, 'It's
going to rain,' and it does. And when the south wind blows, you say, 'It's
going to be hot,' and it is. Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the
appearance of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don't know how to
interpret this present time?” What is our Lord referring to here, and that
his audience is incapable of interpreting from the signs available? He
provides an illustration, this time not from the workings of the world, but
from ordinary social and civil life. It is the imminent threat of civil
judgment and punishment. Everyday life suggests the imperative of
reconciling to one’s obligations in order to avoid this most certain
judgment. “Why don't you judge for yourselves what is right? As you are
going with your adversary to the magistrate, try hard to be reconciled to
him on the way, or he may drag you off to the judge, and the judge turn you
over to the officer, and the officer throw you into prison. I tell you, you
will not get out until you have paid the last penny”
(Luke 12: 54-59). On the way to the court, all the signs
indicate that you may be found guilty and thrown into prison. So, you ought
know you had best be reconciled with your adversary on the way so as to
avoid this. Our Lord is saying, just so — see the signs! Be reconciled to
God and keep his commandments! In the concrete this means, hear the saving
news of the Gospel and receive with obedience and joy the tidings of Christ
and his revelation. Do not truculently refuse Christ, for he is the great
sign from God of his saving plan. He is the sign that reveals and indeed
embodies it, for in seeing him we see the Father. As the Father said from
the cloud on the mountain, this is my beloved Son. Listen to him!
Let us bow in spirit before Jesus Christ our Lord and our divine Friend. He
is the manifestation of God and his divine plan. He is the Sign of all
signs, the Notice of what is coming. By receiving him into our hearts, we
embrace the life that will be ours hereafter, life divine, live abundant,
life everlasting. He is the image of the unseen God, God incarnate, the term
of all human longing and striving. Let us not be so foolish as to do what
the prudent man would not do in ordinary life, ignoring this sign and gift
that has been bestowed on us by our loving God.
(E.J.Tyler)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be men and women of the world, but don't be worldly men and women.
(The Way, no.939)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE
VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
I am He Who in one moment so enlightens the humble mind that it comprehends
more of eternal truth than could be learned by ten years in the schools. I
teach without noise of words or clash of opinions, without ambition for
honour or confusion of argument.
(Continuing)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Truth is opposed not only by direct contradictions which are unequivocal,
but also by such pretences as are of a character to deceive men at first
sight, and to confuse the evidence of what alone is divine and trustworthy.
JHN, from Difficulties of Anglicans (1850)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time
(October 24) St. Anthony Claret (1807-1870)
The "spiritual father of Cuba" was a missionary, religious founder,
social reformer, queen’s chaplain, writer and publisher, archbishop and
refugee. He was a Spaniard whose work took him to the Canary Islands, Cuba,
Madrid, Paris and to the First Vatican Council. In his spare time as weaver
and designer in the textile mills of Barcelona, he learned Latin and
printing: the future priest and publisher was
preparing.
Ordained at 28, he was prevented by ill health from entering religious life
as a Carthusian or as a Jesuit, but went on to become one of Spain’s most
popular preachers. He spent 10 years giving popular missions and retreats,
always placing great emphasis on the Eucharist and devotion to the
Immaculate Heart of Mary. Her rosary, it was said, was never out of his
hand. At 42, beginning with five young priests, he founded a religious
institute of missionaries, known today as the Claretians. He was appointed
to head the much-neglected archdiocese of Santiago in Cuba. He began its
reform by almost ceaseless preaching and hearing of confessions, and
suffered bitter opposition mainly for stamping out concubinage and giving
instruction to black slaves. A hired assassin (whose release from prison
Anthony had obtained) slashed open his face and wrist. Anthony succeeded in
getting the would-be assassin’s death sentence commuted to a prison term.
His solution for the misery of Cubans was family-owned farms producing a
variety of foods for the family’s own needs and for the market. This invited
the enmity of the vested interests who wanted everyone to work on a single
cash crop—sugar. Besides all his religious writings are two books he wrote
in Cuba: Reflections on Agriculture and Country Delights. He was recalled to
Spain for a job he did not relish—being chaplain for the queen. He went on
three conditions: He would reside away from the palace, he would come only
to hear the queen’s confession and instruct the children and he would be
exempt from court functions. In the revolution of 1868, he fled with the
queen’s party to Paris, where he preached to the Spanish colony. All his
life Anthony was interested in the Catholic press. He founded the Religious
Publishing House, a major Catholic publishing venture in Spain, and wrote or
published 200 books and pamphlets. At Vatican I, where he was a staunch
defender of the doctrine of infallibility, he won the admiration of his
fellow bishops. Cardinal Gibbons of Baltimore remarked of him, "There goes a
true saint." At the age of 63, he died in exile near the border of Spain.
Queen Isabella II once said to Anthony, "No one tells me things as
clearly and frankly as you do." Later she told her chaplain, "Everybody is
always asking me for favours, but you never do. Isn't there something you
would like for yourself?" He replied, "Yes, that you let me resign." The
queen made no more offers. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 8:1-11;
Psalm 24:1b-6; Luke 13:1-9
Now there were some present at that
time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with
their sacrifices. Jesus
answered, Do you think that these Galileans were
worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I
tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those
eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them— do you think they
were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!
But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Then he told this parable: A
man had a fig-tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit
on it, but did not find any. So he said to the man who took care of the
vineyard, 'For three years now I've been coming to look for fruit on this
fig-tree and haven't found any. Cut it down! Why should it use up the soil?'
'Sir,' the man replied, 'leave it alone for one more year, and I'll dig
round it and fertilise it. If it bears fruit next year, fine! If not, then
cut it down.'
(Luke 13: 1-9)
Suffering and sin
In
the last decade of the twentieth century and the first decade of the twenty
first, Peter Singer has been considered as one of Australia’s foremost
public intellectuals. He occupied stellar positions in academic philosophy
in both Australia and the United States, specialising in applied ethics and
approaching ethical issues from a secular preference utilitarian
perspective, of which he is a leading exponent. In common with other
utilitarians, he believes that right action is that which produces the most
favourable results for
those who are involved. Singer interprets “the good”
as being the satisfaction of each person’s preferences, and a right action
is that which leads to this satisfaction. Thus there is nothing that is
“good” (or bad) in itself except for the person’s resulting state of mind. I
mention Singer only to quote what he said on one occasion about God and
creation. Singer was asked on television if he believes in God, and he
smilingly dismissed such an idea. There cannot be a God because the obvious
mess everywhere precludes such a proposition. There is too much suffering,
too much evil, too much disorder for this world to be the work of an
all-powerful, all-wise, and all-holy Creator — which is what God is supposed
to be. Of course, there is nothing very original about this remark, which is
not to say that it is not a telling one. There are so many things in life
which we, from our perspective, find very puzzling indeed in view of the
fact that all is in the hands of a loving creator. The man of religion
believes in God with conviction, but that does not eliminate his problems
with the state of the world. The man without religion likewise has his
problems with the state of the world, and these problems can lead him to
reject or ignore God. The evil, the suffering and the disorder are just that
— they constitute a problem which in philosophical discourse is typically
called the problem of evil. I can think of one prominent anthropologist who
wrote that indigenous religions could be understood and described in terms
of the answer their myths and rituals give to this problem of evil.
In our gospel passage today, our Lord is informed of an injustice of which
there are countless instances in the great course of human history. “Now
there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans
whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices.” The Roman procurator
had massacred several persons in the Temple itself. The Jew would not call
into question the very existence of God because of his allowing this
injustice to happen — as might the modern man. Rather, typically he thought
that such a tragic mishap was due to the victim’s own sin. Sin ultimately
brings the punishment of God, and so, he thought, what one suffers in this
world is due to one’s own sin. Further, the suffering in this world is
proportionate to the degree of one’s sins. Suffering, then, is a personal
punishment for sin. The greater the suffering, the greater a sinner must the
sufferer be. But no, our Lord tells them. Just because sin ultimately
attracts divine punishment and, with it, suffering, this does not mean that
all suffering is in fact a divine punishment for the one who is suffering.
