October 2009

   Click on any date to go to the Thought for that Day

Liturgical Season Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
26th Week in Ordinary Time B/I         1 2 or
Guardian Angels
3
27th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
28th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
29th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 18 orSt Luke or
World Mission Sunday
19 20 21 22 23 24
30th Week in Ordinary Time B/1 25 26 27 28 or
Simon and Jude
29 30 31

 

 

 Morning Offering:  O Jesus, through the most pure heart of Mary, I offer you all the prayers, works, joys and sufferings of this day for all the intentions of your divine heart, in union with the holy sacrifice of the Mass. I offer them especially for the Holy Father's intentions:
 
Pope Benedict's general prayer intention for October is: "That Sunday may be lived as the day on which Christians gather to celebrate the risen Lord, participating in the Eucharist".

His mission intention is: "That the entire People of God, to whom Christ entrusted the mandate to go and preach the Gospel to every creature, may eagerly assume their own missionary responsibility and consider it the highest service they can offer humanity".
 
If you wish to read the daily thoughts of the past months, click here
Twitter for updates
Home Page      
 
 

Thursday of the twenty sixth week in Ordinary Time

(October 1) Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, Carmelite nun and doctor of the Church (1873-1897)
"I prefer the monotony of obscure sacrifice to all ecstasies. To pick up a pin for love can convert a soul." These are the words of Theresa of the Child Jesus, a Carmelite nun called the "Little Flower," who lived a cloistered life of obscurity in the convent of Lisieux, France. [In French-speaking areas, she is known as Thérèse of Lisieux.] And her preference for hidden sacrifice did indeed convert souls. Few saints of God are more popular than this young nun. Her autobiography, The Story of a Soul, is read and loved throughout the world. Thérèse Martin entered the convent at the age of 15 and died in 1897 at the age of 24. Life in a Carmelite convent is indeed uneventful and consists mainly of prayer and hard domestic work. But Thérèse possessed that holy insight that redeems the time, however dull that time may be. She saw in quiet suffering redemptive suffering, suffering that was indeed her apostolate. Thérèse said she came to the Carmel convent "to save souls and pray for priests." And shortly before she died, she wrote: "I want to spend my heaven doing good on earth." On October 19, 1997, Pope John Paul II proclaimed her a Doctor of the Church, the third woman to be so recognized in light of her holiness and the influence of her teaching on spirituality in the Church. All her life St. Thérèse suffered from illness. As a young girl she underwent a three-month malady characterized by violent crises, extended delirium and prolonged fainting spells. Afterwards she was ever frail and yet she worked hard in the laundry and refectory of the convent. Psychologically, she endured prolonged periods of darkness when the light of faith seemed all but extinguished. The last year of her life she slowly wasted away from tuberculosis. And yet shortly before her death on September 30 she murmured, "I would not suffer less." 
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:   Nehemiah 8:1-4a, 5-6, 7b-12;    Psalm 19:8-11;    Luke 10:1-12  

After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them two by two ahead of him to every town and place where he was about to
go. He told them, The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field. Go! I am sending you out like lambs among wolves. Do not take a purse or bag or sandals; and do not greet anyone on the road. When you enter a house, first say, 'Peace to this house.' If a man of peace is there, your peace will rest on him; if not, it will return to you. Stay in that house, eating and drinking whatever they give you, for the worker deserves his wages. Do not move around from house to house. When you enter a town and are welcomed, eat what is set before you. Heal the sick who are there and tell them, 'The kingdom of God is near you.' But when you enter a town and are not welcomed, go into its streets and say, 'Even the dust of your town that sticks to our feet we wipe off against you. Yet be sure of this: The kingdom of God is near.' I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for that town. (Luke 10: 1-12)

Drama of dramas      Literature is able to capture human drama, and this drama has varied with the times. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar has a scene in which Caesar is solemnly warned to beware the Ides of March. So much hung in the balance for the Republic, for the liberty of the Senate and for the future of Rome. The day came, and in a meeting of the Senate, Caesar fell. All kinds of drama have featured in human history — I speak now not of drama as a genre of literature, but of that drama that is the stage of human history. We may think of the rise of Cromwell and the execution of King Charles. We may think of the attack on Vienna by the Islamic forces in July 1682, and of how so much hung in the balance, resolved in the great defeat of the Islamic armies by Sobieski. We may think of the drama of anti-Christian rationalism in eighteenth century France and its eruption in the French Revolution. Amid the Terror and the cutting down of the Church, the goddess Reason, represented by an actress, was worshipped in Paris’s Cathedral and the Convention decreed the religion of Reason as the religion of France. We may think of the drama of the Russian Revolution more than a century later and the triumph of atheistic communism. There have been so many dramatic moments with awesome consequences. But there is a greater drama still. The stream of human history proceeds like, we might say, a mighty Amazon. Onward it flows, but it is not just a vast, moving mass. Every little thing within it is engaged in its own great drama. Every life has a unique significance. Man is not just a number, not just an unimportant part of a mass. He is an individual involved in a contest with eternal consequences. What is the drama of dramas — the conflict that is, as we might say, the mother of all conflicts? It is the acceptance or otherwise of God and his will. Amid the astonishing variety characterising human life, this is one thing all mankind has in common. Hanging in the balance of every human life is the acceptance of God and his holy will. This is the drama of dramas.

In our Gospel passage today our Lord sends his disciples out two by two — there were seventy-two of them — to go ahead of him. We sense the urgency of the task. “Go! I am sending you out like lambs among wolves. Do not take a purse or bag or sandals; and do not greet anyone on the road.” All that matters is that people hear and accept in faith and repentance the news of the Kingdom, the Kingdom of God that has come in the person of Jesus. For Christ’s disciples, the drama includes their proclamation of this event. For those to whom Christ’s disciples are sent, the drama involves their acceptance or otherwise of it. Will Jesus Christ be recognized for who he really is, the Saviour of the world, the Son of God become truly man, man’s brother and his Lord and God? There is no drama in human history that compares with this, for eternity is at stake. Consider what our Lord says of the rejection of this message. “When you enter a town and are welcomed, eat what is set before you. Heal the sick who are there and tell them, 'The kingdom of God is near you.' But when you enter a town and are not welcomed, go into its streets and say, 'Even the dust of your town that sticks to our feet we wipe off against you. Yet be sure of this: The kingdom of God is near.' I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for that town” (Luke 10: 1-12). The disciple of Christ, the member of Christ’s Church, and the entire Church herself, have a solemn responsibility to bear witness in life and word to the person and message of Jesus Christ. If this responsibility is not fulfilled in everyday life, then the drama has had a tragic issue. For its part, the world has a solemn responsibility to hear this word, to receive it and to put it into practice. If this responsibility to hear and accept the word of Christ is not fulfilled, then again, the drama has had a tragic issue. The words of our Lord ought ring in our ears. We must not take them lightly. “Be sure of this: The kingdom of God is near. I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for that town.”

There are basic and simple facts that every person must keep constantly before him. There is a God. We depend on him constantly. He has become one of us to save us from our sins and to bring us to eternal glory. We must hear his word, and his word comes to us in various ways but supremely in his Son Jesus Christ, conveyed and proclaimed by his Church. Let us understand the drama of dramas in our life, which is to hear the word of God and to put it into practice.
                                                                                    (E.J.Tyler)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'Did our hearts not burn within us as he talked to us on the road?'

If you are an apostle, these words of the disciples of Emmaus should rise spontaneously to the lips of your professional companions when they meet you along the ways of their lives.
                                                                        (The Way, no.917)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Thirty-Eighth Chapter  
THE RIGHT ORDERING OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS; RECOURSE TO GOD IN DANGERS

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

If, likewise, in every happening you are not content simply with outward appearances, if you do not regard with carnal eyes things which you see and hear, but whatever be the affair, enter with Moses into the tabernacle to ask advice of the Lord, you will sometimes hear the divine answer and return instructed in many things present and to come. For Moses always had recourse to the tabernacle for the solution of doubts and questions, and fled to prayer for support in dangers and the evil deeds of men. So you also should take refuge in the secret chamber of your heart, begging earnestly for divine aid.
                                                                  (Continuing)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Supposing there be otherwise good reason for saying that the Papal Supremacy is part of Christianity, there is nothing in the early history of the Church to contradict it.

          JHN, from An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (1845)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Friday of the twenty-sixth week in Ordinary Time B-2

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:    Job 38: 1.12-21;40:3-5;    Psalm 138;    Luke 10:13-16

Jesus said to them, “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty deeds done in your midst had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would long ago have repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment than for you. And as for you, Capernaum, ‘Will you be exalted to heaven? You will go down to hell.’ Whoever listens to you listens to me. Whoever rejects you rejects me. And whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me.” (Luke 10:13-16)

Religious truth     One of the signs of the seriousness with which religion has traditionally been viewed in human societies is the persecution which has visited those who are not, in the view of the prevailing authority, orthodox. When Christianity first came to the notice of the Roman Empire as a following, there was something about it that those who represented the Empire did not like. It was not just one more of the many religions of the peoples which the Imperial administration tolerated for the sake of civil order and as a means
of social and political unity. Christianity began to appear subversive ― not in terms of ordinary crime, but in terms of its threat to the religious principles on which the Empire rested. The Empire would allow other religions provided, of course, it did not pretend to challenge piety to the gods on which the Empire depended. But this is what the Christian sect presumed to do. It held that their Jesus was Lord ― meaning, Lord of all. All other religions were as nothing, indeed worse than nothing if they were a barrier to the recognition of the full authority of Jesus Christ. All depended on him. This was intolerable, and the Empire came down on it accordingly. The point, though, is that at least this showed that, for Roman civilization, what you believed in religion was important. What you thought of the gods mattered. Of course, the paganism of Roman civilization passed away and was replaced by the victorious Christian religion, but still, the instinctive sense continued on that what you believed in religion mattered enormously. The Catholic religion formed, and in a sense, even created European civilization ― and its religion mattered. When the cataclysm of the Protestant Reformation occurred, religion was seen to matter on all sides. What you thought in respect to religion mattered, and your life was at risk if what you thought was at odds with the prevailing orthodoxy. This is not to comment on the question of truth in religion ― it is only to point out that generally in human culture and society religion matters. It is very important that you see as being true what is true. If you do not, it is a morally serious matter. This is the human instinct, without going into the determination of what is actually true. Traditionally, there is no relativism there.

In this sense, Christ’s insistence on the great seriousness of faith is all of a piece with the natural instinct of man. It is most serious, in Christ’s teaching, if you do not change and accept him for who he is. The truth about him just must be accepted ― though of course you are free to refuse. But if you refuse then it has enormous moral implications. So we read in today’s Gospel passage: “Jesus said to them, “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty deeds done in your midst had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would long ago have repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment than for you. And as for you, Capernaum, ‘Will you be exalted to heaven? You will go down to hell’” (Luke 10:13-16). That was said during his public ministry. Risen from the dead, and soon to ascend into heaven, his parting words are similar ― as reported in the Gospel of St Mark. Appearing to his disciples on the evening of the day he rose from the dead, he upbraided them for their lack of faith in the testimony of those who had seen him that day. So serious is what you believe! He then commands them to go to the whole world to preach the good news to every creature. “He who believes and is baptized will be saved. But he who does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:16). This is no morally neutral matter. Now, this is especially important for our day, in the era of human rights when we all appreciate the right to religious freedom and conscientious belief. It is a great gain that we now understand that no religious belief can be imposed on another ― and gradually the world is coming to see this due to pressure from Western culture, supported by Christian teaching on the dignity of the human being. But a new danger is well in place, that of thinking that right and true religious belief, like truth itself, just does not matter. All that matters is that you be subjectively “sincere” ― or rather, that you think you are sincere. This philosophical assumption can undermine the teaching of Jesus Christ that he who is the Truth saves. I am the Way, the Truth and the Life, he taught. It is the acceptance of this, and living life according to it, which takes us to God and heaven. Let us be alert to a serious enemy: the notion that there is no objective Truth. All there is, is subjective opinion.

Jesus Christ was not just a very nice man. He was not just a very understanding person who forgave everyone, whatever bad things they might have done. There is no prophet in the history of Israel who spoke with such strident clarity about the fact, the evil and the reality of sin and its terrible consequences in eternity. High among the sins vigorously condemned by Christ ― and our Gospel passage today is but one instance ― is the deliberate refusal to accept him as Lord, and his teachings as true. What you believe matters. It is imperative that you take pains to ensure you believe what is the truth. Let us never settle for being merely “a sincere person.” We must be persons in possession of the Truth.

                                                                                   (E.J.Tyler)


 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

The Guardian Angels

(October 2) The Guardian Angels
Perhaps no aspect of Catholic piety is as comforting to parents as the belief that an angel protects their little ones from dangers real and imagined. Yet guardian angels are not just for children. Their role is to represent individuals before God, to watch over them always, to aid their prayer and to present their souls to God at death. The concept of an angel assigned to guide and nurture each human being is a development of Catholic doctrine and piety based on Scripture Matthew 18:10 indicates this teaching: "See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that their angels in heaven always look upon the face of my heavenly Father." Devotion to the angels began to develop with the birth of the monastic tradition. St. Benedict (July 11) gave it impetus and Bernard of Clairvaux (August 20), the great 12th-century reformer, was such an eloquent spokesman for the guardian angels that angelic devotion assumed its current form in his day. A feast in honour of the guardian angels was first observed in the 16th century. In 1615, Pope Paul V added it to the Roman calendar.
"May the angels lead you into paradise; may the martyrs come to welcome you and take you to the holy city, the new and eternal Jerusalem." (Rite for Christian Burial)
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today: Baruch 1:15-22; Psalm 79:1b-5, 8, 9; Matthew 18:1-5, 10 

At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? He called a little child and had him stand among them. And he said: I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever welcomes a little child like this in my name welcomes me. See that you do not look down on one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven. (Matthew 18: 1-5, 10)

Guardian Angel    There are many ways of looking at and interpreting human history. For instance, one obvious theme taken up by some thinkers is that of conflict. It is common experience that conflict characterises much of human life — be it the life of families, the life of communities, the life of nations, the life of the world. The German philosopher Hegel proposed conflict as the key to human history. He saw in history the recurring pattern of the existing situation or idea being challenged by its opposite, and the conflict resolving in a new situation or idea which then calls forth its opposite. Thus the pattern of conflict recurs. Karl Marx took up the idea and in his work, Das Kapital (1848) applied it to history in his own way, seeing economic forces as fundamental. The ultimate resolution of the recurring conflict among classes of society was to be a classless society of the proletariat. The trouble with any idea that places some law or pattern at the heart of history is that the role of free persons can be lost sight of. Be that as it may, another way of looking at history is to consider it as the rise and fall of kingdoms and regimes. Indeed, this perspective appears prominently in Sacred Scripture. Consider the Book of Daniel in the Old Testament, and in particular his visions of the four kingdoms (chapter 7). One kingdom rises, then it falls under pressure of another kingdom. History culminates in the coming on the clouds of heaven One like a son of man. To him is given the everlasting kingdom. Consider the vision of the Ram and the He-Goat of chapter 8. It is a vision of human history and the rise and fall of kingdoms is central to the vision. Well then, as we think of many of the kings and the kingdoms of recorded history — say, Alexander the Great and his successors, Julius Caesar and Octavian and their successors, right through to say, Bonaparte, and the dictators of the twentieth century — what is it that marks the rule of so many (though not all, of course)? It is pride, self-exaltation and a large dose of cruelty. The desire to be great has driven much of history.

The Christian revelation has declared that the final and ultimate Kingdom has already arrived. It is now with us, though not apparent in its glory. The one whom Daniel predicted has come. To him has been given the kingdom that shall never end, and that kingdom is present in the Church which he founded. He, the king, is Jesus Christ, present in his body the Church, and is constantly accessible in and through his Church. But while the kingdoms and regimes of the world which rise and fall and come and go are driven by the desire to be great, the eternal King is marked by the opposite. Those in his kingdom are called to be humble. Let us listen once again to our Lord’s words: “At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? He called a little child and had him stand among them. And he said: I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18: 1-5, 10). The quest of life, then, for someone who a citizen of the eternal kingdom and who follows the eternal King is not power, self-exaltation and any domination over others, but Christ-like service and humility. His goal is to be like his King who came not to be served like the other kings of the earth but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for the many. Today, the memorial of the guardian angels, we are reminded that we have heavenly friends to help us to be like our King and to promote his Kingdom. The Church teaches that God has assigned his angels to aid us in following Christ who is our King. We have an angel of heaven to guide and to guard us along our way of service and humility, building up the Kingdom of Christ and assisting in its triumph of love. Our Lord refers to our guardian angels in our Gospel text today: “See that you do not look down on one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.” May I suggest that every day we pray to our guardian angel, asking for his aid in the great work of following the King of kings and Lord of lords.

Angel of God, my guardian dear! To whom God’s love commits me here! Ever this day be at my side, to light and to guard, to rule and to guide. Amen. Why not give to your guardian angel a name so that you readily address him in prayer. We read in the Gospel that at the end of our Lord’s encounter with Satan in the wilderness on the threshold of his public ministry, the angels came and ministered to him. We also read that during his agony in the Garden at the threshold of his Passion, an angel came to our Lord to comfort and support him. We have, each of us, an angel to guard and help us. Let us make of him our friend and use him to help us on the way of the King.
                                                                                     (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go to apostolate to give everything, and not to seek any earthly reward.
                                                                                           (The Way, no.918)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Thirty-Eighth Chapter   
THE RIGHT ORDERING OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS; RECOURSE TO GOD IN DANGERS

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

For this reason, as we read, Joshua and the children of Israel were deceived by the Gibeonites because they did not first seek counsel of the Lord, but trusted too much in fair words and hence were deceived by false piety.
                                                                        (Concluded)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each part of the Catholic Church has excellences of its own which other parts have not, and is as distinct from the rest in genius and in temper as it is in place.

                 JHN, from the sermon ‘The Tree beside the Waters’ (1859)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Saturday of the twenty sixth week in Ordinary Time

(October 3) St. Mother Theodore Guérin (1798-1856)
     Trust in God’s Providence enabled Mother Theodore to leave her homeland, sail halfway around the world and to found a new religious congregation. Born in Etables, France, Anne-Thérèse’s life was shattered by her father’s murder when she was 15. For several years she cared for her mother and younger sister. She entered the Sisters of Providence in 1823, taking the name Sister St. Theodore. An illness during novitiate left her with lifelong fragile health; that did not keep her from becoming an accomplished teacher. At the invitation of the bishop of Vincennes, she and five sisters were sent in 1840 to Saint Mary-of-the-Woods, Indiana, to teach and to care for the sick poor. She was to establish a motherhouse and novitiate. Only later did she learn that her French superiors had already decided the sisters in the United States should form a new religious congregation under her leadership. She and her community persevered despite fires, crop failures, prejudice against Catholic women religious, misunderstandings and separation from their original religious congregation. She once told her sisters, “Have confidence in the Providence that so far has never failed us. The way is not yet clear. Grope along slowly. Do not press matters; be patient, be trustful.” Another time, she asked, “With Jesus, what shall we have to fear?” She is buried in the Church of the Immaculate Conception in Saint Mary-of-the-Woods, Indiana, and was beatified in 1998. Eight years later she was canonized.
    During his homily at the beatification Mass, Pope John Paul II said that Blessed Mother Theodore “continues to teach Christians to abandon themselves to the providence of our heavenly Father and to be totally committed to doing what pleases him. The life of Blessed Theodore Guérin is a testimony that everything is possible with God and for God.”
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today: Baruch 4:5-12, 27-29; Psalm 69:33-37; Luke 10:17-24 

The seventy-two returned with joy and said, Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name. He replied, I saw Satan fall like lightning
from heaven. I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you. However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven. At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure. All things have been committed to me by my Father. No-one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no-one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him. Then he turned to his disciples and said privately, Blessed are the eyes that see what you see. For I tell you that many prophets and kings wanted to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it. (Luke 10: 17-24)

All authority is his      St Paul writes in one of his Letters that five hundred of the disciples saw the risen Jesus on one occasion. This passing information gives us an inkling of the following our Lord had during his public ministry. It is also clear that many followed our Lord with varying degrees of commitment. For instance, the Gospel of St John tells us that when our Lord announced the doctrine of the Eucharist in the synagogue of Capernaum, many of his disciples left him. It is precisely at that point that there is the first reference to the defection of Judas. In our Gospel passage today our Lord sends out six dozen — seventy two — of his disciples to prepare the way ahead of him. We notice that when Luke lists the Twelve (6:14-16), they are listed broadly in pairs. Presumably when the Twelve were sent out they went two by two, so there were six parties of the Apostles sent out on mission in pairs. Here in our Gospel today there were six dozen of his disciples sent out. I wonder whether this figure somehow related to the six teams of Apostles when they were on mission. At least it can remind us of the link in mission between all Christ’s disciples and the Twelve — and their successors. So they went out and discovered the power of the name of Jesus. We read that “The seventy-two returned with joy and said, Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name.” We do not read of anything like this in the work of the prophets of the Old Testament. They do not invest their disciples with power over the underworld. We even read elsewhere of some of the Twelve encountering a person not of their company — not one of Christ’s disciples — who was using the name of Jesus to cast out demons. Jesus of Nazareth was being seen as a great power for good. Our Lord confirms his power over Satan. “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven,” he told them. This may refer to his having witnessed Satan being cast out of heaven at the beginning. It may refer to his witnessing in his mind’s eye the present and future work of his disciples combating the demons. It could refer to the very end when God will be all in all.