It certainly does not mean that the suffering a person undergoes in this
life is an indicator of the scale of his sin when compared to the sin of
others. “Jesus answered, Do you think that these Galileans were worse
sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell
you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish”
(Luke 13: 1-9). Our Lord does not, here
in this scene, explain why God allowed those who suffered this injustice
inflicted on them by Pilate. He does say, though, that it is an indicator of
the punishment that will fall on the unrepentant sinner. “I tell you, no!
But unless you repent, you too will all perish.” Of ourselves, we cannot
plumb to its depths the reason why a good and all powerful God allows people
to suffer — although, actually, much has been revealed by God about this.
But our Lord does make it clear that God wants the evil and suffering of
the world to remind us of the ultimate suffering that will be ours if we do
not repent of our sins. That is to say, God will judge and condemn the
unrepentant.
Let us remember that it is the Saviour who utters these words about the
judgment that will fall on the sinner who refuses to repent. He himself took
the part of sinners and on his shoulders was laid the burden of the sins of
the world. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, and he
did this precisely by his suffering. Thus has suffering been transformed
into a means of redemption. Furthermore, the Christian is invited by his
Lord to come and follow him. This means dying with him so as to share in his
resurrection, and to bring a share in his resurrection to others. Suffering
is now the greatest means of good, provided we suffer with Christ. Let us
then do as he says and take up our cross every day and follow in his
footsteps.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't forget that unity is a sign of life: to disunite means putrefaction —
a clear sign of being a corpse.
(The Way, no.940)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE
VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
I am He Who teaches man to despise earthly possessions and to loathe present
things, to ask after the eternal, to hunger for heaven, to fly honours and
to bear with scandals, to place all hope in Me, to desire nothing apart from
Me, and to love Me ardently above all things. For a certain man by loving Me
intimately learned divine truths and spoke wonders. He profited more by
leaving all things than by studying subtle questions.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christianity is not a matter of opinion, but an external fact, entering
into, carried out in, indivisible from, the history of the world.
JHN, from Difficulties of Anglicans (1850)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time B
(October 25) St. Antônio de Sant’Anna Galvão
(1739-1822)
God’s plan in a person’s life often takes unexpected turns which
become life-giving through cooperation with God’s grace. Born in
Guarantingueta near São Paulo (Brazil), Antônio attended the Jesuit seminary
in Belem but later decided to become a Franciscan friar. Invested in 1760,
he made final profession the following year and was ordained in 1762. In São
Paulo, he served as preacher, confessor and porter. Within a few years he
was appointed confessor to the Recollects of St. Teresa, a group of nuns in
that city. He and Sister Helena Maria of the Holy Spirit founded a new
community of sisters under the patronage of Our Lady of the Conception of
Divine Providence. Sister Helena Maria’s premature death the next year left
Father Antônio responsible for the new congregation, especially for building
a convent and church adequate for their growing numbers. He served as novice
master for the friars in Macacu and as guardian of St. Francis Friary in São
Paulo. He founded St. Clare Friary in Sorocaba. With the permission of his
provincial and the bishop, he spent his last days at the "Recolhimento de
Nossa Senhora da Luz," the convent of the sisters’ congregation he had
helped establish. He was beatified in Rome on October 25, 1998, and
canonized in 2007.
During the beatification homily, Pope John Paul II quoted from the
Second Letter to Timothy (4:17), "The Lord stood by me and gave me strength
to proclaim the word fully," and then said that Antônio "fulfilled his
religious consecration by dedicating himself with love and devotion to the
afflicted, the suffering and the slaves of his era in Brazil." The pope
continued, "His authentically Franciscan faith, evangelically lived and
apostolically spent in serving his neighbour, will be an encouragement to
imitate this ‘man of peace and charity.’"
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Jeremiah 31:7-9;
Psalm 126:1-6; Hebrews 5:1-6; Mark 10:46-52
Then they came to Jericho. As Jesus
and his disciples, together with a large crowd, were leaving the city, a
blind man, Bartimaeus (that is,
the Son of Timaeus), was sitting by the
roadside begging. When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to
shout, Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me! Many rebuked him and told him
to be quiet, but he shouted all the more, Son of David, have mercy on me!
Jesus stopped and said, Call him. So they called to the blind man, Cheer up!
On your feet! He's calling you. Throwing his cloak aside, he jumped to his
feet and came to Jesus. What do you want me to do for you? Jesus asked him.
The blind man said, Rabbi, I want to see. Go, said Jesus, your faith has
healed you. Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus along the
road. (Mark 10: 46-52)
The holy name
It is a
commonplace observation that modern Western society and culture is secular.
That is to say, at the very least, it does not have a religious face. An
observer, gazing at its public institutions and its public conversation,
would not be led to think of God. Its life, its laws and its literature hum
with incessant activity without reference to a transcendent reality on which
it acknowledges dependence. That is the broad picture, but it varies greatly
in its spectrum. The United States, though secular, has a much more
religious
culture than does Britain, and both have a more religious culture
than do certain European countries. It could be argued that Australia is
among the most secular countries in the world, even though a considerable
portion of its citizens are religious and there is a great vitality among
certain of its religious bodies and institutions. Nevertheless the culture
is a secular one, and this culture is a challenge to religion. There are
some obvious indicators of this secular character. How rare it is for a
public official to acknowledge personal belief in God, let alone belief in
Jesus Christ as the saviour from sin! Were a prime minister or other
minister of Government to refer publicly to such matters in a personal way
it would, I surmise, bring immediate notoriety. While the fact of crime and
wrongdoing is constantly referred to and governments readily place law and
order on their agendas, is “sin” ever found in public discourse? It is not.
It would be a profound embarrassment to colleagues if a Government minister
were to mention “sin” seriously. The fact is that the public canvassing of
such matters as “sin” and, say, “Jesus as the Saviour from sin,” would
probably be inappropriate — and the reason is precisely that the public
culture is profoundly secular. The present secular character of Western
culture has been centuries in the making. European culture was once
professedly Christian. All this is to say that the Christian has a great
mission ahead of him, and that mission is to bring forward in social and
public discourse the name of Jesus. That name is the name that is now not
mentioned — Jesus and his mission to deliver all men from sin.
In this sense our Gospel today (Mark 10:46-52)
has a special relevance for the modern world, a world so profoundly
influenced by Western secular culture. Jesus was passing by in the midst of
a thronging crowd. We may perhaps see in that scene elements of every time
and place. The crowds flow on in the great river of human societies, and in
the midst of the river is the One who brings life to all. A river
proverbially brings life, but in fact there is but one element in the river
of humanity which brings true life, and that is the man Jesus. He has come
to bring life, life in abundance, eternal life, life divine. The blind man
learns that Jesus of Nazareth is in the midst of the throng of humanity
passing him by and immediately he raises his voice stridently and allows
nothing and no one to muffle it. “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!”
Let that cry be a symbol of the mission ahead of the modern Christian. The
name of Jesus Christ has to be uttered and heard. His mission has to be
proclaimed. The name means, “God saves!” At the annunciation the angel
Gabriel gave this very name to him, a name coming from heaven. It expresses
his unique identity and his unique mission to save his people from their
sins. The salvation of the human race is dependent on him alone. One of the
characteristic assumptions of a secular culture, though unmentioned and
almost unconscious, is that, just as there is wrongdoing but no sin, so
there is no need of salvation from sin. It is allowed that man needs
rescuing from various evils — illness, disease, natural catastrophes,
hunger, illiteracy, unethical and criminal behaviour — but not from “sin.”
Least of all is it admitted that the “sin” which is said to afflict him is
the most profound of his afflictions, indeed the one from which spring the
others and the one which will damn him forever if it remains unchecked.
Modern secular man makes no acknowledgment of needing a Saviour from sin.
The world needs, then, to hear that cry of the blind man resounding in the
public square, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!”
As St Paul writes in one of his Letters, the name of Jesus is above every
other name. As Peter bore witness before the Sanhedrin, there is no other
name under heaven by which we can be saved (Acts 4:12), and as our Lord
himself said, no one comes to the Father except through me. Let us pronounce
this holy name frequently, every day of our lives. Let us so live that this
name will be honoured and glorified not only in the hearts of men but by
societies, cultures and by, indeed, the whole world. For, as Jesus Christ
himself said, all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to him. He
is the King of kings and the Lord of lords. By this name do we live!
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no.430-435 (The name of Jesus)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obedience, the sure way. Unreserved obedience to whoever is in charge, the
way of sanctity. Obedience in your apostolate, the only way: for, in a work
of God, the spirit must be to obey or to leave.
(The Way, no.941)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Third Chapter
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
To some I speak of common things, to others of special matters. To some I
appear with sweetness in signs and figures, and to others I appear in great
light and reveal mysteries. The voice of books is but a single voice, yet it
does not teach all men alike, because I within them am the Teacher and the
Truth, the Examiner of hearts, the Understander of thoughts, the Promoter of
acts, distributing to each as I see fit.
(Concluded)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following short passage from an early essay of
John Henry Newman’s on miracles
talks of their nature and meaning and highlights the ‘miraculous’ nature
of Christian revelation itself:
A Revelation, that is, a direct message from God to man,
itself bears in some degree a miraculous character; inasmuch as it supposes
the
Deity
actually to present Himself before His creatures, and to interpose in the
affairs of life in a way above the reach of those settled arrangements of
nature, to the existence of which universal experience bears witness. And as
a Revelation itself, so again the evidences of a Revelation may all more or
less be considered miraculous. Prophecy is an evidence only so far as
foreseeing future events is above the known powers of the human mind, or
miraculous. In like manner, if the rapid extension of Christianity be urged
in favour of its divine origin, it is because such extension, under such
circumstances, is supposed to be inconsistent with the known principles and
capacity of human nature. And the pure morality of the Gospel, as taught by
illiterate fishermen of Galilee, is an evidence, in proportion as the
phenomenon disagrees with the conclusions of general experience, which leads
us to believe that a high state of mental cultivation is ordinarily
requisite for the production of such moral teachers. It might even be said
that, strictly speaking, no evidence of a Revelation is conceivable which
does not partake of the character of a Miracle; since nothing but a display
of power over the existing system of things can attest the immediate
presence of Him by whom it was originally established; or, again, because no
event which results entirely from the ordinary operation of nature can be
the criterion of one that is extraordinary.
(Reference: John Henry Newman, Two Essays on Biblical and
Ecclesiastical Miracles (1870) Essay no. 1, ‘The Miracles of
Scripture’, p. 6-7)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time
(October 26) Blessed Contardo Ferrini (1859-1902)
Contardo Ferrini was the son of a teacher who went on to become a learned
man himself, one acquainted with some dozen languages. Today he is known as
the patron of universities. Born in Milan, he received a doctorate in law in
Italy and then earned a scholarship that enabled him to study
Roman-Byzantine law in Berlin. As a renowned legal expert, he taught in
various schools of higher education until he joined the faculty of the
University of Pavia, where he was considered an outstanding authority on
Roman law. Contardo was learned about the faith he lived and loved. "Our
life," he said, "must reach out toward the Infinite, and from that source we
must draw whatever we can expect of merit and dignity." As a scholar he
studied the ancient biblical languages and read the Scriptures in them. His
speeches and papers show his understanding of the relationship of faith and
science. He attended daily Mass and became a lay Franciscan, faithfully
observing the Third Order rule of life. He also served through membership in
the Society of St. Vincent de Paul. His death in 1902 at the age of 43
occasioned letters from his fellow professors that praised him as a saint;
the people of Suna where he lived insisted that he be declared a saint. Pope
Pius XII beatified Contardo in 1947. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 8:12-17; Psalm 68:2 and 4, 6-7ab, 20-21; Luke
13:10-17
On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues, and a woman was
there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years.
She was bent
over and could not straighten up at all. When Jesus saw her, he called her
forward and said to her, Woman, you are set free from your infirmity.
Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and
praised God. Indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, the
synagogue ruler said to the people, There are six days for work. So come and
be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath. The Lord answered him, You
hypocrites! Doesn't each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or donkey from
the stall and lead it out to give it water? Then should not this woman, a
daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be
set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her? When he said this, all his
opponents were humiliated, but the people were delighted with all the
wonderful things he was doing. (Luke 13: 10-17)
Christ and Satan
Our scene today finds us “in one of the synagogues,” and
Jesus is teaching there. It is the Sabbath, the day of the Lord when God’s
chosen people gathered in his presence to hear the word of the Lord. Our
Lord is teaching. Consider the marvel of that very fact! The congregation is
gazing on God incarnate, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity become man.
This, I suggest, ought be the abiding wonder of the Gospel scenes. The
people mixed familiarly with this marvellous man. They heard his voice, they
watched his
expressions, they caught his eyes, they were captivated by his
speech, they gazed upon the moral beauty of his person. So authentic and
total was the incarnation that the majority did not yet perceive his lofty
and transcendent identity. But there he was, the beloved Son of the Father,
the Lord God himself. We read that “the people were delighted with all the
wonderful things he was doing.” But now, during the course of his address,
our Lord noticed a woman who had been crippled for eighteen years. The Greek
text of the Gospel, explaining her condition, says that she had been having
“a spirit of infirmity for eighteen years, bending over double and quite
unable to straighten up.” Notice that Luke has firm details about the facts
of her case. We are not told her age, but we are told exactly how long she
had been in her physical condition. It had been going on for eighteen years.
Luke had obviously obtained his information from those who knew the facts of
her situation well. Moreover, Luke — physician as he was — adds a detail. It
is that her physical condition involved “a spirit.” There was a demonic
agency involved in some sense in her pitiable condition, “a spirit of
infirmity.” Seeing her, our Lord’s heart was filled with compassion and,
finishing his address, he called her forward from the congregation. There
she stood, bent over, perhaps leaning on some support. Before them all, our
Lord forthwith released her from her infirmity. Our Lord’s power and mercy
was manifested, and the longstanding and crippling burden of the woman was
gone. Radiant, she stood erect.
In his ensuing clash with the jealous synagogue official who was routed in
the encounter, our Lord makes a remark about the woman that provokes further
thought. He said before them all that it was Satan who had held her bound
all those years. “Does not each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or donkey
from the stall and lead it out to give it water? Then should not this woman,
a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be
set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her?” (Luke 13: 10-17). Somehow
Satan had been very much involved in her sad affliction, and this had been
going on long before our Lord arrived on the scene of her life. Our Lord
does not specify in what sense Satan had held her bound, and we may suppose
that Luke, the physician for St Paul, would have been interested to know.
But we have it on the word of our Lord that Satan had been cruelly at work
on her. Our Lord does not say that Satan’s was the only influence. But it is
clear that among all the factors that had contributed to her physical
condition, Satan was an active element. We remember how Satan successfully
encouraged Adam and Eve’s revolt against God which brought to pieces the
resplendent condition in which they had come from the divine hand. In that
ultimate sense Satan had held bound not only this poor woman but the rest of
mankind who inherited a broken human nature. But our Lord’s words imply more
than this. Elsewhere in the Gospels, we read that our Lord expelled a demon
from a boy who had been in his hopeless condition for a long time. Clearly,
there could not have been moral fault in the boy. So it is that as we think
of the broad sweep of human history, with its wars, its oppression, its fire
and fury and mayhem, our Lord’s words about this poor woman suggest a strong
demonic element in many of the catastrophes of human history. The inexorable
rise of a murderous Nazism had, assuredly, much of the demonic in it. We may
imagine the crackling laughter of Satan as the thundering fireball of
Genghis Khan’s forces burst forth from Mongolia and reduced to smoke, blood
and rubble the cities and peoples in their path.