What matters, though, and what they ought rejoice in, is that their names are written in heaven. This comes from their being Christ’s disciples and from being united with him in his mission. They are beloved of the Father, and the Father has chosen to reveal to them, the little ones, the person and mission of Jesus of Nazareth. We read that “At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure.” Then our Lord speaks directly of himself: “All things have been committed to me by my Father.” This is a simple statement but full of momentous significance. Is there any other person in all the Scriptures about whom such a thing is said? It is not said of Abraham, nor of Moses, nor of David, nor of any of the prophets. When in the wilderness at the threshold of his public ministry our Lord had been promised by Satan that he would entrust the world to him provided he, Jesus, worshipped him. Our Lord told Satan to be gone. Here our Lord tells his disciples that all things has been entrusted to him by the Father. The kingdom of heaven was his. He was the King of kings and the Lord of lords. When our Lord rose from the dead he said to his disciples that all authority in heaven and on earth had been given to him. They were to go, then, to the whole world and make disciples of all the nations. Here the seventy-two — representing, we might say, the body of our Lord’s disciples — are being introduced to the Church’s mission. Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of all that was promised and expected. “No-one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no-one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him. Then he turned to his disciples and said privately, Blessed are the eyes that see what you see. I tell you that many prophets and kings wanted to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it. (Luke 10: 17-24)

In Christ, St Paul writes, is found every heavenly blessing. In him dwells the fulness of the godhead bodily. If we wish to plumb the depths of the universe and attain its key, all this will be found in a specific person, the person of Jesus Christ. In encountering him we encounter the Ultimate, the Absolute, the Final, the Deepest. We reach our term in him and there is no further to go when we gain him. The one thing that matters is to know Christ Jesus and become his friend and disciple. This great blessing is granted by the Father, and he grants it not to those who deem themselves wise and clever, but to little children. Let us pray for this blessing, then!
                                                                    (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By calling you to be an apostle, our Lord has reminded you, so that you will never forget it, that you are a 'son of God.'
                                                              (The Way, 919)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE      INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Thirty-Ninth Chapter    
A MAN SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY SOLICITOUS ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

MY CHILD, always commit your cause to Me. I will dispose of it rightly in good time. Await My ordering of it and it will be to your advantage.

THE DISCIPLE

Lord, I willingly commit all things to You, for my anxiety can profit me little. But I would that I were not so concerned about the future, and instead offered myself without hesitation to Your good pleasure.

                                                    (Continuing)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Civilization is that state to which man’s nature points and tends; it is the systematic use, improvement, and combination of those faculties which are his characteristic; and, viewed in its idea, it is the perfection, the happiness of our mortal state.

                          JHN, from Lectures on the History of the Turks in their Relation to Europe (1853)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Twenty seventh Sunday of Ordinary Time B

Prayers this week O Lord, you have given everything its place in the world, and no one can make it otherwise. For it is your creation, the heavens and the earth and the stars: You are the Lord of all. (Esther 13: 9-11).

Father, your love for us surpasses all our  hopes and desires. Forgive our failings, keep us in your peace and lead us in the way of salvation. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever.

(October 4) St. Francis of Assisi (1182-1226)
   Francis of Assisi was a poor little man who astounded and inspired the Church by taking the gospel literally—not in a narrow fundamentalist sense, but by actually following all that Jesus said and did, joyfully, without limit and without a mite of self-importance. Serious illness brought the young Francis to see the emptiness of his frolicking life as leader of Assisi's youth. Prayer—lengthy and difficult—led him to a self-emptying like that of Christ, climaxed by embracing a leper he met on the road. It symbolized his complete obedience to what he had heard in prayer: "Francis! Everything you have loved and desired in the flesh it is your duty to despise and hate, if you wish to know my will. And when you have begun this, all that now seems sweet and lovely to you will become intolerable and bitter, but all that you used to avoid will turn itself to great sweetness and exceeding joy." From the cross in the neglected field-chapel of San Damiano, Christ told him, "Francis, go out and build up my house, for it is nearly falling down." Francis became the totally poor and humble workman. He must have suspected a deeper meaning to "build up my house." But he would have been content to be for the rest of his life the poor "nothing" man actually putting brick on brick in abandoned chapels. He gave up every material thing he had, piling even his clothes before his earthly father (who was demanding restitution for Francis' "gifts" to the poor) so that he would be totally free to say, "Our Father in heaven." He was, for a time, considered to be a religious "nut," begging from door to door when he could not get money for his work, bringing sadness or disgust to the hearts of his former friends, ridicule from the unthinking. But genuineness will tell. A few people began to realize that this man was actually trying to be Christian. He really believed what Jesus said: "Announce the kingdom! Possess no gold or silver or copper in your purses, no traveling bag, no sandals, no staff" (see Luke 9:1-3). Francis' first rule for his followers was a collection of texts from the Gospels. He had no idea of founding an order, but once it began he protected it and accepted all the legal structures needed to support it. His devotion and loyalty to the Church were absolute and highly exemplary at a time when various movements of reform tended to break the Church's unity. He was torn between a life devoted entirely to prayer and a life of active preaching of the Good News. He decided in favour of the latter, but always returned to solitude when he could. He wanted to be a missionary in Syria or in Africa, but was prevented by shipwreck and illness in both cases. He did try to convert the sultan of Egypt during the Fifth Crusade. During the last years of his relatively short life (he died at 44) he was half blind and seriously ill. Two years before his death, he received the stigmata, the real and painful wounds of Christ in his hands, feet and side. On his deathbed, he said over and over again the last addition to his Canticle of the Sun, "Be praised, O Lord, for our Sister Death." He sang Psalm 141, and at the end asked his superior to have his clothes removed when the last hour came and for permission to expire lying naked on the earth, in imitation of his Lord.
   "We adore you and we bless you, Lord Jesus Christ, here and in all the churches which are in the whole world, because by your holy cross you have redeemed the world" (St. Francis).
(AmericanCatholic.org)    For more on St Francis (click here)
 

click on centre arrow

Scripture: Genesis 2:18-24; Psalm 128:1-2, 3, 4-5, 6; Hebrews 2:9-11; Mark 10:2-16 or 10: 2-12.

The Pharisees approached Jesus and asked, "Is it lawful for a husband to divorce his wife?" They were testing him. He said to them in
reply, "What did Moses command you?" They replied, "Moses permitted a husband to write a bill of divorce and dismiss her." But Jesus told them, "Because of the hardness of your hearts he wrote you this commandment. But from the beginning of creation, God made them male and female. For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. So they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate." In the house the disciples again questioned Jesus about this. He said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery." (Mark 10:2-12)

Marriage     There have been philosophical systems the central idea of which is absurdity. That is to say, they propose that reality is discovered to lack purpose and ultimate worth. Ultimately, life is not worth living. At its centre, life is harsh, dark and ugly. One ought not too glibly dismiss this because this is precisely the experience of many. Without a sure conviction of a good God and, perhaps, of a divine Revelation, it may not be easy to see or show how meaningfulness carries the day. Cardinal Newman wrote in his great Apologia (1864)
that were it not for his inescapable sense of God present in his conscience, the evil of the world would have driven him into some from of unbelief. Revelation confirms that sin has stuck the world as lightning might strike a tree, causing grievous damage. Nevertheless, the tree was not destroyed. It survived and, though crippled, continued to bear some foliage while awaiting a new blossoming that would come to it from on high. And so the world is, with all its pain, still a beautiful world. Nature films bear witness to its astonishing beauty — the fields, the mountains, the falls, the birds and the animals. Most beautiful of all is man, man and woman who rise and fall in their grandeur. One of the most beautiful things about man is his love for the other, and in particular his love for his spouse. There are few things of greater beauty than the married love of the newly betrothed who have entrusted themselves in love to one another till death, and to this our Lord alludes in today's Gospel passage (Mark 10:2-12). When the Church and when family and friends look on them at the start of their life’s course, they instinctively think that for all the shadows it is still a beautiful world. Literature extols the beauty of married and family love, and this is absolutely confirmed by divine revelation. In fact, God spoke of himself as a husband and bridegroom. His chosen people are his spouse. He has made married love, one of the most beautiful things in the world, a principal image of his relationship with us his children. In its turn married love looks to Christ’s love for his Church as its truest model, and it will retain and grow in its characteristic beauty the more it mirrors and pulsates with this love.

Man and woman have been created by God in equal dignity, for they are each equally at the summit of the world. They each are human persons and stand together as lord and lady of the garden that is creation. At the same time, while being equal in dignity they are made to complement one another reciprocally. God has willed them one for the other to form a communion of persons. In that communion they transmit human life by forming in matrimony a oneness with each other. Together as one flesh they are called to bring forth new life and to be God’s stewards of the earth. This marital relationship, which man easily takes for granted and easily abuses, has, in the case of the Church’s members, been sanctified and made one of the seven Sacraments. Christian marriage is a Sacrament. It is the sign and channel of Christ’s love. If they remain in Christ, his love becomes the soul and support of their marriage. The Church teaches that there is a more noble vocation still — that which sets aside marriage and for love of God offers one’s heart and life to Christ directly. But the world depends on marriage as God intended it to be, and in particular on the Sacrament of matrimony. A couple who live their married life in accord with the teaching of Christ and his Church are on a grand and beautiful, if difficult, road. It leads to life here, and everlasting life hereafter. It is a road that excludes adultery, contraception, all forms of polygamy, and the ending of their own indissoluble bond. For all the darkness and sin that lurks in every corner of this beautiful house, ever ready to burst into a conflagration, the grace of God is present to sustain, fortify and overcome. God means marriage to be the iconic communion of life, life’s lasting and best joy, issuing in new life. It has the mission to be the image here on earth of the life of the Holy Trinity and to bear witness to the love of Christ for his Church and for mankind. The whole of culture and society ought make it its business to hold marriage and family aloft as a beacon and as its most precious possession.

The Church takes a very strong stand on marriage and in particular on Christian marriage. It will resist any pressure in society to lessen its status or to allow it to be confused with other relationships, be they good or bad. It resists laws and institutions that do not support one or other of the essential features of marriage. These essential characteristics of marriage are revealed by God in the teaching of Christ and in the natural law — and the natural law is illuminated by the teaching of Christ. Let us sing the grandeur of marriage, and let the song be heard everywhere.
                                                                   (E.J.Tyler)

Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1643-1654, 369-373.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each one of you must try to be an apostle of apostles

                                                          (The Way, no.920)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Thirty-Ninth Chapter   
A MAN SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY SOLICITOUS ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

My child, it often happens that a man seeks ardently after something he desires and then when he has attained it he begins to think that it is not at all desirable; for affections do not remain fixed on the same thing, but rather flit from one to another. It is no very small matter, therefore, for a man to forsake himself even in things that are very small.
                                                          (Continuing)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the following passage taken from the sermon ‘The Mystery of Godliness’ (1837), John Henry Newman speaks of what it means for Christ to have taken human nature on himself:

“Both He that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause He is not ashamed to call them brethren.” [Heb. 2: 11] Our Saviour’s birth in the flesh is an earnest, and, as it were, beginning of our birth in the Spirit. It is a figure, promise, or pledge of our new birth, and it effects what it promises. As He was born, so are we born also; and since He was born, therefore we too are born. As He is the Son of God by nature, so are we sons of God by grace; and it is He who has made us such. This is what the text says; He is the “Sanctifier,” we the “sanctified.” Moreover, He and we, says the text, “are all of one.” God sanctifies the Angels, but there the Creator and the creature are not of one. But the Son of God and we are of one; He has become “the firstborn of every creature;” [Col. 1: 15] He has taken our nature, and in and through it He sanctifies us. He is our brother by virtue of His incarnation, and, as the text says, “He is not ashamed to call us brethren;” and, having sanctified our nature in Himself, He communicates it to us.

(Reference: John Henry Newman, Parochial and Plain Sermons Vol 5 (1840) Sermon no. 7, p. 86)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Monday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time

(October 5) St. Maria Faustina Kowalska (1905-1938)
     Mary Faustina's name is forever linked to the annual feast of the Divine Mercy (celebrated on the Second Sunday of Easter), the divine mercy chaplet and the divine mercy prayer recited each day by many people at 3 p.m. Born in what is now west-central Poland (part of Germany before World War I), Helena was the third of 10 children. She worked as a housekeeper in three cities before joining the Congregation of the Sisters of Our Lady of Mercy in 1925. She worked as a cook, gardener and porter in three of their houses. In addition to carrying out her work faithfully, generously serving the needs of the sisters and the local people, she also had a deep interior life. This included receiving revelations from the Lord Jesus, messages that she recorded in her diary at the request of Christ and of her confessors. At a time when some Catholics had an image of God as such a strict judge that they might be tempted to despair about the possibility of being forgiven, Jesus chose to emphasize his mercy and forgiveness for sins acknowledged and confessed. “I do not want to punish aching mankind,” he once told St. Maria Faustina, “but I desire to heal it, pressing it to my merciful heart” (Diary 1588). The two rays emanating from Christ's heart, she said, represent the blood and water poured out after Jesus' death (Gospel of John 19:34) Because Sister Maria Faustina knew that the revelations she had already received did not constitute holiness itself, she wrote in her diary: “Neither graces, nor revelations, nor raptures, nor gifts granted to a soul make it perfect, but rather the intimate union of the soul with God. These gifts are merely ornaments of the soul, but constitute neither its essence nor its perfection. My sanctity and perfection consist in the close union of my will with the will of God” (Diary 1107). Sister Maria Faustina died of tuberculosis in Krakow, Poland, on October 5, 1938. Pope John Paul II beatified her in 1993 and canonized her seven years later.
    Four years after Faustina's beatification, Pope John Paul II visited the Sanctuary of Divine Mercy at Lagiewniki (near Krakow) and addressed members of her congregation. He said: “The message of divine mercy has always been very close and precious to me. It is as though history has written it in the tragic experience of World War II. In those difficult years, this message was a particular support and an inexhaustible source of hope, not only for those living in Krakow, but for the entire nation. This was also my personal experience, which I carried with me to the See of Peter and which, in a certain sense, forms the image of this pontificate. I thank divine providence because I was able to contribute personally to carrying out Christ's will, by instituting the feast of Divine Mercy. Here, close to the remains of Blessed Faustina, I thank God for the gift of her beatification. I pray unceasingly that God may have 'mercy on us and on the whole world' (Quote from the Chaplet of Divine Mercy).”
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow


 

Scripture today: Jonah 1:1-2:2, 11; Jonah 2:3, 4, 5, 8; Luke 10:25-37

On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. Teacher, he asked, what must I do to inherit eternal life? What is written in the Law? he replied. How do you read it? He answered: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all
your strength and with all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbour as yourself.' You have answered correctly, Jesus replied. Do this and you will live. But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, And who is my neighbour? In reply Jesus said: A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half-dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he travelled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper. 'Look after him,' he said, 'and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.' Which of these three do you think was a neighbour to the man who fell into the hands of robbers? The expert in the law replied, The one who had mercy on him. Jesus told him, Go and do likewise. (Luke 10: 25-37)

What man must do    There are many things that are very distinctive about that body of ancient writing which we call the Old Testament, apart from its being the inspired record of supernatural revelation. If we set it next to, say, the works of Plato or Aristotle, one obvious feature about it is its distinctive concern for right and holy living: what man must do in order to please God and gain life. But there is another feature which is closely aligned to this, and that is its need for interpretation. Any body of writing needs to be interpreted,
but the order and structure of the Old Testament presents special challenges. It is made up of a wide variety of literary genres from different eras and settings, all in one way or another setting forth what God had done and said, and what man must do in response. A fundamental order in respect to what man must do is offered in the Ten Commandments of the book of Exodus. But, for instance, the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy contain numerous prescriptions of varied importance, chapter after chapter. The prophets condemn sins of different kinds and uphold the range of God’s laws. The entire Scriptures required interpretation and in fact what characterized the life of the chosen people were the markedly distinct interpretations of the Scriptures propounded by the Pharisees, the Sadducees and others besides. One aspect of Christ’s mission was to reveal the true meaning of the Scriptures in the midst of this plethora. The New Testament, in setting forth the mystery and person of Jesus Christ, was laying down the definitive meaning of the Scriptures and pronouncing on the value of other interpretations. God’s revelation was being given its true meaning and this was itself a revelation from on high in the person and teaching of Jesus Christ. We see this process being played out on a smaller scale in our Gospel today, yet in a way that is immensely illuminating. A teacher and expert in the law rises to test Jesus. He asks him a fundamental question requiring a knowledge of the Scriptures that pinpointed its heart and soul.

That question was, what must I do to gain eternal life  (Luke 10: 25-37)? It is the question of questions, and it is precisely this that sets the Hebrew Scriptures so much above the literature of ancient times. The answer was not difficult. When our Lord asked his questioner to answer from the Law, the lawyer had no difficulty in replying. He immediately cited two sentences from the Old Testament. The first was from Deuteronomy chapter 6 verse 5, and it gave the most magnificent statement of man’s vocation in ancient literature: The Lord is our God, the Lord alone. Therefore you shall love the Lord you God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength. We may notice that the lawyer adds, and with all your mind. The lawyer may have been forgetting the implication of loving God with all your mind. Loving God with all our minds involves striving to know him and his will as perfectly as possible. We remember that on one occasion our Lord told the Sadducees that they understood neither the meaning of the Scriptures nor the power of God, and that they were very much mistaken. He was continually telling the scribes and the Pharisees that in their opposition to him — such as in the interpretation of the Sabbath — they were very much mistaken. It is not enough to love God with all our heart, our soul and all our strength if, in fact, we are in error about him and his will, when the truth of the matter is available to us. God wants us to be right in our understanding of what he has revealed, and of course it is for this very purpose that he has bestowed on us his revelation. This light of understanding comes in the person of Jesus Christ. The lawyer completes his answer by citing another key sentence in the Old Testament, from Leviticus, chapter 19:18. You shall love your neighbour as yourself. Our Lord confirms what the lawyer has said, and in response to a further query proceeds to tell his famous parable of the Good Samaritan — a heretic in religious belief and a foreigner, but who outshines the priest and the Levite in his love for his neighbour in need.

It is love for God in practical action which our Lord highlights in his answer to the lawyer. The lawyer knew the answer to his own question — he was attempting to test and trap Jesus. Our Lord uses the occasion to place at the forefront of divine revelation the imperative of helping our brother in need. As our Lord will explain elsewhere (Matthew 25), at the Last Judgment we shall be judged on whether we have been like the Good Samaritan. Our Lord himself is supremely the Good Samaritan for the entire human race. Let us strive to be like him, then!
                                                                           (E.J.Tyler)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are salt, apostolic soul. 'Salt is a useful thing', we read in the holy Gospel; but if the salt loses its taste, it is good for nothing, neither for the land nor for the manure heap; it is thrown out as useless.