In our Gospel scene today, Christ confronts Satan and expels him from the
scene. He departs, cowering and full of hate. And so the battle continues to
the end of human history when God will be shown as the Conqueror. There are
thus two great Standards before us, the Standard of Christ and the standard
of Satan. Let us take our place with Christ and fight with him against all
that smells and smacks of Satan. Our weapons are those of Christ, and the
route we follow is his. We follow in his footsteps as he makes his way to
the point of victory, which is Calvary. Let us be up and doing, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bear in mind, son, that you are not just a soul who has joined other souls
in order to do a good thing.
That is a lot, but it's still little. You are the Apostle who is carrying
out an imperative command from Christ.
(The Way, no.942)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fourth Chapter
DO NOT BE CONCERNED ABOUT OUTWARD THINGS
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, there are many matters of which it is well for you to be ignorant,
and to consider yourself as one who is dead upon the earth and to whom the
whole world is crucified. There are many things, too, which it is well to
pass by with a deaf ear, thinking, instead, of what is more to your peace.
It is more profitable to turn away from things which displease you and to
leave to every man his own opinion than to take part in quarrelsome talk. If
you stand well with God and look to His judgment, you will more easily bear
being worsted.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Jesus] is our best friend … the only real Lover of our souls—He takes all
means to make us love Him in return, and He refuses us nothing if we do.
JHN, from Meditations and Devotions (1893)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time
(October 27) Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza (c.
1200-1271)
Dominicans honour one of their own today, Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza.
This was a man who used his skills as a preacher to challenge the heresies
of his day. Bartholomew was born in Vicenza around 1200. At 20 he entered
the Dominicans. Following his ordination he served in various leadership
positions. As a young priest he founded a military order whose purpose was
to keep civil peace in towns throughout Italy. In 1248, Bartholomew was
appointed a bishop. For most men, such an appointment is an honour and a
tribute to their holiness and their demonstrated leadership skills. But for
Bartholomew, it was a form of exile that had been urged by an antipapal
group that was only too happy to see him leave for Cyprus. Not many years
later, however, Bartholomew was transferred back to Vicenza. Despite the
antipapal feelings that were still evident, he worked diligently—especially
through his preaching—to rebuild his diocese and strengthen the people’s
loyalty to Rome. During his years as bishop in Cyprus, Bartholomew
befriended King Louis the Ninth of France, who is said to have given the
holy bishop a relic of Christ’s Crown of Thorns. Bartholomew died in 1271.
He was beatified in 1793. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 8:18-25; Psalm
126:1b-6; Luke 13:18-21
Jesus asked, What is the kingdom of God like? What shall I compare it to? It
is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his garden. It grew
and became a tree, and the birds of the air perched in its branches. Again
he asked, What shall I compare the kingdom of God to? It is like yeast that
a woman took and mixed into a large amount of flour until it worked all
through the dough. (Luke 13: 18-21)
Kingdom and Church
In
October of 2009 there was a presentation (Compass) by Australian ABC television on
the Sydney Anglicans. It showed its impressive evangelical dynamism, the
active involvement of youth, and the thought and perspective of its current Archbishop. What was particularly manifest in the Anglicanism
of Sydney was the centrality of Scripture. It was shown to be an Evangelical
diocese and this meant that the all-important issue was the proclamation of
the message of Scripture, as it is understood by evangelical
Anglicanism. It
was clear that Sydney Anglicanism in the main stood in the tradition of
English Puritanism, in which all that truly matters is the word of God.
The Archbishop was interviewed at length during the programme and the
Church and its institutions were viewed as an adjunct to the word
as proclaimed by its ministers. Sydney Anglicanism strongly resisted
movements which undermine the clear teaching of Scripture. The observer
would notice, though, that in the Evangelical scheme everything hinges on
the individual interpreter of Scripture. His personal judgment on the teaching of
Scripture is pivotal. The notion of a definite, structured,
divinely instituted Church which guides the reader is discounted. While the Evangelical would
strongly deny that theirs is ultimately a subjectivist principle, it is
obviously the seed of profound divergences in Christianity. What one man or body
accounts to be the clear teaching of Scripture, another will in all
sincerity contradict. When it becomes accepted in society that the Christian
religion is a vast cluster based on various and conflicting interpretations
of a sacred text, then it is a short step to a widespread assumption that Christ came to
begin nothing more than a movement. He began a movement in history of those
who prize the recorded text of his words and make it their business to shape
their lives according to their reading of this sacred text. But Christ did
not come to begin a movement of those who look to an inspired text. He came
to establish a definite and structured Kingdom, the life of which would be
nourished by this sacred text, but not reducible to the individual’s reading
of it.
It is clear from the Gospels that Christ came establishing a Kingdom, which
is none other than God’s promised rule. It consists in union with Jesus who
is its King, and all those who are in union with him. It is also clear from
the Gospels that this divine Kingdom is inextricably bound up with the
Church. The Church is the locale of this Kingdom, the means of entry to it,
and the instrument of its growth and spread. As we read in the Gospel of St
Matthew, Christ appointed one to be the visible rock on which he would build
this Church, and to him he gave the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven. That rock
was Simon Peter, the first of the holders of the Keys. Christ the King thus
appointed a prime minister to govern this Church in his name. It is the
bearer of the Kingdom. Peter would bind and loose, his decisions would be
ratified in heaven, and the powers of Hell would never prevail. The point is
that Christ did not present a text for his disciples to bring to the world.
He entrusted not a text to them but his very self. It is he who is brought
to the world by his Church. In him is present the Kingdom,
and entry into the Kingdom comes from union with him, and that is achieved
by means of his body the Church. Christ and union with him is the Kingdom, and the Church is
his body. The Church is Christ’s direct creation and precedes the inspired
text of the Gospels and the New Testament. The Twelve and all the disciples
were to bring him to the world, making disciples of all the nations. The
inspired text arose from within the Church as the Church’s Book to help
nourish all her children. There is a further point. It is clear that our
Lord taught that this divine Kingdom here on earth would grow and develop.
As we read in today’s Gospel passage, “What is the kingdom of God like? What
shall I compare it to? It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and
planted in his garden. It grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air
perched in its branches” (Luke 13: 18-21).
Thus the Church, central to the mission of Christ and his Kingdom, develops
in history. It is not a static reality, but in its various features
develops, including in its doctrine which is none other than her
official understanding and teaching of the word of her divine Master.
As we think of our Lord’s words on the Kingdom and its growth, let us think
of the Church which is Christ’s grand instrument of the presence and
advancement of this Kingdom. Let us love the Church and understand that in
her we find all that Christ bestowed on his faithful. It is in the Church
and by her teaching that the inspired text is truly understood. It is in the
Church’s Sacraments and life that the person of her Lord is encountered. Let
us never in our hearts say, Christ and his word, yes! But the Church, no!
Rather, Christ my Lord and the Church, yes! Christ with the Church, Christ
in the Church, Christ through the Church, yes and always!
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be careful that contact with you doesn't make people feel like that person
who once exclaimed (and not without reason): 'I'm sick of these righteous
types!...'
(The Way, no.943)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fourth Chapter
DO NOT BE CONCERNED ABOUT OUTWARD THINGS
THE DISCIPLE
To what have we come, Lord? Behold, we bewail a temporal loss. We labor and
fret for a small gain, while loss of the soul is forgotten and scarcely ever
returns to mind. That which is of little or no value claims our attention,
whereas that which is of highest necessity is neglected -- all because man
gives himself wholly to outward things. And unless he withdraws himself
quickly, he willingly lies immersed in externals.
(Concluded)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That a certain system, called Catholicism, was the religion of the whole of
Christendom, not many centuries after the Christian era, and continued to be
mainly identified with the Gospel, whether with or without certain
additions, at least down to the Reformation, is confessed by all parties.
(JHN, from ‘‘The Theology of St Ignatius’’ 1839)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time B-2
click on centre arrow
Scripture today: Ephesians 6: 1-9;
Psalm 144; Luke 13: 22-30
Jesus went through the towns and
villages, teaching as he made his way to Jerusalem. Someone asked him, "Lord,
are only a few people
going
to be saved?" He said to them, "Make every effort to enter through the narrow
door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to. Once
the owner of the house gets up and closes the door, you will stand outside
knocking and pleading, 'Sir, open the door for us.' "But he will answer, 'I
don't know you or where you come from.' "Then you will say, 'We ate and drank
with you, and you taught in our streets.' "But he will reply, 'I don't know you
or where you come from. Away from me, all you evildoers!' "There will be weeping
there, and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all the
prophets in the kingdom of God, but you yourselves thrown out. People will come
from east and west and north and south, and will take their places at the feast
in the kingdom of God. Indeed there are those who are last who will be first,
and first who will be last." (Luke 13: 22-30)
Struggle to
enter! There have been doctrinal “earthquakes” in the
Christian world, just as there have been earthquakes in the material, physical
world. Perhaps the first such doctrinal “earthquake” occurred in the fourth
century. That earthquake was Arianism. The Alexandrian priest Arius declared
that Christ, the Son of God did not always exist, but was created by—and is
therefore distinct
from
and inferior to—God the Father. Appealing to Christ’s statement that “the Father
is greater than I,” he claimed that the Son was not unbegotten. Speaking of the
criticism he was attracting, he wrote that “we are persecuted because we say
that the Son has a beginning, but that God is without beginning” (Letter from
Arius to the Arian Eusebius of Nicomedia). So, of course, Christ was not God.
This heresy, condemned at Nicea and subsequently, struck at the deepest nerve of
the Christian religion, for it denied the divinity of Jesus Christ. There were
various storms across the centuries following Arius, including the gradual
separation of the Eastern Church from the See of Rome. But the next great
doctrinal earthquake occurred with the declarations of the Augustinian priest
Martin Luther, followed by the writings of John Calvin. A central doctrine in
their system was that God's pardon for sinners is granted to and received
through faith alone, understood as excluding all "works." Christ's righteousness
is imputed (i.e., attributed) by God to the believing sinner. Luther and Calvin
excluded all human works (except the works of Jesus Christ, which form the basis
of justification) from the pardon of justification. So "faith alone" ― sola fide
― is a foundation of Protestantism. According to Martin Luther, justification by
faith alone is the article on which the Church stands or falls. Justification is
entirely the work of God. Now, this doctrine can actually be interpreted in a
way that is close to Catholic doctrine, but as it was understood and promoted in
the sixteenth century, and perceived by the Catholic Church, it was explicitly
condemned by the Council of Trent. Trent insisted that justification is
preserved and increased through good works. Both grace and the effort of man ― his “works”
― were necessary for sanctification, which is not just “attributed.”
We must “work” at our salvation in fear and trembling, as St Paul writes.
In our Gospel today (Luke 13: 22-30) our
Lord directs that we “struggle” to enter through the “narrow door” (agonizesthe
eiselthein dia tees stenees thuras) The Greek word which Matthew uses for
“struggle” or “strive” is agonizesthe, and it is imperative. It is not
just a suggestion, an invitation or a mere indicative. It is imperative for the
disciple and the one who is to enter the kingdom of God that he “struggle” to
enter. The struggle that is involved in agonizesthe is like that of
engaging in an athletic contest. It involves dread. All of one’s powers are at
work in order to succeed. It is to fight, to struggle, to strive. It is like a
tremendous wrestling match or fight, in which one struggles against the
opponent. In the command to enter by the narrow gate (eiselthate dia tees
stenes pulees) as reported by St Matthew (7:12-14) in his Sermon on the
Mount, this word to “struggle” is not used. It is reported by Luke and seems
meant to bring out Christ’s meaning more clearly. The disciple must actively
grapple with all difficulties to the best of his powers so as to enter by the
narrow door. In St Luke’s account of Christ’s greatest struggle, his Passion,
the word appears again, this time as the noun. In the Garden, Christ kneels down
and prays that the cup be removed from him. He was in an agoonia, and
prayed the more earnestly (Luke 22: 42-44). The contest was great and his sweat
appeared as drops of blood that fell to the earth. Christ was in a fight, and he
was striving to prevail ― and an angel of the Lord appeared to him supporting
him in the struggle. He was fighting against his revulsion at all that was soon
to come, grappling to the point of death ― and in the struggle, in the
agoonia, he conquered. The word is not used in Matthew’s account of the
episode in the Garden (26: 38-44), nor is it used in Mark (14: 33-40) whose
account is closer to Matthew’s anyway. Nor is it used by John in his account
(18:1-12). Perhaps Luke, writing for a more overtly Gentile and Greek
readership, used this word to convey the notion of “struggle” more vividly. The
point is that in Christ’s command in our Gospel today, we have much “work” to do
in entering the kingdom of heaven. We must struggle as in a mortal contest,
grappling with opponents that mean to prevail over us. Our model is Christ, who
struggled and prevailed.
When an Anglican, John Henry Newman was challenged by the Evangelical Samuel
Wilberforce (before he became Bishop of Oxford) over his lack of emphasis, in
his sermons, on the all-important work of the Holy Spirit in the Christian life.
Newman replied by saying that the work of the Holy Spirit was absolutely
essential and it was presumed in his sermons. What was commonly lacking, he
replied, was an emphasis on what we must do if the work of the Holy Spirit was
to have its effect. Grace works in and through our own efforts, initiating them,
sustaining them, bringing them to their end. But we must struggle and strive.
Let us do that, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saints Simon and Jude, Apostles
(2009 — Wednesday of the thirtieth week)
(October 28) Saints Simon and Jude, Apostles
Jude is so named by Luke and Acts. Matthew and Mark call him
Thaddeus. He is not mentioned elsewhere in the Gospels, except, of
course,
where all the apostles are mentioned. Some scholars hold that he is not the
author of the Letter of Jude. Actually, Jude had the same name as Judas
Iscariot. Probably because of the disgrace of that name, it was shortened
to "Jude" in English translation. Simon is mentioned on all four lists of the apostles.
On two of them (e.g., Luke's) he is called "the Zealot." The Zealots were a Jewish sect
that represented an extreme of Jewish nationalism. For them, the messianic
promise of the Old Testament meant that the Jews were to be a free and
independent nation. God alone was their king, and any payment of taxes to
the Romans—the very domination of the Romans—was a blasphemy against God. No
doubt some of the Zealots were the spiritual heirs of the Maccabees,
carrying on their ideals of religion and independence. But some were a
little similar to modern terrorists. They raided and killed, attacking both
foreigners and "collaborating" Jews. They were chiefly responsible for the
rebellion against Rome which ended in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D.
70. Our Simon the Apostle became an ardent lover and Apostle of Jesus
Christ, a great saint, as did Jude his companion.
"Just as Christ was sent by the Father, so also he sent the
apostles, filled with the Holy Spirit. This he did so that, by preaching the
gospel to every creature (cf. Mark 16:15), they might proclaim that the Son
of God, by his death and resurrection, had freed us from the power of Satan
(cf. Acts 26:18) and from death, and brought us into the kingdom of his
Father" (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy). (AmericanCatholic)
Scripture today: Ephesians 2:19-22; Psalm
19:2-5; Luke 6:12-16
One of those days Jesus went out to
a mountain to pray, and spent the whole night praying to God. When morning
came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also
designated apostles: Simon (whom he named Peter), his brother Andrew, James,
John, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon who
was called the Zealot, Judas son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a
traitor. (Luke 6: 12-16)
Betrayal
Our Gospel scene today is a momentous one in our Lord’s public
ministry, which is already well in process and many disciples are following
him. The implacable hostility of the scribes and Pharisees has begun and it
will not abate till our Lord is dead on the Cross. Our Lord could see the
final upshot and he now takes a decisive step, the establishment of the
Twelve from among his disciples. They will constitute the foundation of his
Church, and a little later from among these Twelve he would appoint Simon to
be the
Rock on which the enduring structure would stand. The seriousness of
this step is shown in the fact that, as we are told, “Jesus went out to a
mountain to pray, and he spent the whole night in prayer to God.” He, divine
Son of the Father, spent the whole night in prayer before taking this step.