You are salt, apostolic soul. But if you lose your taste...
                                                              (The Way, no.921)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE      INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Thirty-Ninth Chapter  
 A MAN SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY SOLICITOUS ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

A man's true progress consists in denying himself, and the man who has denied himself is truly free and secure. The old enemy, however, setting himself against all good, never ceases to tempt them, but day and night plots dangerous snares to cast the unwary into the net of deceit. "Watch ye and pray," says the Lord, "that ye enter not into temptation."
                                                        (Concluded)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Though Faith is the characteristic of the Gospel, and Faith is the simple lifting of the mind to the Unseen God, without conscious reasoning or formal argument, still the mind may be allowably, nay, religiously engaged, in reflecting upon its own Faith; investigating the grounds and the Object of it, bringing it out into words, whether to defend, or recommend, or teach it to others.

                                JHN, from the university Sermon ‘Implicit and Explicit Reason’ (1840)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Tuesday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time

(October 6) St. Bruno (1030?-1101)
    This saint has the honour of having founded a religious order which, as the saying goes, has never had to be reformed because it was never deformed. No doubt both the founder and the members would reject such high praise, but it is an indication of the saint's intense love of a penitential life in solitude. He was born in Cologne, Germany, became a famous teacher at Rheims and was appointed chancellor of the archdiocese at the age of 45. He supported Pope Gregory VII (May 25) in his fight against the decadence of the clergy and took part in the removal of his own scandalous archbishop, Manasses. Bruno suffered the plundering of his house for his pains. He had a dream of living in solitude and prayer, and persuaded a few friends to join him in a hermitage. After a while he felt the place unsuitable and, through a friend, was given some land which was to become famous for his foundation "in the Chartreuse" (from which comes the word Carthusians). The climate, desert, mountainous terrain and inaccessibility guaranteed silence, poverty and small numbers. Bruno and his friends built an oratory with small individual cells at a distance from each other. They met for Matins and Vespers each day, and spent the rest of the time in solitude, eating together only on great feasts. Their chief work was copying manuscripts. The pope, hearing of Bruno's holiness, called for his assistance in Rome. When the pope had to flee Rome, Bruno pulled up stakes again, and spent his last years (after refusing a bishopric) in the wilderness of Calabria. He was never formally canonized, because the Carthusians were averse to all occasions of publicity. Pope Clement extended his feast to the whole Church in 1674.
    “Members of those communities which are totally dedicated to contemplation give themselves to God alone in solitude and silence and through constant prayer and ready penance. No matter how urgent may be the needs of the active apostolate, such communities will always have a distinguished part to play in Christ's Mystical Body...” (Decree on the Renewal of Religious Life, 7)
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today:   Jonah 3:1-10;   Psalm 130:1b-2, 3-4ab, 7-8;   Luke 10:38-42

As Jesus and his disciples were on their way, he came to a village where a woman named Martha opened her home to him. She had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet listening to what he said. But Martha was distracted by all the preparations that had to be made. She came to him and asked, Lord, don't you care that my sister has left me to do the work by myself? Tell her to help me! Martha, Martha, the Lord answered, you are worried and upset about many things, but only one thing is needed. Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her. (Luke 10:38-42)

Being busy     I know of an outstanding two volume life of Christ (entitled The Mystery of Jesus) which, in its treatment of this Gospel passage today, places Mary the sister of Martha at the centre of the scene. Yes, Mary’s action of sitting at the Lord’s feet listening to what he said is held up as more important than being worried and upset about many other things, such as the serving. But the focus is surely on Martha. Decades after the event the scene was recorded by Luke for the sake of the Church. In the Gospel of St John, Martha and
Mary together with their brother Lazarus have an entire chapter devoted to them, and in it Martha’s example of faith in our Lord is an instance of the faith that the Gospel is designed to produce. Martha professed before Jesus that he was the Messiah and the Son of God, and this profession was followed by Christ’s raising of her brother Lazarus from the dead. Luke also knew of Martha, and in our scene today it is she who welcomes Jesus into her home. She takes the initiative in giving this welcome, and showers upon him the service she desires to give to him. We read elsewhere in the Gospel that the apostolic band with Jesus at their centre was, in their travelling, assisted by some women who supported them out of their means and attended to what was needed. Martha was of this stamp. She loved our Lord, recognized him for who he was, and wished to serve him with all her heart. We ought also remember that Martha is celebrated in the Church’s Liturgical Year as a saint. The Evangelist, in presenting her loving service to the Christian reader, wished also to record a correction our Lord was remembered to have given. Do not get distracted away from Christ by all the business that is part and parcel of serving him in the life of the Church. Martha was an image of the one who serves Christ and his Church. This work of service can lead to irritation, anxiety and even annoyance with others. The one thing necessary can, on occasion, be forgotten.

What is the one thing necessary which the Christian must always be doing? It is to have one’s heart focussed on the person of Jesus and to be listening to his word with the desire to put it into practice. On another occasion in the Gospel our Lord was teaching a group of disciples before a crowd, and word came through that his mother and his relatives were outside desirous of seeing him. His response was to point to the ones before him and say, here are my mother and my brothers. Whoever does the will of my Father is my mother and my sister and my brother. What matters to our Lord is that we listen to him in love with the resolve to put his word into practice. We remember how, at the beginning of his public ministry, our Lord and his disciples attended the wedding feast of Cana where the wine ran out. Mary the mother of Jesus, having informed her son that the wine had run out, told the servants to do whatever he tells them. The changing of the water into wine followed, but the words of Mary are what is important. The Christian must listen to Christ and do whatever he says. On another occasion our Lord, using the example of building a house, said that it is the man who hears his words and puts them into practice who is building on rock. In our Gospel scene today (Luke 10:38-42) Mary’s action is held up before Martha — Martha, the example of loving welcome and service of Christ — as something she must always remember. Do not get lost in the service of Christ to the point of partially forgetting Christ himself. The one thing necessary and which Christ himself desires, is that we keep the attention of our hearts on him and on his will. In the particular circumstance of our Gospel passage today, it is this which, Mary the sister of Martha, was doing. Our Lord wishes Martha to take advantage of Mary’s example, and Luke holds it up for the benefit of all of Christ’s faithful. Perhaps Luke saw this event as particularly instructive for him and his companions who were so much part of the grand and very busy missionary enterprise of St Paul.

Let us who are followers of Jesus Christ every day keep before our minds our primary ambition. It is to love Jesus with all our heart, for he is our Redeemer and our God. We must not let our work of serving Jesus with its possible distraction, worry and irritation cloud our hearts and diminish his presence in our souls. The cares of life can distract us away. Rather, in the midst of these cares, the one thing necessary is that we keep our mind, our heart and our soul focussed on Jesus. This requires a regime of prayer, spiritual reading, sacraments and general recollection. We must be contemplative in action and be persons whose vision is ever on Christ, whatever be our particular calling.
                                                                                     (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My son, if you love your apostolate, be certain that you love God.
                                                                    (The Way, no.922)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Fortieth Chapter   
MAN HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING

THE DISCIPLE

LORD, what is man that You are mindful of him, or the son of man that You visit him? What has man deserved that You should give him Your grace? What cause have I, Lord, to complain if You desert me, or what objection can I have if You do not do what I ask? This I may think and say in all truth: "Lord, I am nothing, of myself I have nothing that is good; I am lacking in all things, and I am ever tending toward nothing. And unless I have Your help and am inwardly strengthened by You, I become quite lukewarm and lax."
                                                                         (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let us be far more set upon alluring souls into the right way than on forbidding them the wrong.

         JHN, from the sermon ‘The Fellowship of the Apostles’ (1839)



---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Wednesday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time

(October 7) Our Lady of the Rosary
   Pope St. Pius V established this feast in 1573. The purpose was to thank God for the victory of Christians over the Turks at Lepanto — a victory attributed to the praying of the rosary. Clement XI extended the feast to the universal Church in 1716. The development of the rosary has a long history. First, a practice developed of praying 150 Our Fathers in imitation of the 150 Psalms. Then there was a parallel practice of praying 150 Hail Marys. Soon a mystery of Jesus' life was attached to each Hail Mary. Though Mary's giving the rosary to St. Dominic is recognized as a legend, the development of this prayer form owes much to the followers of St. Dominic. One of them, Alan de la Roche, was known as "the apostle of the rosary." He founded the first Confraternity of the Rosary in the 15th century. In the 16th century the rosary was developed to its present form — with the 15 mysteries (joyful, luminous and glorious). In 2002, Pope John Paul II added the five Mysteries of Light to this devotion.
   “The rosary, though clearly Marian in character, is at a heart a Christ-centred prayer. It has all the depth of the gospel message in its entirety. It is an echo of the prayer of Mary, her perennial Magnificat for the work of the redemptive Incarnation which began in her virginal womb...It can be said that the rosary is, in some sense, a prayer-commentary on the final chapter of the Vatican II Constitution Lumen Gentium, a chapter that discusses the wondrous presence of the Mother of God in the mystery of Christ and the Church" (Pope John Paul II, apostolic letter The Rosary of the Virgin Mary).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Jonah 4:1-11; Psalm 86:3-6, 9-10; Luke 11:1-4

One day Jesus was praying in a certain place. When he finished, one of his disciples said to him, Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples. He said to them, When you pray, say: 'Father, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come. Give us each day our daily bread. Forgive us our sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us. And lead us not into temptation.' (Luke 11: 1-4)

Our Father!    Many things that Jesus said and did caused mounting hostility towards him on the part of the leaders of the Jews. There was his observance of and pronouncements on the Sabbath. There were his utterances on the traditions of the elders. Above and beyond all, there was his attitude to Yahweh God and, consequently, his claims about himself. God was his very own father, in an absolutely unique sense. We read in the Gospel of St John that on one occasion the “Jews” — which is to say some of the leaders of the Jews — took
up stones with which to stone him because he claimed that God was his father. They grasped the point exactly and correctly: his claim implied that he himself was equal to God, for as God’s own son he must share with God the divine nature. “I and the Father are one,” he said elsewhere. “Before Abraham ever was, I am.” “He who sees me sees the Father.” No prophet of God’s chosen people had spoken like this. It is in this context that we must consider the prayer which the Lord taught his disciples, and which in shorter form is given to us by St Luke in our Gospel today. It begins most significantly. It addresses God as Father! St Matthew’s version gives the fuller expression of it: our Father! St Paul writes that in the Spirit we address God as Abba! Father! In turning to God we say, Father — dear, dear Father! So it is that among the many distinctive features of the Christian religion is to be counted the character of its prayer. The Christian regards the most high God as his Father — not his Father by nature as does Christ, but by virtue of an “adoption.” God is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and because of his death and resurrection the baptized Christian is granted the grace of a share in Christ’s divine sonship. We are not God’s natural children who possess by nature his divine life. Rather, we have been granted a share in the divine life by the gift of grace making us adopted children of God. Christ is the second divine person made man and is the Father's natural and only begotten son.

This is not allowed by our Jewish brethren. For them, God is Father and Husband to his chosen people by special choice, ratified by the covenant of Moses and spelt out by the prophets. So God is indeed very close to his people. But for those who are privileged to be members of this people there is no question of a sharing in the very life of God. We remain his creatures and nothing more by nature. Such is the revealed monotheism of Judaism and within that tradition one could not pray the Lord’s prayer as Christ meant it. Islam will not have it that Allah, the one and only God, is Father and Husband to a chosen people. God, the Lord of Mercy and of the Worlds, Master of Judgment, is the One man worships. He is great and he is beyond. This, of course, is manifestly a different teaching on the one God from that of Moses and the Prophets. But far more so does it differ from that of Jesus Christ. Mahomet absolutely rejects that Allah could have a natural divine Son, who — to crown all — became man and even died on a cross, rising then in glory as man again! For Islam this contradicts monotheism. All this shows the ineffable and wondrously distinct character of the Christian revelation, and therefore of Christian prayer. In Christ, God has granted a revelation of himself that is far beyond what nature and man's natural powers will suggest. The most exalted conceptions of God will not attain to it. The Christian, because of the gift of grace, is an adopted child of God enjoying a share in his divine life. He is thus empowered to address God as his father — not, of course, in the unique and natural sense in which Christ does, but by the special gift of being “adopted” by God. This gift of adoption is granted at baptism and involves a new birth in the soul. As St Paul writes, this new birth makes of the Christian a new creature able to call God his Father: Abba, dear Father! The prayer of the Christian is different from that of his brother the Jew because the Christian shares in the life of Christ. Far more so is it different from the prayer of Islam.

Let us treasure the Lord’s prayer, always praying it with the doctrine of God revealed by Jesus Christ in mind. The one God in three persons has offered us the grace of being his adopted children. We address the most high God as our Father. Let us live as his children, striving to be like his only-begotten Son. 'Father, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come. Give us each day our daily bread. Forgive us our sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us. And lead us not into temptation.' (Luke 11: 1-4)
                                                                        (E.J.Tyler)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The day you really 'get the feel' of your apostolate, that apostolate will serve you as a shield with which to resist all the attacks of your enemies of this earth and of hell.
                                                                  (The Way, no.923)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE       INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Fortieth Chapter  
MAN HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING

THE DISCIPLE

But You, Lord, are always the same. You remain forever, always good, just, and holy; doing all things rightly, justly, and holily, disposing them wisely. I, however, who am more ready to go backward than forward, do not remain always in one state, for I change with the seasons. Yet my condition quickly improves when it pleases You and when You reach forth Your helping hand. For You alone, without human aid, can help me and strengthen me so greatly that my heart shall no more change but be converted and rest solely in You. Hence, if I knew well how to cast aside all earthly consolation, either to attain devotion or because of the necessity which, in the absence of human solace, compels me to seek You alone, then I could deservedly hope for Your grace and rejoice in the gift of new consolation.
                                                               (Continuing)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The matter of revelation is not a mere collection of truths, not a philosophical view, not a religious sentiment or spirit, not a special
morality,—poured out upon mankind as a stream might pour itself into the sea, mixing with the world’s thought, modifying, purifying, invigorating it;—but an authoritative teaching, which bears witness to itself and keeps itself together as one, in contrast to the assemblage of opinions on all sides of it, and speaks to all men, as being ever and everywhere one and the same, and claiming to be received intelligently, by all whom it addresses, as one doctrine, discipline, and devotion directly given from above.

                                     JHN, from An Essay in aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Thursday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time

(October 8) St. John Leonardi (1541?-1609)
"I am only one person! Why should I do anything? What good would it do?" Today, as in any age, people seem plagued with the dilemma of getting involved. In his own way John Leonardi answered these questions. He chose to become a priest. After his ordination, he became very active in the works of the ministry, especially in hospitals and prisons. The example and dedication of his work attracted several young laymen who began to assist him. They later became priests themselves. John lived after the Protestant Reformation and the Council of Trent. He and his followers projected a new congregation of diocesan priests. For some reason the plan, which was ultimately approved, provoked great political opposition. John was exiled from his home town of Lucca, Italy, for almost the entire remainder of his life. He received encouragement and help from St. Philip Neri [whose feast is May 26], who gave him his lodgings—along with the care of his cat! In 1579, John formed the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, and published a compendium of Christian doctrine that remained in use until the 19th century. Father Leonardi and his priests became a great power for good in Italy, and their congregation was confirmed by Pope Clement in 1595. He died at the age of 68 from a disease caught when tending those stricken by the plague. By the deliberate policy of the founder, the Clerks Regular of the Mother of God have never had more than 15 churches and today form only a very small congregation.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Malachi 3:13-20b;  Psalm 1:1-4 and 6;   Luke 11:5-13 

Then Jesus said to them, Suppose one of you has a friend, and he goes to him at midnight and says, 'Friend, lend me three loaves of
bread, because a friend of mine on a journey has come to me, and I have nothing to set before him.' Then the one inside answers, 'Don't bother me. The door is already locked, and my children are with me in bed. I can't get up and give you anything.' I tell you, though he will not get up and give him the bread because he is his friend, yet because of the man's boldness he will get up and give him as much as he needs. So I say to you: Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened. Which of you fathers, if your son asks for a fish, will give him a snake instead? Or if he asks for an egg, will give him a scorpion? If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him! (Luke 11: 5-13)

Ask!     I remember attending a lunchtime lecture by a staff member of the department of Philosophy at Sydney University. The lecture was on prayer, and at one point he said that if a person prays for rain and rain comes very soon afterwards, it will naturally be thought that the rain was an answer to prayer. There were persons who criticised his example, saying that while it might be natural to think this, the mere fact that rain came soon after the prayer does not prove that it was due to the prayer. It could have been a coincidence. The Christian, though, begins not with an example of that kind, but with the person and word of Jesus Christ. He accepts that the Gospels are inspired and are therefore a true record of the deeds and sayings of Jesus Christ. The Catholic Christian also, very importantly, accepts that the Church is his creation and has by his gift the assistance of the same Spirit who inspired the Scriptures. He therefore relies on Christ’s guarantee in the Gospels and confirmed by the Church’s teaching on the power of prayer. As with the rest of Christian teaching, Christ’s teaching on prayer is expressed not just in one passage of the Scriptures but in the sweep of the Scriptures. Our Gospel passage today is not the only passage in the Gospels that relates to prayer. Furthermore, the Scriptures themselves must be interpreted according to the mind of the Church who is their guardian and divinely appointed interpreter. All this having been said, we have before us in today’s passage some wonderful words about prayer to God our Father in heaven. There is no avoiding it — Christ says that our prayers will be answered, if we persist. He is manifestly insistent: Ask and it will be given to you. St James makes the point in his Letter that if our faith is not shown in deeds, our faith is shown to be dead (2:17). If in our heart of hearts we do not think there is much use in praying for what we think we or others truly need, what is to be said of our faith in the person of Christ and his word?

Therefore we must pray for what we need. St Alphonsus Ligouri in one of his works makes the point that the reason why we do not receive more from God is that we ask very little from him. Would this be the case if we had a truly lively faith in his reality and presence, most especially in the person of Jesus his Son? Do we believe that God as our Father wants to give us what we need? “For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened.” St Alphonsus says elsewhere that the prayer of petition is perhaps the most important prayer of all and our salvation in a sense depends on it. Our receiving the divine help we need to grow in goodness and holiness of life and to reach our eternal homeland, to a degree depends on our asking for it. “If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” (Luke 11: 5-13). Of course, the test of our faith will come when we do not receive in a short time what we have asked for. A further test of our faith will come when we do not receive what we have been asking for even over a period of quite some time. Many give up on the prayer of petition at this point, and it represents a decline in faith. A further test still will come if we do not ever receive precisely what we have been asking for. A dear relative — a parent or child — falls with terminal cancer, and prayers ascend to God for that person’s full recovery. The decline continues and the sufferer dies. What is to be made of it? As with all hard facts, such a fact as this summons the Christian to a deeper understanding of God’s word in its fullness. Christ himself asked his Father that the chalice be taken away from him, but it was not. Rather, his prayer brought strength to his humanity and it served to attain the full objective of the redemption of the world. All that is promised to us is to be situated within the divine plan. God cannot promise to do what opposes his plan for our welfare. It is not difficult to understand this point, and it must not lessen our resolve to pray constantly, never losing heart. “Thy will be done” must be the first of our petitions.

At the very beginning of his public ministry our Lord and his disciples attended the wedding feast at Cana. Mary his mother was there. As St John tells us, during the feast, the wine ran out and she came to him and simply said, “They have no wine.” It must not have been the intention of Jesus to begin at that point to show his glory, for he said to her, “Woman, what is that to me? My hour has not yet come.” But her petition stood, and she simply said to the stewards, “Do whatever he tells you.” She had no doubt that something would be done. And so it was. Let us unhesitatingly pray for what we need, provided it seems that what we are asking for is in accord with the will of God. Let us pray, and keep on praying, asking withal that the will of God be done.
                                                                        (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pray always for perseverance for yourself and your companions in the apostolate. Our adversary, the devil, knows only too well that you are his great enemies,... and when he sees a fall in your ranks how pleased he is!
                                                             (The Way, no.924)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Fortieth Chapter     
MAN HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING

THE DISCIPLE

Thanks be to You from Whom all things come, whenever it is well with me. In Your sight I am vanity and nothingness, a weak, unstable man. In what, therefore, can I glory, and how can I wish to be highly regarded? Is it because I am nothing? This, too, is utterly vain. Indeed, the greatest vanity is the evil plague of empty self-glory, because it draws one away from true glory and robs one of heavenly grace. For when a man is pleased with himself he displeases You, when he pants after human praise he is deprived of true virtue. But it is true glory and holy exultation to glory in You and not in self, to rejoice in Your name rather than in one's own virtue, and not to delight in any creature except for Your sake.
                                                    (Continuing)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There have been ages of the world, in which men have thought too much of Angels, and paid them excessive honour; honoured them so perversely as to forget the supreme worship due to Almighty God. This is the sin of a dark age. But the sin of what is called an educated age, such as our own, is just the reverse: to account slightly of them, or not at all; to ascribe all we see around us, not to their agency, but to certain assumed laws of nature.

                            JHN, from the sermon ‘The Powers of Nature’ (1831)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Friday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time

(October 9) St. Denis and Companions (d. 258?)
    This martyr and patron of France is regarded as the first bishop of Paris. His popularity is due to a series of legends, especially those connecting him with the great abbey church of St. Denis in Paris. He was for a time confused with the writer now called Pseudo-Dionysius. The best hypothesis contends that Denis was sent to Gaul from Rome in the third century and beheaded in the persecution under Valerius in 258. According to one of the legends, after he was martyred on Montmartre (literally, "mountain of martyrs") in Paris, he carried his head to a village northeast of the city. St. Genevieve built a basilica over his tomb at the beginning of the sixth century.
   "Martyrdom is part of the Church's nature since it manifests Christian death in its pure form, as the death of unrestrained faith, which is otherwise hidden in the ambivalence of all human events. Through martyrdom the Church's holiness, instead of remaining purely subjective, achieves by God's grace the visible expression it needs. As early as the second century one who accepted death for the sake of Christian faith or Christian morals was looked on and revered as a 'martus' (witness). The term is scriptural in that Jesus Christ is the 'faithful witness' absolutely (Revelations 1:5; 3:14)" (Karl Rahner, Theological Dictionary).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:   Joel 1:13-15; 2:1-2;   Psalm 9:2-3, 6 and 16, 8-9;    Luke 11:15-26 

Some people said of Jesus, It is by Beelzebub, the prince of demons, that he is driving out demons. Others tested him by asking for a sign from heaven. Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them: Any kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and a house divided against
itself will fall. If Satan is divided against himself, how can his kingdom stand? I say this because you claim that I drive out demons by Beelzebub. Now if I drive out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your followers drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. But if I drive out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has come to you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe. But when someone stronger attacks and overpowers him, he takes away the armour in which the man trusted and divides up the spoils. He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me, scatters. When an evil spirit comes out of a man, it goes through arid places seeking rest and does not find it. Then it says, 'I will return to the house I left.' When it arrives, it finds the house swept clean and put in order. Then it goes and takes seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and live there. And the final condition of that man is worse than the first. (Luke 11: 15-26)

Satan       In the Old Testament — the Hebrew Scriptures — we find various references to the good angels. When God expelled Adam from the Garden “he stationed the cherubim and the fiery revolving sword, to guard the way to the tree of life” (Genesis 3:24). Angels appear to Abraham. An angel appears to Gideon. The book of Tobit is largely concerned with the guidance given by the angel Raphael to Tobias. The most important revelation about Satan is in the book of Genesis where he engineers the Fall of man. Another important reference to
Satan is found in the book of Job, in which he is the initiator of Job’s afflictions. He does not appear much elsewhere. When it comes to the angelic world, it is the angels, the good spirits, who feature much more. Now, the angels have an important place in the New Testament, especially though not exclusively in the narratives of Matthew and Luke about the infancy of Christ. They feature in our Lord’s public ministry, in his passion (in the Garden of Gethsemane) and in the resurrection. But what is especially noteworthy is — at least when set against the Old Testament- the sudden prominence of Satan in the Gospels. In his teaching our Lord refers to Hell and the demonic far often than is found anywhere in the Old Testament. He reveals the prospect of an eternity in Hell for the sinner who does not repent, and it was to save us from the fires of Hell that he became man. Salvation comes from union in faith and baptism with him. Our Lord’s public ministry, beginning with his temporary withdrawal to the wilderness following his baptism, is marked by an encounter with the prince of Hell, Satan. It began a battle to the death. From the outset Christ is in direct conflict with the demons who have in numbers made their abode in the lives of very many unfortunates of God’s chosen people. We do not get the impression that this was wholly the fault of those possessed. We read of a young boy possessed by a demon. One of Christ’s most ardent disciples, Mary Magdalene, had had seven demons cast out of her by him.

Christ’s public ministry was in large measure dominated by his conflict with Satan. Appointing Simon to be the rock of his Church and giving to him the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, Christ promises that the powers of Hell will not prevail. At the Last Supper he spoke to his disciples of his Passion as the moment when the Prince of this world was on his way. In our Gospel today our Lord speaks specifically of Satan’s kingdom. The demonic world, our Lord implies, is organized and well thought through. It is “a kingdom” and “a household,” suggesting a unity and a strategy. “Any kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and a house divided against itself will fall. If Satan is divided against himself, how can his kingdom stand? I say this because you claim that I drive out demons by Beelzebub.” The only victor over Satan is Jesus Christ because he is far the stronger. He despoils Satan who has been in possession, and shares out the spoils — and this was the upshot of our Lord’s ministry and death and resurrection. “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe. But when someone stronger attacks and overpowers him, he takes away the armour in which the man trusted and divides up the spoils. He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me, scatters” (Luke 11: 15-26). Christ warns all to be vigilant. It is not enough to have been freed by God’s power of the influence of this spirit, for this enemy seeks to return. “When an evil spirit comes out of a man, it goes through arid places seeking rest and does not find it. Then it says, 'I will return to the house I left.' When it arrives, it finds the house swept clean and put in order. Then it goes and takes seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and live there. And the final condition of that man is worse than the first” (Luke 11: 15-26). I remember watching a contest shot on film between a crocodile and a lion. The more nimble lion forced the crocodile away back into the river. But then, becoming distracted, the lion remained on the shore and ceased to be on guard. The crocodile suddenly returned and, rushing from the water, took the lion.

Let us beware, as our first parents did not beware. Their archetypal example has been replicated time and time again in the history of our race. Wellington did not underestimate the genius of Bonaparte as a military commander, but prepared for the final encounter at Waterloo with great care. Were it not for the arrival of Blucher, he would have probably lost. Bonaparte, on the other hand, underestimated Wellington and underperformed. Should we underestimate Satan — and our age tends to regard the demons as a joke — it will lead to a downfall. Let us take our stand with Christ, carrying his banner to victory. That banner is the sign Constantine saw in the skies: it is the Cross. Let us follow Jesus as he carries the cross. That is our weapon, and by it we win.
                                                                       (E.J.Tyler)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just as observant religious are eager to know how the first of their order or congregation lived, so as to have their model to follow you too, Christian gentleman, should also seek to know and imitate the lives of the disciples of Jesus, who knew Peter and Paul and John, and all but witnessed the Death and Resurrection of the Master.
                                                              (The Way, no.925)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Fortieth Chapter   
MAN HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING

THE DISCIPLE

Let Your name, not mine, be praised. Let Your work, not mine, be magnified. Let Your holy name be blessed, but let no human praise be given to me. You are my glory. You are the joy of my heart. In You I will glory and rejoice all the day, and for myself I will glory in nothing but my infirmities.
                                                            (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The body of the faithful is one of the witnesses to the fact of the tradition of revealed doctrine.

                JHN, from ‘On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine’ (1859)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Saturday of the twenty seventh week in Ordinary Time

(October 10) St. Francis Borgia (1510-1572)
Today's saint grew up in an important family in 16th-century Spain, serving in the imperial court and quickly advancing in his career. But a series of events—including the death of his beloved wife—made Francis Borgia rethink his priorities. He gave up public life, gave away his possessions and joined the new and little-known Society of Jesus. Religious life proved to be the right choice. He felt drawn to spend time in seclusion and prayer, but his administrative talents also made him a natural for other tasks. He helped in the establishment of what is now the Gregorian University in Rome. Not long after his ordination he served as political and spiritual adviser to the emperor. In Spain, he founded a dozen colleges. At 55, Francis was elected head of the Jesuits. He focused on the growth of the Society of Jesus, the spiritual preparation of its new members and spreading the faith in many parts of Europe. He was responsible for the founding of Jesuit missions in Florida, Mexico and Peru. Francis Borgia is often regarded as the second founder of the Jesuits. He died in 1572 and was canonized 100 years later.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:  Joel 4:12-21;  Psalm 97:1-2, 5-6, 11-12;  Luke 11:27-28 

As Jesus was saying these things, a woman in the crowd called out, Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you. He replied, Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it. (Luke 11: 27-28)

Blessedness    Our brief gospel passage today is from St Luke, and Luke — the companion of St Paul and one of the principal writers of the New Testament — includes various tributes to Mary the mother of Jesus. The first comes directly from a great angel. Gabriel is one of three angels who feature in the Old Testament and whose names we are given. He addresses Mary with profound respect, and adds (in various manuscripts), “blessed are you among women” (Luke 1:28). He tells her that she will bring forth a superlative son. This, then,
was the pronouncement of heaven. Mary’s kinswoman Elizabeth, speaking under inspiration of the Holy Spirit, utters the same praise: “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the one to be born of you” (1:42). Mary herself in response, praises God for what he has done for her and acknowledges the same, “for behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed” (1:48). The Greek word varies, but the sense is similar and consistent. Luke means to be clear: Mary is the most “blessed” among women. Again, in our Gospel passage today which is later in Luke’s Gospel, Mary is pronounced to be “blessed among women”. As we read, “As Jesus was saying these things, a woman in the crowd called out, Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you” (Luke 11:27). This, then, is the teaching of the Scriptures, that Mary is the blessed one among God’s creatures. She is the “blessed” one, and as the angel Gabriel made clear, as did Elizabeth her kinswoman, and as did the woman in the crowd today, her blessedness comes from her being the mother of Jesus her divine Son. During his dying moments on the Cross, Christ bestowed on his beloved disciple this blessing that was his mother. “Behold your mother!” he said to him. “Behold your son!” he said to her. John did not include these last words of Christ as a mere curiosity. They were meant to indicate to us that the Church now has a most “blessed” mother and model.

Christ does not rebuff this praise for his mother — it is above all praise for himself. The woman is overcome with admiration for him, and as a mother she cannot help but acknowledge the blessedness of the one who bore and nurtured him. But our Lord — humbly deflecting what is really praise of himself — points to a deeper blessedness. Man is indeed blessed because of what God gives to him, but he is especially blessed if he hears the word of God and obeys it. This is what his own mother did, and it is what he himself always did so supremely. “Can any of you convict me of sin?” he challenged his enemies. “I always do what pleases him,” he says elsewhere. “Not my will, but yours be done” he prayed in agony in the Garden. The supreme blessing of life is not to have abundance of material goods, nor an abundance of goods of any kind. It is not to have been successful in one’s career, or to have an especially wide circle of friends and to enjoy consequent popularity. We do not see this in the life of Mary the mother of Jesus. What we see in her is perfect faith and obedience — humble and hidden withal. The greatest blessing of life is to have found the path to obedience. The supreme success is to have made great headway in true religion, which, as John Henry Newman once wrote, is in essence recognizing God’s authority and obeying it. This is precisely what our Lord tells us in today’s Gospel. The essential thing in life is that we hear the word of God and obey it. Every day we ought rise and immediately make that our ambition for the day. It is often said that we must develop a very positive attitude to life. The most positive thing we can do, and which is attainable for every person whatever be his talents or lack of them, is to strive to know the will of God, to hear his word, and assiduously to obey it. His will and his word is presented in the Scriptures, explicated by the Church, and made concrete in the dictates of conscience and the duties of our state in life.

Let us accept our Lord’s simple and very clear teaching. It is the path to true success, whatever be the poverty of our circumstances and achievements. In this we ought be ever starting again. Every day, let us begin all over again to attend with a full heart to the person and word of Jesus Christ. Hearing his word, let us make it our entire business to put it into practice, for “blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it” (Luke 11: 27-28).
                                                                             (E.J.Tyler)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You ask me, and I answer: your perfection consists in living perfectly in the place, occupation and position that God, through those in authority, has assigned to you.
                                                                     (The Way, no.926)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Fortieth Chapter  
 MAN HAS NO GOOD IN HIMSELF AND CAN GLORY IN NOTHING

THE DISCIPLE

Let the Jews seek the glory that comes from another. I will seek that which comes from God alone. All human glory, all temporal honour, all worldly position is truly vanity and foolishness compared to Your everlasting glory. O my Truth, my Mercy, my God, O Blessed Trinity, to You alone be praise and honour, power and glory, throughout all the endless ages of ages.
                                               (Concluded)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We must bear in mind what is meant by perfection. It does not mean any extraordinary service, anything out of the way, or especially heroic—not all have the opportunity of heroic acts, of sufferings—but it means what the word perfection ordinarily means. By perfect we mean that which has no flaw in it, that which is complete, that which is consistent, that which is sound—we mean the opposite to imperfect. As we know well what imperfection in religious service means, we know by the contrast what is meant by perfection.

                               JHN, from Meditations and Devotions (1893)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Twenty eighth Sunday in Ordinary Time B

Prayers this weekIf you, O Lord, laid bare our guilt, who could endure it? But you are forgiving, God of Israel. (Ps. 129:3-4)

Lord, our help and guide, make your love the foundation of our lives. May our love for you express itself in our eagerness to do good for others. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever.


(October 11) Blessed Angela Truszkowska (1825-1899)
Today we honour a woman who submitted to God's will throughout her life—a life filled with pain and suffering. Born in 1825 in central Poland and baptized Sophia, she contracted tuberculosis as a young girl. The forced period of convalescence gave her ample time for reflection. Sophia felt called to serve God by working with the poor, including street children and the elderly homeless in Warsaw's slums. In time, her cousin joined her in the work. In 1855, the two women made private vows and consecrated themselves to the Blessed Mother. New followers joined them. Within two years they formed a new congregation, which came to be known as the Felician Sisters. As their numbers grew, so did their work, and so did the pressures on Mother Angela (the new name Sophia took in religious life). Mother Angela served as superior for many years until ill health forced her to resign at the age of 44. She watched the order grow and expand, including missions to the United States among the sons and daughters of Polish immigrants. Pope John Paul II beatified her in 1993.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Wisdom 7:7-11; Psalm 90:12-17; Hebrews 4:12-13; Mark 10:17-30 

As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. Good teacher, he asked, what must I do to inherit eternal life? Why do you call me good? Jesus answered. No-one is good— except God alone. You know the commandments: 'Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, do not defraud, honour your father and mother.' Teacher, he
declared, all these I have kept since I was a boy. Jesus looked at him and loved him. One thing you lack, he said. Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me. At this the man's face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth. Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God! The disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said again, Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. The disciples were even more amazed, and said to each other, Who then can be saved? Jesus looked at them and said, With man this is impossible, but not with God; all things are possible with God. Peter said to him, We have left everything to follow you! I tell you the truth, Jesus replied, no-one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age (homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields— and with them, persecutions) and in the age to come, eternal life. (Mark 10: 17-30)

Material goods    Our Gospel scene today presents us with a situation of great promise. A man whom our Lord quickly came to regard with a special love presented himself to him. With ardour and respect, he asked from our Lord the direction that leads to heaven. Our Lord appears reserved before this enthusiasm, but immediately learns from the man that this keenness is of a piece with his past life. He has kept God’s commandments from his earliest years. On a separate occasion our Lord said that he counted the one who hears the word
of God and keeps it as his brother and sister. Our Lord looked on this man and loved him. He then extended to him a precious invitation which meant so much to our Lord. If you wish to be perfect in the love and service of God, sell all your many possessions and give to the poor, then come and follow me (Mark 10: 17-30). This direct following of Christ in the way indicated would have set him on the path to perfection. But the man, in a terrible sadness, refused. The stumbling block was his attachment to his many possessions. He loved material wealth in a way that led him to turn away from the word and the person of Christ. The thought of this good young man’s material possessions ought lead us to consider the place in life of the material goods we use and own and seek to own. As St Ignatius Loyola states in the foundation meditation of his Spiritual Exercises, man was created to know, love and serve God his Creator. The love and service of God is the objective to which God means the heart of man to be totally attached, and man’s happiness will be found therein. All that the Creator bestows, including material goods, is intended to help man attain this all-encompassing goal. Inasmuch as man is a member of this material world, the material goods which in the providence of God come his way and which he owns, obviously have a fundamental place in his life. But their place must be that given to them by God. In his use of material goods, man must be on guard lest they turn his heart away from the service of God. Rather, they must help him grow in the love of God.

Material goods are not to be used, and are not to have a place in human life, which is at the whim or ambition of man alone. He must in all things be subject to the will of God our Creator as revealed by Jesus Christ his Son, and Christ’s teaching is explained and applied by the Church speaking in his name. The Church has an entire social doctrine involving the correct way of acting in economic, social and political life, as well as the right and duty of human labour, of justice and solidarity among nations, and of love for the poor. From the Encyclical Rerum Novarum of Pope Leo XIII in 1891 to the Encyclical Populorum Progressio of Pope Paul VI in 1967 and on to the Encyclical Caritas in Veritate of Pope Benedict in 2009, the Church has pronounced on the proper use of material goods in personal, social and international life. This authoritative teaching may be said to stem from the Seventh Commandment, You shall not steal. That commandment requires firstly, respect for the fact that the goods of the earth are meant for the benefit of all. At the same time, it requires respect for the principle of private ownership of them, as well as respect for persons, for their property and the integrity of creation. By nature we desire property and this natural desire comes from the Creator. The purpose of private ownership is to guarantee our freedom and dignity, to meet our own basic needs and the needs of those who depend on us, as well as the needs of all. If we own little or nothing it is very difficult to meet these needs. But our property must be acquired and received and used in a just way, and the right of all to the satisfaction of their basic needs takes a certain precedence. If the Seventh Commandment is to be observed in individual and social life, the principle of private ownership and the principle that the goods of the earth are intended for all must both be respected by all and kept in balance. The tragic lessons of the past two centuries of capitalist and socialist regimes should be kept vividly in mind, and all ought make it their business to listen to the Church’s social doctrine.

That rich young man who had so much promise allowed material possessions to assume a place in his life which proved to be tragic. That is not to say he lost his soul — we do not know his future. But he failed to gain the pearl of great price, the treasure of all treasures hidden in the field. That pearl, that treasure is union with Jesus Christ and the fulfilment of God’s will. Material goods can help us to please God, or they can lead our hearts astray. Let us for love of God preserve in our hearts a healthy detachment from them so as to be able to grow in a total attachment to God.
                                                                            (E.J.Tyler)

Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, no.2402-2406
(goods and property)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pray for each other. One is wavering?... And another?...

Keep on praying, without losing your peace. Some are going? Some are being lost?... God has you all numbered from eternity!
                                                               (The Way, no.927)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-First Chapter   
CONTEMPT FOR ALL EARTHLY HONOUR

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

MY CHILD, do not take it to heart if you see others honoured and advanced, while you yourself are despised and humbled. Lift up your heart to Me in heaven and the contempt of men on earth will not grieve you.
                                                                   (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


He truly is a rare and marvellous work of heavenly grace, who when he comes into the din and tumult of the world, can view things just as he calmly contemplated them in the distance, before the time of action came.