He was contemplating the Church his creation, and praying for its mission in
the long history of the world. He was founding a dynasty, a Kingdom that
would never end. He had before him those whom he was about to appoint as its
foremost officers, its founding generals. He would be with them and with his
Church to the end of the age. Bonaparte attempted to found an empire at the
beginning of the nineteenth century that would outshine all previous
empires. Marching on Europe and overwhelming formidable enemies, he
installed his family members on various European thrones. But as is the case
with earthly kingdoms, it came to its end. In his particular case it was a
rapid and ignoble ruin that left him with nothing. But Christ was
establishing the Messianic Kingdom that would last forever and would triumph
in complete glory. He knew exactly what was best, and he could not make a
mistake. As St John points out, he knew what was in a man. He knew his men,
and he chose them with great care and decision.
Yet — we might wonder — he chose Judas!
I do not refer, of course, to Judas the son of James, whose feast we
celebrate today. I refer to Iscariot. Our Gospel passage tells us that
“when morning came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them,
whom he also designated apostles: Simon (whom he named Peter), his brother
Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon who was called the Zealot, Judas son of James, and Judas
Iscariot, who became a traitor” (Luke 6: 12-16).
Judas turned out so very badly. The inspired authors of the Gospels did not
hesitate to include this seemingly embarrassing fact that one who lived in
such intimacy with Jesus, one who was chosen personally by our Lord himself,
turned his back on his wondrous Master and betrayed him. Did Jesus of
Nazareth make a serious mistake? Surely he could have chosen instead, say,
Matthias, who would, after his ascension into heaven, replace Judas Iscariot as one
of the Twelve. We read that Matthias was among the disciples who had been
with our Lord from the baptism of John right to his ascension (Acts
1:21-22). Perhaps Matthias had been present among the disciples when from
their number our Lord chose Judas. Perhaps Judas had even been near Matthias
at the moment of his being chosen. What an honour had come to Judas! Our
Lord had made no mistake. Judas was the man intended by God from all
eternity to be one of the Twelve. He could have been a great saint, with his
day celebrated in the Church’s Liturgical Year till the end of the world — like his namesake Judas the son of James.
But he opened his heart to Satan, and Satan carried him off. Imagine the
profound concern of Christ as he saw this happening! It is the
mystery of sin and we must all of us take notice. St Paul writes in one of
his Letters that we have been chosen by God from before the foundation of
the world to be in Jesus Christ, holy and full of love in his sight. This is
the deliberate choice by God of each of us. But we can fall away if we do
not guard our hearts from sin. We can deliberately turn from Christ and,
indeed, be damned forever. How is it that God can choose one who, in the
event, himself chooses to reject his call? It is the mystery of God creating
persons with free will and able to sin.
Let us ponder on the tragic significance of the mention of Judas in the
inspired text. He was the traitor. On one occasion two of the Twelve
approached our Lord to ask for places at his right and his left in his
Kingdom. Our Lord countered with a more fundamental question. Could they
drink his cup? We can, they said. Our Lord proceeded to promise that they
would drink his cup. But elsewhere (John 6:70) he describes Judas, whom he
had deliberately chosen to be his special companion and collaborator. He
was, he said, a devil. Let each of us take heed, and every day renew our
stand with Jesus, affirming our choice for him and our renunciation of sin
and Satan.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must inspire others with love of God and zeal for souls, so that they in
turn will set on fire many more who are on a third plane and each of these
latter spread the flame to their professional companions.
What a lot of spiritual calories you need! And what a tremendous
responsibility if you let yourself grow cold! And — I don't even want to
think of it — what a terrible crime if you were to give bad example!
(The Way, no.944)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter
ALL MEN ARE
NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
GRANT me help in my needs, O Lord, for the aid of man is useless. How often
have I failed to find faithfulness in places where I thought I possessed it!
And how many times I have found it where I least expected it! Vain,
therefore, is hope in men, but the salvation of the just is in You, O God.
Blessed be Your name, O Lord my God, in everything that befalls us.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is plain every great change is effected by the few, not by the many; by
the resolute, undaunted, zealous few.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Witnesses of the Resurrection’ (1831)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time
(October 29) St. Narcissus of Jerusalem (d. 215)
Life in second- and third-century Jerusalem couldn’t have been easy, but St.
Narcissus managed to live well beyond 100. Some even speculate he lived to
160. Details of his life are sketchy, but there are many reports of his
miracles. The miracle for which he is most remembered was turning water into
oil for use in the church lamps on Holy Saturday when the deacons had
forgotten to provide any. We do know that Narcissus became bishop of
Jerusalem in the late second century. He was known for his holiness, but
there are hints that many people found him harsh and rigid in his efforts to
impose church discipline. One of his many detractors accused Narcissus of a
serious crime at one point. Though the charges against him did not hold up,
he used the occasion to retire from his role as bishop and live in solitude.
His disappearance was so sudden and convincing that many people assumed he
had actually died. Several successors were appointed during his years in
isolation. Finally, Narcissus reappeared in Jerusalem and was persuaded to
resume his duties. By then, he had reached an advanced age, so a younger
bishop was brought in to assist him until his death. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 8:31b-39; Psalm
109:21-22, 26-27, 30-31; Luke 13:31-35
At that
time some Pharisees came to
Jesus and said to him, Leave this place and go somewhere else. Herod wants
to kill you. He replied,
Go tell that fox, 'I will drive out demons and heal
people today and tomorrow, and on the third day I will attain my end.' But
for today and tomorrow and the next day I must keep going — for surely no
prophet can die outside Jerusalem! O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the
prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your
children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were
not willing! So be it! Your house will be left to you. I tell you, you will
not see me again until you say, 'Blessed is he who comes in the name of the
Lord.' (Luke 13:31-35)
Success
Peter
the Great demonstrated a far-sighted vision for Russia and many have
maintained that it was he who set the nation on the road to being a modern
state. Many other examples could be given of persons who, having attained
great prominence in society and with the forces of society now at their
command, displayed great insight and ability. In such cases, though, their
civil powers and their achievements — for good or for ill — depended on
their securing and retaining positions of influence and even dominance.
Peter the Great
was impressive precisely as one who was in full mastery and
seen to be so. So too with Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar long before
him — without their military and political power to impose themselves, what
would they have been or done? Their success was visible and enforceable.
Thus, we may say, it has always been. Success is deemed to be visible success and failure
is visible failure. In modern societies the influence of the media is
proverbial. When Pope Paul VI visited Sydney at the end of 1970, among the
groups he addressed were the journalists. He told them they were world power
number one. Now, in the media’s presentation of the world, politics and
economics, there is nothing like success to be successful, and there is
nothing like failure to be a failure. However, all this can be a house of
cards, for all the props of success in these terms can suddenly crumble, and
this we often see. A question we should ask is, Is there a success which is
not dependent on social approval, adulation or coercion? Indeed, is there a
success which comes forth from evident failure? In a word, is there a
success which is open to anyone, in any and every circumstance? Can a person
be successful in the midst of a very ordinary life, or a life of manifest
failures, or even opprobrium? To answer such a question we may think the
matter through in a philosophical fashion, or look to examples. Both are
important, but examples convince and inspire the imagination to action.
In our Gospel passage today (Luke 13:31-35),
the Pharisees come to Jesus and urge him to flee because Herod was after
him. Perhaps the Pharisees had been told this by the Herodians, and we have
instances in the Gospels of the Pharisees and the Herodians colluding in
their opposition to Jesus — though there were Pharisees who were secret
believers, such as Nicodemus. Perhaps the Pharisees of our Gospel passage
today were testing the courage of Jesus, or hoping to see him on the run.
Christ knows that the forces against him were growing and closing in on him.