                 JHN, from the university sermon ‘Contest between Faith and Sight’ (1832)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Monday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time

(October 12) St. Seraphin of Montegranaro (1540-1604)
   Born into a poor Italian family, young Seraphin lived the life of a shepherd and spent much of his time in prayer. Mistreated for a time by his older brother after the two of them had been orphaned, Seraphin became a Capuchin Franciscan at age 16 and impressed everyone with his humility and generosity. Serving as a lay brother, Seraphin imitated St. Francis in fasting, clothing and courtesy to all. He even mirrored Francis' missionary zeal, but Seraphin's superiors did not judge him to be a candidate for the missions. Faithful to the core, Seraphin spent three hours in prayer before the Blessed Sacrament daily. The poor who begged at the friary door came to hold a special love for him. Despite his uneventful life, he reached impressive spiritual heights and has had miracles attributed to him. Seraphin died on October 12, 1604, and was canonized in 1767.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

Scripture today:  Romans 1:1-7;   Psalm 98:1-4;   Luke 11:29-32 

As the crowds increased, Jesus said, This is a wicked generation. It asks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah. For as Jonah was a sign to the Ninevites, so also will the Son of Man be to this generation. The Queen of the South will rise at the judgment with the men of this generation and condemn them; for she came from the ends of the earth to listen to Solomon's wisdom, and now one greater than Solomon is here. The men of Nineveh will stand up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it; for they repented at the preaching of Jonah, and now one greater than Jonah is here. (Luke 11: 29-32)

The Answer    I do not think that any instance can be found in the Old Testament of a prophet claiming to be greater than the prophets before him. Moses did not claim to be greater than Abraham, and Abraham did not claim to be greater than those who would come after him. Any such comparisons were out of the question. Elijah did not claim to be greater than Elisha, his future successor, nor did Elisha claim to be greater than Elijah. Jeremiah did not claim to be the greatest prophet, nor did any other make such a claim. The one figure in
all of the Scriptures who did make a claim of this kind was Jesus of Nazareth, and we have an instance of it in our Gospel passage today. The Queen of the South came from Sheba to “listen to the wisdom of Solomon, and now one greater than Solomon is here.” Our Lord says that in his wisdom he is greater than Solomon. The men of Nineveh “repented at the preaching of Jonah, and now one greater than Jonah is here.” Our Lord is a far greater prophet than Jonah. Christ is serenely aware that all who went before him, all the prophets and kings of which Jonah and Solomon were examples, pointed to him and were transcended by him. On one occasion our Lord said to his disciples in private that blessed were their eyes to see what they were seeing, and their ears to hear what they were hearing, because many prophets and kings sought to see and hear what they had before them, and it was denied them. It is yet another indication of the uniqueness of Jesus Christ, and of his own clear consciousness of this. The Scriptures pointed to the One who was coming, and to what God would do for man by means of his coming, but in fact the event proved to be a far greater blessing than was promised. The Messiah, greater than any of the prophets or priests or kings before him, was the Son of God himself. He was one of us, and yet he was God. He was far more than God’s all-holy Servant. He was God’s own Son, equal to the Father.

Despite this, the people were demanding a sign from heaven by way of proof. Our Lord had given many proofs, and John in his Gospel calls them “signs.” He had cured the lepers, healed all kinds of sickness and disease, raised the dead to life, calmed the storms, fed multitudes with a handful of food, cast out intractable demons with a mere word. No prophet or king displayed such constant and effortless power at the service of good. It ought to have been enough, and for this reason our Lord said that “this is a wicked generation. It asks for a miraculous sign” (Luke 11: 29-32). All that was really needed was to gaze on him and on the holiness of his life, and listen to his word in faith and obedience. The pagan city of Nineveh looked on Jonah and heard his preaching. They recognized in him a prophet and repented. Far more, then, ought all listen to Jesus of Nazareth and repent. The problem is that we do not want to listen to Jesus, or at least we do not care. We are not interested. We are content to live as if God does not exist — and we do not care if he does. This, I think, is the characteristic posture of modern secular man. His reason has been set adrift from religious faith, and the reason for this is perhaps that he does not recognize sin and its odiousness. Christ is not deemed to be needed. Christ is just one of many religious phenomena in history and a matter more of curiosity than of life and death. His uniqueness is dismissed. The pressing need, then, is to resolve to gaze on Jesus of Nazareth with a consciousness of our need. We must ask God to give us a sense of our true condition and place ourselves in the presence of Jesus, contemplating his person and the blessing of redemption he brings. I once watched an interview with a fine Catholic mother of a large family. She was a convert from Islam. When asked what led her to the Catholic religion, she said it was the thought of Christ the Redeemer, and the thought of our need for redemption. Islam has no recognition of a need to be redeemed.

Every day let us place ourselves in the presence of Jesus Christ, with the conviction that he lives now, risen from the dead and in glory, but present to each of us. He is worthy of our constant contemplation, our constant gaze. Let us resolve to come to know him as our living Friend and Lord, placing our faith in him and resolving to follow him in the ordinary course of our daily life. We must place all our faith in him, a faith based on a vivid awareness of our need and on an intimate knowledge of the One who answers our need.
                                                                                                (E.J.Tyler)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are right. 'The peak' — you told me — 'dominates the country for miles around, and yet there is not a single plain to be seen: just one mountain after another. At times the landscape seems to level out, but then the mist rises and reveals another range that had been hidden.'

So it is, so it must be with the horizon of your apostolate: the world has to be crossed. But there are no ways made for you. You yourselves will make them through the mountains with the impact of your feet.
                                                          (The Way, no.928)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-First Chapter   
CONTEMPT FOR ALL EARTHLY HONOUR

THE DISCIPLE

Lord, we are blinded and quickly misled by vanity. If I examine myself rightly, no injury has ever been done me by any creature; hence I have nothing for which to make just complaint to You. But I have sinned often and gravely against You; therefore is every creature in arms against me. Confusion and contempt should in justice come upon me, but to You due praise, honour, and glory. And unless I prepare myself to be willingly despised and forsaken by every creature, to be considered absolutely nothing, I cannot have interior peace and strength, nor can I be enlightened spiritually or completely united with You.
                                                       (Concluded)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The idea of disbelieving, or criticizing the great doctrines of the faith, from the nature of the case, would scarcely occur to the primitive Christians.

             JHN, from The Arians of the Fourth Century (1833)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Tuesday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time

(October 13) St. Margaret Mary Alacoque (1647-1690)  (Picture on left: face of St Margaret Mary)
    Margaret Mary was chosen by Christ to arouse the Church to a realization of the love of God symbolized by the heart of Jesus. Her early years were marked by sickness and a painful home situation. "The heaviest of my crosses was that I could do nothing to lighten the cross my mother was suffering." After considering marriage for some time, Margaret entered the Order of Visitation nuns at the age of 24. A Visitation nun was "not to be extraordinary except by being ordinary," but the young nun was not to enjoy this anonymity. A fellow novice (shrewdest of critics) termed Margaret humble, simple and frank, but above all kind and patient under sharp criticism and correction. She could not meditate in the formal way expected, though she tried her best to give up her "prayer of simplicity." Slow, quiet and clumsy, she was assigned to help an infirmarian who was a bundle of energy. On December 21, 1674, three years a nun, she received the first of her revelations. She felt "invested" with the presence of God, though always afraid of deceiving herself in such matters. The request of Christ was that his love for humankind be made evident through her. During the next 13 months he appeared to her at intervals. His human heart was to be the symbol of his divine-human love. By her own love she was to make up for the coldness and ingratitude of the world—by frequent and loving Holy Communion, especially on the first Friday of each month, and by an hour's vigil of prayer every Thursday night in memory of his agony and isolation in Gethsemane. He also asked that a feast of reparation be instituted.
Like all saints, Margaret had to pay for her gift of holiness. Some of her own sisters were hostile. Theologians who were called in declared her visions delusions and suggested that she eat more heartily. Later, parents of children she taught called her an impostor, an unorthodox innovator. A new confessor, Blessed Claude de la Colombiere, a Jesuit, recognized her genuineness and supported her. Against her great resistance, Christ called her to be a sacrificial victim for the shortcomings of her own sisters, and to make this known. After serving as novice mistress and assistant superior, she died at the age of 43 while being anointed. "I need nothing but God, and to lose myself in the heart of Jesus."
   Christ speaks to St. Margaret Mary: "Behold this Heart which has so loved men that it has spared nothing, even to exhausting and consuming itself, in order to testify its love. In return, I receive from the greater part only ingratitude, by their irreverence and sacrileges, and by the coldness and contempt they have for me in this sacrament of love.... I come into the heart I have given you in order that through your fervour you may atone for the offences which I have received from lukewarm and slothful hearts that dishonour me in the Blessed Sacrament" (Third apparition).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today: Romans 1:16-25; Psalm 19:2-5; Luke 11:37-41 

When Jesus had finished speaking, a Pharisee invited him to eat with him; so he went in and reclined at the table. But the Pharisee, noticing that Jesus did not first wash before the meal, was surprised. Then the Lord said to him, Now then, you Pharisees clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside you are full of greed and wickedness. You foolish people! Did not the one who made the outside make the inside also? But give what is inside the dish to the poor, and everything will be clean for you. (Luke 11:37-41)

Material means        Our Lord’s indictment of the scribes, the Pharisees and the Sadducees is manifest in the Gospels. But we must not think that all the scribes and all the Pharisees were the object of our Lord’s denunciation. Nicodemus was one of the Pharisees, and though fearful of the censure of his colleagues, he visited Jesus by night to be taught by him. He defended Jesus among his peers when their hostility was mounting, and he assisted Joseph of Arimathea when the moment came for Christ’s burial. Moreover, at the time of his
visits to Jesus by night he said that “we know” that you are a teacher from God — implying that there were others apart from himself who recognized this. At the time of the trial of the Apostles before the Sanhedrin, Gamaliel, a doctor of the law and leading Pharisee solemnly urged restraint and a certain liberality in respect to the new persuasion. Moreover, Paul, though of the party of the Pharisees and intent on destroying the Christian sect, was upright and a true man of conscience. He was a good man though profoundly mistaken. All this is to say that not all the Pharisees were guilty of what our Lord says here. That having been said, our Lord’s words are clear that many were indeed guilty. Let us notice a detail in our Lord’s denunciation of them. We read that when he had finished speaking, he was invited by a Pharisee to dine at his house. We gain the impression, incidentally, that the Pharisees were well off. They were men of means. We notice that our Lord criticizes them for what they do not do with their means — they do not assist the poor. He says in our text that “you Pharisees clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside you are full of greed and wickedness”. The externals of their religion — those religious observances that were to be seen by others — are clean and polished and present a bright spectacle. But “inside” they are “full” — “full”, let us notice — of both greed and evil. Greed was a principal feature of their moral decay.

Our Lord repeats his point in the same passage when he tells his host what he and his colleagues must do. “Give what is inside the dish to the poor, and everything will be clean for you” (Luke 11:37-41). They must give of their means to the poor and the effect will be great for their own spiritual condition. It is yet another example of the Christian insistence on the Christ-like service of the poor. Our Lord was filled with compassion for the poor, and he exercised his divine power time and again for their benefit. We read that when Judas left the Last Supper, some thought that, having the care of the common fund, he was being directed by our Lord to give to the poor. This implies that part and parcel of the use of monies that came for the sustenance of the Apostolic body was almsgiving to the poor. When Paul eventually came up to Jerusalem well after his conversion to meet with the Apostles, he was assigned by them to work among the Gentiles, with the request that he have a constant concern for the poor. It is an essential feature of the Christian religion that the poor be cared for and that, to the extent possible, we use our means in their service. In our Lord’s description of the Last Judgment (Matthew 25), the Judge will say, I was naked and you clothed me — going on to explain that whatever is done to the least he counts as having been done to him. But of course this is not just a command of supernatural revelation — that revelation granted to man by Christ and by the prophetic tradition prior to him. It is clearly a command of the natural law to which the conscience of the prudent and good man will bear witness. When disaster hits, aid agencies appeal for generous donations, and the conscience of man sanctions their request. Each person hears the voice of conscience dictating to him that he assist the poor. It is the voice of God being naturally revealed, which is clearer still when supernaturally revealed. The poor have a right to sufficient goods of the earth to meet their legitimate needs, and it is, in effect, stealing from them to leave them in their abject poverty.

As the Second Vatican Council states in its decree on The Church in the Modern World, “in his use of things man should regard the external goods he legitimately owns not merely as exclusive to himself but common to others also, in the sense that they can benefit others as well as himself” (GS, 69, 1). Our ownership of goods makes us a steward of God’s fatherly Providence, with the task of making it fruitful and communicating its benefits to others — first of all, of course, to those for which one is directly responsible, but also for all those in need. Let us resolve to use the good things God has given us for the benefit not only of ourselves, but for all those in need.
                                                                                    (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Cross on your breast?... Very good. But the Cross on your shoulders, the Cross in your flesh, the Cross in your mind. Only then will you live for Christ, with Christ and in Christ; only then will you be an apostle.
                                                                                (The Way, no.929)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Second Chapter    
PEACE IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN MEN

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

MY CHILD, if you place your peace in any creature because of your own feeling or for the sake of his company, you will be unsettled and entangled. But if you have recourse to the ever-living and abiding Truth, you will not grieve if a friend should die or forsake you. Your love for your friend should be grounded in Me, and for My sake you should love whoever seems to be good and is very dear to you in this life. Without Me friendship has no strength and cannot endure. Love which I do not bind is neither true nor pure.
                                                             (Continuing)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberty of thought is in itself a good; but it gives an opening to false liberty. Now by Liberalism I mean false liberty of thought, or the exercise of thought upon matters, in which, from the constitution of the human mind, thought cannot be brought to any successful issue, and therefore is out of place.

                                                  JHN, from the Apologia pro Vita Sua (1865)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Wednesday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time

(October14) St. Callistus I (d. 223?)
    The most reliable information about this saint comes from his enemy St. Hippolytus, an early antipope, later a martyr for the Church. A negative principle is used: If some worse things had happened, Hippolytus would surely have mentioned them. Callistus was a slave in the imperial Roman household. Put in charge of the bank by his master, he lost the money deposited, fled and was caught. After serving time for a while, he was released to make some attempt to recover the money. Apparently he carried his zeal too far, being arrested for brawling in a Jewish synagogue. This time he was condemned to work in the mines of Sardinia. He was released through the influence of the emperor's mistress and lived at Anzio (site of a famous World War II beachhead). After winning his freedom, Callistus was made superintendent of the public Christian burial ground in Rome (still called the cemetery of St. Callistus), probably the first land owned by the Church. The pope ordained him a deacon and made him his friend and adviser. He was elected pope by a majority vote of the clergy and laity of Rome, and thereafter was attacked by the losing candidate, St. Hippolytus, who let himself be set up as the first antipope in the history of the Church. The schism lasted about 18 years. Hippolytus is venerated as a saint. He was banished during the persecution of 235 and was reconciled to the Church. He died from his sufferings in Sardinia. He attacked Callistus on two fronts—doctrine and discipline. Hippolytus seems to have exaggerated the distinction between Father and Son (almost making two gods) possibly because theological language had not yet been refined. He also accused Callistus of being too lenient, for reasons we may find surprising: (1) Callistus admitted to Holy Communion those who had already done public penance for murder, adultery, fornication; (2) he held marriages between free women and slaves to be valid—contrary to Roman law; (3) he authorized the ordination of men who had been married two or three times; (4) he held that mortal sin was not a sufficient reason to depose a bishop; (5) he held to a policy of leniency toward those who had temporarily denied their faith during persecution. Callistus was martyred during a local disturbance in Trastevere, Rome, and is the first pope (except for Peter) to be commemorated as a martyr in the earliest martyrology of the Church.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Romans 2:1-11;  Psalm 62:2-3, 6-7, 9;  Luke 11:42-46 

Jesus said, Woe to you Pharisees, because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue and all other kinds of garden herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have practised the latter without leaving the former undone. Woe to you Pharisees, because you love the most important seats in the synagogues and greetings in the market-places. Woe to you, because you are like unmarked graves, which men walk over without knowing it. One of the experts in the law answered him, Teacher, when you say these things, you insult us also. Jesus replied, And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them. (Luke 11:42-46)

Justice    Our Lord begins his words in today’s passage with a woe. There are four woes (Greek: ouai). The woe suggests a grieving because of the judgment to come. Our Lord uses this word earlier in the Gospel when, having designated the Twelve, the whole multitude gathers before him. In that earlier chapter (ch.6), our Lord utters his beatitudes and his woes, a much briefer form of what St Matthew reports at the beginning of his presentation of the Sermon on the Mount. He speaks to his disciples (Luke 6:20), telling them that they are
blessed when they are poor, when they hunger, when they are sorrowful and when they are hated because of him. Then he turns to those whose life consists of seeking riches, being full of all they want, having a life of pleasure and laughter and being adulated by the world. Woe to you, he repeats four times: ouai! You are living to yourselves. You are heading towards the judgment of God. Having pronounced this multiple woe, our Lord then goes on immediately to command a loving service of others. To you who hear, he continues, love your enemies, bless them, offer the other cheek, give to all who ask, do to others as you would want done to you. Be merciful and do not judge. It is clear that the woe pronounced by our Lord is a terrible warning to those who do not love God and serve their neighbour. In our Gospel today, which is from a later chapter (ch.11), our Lord again pronounces a woe. Three times he lays a woe on the Pharisees and once on the lawyers — but two more woes are to be pronounced on the lawyers in following passages of this chapter. Let us consider, then, the woe pronounced on the Pharisees of our Gospel passage today. You Pharisees fiddle and tinker with mint, rue and all kinds of garden herbs and make such things the centrepiece of your religion. Yet you neglect the judgment and the love of God. Notice the word, “judgment” (Greek: krisin) — in many versions rendered as “justice.” Our Lord is referring to what the judgment (krisin) will be all about: man’s practice of justice. Our Lord is saying that they neglect both the practice of justice towards others and love for God.

This concise statement by our Lord sets before us how central to the divine judgment will be the practice of justice. The Pharisees neglected the judgment, which is to say, what will dominate the judgment of God. In the twenty fifth chapter of St Matthew, our Lord describes in grand and vivid detail the General Judgment on mankind. It is remarkable how much will depend on our practice of justice during life. One of the most notable features of religion in the history of mankind is the degree to which the observance of ceremony has dominated religion. The gods are placated and won over by the due and careful observance of the ceremonies. Thereby they feel honoured. But revealed religion has a remarkable stress on justice. The prophets are singular in their denunciation of a religion of ceremonies that neglects the needs and the rights of others, most especially the poor. This, of course, must in no way to be understood as a dismissal of formal and wholehearted worship, for the prophets and the entire Scriptures stress in great detail the centrality of worship. Our Lord vigorously cleansed the Temple. It is the focus of the Third Commandment. But worship and ceremony is utterly vitiated when there is a callous indifference to those in need. If we aspire to love God — as we must, for it is the very first commandment — then we must aspire to love and serve others. The implication of much of our Lord’s teaching is that it is justice which is in constant danger of being neglected. So important is this that at the General Judgment, Christ our Judge will say to us that when we served the least we were serving him, when we neglected the least we were neglecting him. The Pharisees were neglecting the judgment, because they were neglecting the practice of justice which will be the centrepiece of the divine judgment. In this, they were neglecting the love of God. “These,” — the judgment and the love of God — “you ought to have done, while not leaving the other undone” (Luke 11:42-46).

The first three of the ten commandments direct our lives to the love and veneration of God, both individually and together as God’s family. The remaining seven commandments direct our lives to the practice of justice towards others and towards ourselves. The love of God must be shown in the practice of justice. There will be no love without justice. Nor, of course, will there be true justice without love and mercy. Let us beware of being like the Pharisees in our religion, for God wants a religion of the heart, a heart given over to him and manifested in our love for those around us.
                                                          (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apostolic soul: first of all, yourself. Our Lord has said, through Saint Matthew: 'When the day of Judgment comes, many will say to me: "Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, work many miracles in your name?" Then I shall tell them to their faces: "I have never known you; away from me, you evil men"'.

God forbid — says Saint Paul — that I, who have preached to others should myself be rejected.
                                                         (The Way, no.930)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Second Chapter  
PEACE IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN MEN

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

You ought, therefore, to be so dead to such human affections as to wish as far as lies within you to be without the fellowship of men. Man draws nearer to God in proportion as he withdraws farther from all earthly comfort. And he ascends higher to God as he descends lower into himself and grows more vile in his own eyes. He who attributes any good to himself hinders God's grace from coming into his heart, for the grace of the Holy Spirit seeks always the humble heart.
                                                      (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While, then, Reason and Revelation are consistent in fact, they often are inconsistent in appearance; and this seeming discordance acts most keenly and alarmingly on the Imagination, and may suddenly expose a man to the temptation, and even hurry him on to the commission, of definite acts of unbelief, in which reason itself really does not come into exercise at all.

                                         JHN, from The Idea of a University Part II (1858)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Thursday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time

(October 15) Saint Teresa of Jesus, virgin and doctor of the Church (1515-1582)
   Teresa lived in an age of exploration as well as political, social and religious upheaval. It was the 16th century, a time of turmoil and reform. She was born before the Protestant Reformation and died almost 20 years after the closing of the Council of Trent. The gift of God to Teresa in and through which she became holy and left her mark on the Church and the world is threefold: She was a woman; she was a contemplative; she was an active reformer. As a woman, Teresa stood on her own two feet, even in the man's world of her time. She was "her own woman," entering the Carmelites despite strong opposition from her father. She is a person wrapped not so much in silence as in mystery. Beautiful, talented, outgoing, adaptable, affectionate, courageous, enthusiastic, she was totally human. Like Jesus, she was a mystery of paradoxes: wise, yet practical; intelligent, yet much in tune with her experience; a mystic, yet an energetic reformer. A holy woman, a womanly woman. Teresa was a woman "for God," a woman of prayer, discipline and compassion. Her heart belonged to God. Her ongoing conversion was an arduous lifelong struggle, involving ongoing purification and suffering. She was misunderstood, misjudged, opposed in her efforts at reform. Yet she struggled on, courageous and faithful; she struggled with her own mediocrity, her illness, her opposition. And in the midst of all this she clung to God in life and in prayer. Her writings on prayer and contemplation are drawn from her experience: powerful, practical and graceful. A woman of prayer; a woman for God. Teresa was a woman "for others." Though a contemplative, she spent much of her time and energy seeking to reform herself and the Carmelites, to lead them back to the full observance of the primitive Rule. She founded over a half-dozen new monasteries. She travelled, wrote, fought—always to renew, to reform. In her self, in her prayer, in her life, in her efforts to reform, in all the people she touched, she was a woman for others, a woman who inspired and gave life.
  Her writings, especially the Way of Perfection and The Interior Castle, have helped generations of believers. In 1970, the Church gave her the title she had long held in the popular mind: doctor of the Church. She and St. Catherine of Siena were the first women so honoured. 
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:  Romans 3:21-30;   Psalm 130:1b-6ab;   Luke 11:47-54 

Jesus said to
the experts in the law, Woe to you, because you build tombs for the prophets, and it was your forefathers who killed them. So you testify that you approve of what your forefathers did; they killed the prophets, and you build their tombs. Because of this, God in his wisdom said, 'I will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and others they will persecute.' Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, this generation will be held responsible for it all. Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering. When Jesus left there, the Pharisees and the teachers of the law began to oppose him fiercely and to besiege him with questions, waiting to catch him in something he might say. (Luke 11: 47-54)

Judgment     In his diagnosis of the religious life of the England of his time, John Henry Newman made a point he often repeated. People had little fear of God. We might put it more colloquially — they viewed God as being fairly harmless. In all things, God is assumed to be benevolent in the sense that only pleasant things are to be expected of him. We could say that this is very much the modern Western image of God, except that now the prevailing image of God is faint anyway. The world is what commands the attention of modern man. Newman urged that the intimations of God the Judge prompted by our conscience be attended to, as well as the manifest warnings of Revelation. Related to this common and very modern impression of God, is the notion that while the Old Testament presents a wrathful God, the New has done away with this and offered a truly kindly God. Talk of terrible punishments both immediate and ultimate is deemed to be inappropriate. Satan is often depicted as something of a goblin — a mischief, it is true, but also not to be taken very seriously. Of course, these are generalizations and there are exceptions without number, but the point is that the real Christ and his preaching is absolutely relevant to the spiritual emptiness of modern Western secular man. Set the preaching of Christ next to any of the prophets and it will be seen that Christ speaks far more of eternal punishment than they. Our Lord repeatedly accuses people of wrongdoing and sin and warns of the judgment of God and divine punishment. He speaks with thunder and lightning, as it were. He means his audience to change their lives, for their result will be terrible. Consider our Gospel passage today: “Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, this generation will be held responsible for it all” (Luke 11: 47-54).

What is our Lord saying here? He is warning those who are rejecting him that the consequences will be terrible, and that the opposition they are mounting towards him is all of a piece with all that has gone before. The prophets were rejected and this pattern of rejection has been at work from the very beginning, as evidenced in the biblical figure of Abel and his murder by Cain. It seems that our Lord is pointing to a coming catastrophe which will be the fruit of the numerous rejections of God and his servants, the prophets. I referred earlier to Newman — the acknowledged leader of the Oxford Movement during the third decade of the nineteenth century. In a work he wrote later in life he speaks of the fall of the Roman Empire under the weight of its own gradual decay and the irresistible Barbarian invasions. In that particular work he sees the invasions as (at least in part) the judgment of God on the Roman persecutions of the Christian Church. That is a view that one may accept or not, but it illustrates the general point that while God is indeed a God of love, his is a holy love and he judges sin. God is not just a kindly and harmless pie-in-the-sky. He is the very moral Ruler and Judge of the world, and all creation derives its being, moment by moment, from his creative will. Sin is the one thing God hates. Ultimate and confirmed sin will be punished. Now, we must never attribute sin to those who suffer. Nevertheless the hardships of this life can serve as an illustration of the consequences of sin and of God’s call to repent. Great catastrophes and mass hardships can also at least illustrate the consequences of sin. It is surely the case that accumulated sins and rejection of God do have their historical consequences — consequences which will also affect the innocent. There have been terrible moments in history following long periods of moral decline. I cannot help but think that the carnage of the French Revolution and the vast loss of life of the Napoleonic wars were a consequence of the moral and religious decay of the century prior to it. It may have been — at least partially — a judgment.

We ought have a holy fear of offending God. He is our Father and our Judge. In ordinary experience we see many things without noticing them, or to put it differently, we look at things and not see them. Then we look back at them and we see. The same thing can happen in our reading and hearing the word of God in holy Scripture. We can read the words of Christ and never notice many of the things he says and the force with which he says them. Let us notice and take to heart that he warns us that God will judge and punish sin — so we must repent to avoid this judgment. He pronounces harsh woes on the lawyers of today’s Gospel. Let us take these woes to heart, and resolve to live in union with Jesus our Lord.
                                                                               (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The military mind of Saint Ignatius has left us a picture of the devil calling up innumerable demons and scattering them through nations, provinces, towns and villages, after a 'sermon' in which he exhorts them to fasten their chains and fetters on the world, leaving not a single person unbound...

You have told me that you want to be a leader; and what good is a leader in chains?
                                                                     (The Way, 931)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Second Chapter   
PEACE IS NOT TO BE PLACED IN MEN

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

If you knew how to annihilate yourself completely and empty yourself of all created love, then I should overflow in you with great grace. When you look to creatures, the sight of the Creator is taken from you. Learn, therefore, to conquer yourself in all things for the sake of your Maker. Then will you be able to attain to divine knowledge. But anything, no matter how small, that is loved and regarded inordinately keeps you back from the highest good and corrupts the soul.
                                                                       (Concluded)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are those, not a few, who would be Catholics, if their conscience would let them; for they see in the Catholic Religion a great
substance and earnest of truth; a depth, strength, coherence, elasticity, and life, a nobleness and grandeur … ; a glorious history, and a promise of perpetual youthfulness; and they already accept without scruple or rather joyfully feed upon its solemn mysteries, which are a trial to others; but they cannot, as a matter of duty, enter its fold on account of certain great difficulties which block their way, and throw them back, when they would embrace that faith which looks so like what it professes to be.

                  JHN, from the ‘Preface to the Third Edition’ of the Prophetical Office of the Church (1877)



---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Friday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time

(October 16) St. Marguerite d’Youville (1701-1771)
  We learn compassion from allowing our lives to be influenced by compassionate people, by seeing life from their perspective and reconsidering our own values. Born in Varennes, Canada, Marie Marguerite Dufrost de Lajemmerais had to interrupt her schooling at the age of 12 to help her widowed mother. Eight years later she married Francois d'Youville; they had six children, four of whom died young. Despite the fact that her husband gambled, sold liquor illegally to Native Americans and treated her indifferently, she cared for him compassionately before his death in 1730. Even though she was caring for two small children and running a store to help pay off her husband's debts, Marguerite still helped the poor. Once her children were grown, she and several companions rescued a Quebec hospital that was in danger of failing. She called her community the Institute of the Sisters of Charity of Montreal; the people called them the "Grey Nuns" because of the colour of their habit. In time, a proverb arose among the poor people of Montreal, "Go to the Grey Nuns; they never refuse to serve." In time, five other religious communities traced their roots to the Grey Nuns. The General Hospital in Montreal became known as the Hotel Dieu (House of God) and set a standard for medical care and Christian compassion. When the hospital was destroyed by fire in 1766, she knelt in the ashes, led the Te Deum (a hymn to God's providence in all circumstances) and began the rebuilding process. She fought the attempts of government officials to restrain her charity and established the first foundling home in North America.
   Pope John XXIII, who beatified her in 1959, called her the "Mother of Universal Charity." She was canonized in 1990. "More than once the work which Marguerite undertook was hindered by nature or people. In order to work to bring that new world of justice and love closer, she had to fight some hard and difficult battles" (John Paul II, at canonization).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Romans 4:1-8; Psalm 32:1b-2, 5, 11; Luke 12:1-7 

Meanwhile,
when a crowd of many thousands had gathered, so that they were trampling on one another, Jesus began to speak first to his disciples, saying: Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs. I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don't be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows. (Luke 12:1-7)

In God’s presence    It is a commonplace observation that religion is all too often a matter of mere religious observances. In making such a critique of the religion of very many people, it is not being suggested that religious observances are not necessary for religion. Rather, the criticism is that in such a case religion consists in little more than religious observances. A person goes to church or to synagogue or to mosque on the designated days, but his life for the rest of the time is lived as if God had altogether receded from the scene of life. It is
akin to an official religion which keeps the gods happy by fulfilling their basic requirements of ritual. As all know, or as all ought know, religion is not this. True religion is a religion present in, and springing from, the heart of man. It flows out into the duties of his daily life and is manifested in a special way by the heartfelt observance of that worship which God wants. True religion is not merely — though it most certainly includes — the fulfilment of the duty to worship God publicly and privately. It is also the fulfilment of the duties of everyday life for love of him. Religion should pervade all of life — indeed it ought pervade all of social and political and international life. The significant feature of the modern world when set against the background of previous eras is that life is separated from religion, whereas life has characteristically been pervaded by religion — even if the religion itself has been profoundly faulty. So the question before every person whose religious instincts are alive and seeking to be respected is, how am I to live a life that is genuinely religious? What is the key to a life pervaded by religion rather than a life that turns to religion only on occasion? The key to it is to discover the presence of God and then, by deliberate resolve and policy, to live in it. God is present to man because man constantly draws his life and being from him. But man must turn his attention to the divine presence, discover it, and then abide daily in it with obedient awareness.

We must learn to live in the presence of God. The Christian knows that God has become man and has united us to himself by the grace of faith and baptism. In our Gospel today our Lord warns his disciples against hypocrisy, which is to say, living with the appearance of religious practice while one’s heart is far from God. “Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.” In essence this means living in the presence of men and seeking their favour while living out of the presence of God and being without regard for his favour. It means having little sense of the presence of God who sees all. Our Lord continues by reminding his disciples that God sees all and that all will be disclosed before his unerring gaze and judgment. Nothing is, nor will be, hidden from him. “There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs.” We must abide constantly in the presence of God, knowing that his favour alone matters, for in him all will be brought to light and rewarded accordingly. “Abide in my love,” Christ told his disciples on another occasion. It is the one who abides in his love profoundly and consistently who has the wherewithal to withstand the pressures and the threats of all that is contrary to God and the moral law. “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him” (Luke 12:1-7). Do not be afraid, Christ commands us. It was a refrain repeated time and again during the pontificate of John Paul II, and its basis is the resolve to abide in the loving presence of God and Christ. The only one ultimately to fear is God our Father whose love and favour must be the constant basis of our life. All other fears pale before the fear of offending him. As St Thomas More, one-time chancellor of England said as he approached the scaffold, “Though I lose my head I’ll come to no harm.”

Our fear of offending God is the fear of offending one who loves us with a fatherly and everlasting love. He knows every element of our being, for he sustains us moment by moment. “Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don't be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.” On the one hand we fear offending him, but on the other, if we live in his presence ultimately we may fear nothing and no one. Living in the presence of God is the basis of religion.
                                                                   (E.J.Tyler)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Look: the apostles, for all their evident and undeniable defects, were sincere, simple... transparent.

You too have evident and undeniable defects. May you not lack simplicity.
                                                           (The Way, no.932)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter   
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

MY CHILD, do not let the fine-sounding and subtle words of men deceive you. For the kingdom of heaven consists not in talk but in virtue. Attend, rather, to My words which enkindle the heart and enlighten the mind, which excite contrition and abound in manifold consolations. Never read them for the purpose of appearing more learned or more wise. Apply yourself to mortifying your vices, for this will benefit you more than your understanding of many difficult questions.
                                                    (Continuing)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The arguments for religion do not compel any one to believe, just as arguments for good conduct do not compel any one to obey. Obedience is the consequence of willing to obey, and faith is the consequence of willing to believe; we may see what is right, whether in matters of faith or obedience, of ourselves, but we cannot will what is right without the grace of God.

                                         JHN, from the sermon ‘Faith and Doubt‘ (1849)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Saturday of the twenty eighth week in Ordinary Time

Prayers this weekIf you, O Lord, laid bare our guilt, who could endure it? But you are forgiving, God of Israel. (Ps. 129:3-4)

Lord, our help and guide, make your love the foundation of our lives. May our love for you express itself in our eagerness to do good for others. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever.


(October 17)  Saint Ignatius of Antioch, bishop and martyr (d. 107?)
   Born in Syria, Ignatius converted to Christianity and eventually became bishop of Antioch. In the year 107, Emperor Trajan visited Antioch and forced the Christians there to choose between death and apostasy. Ignatius would not deny Christ and thus was condemned to be put to death in Rome. Ignatius is well known for the seven letters he wrote on the long journey from Antioch to Rome. Five of these letters are to Churches in Asia Minor; they urge the Christians there to remain faithful to God and to obey their superiors. He warns them against heretical doctrines, providing them with the solid truths of the Christian faith. The sixth letter was to Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna, who was later martyred for the faith. The final letter begs the Christians in Rome not to try to stop his martyrdom. "The only thing I ask of you is to allow me to offer the libation of my blood to God. I am the wheat of the Lord; may I be ground by the teeth of the beasts to become the immaculate bread of Christ." Ignatius bravely met the lions in the Circus Maximus.
   "I greet you from Smyrna together with the Churches of God present here with me. They comfort me in every way, both in body and in soul. My chains, which I carry about on me for Jesus Christ, begging that I may happily make my way to God, exhort you: persevere in your concord and in your community prayers" (Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Church at Tralles).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Romans 4:13, 16-18; Psalm 105:6-9, 42-43; Luke 12:8-12

Jesus said, I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God. But he who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God. And everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. When you are brought before synagogues, rulers and authorities, do not worry about how you will defend yourselves or what you will say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what you should say. (Luke 12: 8-12)

Bearing witness    Alexis de Tocqueville in his Democracy in America (1835 and 1840) wrote of the tendency for the majority of a democracy to provide opinions to individuals who then feel freed from the necessity to formulate their own. One instance of this is the influence of the democratic press and mass media. While often being a manifestation of the culture and the view of the majority, the media forms the opinions of the mass of individuals who too often take little trouble to assess what they read or hear. One result of this can be the lack of true argument in social discourse. For example, in response to a question by a journalist during his flight to Africa in
2009, the Pope, observed that condoms are not the true way to deal with the scourge of AIDS. In fact, it sets the problem back. The Western media and European government officials erupted. There was no space for true argument. The few experts in the field vainly tried to counter the prevailing clamour by presenting the statistical facts which greatly support the Pope. The very successful papal visit to Africa proceeded, Africans supported him, demographic experts gradually made their views known, and for those following the argument carefully the Pope was quietly vindicated. But what was been lacking was the opportunity for true argument. Now this is vitally important for the modern democracy. But — and this is most important — if there is to be true argument and an advance in the standard of national conversation, the argument must bring forward and revolve around first principles. A democracy above all else ought be a regime in which the first principles of life and thought are able to be argued out in freedom and respect. These first principles are the starting points, the fundamental positions, from which flow the opinions of individuals and communities. One widely held first principle which in the West emerged from the Enlightenment is that life and the world runs on its own terms. It is a weakness to depend on God. What is real is what is to be seen and empirically verified. This is assumed, and the assumption has practical results.

Other assumptions could be mentioned, but the point I am making here is that a society depends for its health on public conversation involving argument. The argument must be characterised by civility and it ought be argument that involves the discussion of first principles. This brings us to our Gospel passage today. Our Lord in effect speaks of the contribution which the Christian should make to the public conversation among men and in society. Indeed, the Christian is absolutely obliged for love of Christ himself and for love of his fellow man to engage in the argument and to strive to do so at the level of first principles. The first principle of the Christian which he considers to be the first principle of life and the world, is the person and status of Christ. Christ is the linchpin of the world and the source of its true life. Without him man dies an ultimate death. It is of critical importance for the world that it hear the argument for this, and it is the Christian alone who can initiate and sustain the conversation. Let us consider Christ’s words. “I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God. But he who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God.” The disciple of Christ is bound to acknowledge before men the person and mission and teaching of Jesus Christ. If he does not, Christ will not acknowledge him before the angels in heaven. The world depends on this acknowledgement. A second thing is revealed by Jesus Christ, and it is that the world will not be ready to discuss it. It is predisposed against the subject. In fact, it will make life difficult for those who argue for, and live by, the basic principle that Jesus Christ is Lord — indeed, Lord of lords and King of kings, the one who has all authority in heaven and on earth. But the aid of God is promised to the disciple who bears this witness. So it is that our Lord continues, “When you are brought before synagogues, rulers and authorities, do not worry about how you will defend yourselves or what you will say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what you should say” (Luke 12: 8-12).

Let the Christian regard himself as an agent of change. Let him readily engage with his times. Let him enter into it and be part of the tide, endeavouring to change its course. While he does in a sense act alone, as a guerrilla, we might say, he is not really alone. He is a member of Christ’s Church and all his fellows in belief are living and acting in Christ the head. Thus society can be changed in accord with the true first principles. But the argument — ever civil — must be sustained. The conversation must not be allowed to fall silent, for evil flourishes when good people say and do nothing. In our hearts we must ever be shouting, may Jesus Christ reign!
                                                                              (E.J.Tyler)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a story of a soul who, on saying to our Lord in prayer, 'Jesus, I love you', heard this reply from heaven: 'Love means deeds, not sweet words.'

Think if you also could deserve this gentle reproach.
                                                                     (The Way, no.933)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter    
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

Though you shall have read and learned many things, it will always be necessary for you to return to this one principle: I am He who teaches man knowledge, and to the little ones I give a clearer understanding than can be taught by man. He to whom I speak will soon be wise and his soul will profit. But woe to those who inquire of men about many curious things, and care very little about the way they serve Me.
                                                                 (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this day especially it is very easy for men to be benevolent, liberal, and dispassionate. It costs nothing to be dispassionate when you feel nothing, to be cheerful when you have nothing to fear, to be generous or liberal when what you give is not your own, and to be benevolent and considerate when you have no principles and no opinions. Men nowadays are moderate and equitable, not because the Lord is at hand, but because they do not feel that He is coming. Quietness is a grace, not in itself, only when it is grafted on the stem of faith, zeal, self-abasement, and diligence.

                                                JHN, from the sermon ‘Equanimity’ (1839)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

St. Luke the Evangelist (October 18)

Entrance Antiphon Is 52:7    How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings glad tidings of peace, bearing good news, announcing salvation! Gloria in excelsis.

Collect     Lord God, who chose Saint Luke to reveal by his preaching and writings the mystery of your love for the poor, grant that those who already glory in your name may persevere as one heart and one soul and that all nations may merit to see your salvation. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever.