As he would say to the Twelve at the Last Supper, the Prince of this world
was on his way. Our Lord’s seeming success was draining away, and the
spectre of failure in visible terms was looming large. Let us notice,
though, there is no panic in Christ, no confusion, no radical change of
course in order to retrieve a crumbling dream. On the contrary, the vision
splendid grows as the apparent failure grows. Success looms in proportion to
the looming failure. He can see, he knows, and he teaches, that it is
“failure” that will give him the victory. His rejection by those who matter
is the way his mission will attain its end. It is precisely the Cross which
will take him and all others to Glory. No matter what the circumstances
might be, Christ possessed the key to success. It had nothing to do with
visible success, approval, adulation or the possession of the means of
influence and command. This is a resounding message to the ordinary man of
history, the man of numerous failures and disappointments, the man who has
nothing of the means of success as ordinarily regarded. Herod was after him,
but Christ knew that this mattered little. What mattered was doing the will
of his heavenly Father and completing the work he — he, not others — gave
him to do. “Go tell that fox, 'I will drive out demons and heal people today
and tomorrow, and on the third day I will attain my end.'” His end — his
success — is attained by doing the will of his Father.
Let us not be distracted in ways we may not fully realize by the standards
of the world. Let us not allow to lurk deep within our imaginations an image
of success in life that is worldly, dependent on what is seen and approved
by others. Let us look to Christ and his pre-eminent example. The only
success that matters here and hereafter is that which is accounted such by
God, who sees all. Success is the success which Christ sought and most
assuredly attained, and he did this in the midst of seeming failure. Indeed,
his “failure” was an integral element in his success. He had to undergo the
Cross in order to enter his Glory — and to bring all others into Glory with
him. Let us, then, for love of him take up our cross every day and follow
closely in his footsteps.
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It shows a bad disposition if you listen to God's word with a critical
spirit.
(The Way, no.945)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter
ALL MEN
ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
We are weak and unstable, quickly deceived and changed. Who is the man that
is able to guard himself with such caution and care as not sometimes to fall
into deception or perplexity? He who confides in You, O Lord, and seeks You
with a simple heart does not fall so easily. And if some trouble should come
upon him, no matter how entangled in it he may be, he will be more quickly
delivered and comforted by You. For You will not forsake him who trusts in
You to the very end.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ignorance is the root of all littleness; he who can realise the law of moral
conflicts, and the incoherence of falsehood, and the issue of perplexities,
and the end of all things, and the Presence of the Judge, becomes, from the
very necessity of the case, philosophical, long-suffering, and magnanimous.
JHN, from Lectures on the Present Position of Catholics in England
(1851)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time
(October 30) St. Alphonsus Rodriguez (c. 1533-1617)
Tragedy and challenge beset today’s saint early in life, but Alphonsus
Rodriguez found happiness and contentment through simple service and prayer.
Born in Spain in 1533, Alphonsus inherited the family textile business at
23. Within the space of three years, his wife, daughter and mother died;
meanwhile, business was poor. Alphonsus stepped back and reassessed his
life. He sold the business and, with his young son, moved into his sisters’
home. There he learned the discipline of prayer and meditation. Years later,
at the death of his son, Alphonsus, almost 40 by then, sought to join the
Jesuits. He was not helped by his poor education. He applied twice before
being admitted. For 45 years he served as doorkeeper at the Jesuits’ college
in Majorca. When not at his post, he was almost always at prayer, though he
often encountered difficulties and temptations. His holiness and
prayerfulness attracted many to him, including St. Peter Claver, then a
Jesuit seminarian. Alphonsus’s life as doorkeeper may have been humdrum, but
he caught the attention of poet and fellow-Jesuit Gerard Manley Hopkins, who
made him the subject of one of his poems. Alphonsus died in 1617. He is the
patron saint of Majorca. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 9:1-5;
Psalm 147:12-15, 19-20; Luke 14:1-6
One Sabbath, when Jesus went to eat
in the house of a prominent Pharisee, he was being carefully watched. There
in front of him was a man suffering from dropsy. Jesus asked the Pharisees
and experts in the law, Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath or not? But they
remained silent. So he took the man, healed him and sent him away. Then he
asked them, If one of you has a son or an ox that falls into a well on the
Sabbath day, will you not immediately pull him out? To this they could find
no answer. (Luke 14: 1-6)
Brother to all
There are a few details in our Gospel passage today
(Luke 14: 1-6) which help us appreciate
the manner, the style and the very person of our Lord. It is a Sabbath day,
and the Synagogue service is over. We may presume it is our Lord who was the
reader and speaker at the Synagogue. A classic description of our Lord
teaching in a synagogue is given earlier in this very Gospel by St Luke. At
the start of his public ministry and following his baptism and his rejection
of the temptations of Satan, Jesus returns to Galilee and in due
course to
his home town of Nazareth (Luke 4: 16). We are told that “he went into the
Synagogue on the Sabbath day and stood up to read.” The book of the prophet
Isaiah was handed to him, and “when he had opened the book, he found the
place” he was looking for, and read it to the people assembled. Then, we are
told, “he closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant, and sat down.”
Then he began to speak on his theme, and the people were riveted by his
discourse. That description we could take as applying to the numerous times
he spoke in the various Synagogues, including on the Sabbath of our Gospel
passage today. The service being over, the people went their ways back to
their homes or to activities of Sabbath rest. For instance, we read that on
one Sabbath our Lord was walking with his disciples through the cornfields,
and they began to pick ears of corn. Presumably this happened following the
Sabbath service. That is to say, our Lord was observing the Sabbath rest
with a stroll through the fields with his disciples. Again, on a separate
occasion (Mark 1:29) following his address and exorcism in the Synagogue at
Capernaum, he and his closest disciples immediately went to the home of
Simon and Andrew. There he cured Simon’s mother-in-law of her fever, and she
rose up and served them. So it was in Simon’s house that they rested. On the
Sabbath of our Gospel passage today, our Lord is invited to the home of a
leading Pharisee. The Pharisee, hospitable to his honoured guest, watched
him closely.
At times we can form the impression that there was something of a war
between Jesus and all the Pharisees. Not so, it seems. John tells us in his
Gospel (3:1) that Nicodemus was a Pharisee, a leading Jew. He was a disciple
and came to Jesus by night for instruction — secretly, for fear of his
colleagues. Joseph of Arimathea was, it seems, a member of the Sanhedrin and
yet a secret disciple of Jesus. It looks as if the Pharisees formed the
strongest knot of opposition to Jesus but this does not mean that all were
opposed to him, nor that they were opposed to him to an equal degree. We
read in John 12: 42 that “there were many of the rulers who believed in him,
but because of the Pharisees did not acknowledge this.” In any case, we read
of our Lord dining in the homes of Pharisees on different occasions.
Whatever about their attitude to our Lord, it was plain to them that he
himself was entirely open to their advances. He responded to their
invitations and they felt able easily to approach him, if often only to
attack him. All of this tells us of the heart of Jesus himself and of the
style of his ministry. He was open to all. He sought all. He wished to save
all, including those who were making his ministry more and more difficult.
He loved all with a divine love, a love that opposed sin nevertheless, and
exposed it in order to bring forth repentance. He sought out all, from the
smallest to the most important. On one occasion word came from a centurion,
asking that he come to heal his servant. Our Lord rose and made his way
towards the centurion’s dwelling. Our Lord invited himself to dine in the
home of a leading tax collector, Zacchaeus. On the request of the ruler of a
Synagogue, Jairus, he went to heal his daughter. We remember the simple
courtesy with which he addressed Pilate during his Passion. The point is
that our Lord came to serve those who held prominent positions and those
that did not — to bring life, life in abundance to all. Today his contact is
with the leading Pharisee, another day it is with a poor unknown woman who
is healed by her grasping at his garment. Jesus Christ is brother to all.
This is what God is like. He is not a God who is remote and withdrawn. He is
not a God who threatens the helpless. He is a God who loves and is entirely
accessible. If we place the image of the divine as it is in the Christian
religion next to that of Islam, Hinduism, and so many of the religions of
traditional indigenous societies, what stands out is the extraordinary
accessibility of God. God in Christian revelation loves man. He inclines
towards him and seeks him out. He is like a good shepherd. He is our Father.