(October 18) St. Luke the Evangelist
    Luke wrote one of the major portions of the New Testament, a two-volume work comprising the third Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. In the two books he shows the parallel between the life of Christ and that of the Church. He is the only Gentile Christian among the Gospel writers. Tradition holds him to be a native of Antioch, and Paul calls him "our beloved physician" (Colossians 4:14). His Gospel was probably written between A.D. 70 and 85. Luke appears in Acts during Paul’s second journey, remains at Philippi for several years until Paul returns from his third journey, accompanies Paul to Jerusalem and remains near him when he is imprisoned in Caesarea. During these two years, Luke had time to seek information and interview persons who had known Jesus. He accompanied Paul on the dangerous journey to Rome where he was a faithful companion. "Only Luke is with me," Paul writes (2 Timothy 4:11).
    Luke wrote as a Gentile for Gentile Christians. This Gospel reveals Luke's expertise in classic Greek style as well as his knowledge of Jewish sources. The character of Luke may best be seen by the emphases of his Gospel, which has been given a number of subtitles: (1) The Gospel of Mercy: Luke emphasizes Jesus' compassion and patience with the sinners and the suffering. He has a broadminded openness to all, showing concern for Samaritans, lepers, publicans, soldiers, public sinners, unlettered shepherds, the poor. Luke alone records the stories of the sinful woman, the lost sheep and coin, the prodigal son, the good thief. (2) The Gospel of Universal Salvation: Jesus died for all. He is the son of Adam, not just of David, and Gentiles are his friends too. (3) The Gospel of the Poor: "Little people" are prominent—Zechariah and Elizabeth, Mary and Joseph, shepherds, Simeon and the elderly widow, Anna. He is also concerned with what we now call "evangelical poverty." (4) The Gospel of Absolute Renunciation: He stresses the need for total dedication to Christ. (5) The Gospel of Prayer and the Holy Spirit: He shows Jesus at prayer before every important step of his ministry. The Spirit is bringing the Church to its final perfection. (6) The Gospel of Joy: Luke succeeds in portraying the joy of salvation that permeated the primitive Church. (Luke 24:50-53).  (
AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:    2 Timothy 4:10-17b;     Psalm 145;     Luke 10:1-9

The Lord Jesus appointed seventy-two disciples whom he sent ahead of him in pairs to every town and place he intended to visit. He
said to them, “The harvest is abundant but the labourers are few; so ask the master of the harvest to send out labourers for his harvest. Go on your way; behold, I am sending you like lambs among wolves. Carry no money bag, no sack, no sandals; and greet no one along the way. Into whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace to this household.’ If a peaceful person lives there, your peace will rest on him; but if not, it will return to you. Stay in the same house and eat and drink what is offered to you, for the labourer deserves payment. Do not move about from one house to another. Whatever town you enter and they welcome you, eat what is set before you, cure the sick in it and say to them, ‘The Kingdom of God is at hand for you.’” (Luke 10:1-9)

The mission       There are two features to be noticed in the history of God’s chosen people before the coming of Jesus Christ. The first is that the chosen people had a universal mission. This note is decisively struck in the Book of Genesis at the appearance of Abram and his call by God. “I will make you a great nation ... All the tribes of the earth shall bless themselves because of you” (Genesis 12:2-3). This promise that the chosen people, the children of Israel, would bear along with them a blessing for the world flickers here and there
throughout the Old Testament, at times flaring out in the Prophets, such as in Isaiah. Somehow, salvation would come from the Jews. What this meant was, of course, disputed, but it was the Messiah who would bring this blessing not only to the children of Israel, but to all the tribes of the earth. At the same time, the constant effort was to preserve Israel in the faith amid all its temptations to infidelity and amid all its reversals. That is to say, the universal impetus never took flight. The preoccupation of the prophets and of the religious leaders was to hold the people to the Law and to all that God had spoken. It was as if this was as much as could be managed in that dispensation―but things would change when the Messiah arrived. It was then that the world would know the difference. Now, among the many differences between Jesus and the prophets prior to him, including John the Baptist, was precisely this universal thrust. From the outset, Jesus Christ was engaged in a very missionary activity. He did not simply attract disciples―he sought them. He drew his disciples not only into the acceptance of his teaching, but into an active participation in his mission to the whole of the House of Israel, particularly its lost and wandering sheep. Twelve were established as the future foundation, as it were, and were to be his special companions. They were apostles―his envoys. Follow me, he said to Simon and his companions, and I will make you fishers of men. It was a missionary business, and other disciples―72 of them―were sent out, two by two. From the appearance of Jesus Christ, first Israel, then the world, was the great target of action.

So it is that the “Church” which Christ built, and in which he lodged the “keys of the Kingdom of Heaven” (which he had so incessantly preached), was “catholic” (or universal) and “apostolic.” It was “apostolic” in that it was founded on the Apostles with Simon at their head and as the Rock, and in that it was enlivened by the missionary spirit of Christ and the Apostles. Importantly, it was universal (or “catholic”). It was not primarily a national Church, as the religion of the Jews had primarily been a religion of the children of Israel. It was “catholic,” universal. It possessed an inherent impulse (derived from the presence of the Holy Spirit, with Christ at her head) to take root everywhere, and to make disciples of all the nations. Christ’s parting command to his disciples was that they go to the whole world and make disciples of all the nations. The very first step taken by the infant Church―after it received the gift of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost bringing it into birth―gave to it its universal character. That first step was the preaching of Simon Peter. As a result, a large number were baptized―the Acts of the Apostles tells us that some 3000 were added to their number (Acts 2: 41), and these were drawn from all over the known world (Acts 2: 8-12). That is to say, from the first, immediately after its birth at Pentecost, the Church was catholic, universal. Its impulse was to take Christ not only to the House of Israel, but to the ends of the earth. The blessing promised in Genesis for all the tribes of the earth was now being brought to them by the Church Christ founded on the Apostles. These are some of the things we think of when we think of St Luke the Evangelist. Luke was not an Apostle, but was a member of the Church founded on the Apostles. He was not what we would now call a “bishop”―one with the fullness of the ministerial priesthood (like his companion Paul), nor was he a “presbyter”―a ministerial priest. He was a layman―a doctor, and as it turned out, an inspired writer. Luke’s Gospel has distinctive feature―one of the most obvious being his rich accounts of the infancy of Jesus Christ and his portrayal of the virgin Mary. All of this was part of the dedicated service he gave to the Church in its indefatigable mission.

It is especially through his Gospel that St Luke will shape the Church till the end of the world. He was privileged to be an instrument of the Holy Spirit in his account of the birth, the childhood, the ministry, the Passion, the Death, the Resurrection and the Ascension of Jesus Christ our Lord. It is a beautiful Gospel that he has written. I would propose that St Luke could be regarded as a model Christian layman for the Church till the end of history. His love for Jesus Christ and for his blessed Mother is manifest. Let us love and venerate this saint, and learn to imitate him.

                                                                            (E.J.Tyler)


 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

World Mission Sunday (Second-last Sunday in October)

click on centre arrow

 

A possible Gospel: Matthew 28: 16-20

The eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. When they saw him, they worshipped him; but some doubted. Then Jesus came to them and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age. (Matthew 28: 16-20)

The Church's Mission      One of the many gains of modern Scriptural studies is a new appreciation of the distinctive approach of each of the four Gospels. The differences among them are not simply a matter of discrepancies, but of different perspectives and preoccupations. Two Gospels may report the same event, but while one may include a certain detail, another may not. For example, one Gospel’s narration
of the confrontation between our Lord and the Pharisees in the Synagogue includes our Lord looking around on them in anger, grieved at the hardness and blindness of their hearts, while another (Luke) drops the mention of his anger. Of interest are the different ways the four Gospels conclude. The last chapter of St Mark’s Gospel is of uncertain composition―our received text is made up of different manuscripts. This need not concern us here, but as it stands the Angel in the empty tomb orders the women to go and tell the “disciples and Peter that he goes before you into Galilee: there you shall see him, as he said to you” (Mark 16:7). But there is no formal mention of their going to Galilee. The post-resurrection scene remains in Jerusalem (16:8-15.19). What is stressed in Mark’s final chapter is the encounter with the risen Jesus and his command that his disciples go “to the whole world and preach the Gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15), crowned by his Ascension and their going forth everywhere (Mark 16:19-20). Luke’s entire post-Resurrection scene is in the Jerusalem area (Luke 24: 13-53; Acts 1:4-2:4), with no mention of Galilee. Christ’s command to bear witness to him “in Jerusalem, in all Judea, and in Samaria, and to the ends of the earth” is stressed. He then ascends into heaven, having directed them to await the Holy Spirit (Acts 1: 8-9). In John’s Gospel, which seems originally to have concluded at chapter 20: 28-31, there is no mention of a sojourn in Galilee till the later addition of chapter 21. In this original conclusion (chapter 20), there is the conferral of the Holy Spirit on the Apostles and Christ’s granting to them of their share in the mission Christ had received from his Father (John 20: 21-22). There is this stress on mission. Chapter 21 is especially concerned with Christ’s relationship with Peter and his giving to Peter his special mission in the Church.

What is common to the accounts by Mark, Luke and John is an emphasis on the mission of the Church to bring the Gospel to mankind. This is a particularly notable feature of the Christian religion, just as it was the notable feature of the public life of Jesus Christ himself. He did not stay in one place attracting disciples, as did John. He went out to the entire land of the House of Israel, attracting disciples not merely to his teaching, but to his person. To the rich young man he said that if he wished to be perfect, he should sell all and follow him. Christ was a missionary, and discipleship involved a share in this missionary existence. The Christian religion involved the love, adoration and company of the person of Jesus Christ but importantly, it also involved bringing others into his company as his disciples. It would not do, as far as Jesus Christ was concerned, simply to be with him and to be unconcerned with whether or not others were with him. One had to be up and doing in some sense, and participating in our Lord’s own quest to bring all others into his circle of disciples―indeed the whole wide world. The matter was critical because entry into the Kingdom of Heaven was gained precisely by becoming a disciple of Jesus Christ, and this one did by becoming a member of his Church by faith and baptism. Each of Christ’s disciples had to understand that love for him―which is the soul of Christianity―includes striving to bring all to the knowledge and love of him. Now, our chosen Gospel passage for World Mission Sunday today is from the end of the Gospel of St Matthew (Matthew 28: 16-20). It is plain that Matthew wishes to conclude his Gospel with the proclamations of the Resurrection, of Jesus Christ as possessing “all authority in heaven and on earth” (Matthew 28:18), and of the mission of the Church. Christ’s disciples were to go “and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:19). Christ promises to be with them till the end of the world. There is no mention of the Ascension, no mention of the appearances in the Jerusalem area, no mention of the coming of the Holy Spirit. What Matthew chooses to stress is the Fact of the risen Christ and the mission of the Church to bring him to the nations.

The Catholic Church, the Church founded by Jesus Christ, may be said to be a sleeping giant. The militant British atheist of the early years of this century, Richard Dawkins, chose to attack and protest what he calls the power of the Catholic Church. Such a characterisation is laughable. But it does suggest to the Church’s members the responsibility they have to take up the mission of Jesus Christ in which they share by baptism, and to prosecute it. One of the great gains of the Second Vatican Council was the reclaiming of the vocation of all members of Christ’s faithful to holiness and to mission. Let each of Christ’s faithful see every day as a share in the adventure that is Christ’s mission to make disciples of the whole world. Therein lies the world’s salvation
.

                                                             (E.J.Tyler)
 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Twenty ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time B

Prayers this week:   I call upon you, God, for you will answer me; bend your ear and hear my prayer. Guard me as the pupil of your eye; hide me in the shade of your wings. (Psalm 16: 6.8)

Almighty and ever-living God, our source of power and inspiration, give us strength and joy in serving your as followers of Christ. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God for ever and ever.

 

click on centre arrow

 

 

Scripture: Isaiah 53:10-11; Ps 33:4-5, 18-20, 22; Heb 4:14-16; Mk 10:35-45 or 10:42-45 

Then James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came to him. Teacher, they said, we want you to do for us whatever we ask. What do you want me to do for you? he asked. They replied, Let one of us sit at your right and the other at your left in your glory. You don't know
what you are asking, Jesus said. Can you drink the cup I drink or be baptised with the baptism I am baptised with? We can, they answered. Jesus said to them, You will drink the cup I drink and be baptised with the baptism I am baptised with, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared. When the ten heard about this, they became indignant with James and John. Jesus called them together and said, You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials impose authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10: 35-45)

The common good     I once watched a Vietnamese movie portraying the terrible sufferings of many Vietnamese in communist re-education camps. At great threat to their lives many attempted to escape, at times succeeding. Once scene showed a conversation between the young and brutal commander and a badly treated inmate. The commander accused the inmate of not appreciating the freedom and liberation that communism had brought to the country. The weakened inmate replied that he had no freedom at all — and,
with that perceived insult, the commander proceeded to beat him savagely. Powerful and aggressive ideologies of the last couple of centuries have had as their goal the improvement of society — that is, the common good. Robert Owen (1771–1858) was one of the founders of the socialist movement and had as his aim the alleviation of poverty. He laid it down that no one is responsible for his own will and behaviour, and is entirely formed by his external factors. So, he decided, the common good of society involved shaping individuals by a properly constructed environment. Of course, in such a view of the common good it is a short step towards tyranny. With the appearance of Karl Marx’s master work, Das Kapital (1848), the sad story of communism began. The common good — in its Marxist understanding — was the prize ahead, and untold suffering for untold numbers resulted. But there was at this time a very different notion of the common good. Capitalism understood itself as based on full freedom, especially in the use of one’s goods. It held that each person has the right to own and use his property as he deems fit and the state ought desist from interference. Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) held that rational self-interest in a free-market economy leads to economic well-being. Economic development was best fostered in an environment of free competition. But so bad did the practical result of this view become during the Industrial Revolution, that untold numbers of workers lived lives of terrible misery. They were at the mercy of those who had complete freedom in the use of their capital. All that mattered was production and profit. The great papal Encyclical Rerum Novarum (1891) was in large measure a rebuttal of this laissez-faire capitalism.

I say all this as an introduction to what our Lord teaches in today’s Gospel, for it has direct implications for our understanding of the common good and the way society is to attain it. The result of so much of social and economic theory and practice of the last two and a half centuries has been the denial of the proper fulfilment of very many groups and individuals. It has resulted in tremendous abuses of authority and power, bringing misery and the denial of rights to those groups and individuals. Indeed, those groups have at times constituted the majority of the state. Russia was a religious nation, and nearly a century ago the Bolsheviks, with their notion of what was good for society — the common good, that is — seized power and over the course of decades wreaked great violence on the adherents of religion. We read that Jesus called his disciples together and said, “You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials impose authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all.” The common good is attained by a profound spirit of service. By the common good is meant the total of those conditions of social life which allow people as groups and individuals to reach their proper fulfilment. It involves respect for and promotion of the fundamental rights of the person, the development of the spiritual and temporal goods of persons and of society, and it involves the peace and security of all. All men and women according to the place that they occupy participate in promoting this common good. They do this by respecting just laws and taking charge of the areas for which they have personal responsibility — such as the care of their own family and the commitment to their own work. They are also called, and should be free to, take an active part in public life as far as possible. All of this constitutes the true common good. For all of this, society needs a proper understanding of man and a model of service to man.

Now, where is this understanding and this model to be found? Jesus Christ is the model for every man of what it is to live a life of service. As we heard in the Gospel, “The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10: 35-45). How far from the example of Jesus Christ have been very many theories of society and of the common good! Let us take Jesus Christ and what he has revealed of the nature and destiny of man as our inspiration for our service to society and our understanding of the common good. The implications for the common good of Christ’s person and teaching are extensively developed in the Church’s great social teaching, extending from Rerum Novarum already mentioned, through the various social Encyclicals since then, and including Caritas in Veritate of Benedict XVI. In our concern for the common good of society let us make it our business to be imbued with the person and example of Jesus Christ and nourished by the Church’s teaching.
                                                                           (E.J.Tyler)

Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1905-1917
(common good)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apostolic zeal is a divine craziness I want you to have. Its symptoms are: hunger to know the Master; constant concern for souls; perseverance that nothing can shake.
                                                          (The Way, no.934)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter  
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

The time will come when Christ, the Teacher of teachers, the Lord of angels, will appear to hear the lessons of all -- that is, to examine the conscience of everyone. Then He will search Jerusalem with lamps and the hidden things of darkness will be brought to light and the arguings of men's tongues be silenced.
                                                                       (Continuing)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is a passage from John Henry Newman’s sermon Unreal Words.’ Here, Newman analyses what it means to speak in an ‘unreal’ way, and shows how this can apply to religious beliefs. Do we, like the Apostles sometimes ‘not know what we are asking’ (cf. Mark 10: 38)?

Of course it is very common in all matters, not only in religion, to speak in an unreal way; viz., when we speak on a subject with which our minds are not familiar. If you were to hear a person who knew nothing about military matters, giving directions how soldiers on service should conduct themselves, or how their food and lodging, or their marching, was to be duly arranged, you would be sure that his mistakes would be such as to excite the ridicule and contempt of men experienced in warfare. … If a dim-sighted man were to attempt to decide questions of proportion and colour, or a man without ear to judge of musical compositions, we should feel that he spoke on and from general principles, on fancy, or by deduction and argument, not from a real apprehension of the matters which he discussed. His remarks would be theoretical and unreal.

This unsubstantial way of speaking is instanced in the case of persons who fall into any new company among strange faces and amid novel occurrences. They sometimes form amiable judgments of men and things, sometimes the reverse,—but whatever their judgments be, they are to those who know the men and the things strangely unreal and distorted. They feel reverence where they should not; they discern slights where none were intended; they discover meaning in events which have none; they fancy motives; they misinterpret manner; they mistake character; and they form generalizations and combinations which exist only in their own minds.

Again, persons who have not attended to the subject of morals, or to politics, or to matters ecclesiastical, or to theology, do not know the relative value of questions which they meet with in these departments of knowledge. They do not understand the difference between one point and another. The one and the other are the same to them. They look at them as infants gaze at the objects which meet their eyes, in a vague unapprehensive way, as if not knowing whether a thing is a hundred miles off or close at hand, whether great or small, hard or soft. They have no means of judging, no standard to measure by,—and they give judgment at random, saying yea or nay on very deep questions, according as their fancy is struck at the moment, or as some clever or specious argument happens to come across them. Consequently they are inconsistent; say one thing one day, another the next;—and if they must act, act in the dark; or if they can help acting, do not act; or if they act freely, act from some other reason not avowed. All this is to be unreal. [...]

And in like manner as regards religious emotions. Persons are aware from the mere force of the doctrines of which the Gospel consists, that they ought to be variously affected, and deeply and intensely too, in consequence of them. The doctrines of original and actual sin, of Christ’s Divinity and Atonement, and of Holy Baptism, are so vast, that no one can realize them without very complicated and profound feelings. Natural reason tells a man this, and that if he simply and genuinely believes the doctrines, he must have these feelings; and he professes to believe the doctrines absolutely, and therefore he professes the correspondent feelings. But in truth he perhaps does not really believe them absolutely, because such absolute belief is the work of long time, and therefore his profession of feeling outruns the real inward existence of feeling, or he becomes unreal. Let us never lose sight of two truths,—that we ought to have our hearts penetrated with the love of Christ and full of self-renunciation; but that if they be not, professing that they are does not make them so.