We can turn to him and depend on his love. Let us see our Lord’s dining with
the leading Pharisee in our Gospel today as all of a piece with this
wondrous revelation.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want to give yourself to God in the world, rather than being
scholarly (women needn't be scholars: it's enough for them to be prudent)
you must be spiritual, closely united to our Lord by prayer: you must wear
an invisible cloak that will cover each and every one of your senses and
faculties: praying, praying, praying; atoning, atoning, atoning.
(The Way, no.946)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN
SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
Rare is the friend who remains faithful through all his friend's distress.
But You, Lord, and You alone, are entirely faithful in all things; other
than You, there is none so faithful.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the narrow-minded and the bigoted the history of the Church for eighteen
centuries is unintelligible and useless; but where there is Faith, it is
full of sacred principles, ever the same in substance, ever varying in
accidentals, and is a continual lesson of “the manifold Wisdom of God.”
JHN, from the University sermon ‘Wisdom, as Contrasted with Faith and with
Bigotry’ (1841)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time
(October 31) St. Wolfgang of Regensburg (c.
924-994)
Wolfgang was born in Swabia, Germany, and was educated at a school located
at the abbey of Reichenau. There he encountered Henry, a young noble who
went on to become Archbishop of Trier. Meanwhile, Wolfgang remained in close
contact with the archbishop, teaching in his cathedral school and supporting
his efforts to reform the clergy. At the death of the archbishop, Wolfgang
chose to become a Benedictine monk and moved to an abbey in Einsiedeln, now
part of Switzerland. Ordained a priest, he was appointed director of the
monastery school there. Later he was sent to Hungary as a missionary, though
his zeal and good will yielded limited results. Emperor Otto II appointed
him Bishop of Regensburg (near Munich). He immediately initiated reform of
the clergy and of religious life, preaching with vigor and effectiveness and
always demonstrating special concern for the poor. He wore the habit of a
monk and lived an austere life.
The draw to monastic life never left him, including the desire for a life of
solitude. At one point he left his diocese so that he could devote himself
to prayer, but his responsibilities as bishop called him back. In 994 he
became ill while on a journey; he died in Puppingen near Linz, Austria. His
feast day is celebrated widely in much of central Europe. He was canonized
in 1052. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 11:1-2a, 11-12,
25-29; Psalm 94:12-15, 17-18; Luke 14:1.7-11
One Sabbath, when Jesus went to eat in the house of a prominent Pharisee, he
was being carefully watched. When he noticed how the
guests picked the
places of honour at the table, he told them this parable: When someone
invites you to a wedding feast, do not take the place of honour, for a
person more distinguished than you may have been invited. If so, the host
who invited both of you will come and say to you, 'Give this man your seat.'
Then, humiliated, you will have to take the least important place. But when
you are invited, take the lowest place, so that when your host comes, he
will say to you, 'Friend, move up to a better place.' Then you will be
honoured in the presence of all your fellow guests. For everyone who exalts
himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.
(Luke 14: 1, 7-11)
Being humble
In a certain sense, it is not difficult being religious. By that I
mean that there is an instinctive tendency in the heart of man to seek the
divine — often referred to as the numen by anthropologists and sociologists
— and to strive to be pleasing to him. His displeasure is feared, and his
favour is sought by observance of the rites and by behaviour that is
understood to be required by him. So widespread is the evidence of this in
human societies that many have chosen to regard man as a religious animal.
The hypothesis of evolution would
presumably regard religious practice as a
distinctive marker of the appearance of man in the process. Once human
societies appear in archaeological, literary or other indicators, so do
religious rites. The people’s myths are populated by their deities. In this
sense, the revealed religion of Abraham, Moses and the prophets was, in the
best sense of the word, profoundly natural, while in its doctrine and
central rites being divinely revealed. It fulfilled man’s natural tendencies
and yearnings while actually excelling them. There is this to be noticed,
though. While religion tends to pervade man’s culture and society because it
is so natural to him (excepting modern secular cultures), at the same time
there tends to be a divorce between religious practice and man’s best moral
instincts. In practising his religion man tends to remain proud, selfish,
lazy. Indeed, his religion can very easily become a channel for these
immoral tendencies to gain expression. In indigenous societies religious
leaders and certain groups can impose their power through the religion, as
can be the tendency in any society. That is to say, the core of man’s heart
— his will — can become and remain irreligious in the midst of all his
religious practice. Secretly he can be worshipping himself while sacrificing
to the gods. This brings us to our Gospel passage today, which places us
once again in the scene of the chasm between our Lord and many religious
professionals of the chosen people of God. They professed to practice
revealed religion, but their hearts were far from being pleasing to God.
Our Lord has been invited to the house of a leading Pharisee. Others of his
party and experts in the law have also been invited, and they are observing
our Lord narrowly. It is the Sabbath day, and before their eyes he has
healed someone of their affliction — thus calmly flouting yet another of
their fussy and burdensome impositions. As was often the case, they had been
unable to answer his logic. But our Lord then proceeds to expose the moral
decay he sees active in them even during the meal. Their religion is largely
a means of self-aggrandisement. They wish for the honourable places in the
estimation of men. They are not aware of the cancer that is at work in every
heart, the cancer of pride and vanity, a spiritual disease that must be
identified and attacked. Our Lord, seeing everything and being far more
astute than any of those who were crouching to pounce, observed the other
guests picking the places of honour at table. Silently, deftly, subtly, each
was trying to manoeuvre himself into a position of special respectability.
Our Lord had the attention of all, for all were watching him. Do not be
vain, he told them. The atmosphere here is one of self-seeking, the seeking
of human honours and not the seeking of what was pleasing to God. Perhaps
our Lord noticed that this had caused a complication for those managing the
dinner. This or that guest had to be asked to move to another position at
the table. Rather, our Lord said, abase yourselves before God and be content
with whatever place turns out to be yours. Look at what happens even from a
human point of view. “When someone invites you to a wedding feast, do not
take the place of honour, for a person more distinguished than you may have
been invited. If so, the host who invited both of you will come and say to
you, 'Give this man your seat.' Then, humiliated, you will have to take the
least important place. But when you are invited, take the lowest place, so
that when your host comes, he will say to you, 'Friend, move up to a better
place.' Then you will be honoured in the presence of all your fellow guests”
(Luke 14: 1, 7-11).
Our Lord is saying that religion must be a religion of the heart. The
worship of God and the exalting of his person must not be merely a matter of
external appearances and objective ritual. It must mark the action of the
secret heart of man. In his heart man must seek the lower place before God
and others, and in this way serve to glorify and honour God. Seek the lower
place, and God will in due course exalt you — when, how and in what sense,
we must leave to him. Our example in this, as in everything, is Jesus Christ
himself. He humbled himself and was exalted above every other name. Let us
then follow in his footsteps of humility of heart and life!
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You were amazed to hear me approve of the lack of 'uniformity' in that
apostolate in which you work. And I told you:
Unity and variety. You have to be different from one another, as the saints
in heaven are different, each having his own personal and special
characteristics. But also as alike one another as the saints, who would not
be saints if each of them had not identified himself with Christ.
(The Way, no.947)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter ALL
MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
Oh, how wise is that holy soul who said: "My mind is firmly settled and
founded in Christ." If that were true of me, human fear would not so easily
cause me anxiety, nor would the darts of words disturb. But who can foresee
all things and provide against all evils? And if things foreseen have often
hurt, can those which are unlooked for do otherwise than wound us gravely?
Why, indeed, have I not provided better for my wretched self? Why, too, have
I so easily kept faith in others? We are but men, however, nothing more than
weak men, although we are thought by many to be, and are called, angels.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is easy, indeed, for the ruling powers to make a decree, and set religion
on high, and extend its range, and herald its name; but they cannot plant
it, they can but impose it. The Church alone can plant the Church. The
Church alone can found her sees, and inclose herself within walls. None but
saintly men, mortified men, preachers of righteousness, and confessors for
the truth, can create a home for the truth in any land.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Gospel Palaces’ (1836)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------