(Reference: John Henry Newman, Parochial and Plain Sermons Vol 5 (1840) Sermon no. 3, p. 34-36, 38-39)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Monday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time

(October 19) Saint John de Brébeuf and Saint Isaac Jogues, priests and martyrs, and their companions, martyrs
   Isaac Jogues (1607-1646): Isaac Jogues and his companions were the first martyrs of the North American continent officially recognized by the Church. As a young Jesuit, Isaac Jogues, a man of learning and culture, taught literature in France. He gave up that career to work among the Huron Indians in the New World, and in 1636 he and his companions, under the leadership of John de Brébeuf, arrived in Quebec. The Hurons were constantly warred upon by the Iroquois, and in a few years Father Jogues was captured by the Iroquois and imprisoned for 13 months. His letters and journals tell how he and his companions were led from village to village, how they were beaten, tortured and forced to watch as their Huron converts were mangled and killed. An unexpected chance for escape came to Isaac Jogues through the Dutch, and he returned to France, bearing the marks of his sufferings. Several fingers had been cut, chewed or burnt off. Pope Urban VIII gave him permission to offer Mass with his mutilated hands: "It would be shameful that a martyr of Christ be not allowed to drink the Blood of Christ." Welcomed home as a hero, Father Jogues might have sat back, thanked God for his safe return and died peacefully in his homeland. But his zeal led him back once more to the fulfillment of his dreams. In a few months he sailed for his missions among the Hurons. In 1646 he and Jean de Lalande, who had offered his services to the missioners, set out for Iroquois country in the belief that a recently signed peace treaty would be observed. They were captured by a Mohawk war party, and on October 18 Father Jogues was tomahawked and beheaded. Jean de Lalande was killed the next day at Ossernenon, a village near Albany, New York.
   The first of the Jesuit missionaries to be martyred was René Goupil who, with Lalande, had offered his services as an oblate. He was tortured along with Isaac Jogues in 1642, and was tomahawked for having made the Sign of the Cross on the brow of some children. Jean de Brébeuf (1593-1649): Jean de Brébeuf was a French Jesuit who came to Canada at the age of 32 and laboured there for 24 years. He went back to France when the English captured Quebec (1629) and expelled the Jesuits, but returned to his missions four years later. Although medicine men blamed the Jesuits for a smallpox epidemic among the Hurons, Jean remained with them. He composed catechisms and a dictionary in Huron, and saw 7,000 converted before his death. He was captured by the Iroquois and died after four hours of extreme torture at Sainte Marie, near Georgian Bay, Canada. Father Anthony Daniel, working among Hurons who were gradually becoming Christian, was killed by Iroquois on July 4, 1648. His body was thrown into his chapel, which was set on fire. Gabriel Lalemant had taken a fourth vow—to sacrifice his life to the Indians. He was horribly tortured to death along with Father Brébeuf. Father Charles Garnier was shot to death as he baptized children and catechumens during an Iroquois attack. Father Noel Chabanel was killed before he could answer his recall to France. He had found it exceedingly hard to adapt to mission life. He could not learn the language, the food and life of the Indians revolted him, plus he suffered spiritual dryness during his whole stay in Canada. Yet he made a vow to remain until death in his mission. These eight Jesuit martyrs of North America were canonized in 1930.
   "My confidence is placed in God who does not need our help for accomplishing his designs. Our single endeavour should be to give ourselves to the work and to be faithful to him, and not to spoil his work by our shortcomings" (from a letter of Isaac Jogues to a Jesuit friend in France, September 12, 1646, a month before he died).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow


 

Scripture today: Romans 4:20-25; Luke 1:69-75; Luke 12:13-21 

Someone in the crowd said to Jesus, Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me. Jesus replied, Man, who appointed me a
judge or an arbiter between you? Then he said to them, Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions. And he told them this parable: The ground of a certain rich man produced a good crop. He thought to himself, 'What shall I do? I have no place to store my crops.' Then he said, 'This is what I'll do. I will tear down my barns and build bigger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I'll say to myself, You have plenty of good things laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be merry.' But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?' This is how it will be with anyone who stores up things for himself but is not rich towards God. (Luke 12: 13-21)

Material possessions     A professorship of political economy at Oxford was established in 1825, with Nassau William Senior as the first professor. He was followed by his old university tutor, Richard Whately who shortly afterwards was appointed Anglican Archbishop of Dublin. That founding of the Oxford professorship we may take as symbolic of the modern rise of the discipline of economics. With its foundations in moral philosophy, political economy originally was the term for the study of production, buying and selling, and their
relations with law, custom, and government. It developed in the 18th century as the study of the economies of states — hence “political economy.” Karl Marx understood history to consist of the struggle between opposing classes over mastery of the economy. In the late nineteenth century, the term "political economy" was generally replaced by the term “economics,” often used by those seeking to place the study of economy upon mathematical bases, rather than the relationships of production and consumption. So it is that economics is a principal discipline of the modern age. Business Studies is a popular elective at the final level of Secondary School, while Economics and Commerce remains ever strong at Universities. The combined Law/Economics degree has a high entrance requirement. The principal minister of Government after the Prime Minister is often the Treasurer or his equivalent, and a dominant Government department is the Treasury. The world pulsates with the importance of the economy — which is to say, with the importance of maximizing the availability of money and material goods for the short and long term. An observer of the modern world would be forgiven for gaining the impression that what matters most in the lives of human beings is money-making and the possession or control of material goods. But a little philosophical reflection ought dispel any conviction that this is as it should be, widespread though it might be. The fact is that money and material goods are manifestly ephemeral and profoundly vulnerable.

Yes, indeed. If an individual’s life and work has been directed towards economic goals alone or principally, he has spent his efforts on what can and (ultimately) will pass uncontrollably through his fingers. As it has always been said, you cannot take it with you. Because of divine revelation we know that there is a Hereafter, and we know a good deal about it. Ordinary common sense would suggest that our lives ought be spent working for what we will be able to retain — forever. Our economic interests and goals ought be sought only within this ultimate perspective. This common sense consideration brings us to our Gospel today, in which our Lord is asked a very practical question by a person in his audience. “Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me.” How common is this problem, the matter of the Will! The point here, though, is that our Lord uses the occasion to drive home a few simple and central points for human life. “Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.” Many have made their life to consist in the abundance of possessions, so as even to lead them into a variety of forms of theft on a massive scale. It has been argued that the great economic problem of 2009 was ultimately an ethical failure due to a rapacious desire for profits. A man’s life does not consist simply in possessions, let alone an abundance of possessions. He must have the use of some things, but those things ought be oriented towards the truly central goals of human flourishing. At the heart of the flowering of the human person is love — loving and being loved — and ultimately this is achieved in the love of God. Material goods and prosperity ought support and assist the attainment of the love and service of God. This applies to the life of the individual as well as to the life of society. It is this which a man takes with him, and if he cannot take this, he takes nothing. For all his labour and his talents, he goes from this life with everything having slipped through his fingers.

Our Lord tells the parable of the man who built large barns for his abundant possessions. But it was all so very vulnerable. He was about to lose it all, for “God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?' This is how it will be with anyone who stores up things for himself but is not rich towards God”(Luke 12: 13-21). Let us heed our Lord’s words and make the love and service of God the great goal of every day, with the business of material security and prosperity serving that one all-important aim.
                                                                          (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't rest on your laurels. If, humanly speaking, that attitude is neither comfortable nor becoming, what will it be when — as now — the laurels are not really yours, but God's?
                                             (The Way, no.935)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter   
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

am He Who in one moment so enlightens the humble mind that it comprehends more of eternal truth than could be learned by ten years in the schools. I teach without noise of words or clash of opinions, without ambition for honour or confusion of argument.
                                             (Continuing)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the Church is to be regal, a witness for Heaven, unchangeable amid secular changes, if in every age she is to hold her own, and proclaim as well as profess the truth, if she is to thrive without or against the civil power, if she is to be resourceful and self-recuperative under all fortunes, she must be more than Holy and Apostolic; she must be Catholic.

                      JHN, from the ‘Preface to the Third Edition’ of the Prophetical Office of the Church (1877)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Tuesday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time

(October 20) St. Maria Bertilla Boscardin (1888-1922) 
             If anyone knew rejection, ridicule and disappointment, it was today’s saint. But such trials only brought Maria Bertilla Boscardin closer to God and more determined to serve him. Born in Italy in 1888, the young girl lived in fear of her father, a violent man prone to jealousy and drunkenness. Her schooling was limited so that she could spend more time helping at home and working in the fields. She showed few talents and was often the butt of jokes. In 1904 she joined the Sisters of St. Dorothy and was assigned to work in the kitchen, bakery and laundry. After some time Maria received nurses’ training and began working in a hospital with children suffering from diphtheria. There the young nun seemed to find her true vocation: nursing very ill and disturbed children. Later, when the hospital was taken over by the military in World War I, Sister Maria Bertilla fearlessly cared for patients amidst the threat of constant air raids and bombings. She died in 1922 after suffering for many years from a painful tumor. Some of the patients she had nursed many years before were present at her canonization in 1961. 
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:   Romans 5:12, 15b, 17-19, 20b-21;   Psalm 40:7-10, 17;   Luke 12:35-38 

Jesus said, Be dressed ready for service and keep your lamps burning, like men waiting for their master to return from a wedding banquet, so that when he comes and knocks they can immediately open the door for him. It will be good for those servants whose master finds them watching when he comes. I tell you the truth, he will dress himself to serve, will have them recline at the table and will come and wait on them. It will be good for those servants whose master finds them ready, even if he comes in the second or third watch of the night. (Luke 12: 35-38)

Personal convictions      Consider some of the great figures of history and ask, what would society and the world have been like had they not appeared on the scene and gained the power they wielded? Napoleon Bonaparte dazzled Europe by his military prowess following his rise from utter obscurity, and, having attained the title of Emperor, proceeded virtually to march on all Europe, with great designs on England too. The prodigy from Corsica brought fire and sword, smoking cities, untold carnage of human life — some two million dead — and the greatest European war to that point. Now, let us ask, what was the mind within him that led to all this? Obviously personal ambition drove him — his vision was a lasting empire in Europe ruled by the French, with the Church and indeed the papacy itself subject to him and his dynasty. But what was the seed-ground of his notions? Born into a Catholic Corsican family, as a boy he entered the military school of Brienne, and in 1783 the military school of Paris. In 1785, when he was in garrison at Valence as a lieutenant, he occupied his leisure by reading many of the philosophers of his time, particularly Rousseau. This reading left him in a kind of Deism, a mere admirer of the personality of Jesus and with no observance of religious practices. He imbibed and represented the anti-Christian rationalism of the Revolutionary leaders. He married civilly. He eschewed the religion of Christian revelation. Christ as the living Lord meant little or nothing to him. How different would Europe have been if Napoleon had discovered by true conviction the person of Christ and the Church his body. Imagine if he had discovered the truth of his native Catholicism! The fundamental convictions of this one man made an enormous difference to Europe, as had the rationalism of many who spearheaded the Revolution before him. They were agents of great change. The change that was effected was the fruit of convictions. I use all this as an example to illustrate the immense importance of basic personal convictions.

In our Gospel passage today our Lord says, "Be dressed ready for service and keep your lamps burning, like men waiting for their master to return from a wedding banquet, so that when he comes and knocks they can immediately open the door for him." Firstly, then, we are to be "dressed ready for service" — which is to say, busy about our work in life whatever that may be. We must be coming to grips with our responsibilities. We must keep our "lamps burning." We must be people of our work in life. That "work" in life may even be the "work" of being sick. St Bernadette Soubiroux (who received the appearances of Our Lady at Lourdes in 1858) spoke of her last sickness as a nun as being her last "job." She was resolved to do it well, and she died a very holy death. Each individual and all of society depend on the fulfilment of responsibility through work. Bonaparte worked — and worked furiously, and his fundamental convictions shaped the tenor and direction of his work. Our fundamental convictions will shape the tenor and direction of our work, and in our Gospel today our Lord speaks of what ought be those fundamental convictions. We must be convinced that this life is no more than a pilgrimage. We are on our way to our true homeland, and what we do here ought be done with the thought of Christ our Lord and Judge before us. So it is that the parable of today’s Gospel (Luke 12: 35-38) refers also to the conviction underlying our work. Christ tells us that our work and our service must be such as to leave us constantly ready for the arrival of him, our Master. Of course, this was the last thing that Bonaparte bothered himself with. We must so work that at a moment’s notice — such as if we were suddenly to succumb to a terminal condition — we would with joy open the door to the Master’s arrival. All this will depend on our convictions — which is to say, on our acceptance of Jesus Christ as Master, Lord and Judge. With such a conviction we will work day by day in a way which is according to the will and revelation of God. Let us then build the house of our life on rock, the rock of Christ our Redeemer.

Napoleon’s life ended in ruins. There is evidence that he came to a greater religious belief during these last years. Gaoled on the far-flung island of St Helena, treated harshly by his guards, he died 1821 of bowel cancer (like his father before him) and probably of poisoning. The humble and dedicated disciple of Christ may also come to temporal ruin, but his fidelity will pay off. He has a wonderful assurance from his beloved Master. "It will be good for those servants whose master finds them watching when he comes. I tell you the truth, he will dress himself to serve, will have them recline at the table and will come and wait on them. It will be good for those servants whose master finds them ready, even if he comes in the second or third watch of the night."
                                                                                   (E.J.Tyler)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You have come to the apostolate to submit, to annihilate yourself: not to impose your own personal viewpoints.
                                                                           (The Way, no.936)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter    BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

I am He Who teaches man to despise earthly possessions and to loathe present things, to ask after the eternal, to hunger for heaven, to fly honours and to bear with scandals, to place all hope in Me, to desire nothing apart from Me, and to love Me ardently above all things. For a certain man by loving Me intimately learned divine truths and spoke wonders. He profited more by leaving all things than by studying subtle questions.
                                                                       (Continuing)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

God sees every one of us; He creates every soul, He lodges it in the body, one by one, for a purpose. He needs, He deigns to need, every one of us. He has an end for each of us; we are all equal in His sight, and we are placed in our different ranks and stations, not to get what we can out of them for ourselves, but to labour in them for Him. As Christ has His work, we too have ours; as He rejoiced to do His work, we must rejoice in ours also.
                                              JHN, from the discourse ‘God’s Will the End of Life’ (1849)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Wednesday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time

(October 21) St. Hilarion (c. 291-371)
Despite his best efforts to live in prayer and solitude, today’s saint found it difficult to achieve his deepest desire. People were naturally drawn to Hilarion as a source of spiritual wisdom and peace. He had reached such fame by the time of his death that his body had to be secretly removed so that a shrine would not be built in his honour. Instead, he was buried in his home village. St. Hilarion the Great, as he is sometimes called, was born in Palestine. After his conversion to Christianity he spent some time with St. Anthony of Egypt, another holy man drawn to solitude. Hilarion lived a life of hardship and simplicity in the desert, where he also experienced spiritual dryness that included temptations to despair. At the same time, miracles were attributed to him. As his fame grew, a small group of disciples wanted to follow Hilarion. He began a series of journeys to find a place where he could live away from the world. He finally settled on Cyprus, where he died in 371 at about age 80. Hilarion is celebrated as the founder of monasticism in Palestine. Much of his fame flows from the biography of him written by St. Jerome.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Romans 6:12-18; Psalm 124:1b-8; Luke 12:39-48

Jesus said, Understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what hour the thief was coming, he would not have let his house be broken into. You also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. Peter asked, Lord, are
you telling this parable to us, or to everyone? The Lord answered, Who then is the faithful and wise manager, whom the master puts in charge of his servants to give them their food allowance at the proper time? It will be good for that servant whom the master finds doing so when he returns. I tell you the truth, he will put him in charge of all his possessions. But suppose the servant says to himself, 'My master is taking a long time in coming,' and he then begins to beat the menservants and maidservants and to eat and drink and get drunk. The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers. That servant who knows his master's will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked. (Luke 12: 39-48)

Divine judgment     A great difference to the policing of traffic was made when speed cameras began to be installed. Now cameras are commonplace on our roads, and the issue facing motorists is to remember to watch for them. The likelihood of not noticing the camera surely induces the motorist to be very careful to observe the rules of the road. It was once canvassed in the New South Wales Parliament the possibility of installing numerous camera look-alikes all across the states, thus having the effect without having the expense. The aim was to educate the motorist to observe the law for fear of being caught. In a few countries the possession of certain drugs attracts capital punishment, and it is said that this law has had a dramatic effect on drug dealing there. The point I am making here is that the fear of being suddenly caught can induce a policy of compliance. The same pattern is present in other areas of life. For example, health authorities urge a universal screening for bowel cancer, for the disease can silently advance like a serpent approaching its prey. Then it strikes with deadly effect, the victim is caught unawares and his life is lost. Again, great efforts are made to establish warning systems for certain regions of the world against tsunamis. Those who manage the systems are on constant alert lest populations be caught unawares. Or again, whole nations build up a readiness against terrorist threats, for experience has shown that the innocent can be engulfed in sudden horror. The point is the same: if at all possible we must stand ready and not be caught off guard against the known threat. The threat is to life, for life is the dearest possession. But now, it is obvious that whatever man may do to protect his life from threats, he cannot ward off the coming of death, and he cannot ensure that death will not be sudden. The issue is, if death comes suddenly, will he be prepared for what follows death? This is the greatest question of all because the revealed fact is that what follows death is the divine judgment.

No matter how advanced civilization becomes in a technological sense, the fact of threats and sudden death cannot be eliminated. At any point we can die. A person with the cleanest bill of health begins his walk in the tracks of New Guinea and on the way suddenly dies of a heart attack. No test predicted this eventuality. This pattern applies to every time and every place. So we do not know — as our Lord says in our Gospel today — at what hour the Son of Man is coming. What we must do is so live as to be ready, were the Son of Man to come suddenly. That is to say, we must live in the light of the Last Things which every man and woman will most assuredly face: death and the divine judgment. There is not very much about the future that we can be absolutely sure of. I am sure that if the average person who is well on in life were to look back to his childhood and youth, he would admit that he could never have predicted his future course. No, there is little of the future we can predict. But there are a few things that are absolutely certain. The first thing is that we shall die, and every passing second brings us closer to that most certain of future events. The second great certainty is that we shall face the awesome judgment of God our Creator and Redeemer. His searching gaze will bring to light in an instant all that we have thought, said and done. The books will be opened and the judgment made. Our Lord tells us in simple and figurative language the upshot of this single pivotal event in the existence of every person. “But suppose the servant says to himself, 'My master is taking a long time in coming,' and he then begins to beat the menservants and maidservants and to eat and drink and get drunk. The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers” (Luke 12: 39-48). The wise and prudent person lives in the light of this tremendous reality.

There is the glorious promise of heaven to those who love and serve God in the fulfilment of their duties in life. In our passage today our Lord speaks of God’s judgment and the threat of divine punishment. St Teresa of Avila, doctor of the Church on the spiritual life, was shown her place in hell were she to fail to serve God and turn away from him. What Christ says in today’s Gospel must be borne in mind. Let his words prompt us to keep close to God and to do all we can to save others from the risk of eternal damnation.
                                                                      (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Never be men or women of long action and short prayer.
                                                 (The Way, no.937)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter  
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

Though you shall have read and learned many things, it will always be necessary for you to return to this one principle: I am He who teaches man knowledge, and to the little ones I give a clearer understanding than can be taught by man. He to whom I speak will soon be wise and his soul will profit. But woe to those who inquire of men about many curious things, and care very little about the way they serve Me.
                                                   (Continuing)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Faith has no leisure to act the busy politician, to bring the world’s language into the sacred fold, or to use the world’s jealousies in a divine polity, to demand rights, to flatter the many, or to court the powerful.

                  JHN, from the sermon ‘Submission to Church Authority’ (1829)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Thursday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time

(October 22) St. Peter of Alcantara (1499-1562)
     Peter was a contemporary of well-known 16th-century Spanish saints, including Ignatius of Loyola and John of the Cross. He served as confessor to St. Teresa of Avila. Church reform was a major issue in Peter’s day, and he directed most of his energies toward that end. His death came one year before the Council of Trent ended. Born into a noble family (his father was the governor of Alcantara in Spain), Peter studied law at Salamanca University and, at 16, joined the so-called Observant Franciscans (also known as the discalced, or barefoot, friars). While he practised many penances, he also demonstrated abilities which were soon recognized. He was named the superior of a new house even before his ordination as a priest; at the age of 39, he was elected provincial; he was a very successful preacher. Still, he was not above washing dishes and cutting wood for the friars. He did not seek attention; indeed, he preferred solitude. Peter’s penitential side was evident when it came to food and clothing. It is said that he slept only 90 minutes each night. While others talked about Church reform, Peter’s reform began with himself. His patience was so great that a proverb arose: "To bear such an insult one must have the patience of Peter of Alcantara." In 1554, Peter, having received permission, formed a group of Franciscans who followed the Rule of St. Francis with even greater rigor. These friars were known as Alcantarines. Some of the Spanish friars who came to North and South America in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries were members of this group. At the end of the 19th century, the Alcantarines were joined with other Observant friars to form the Order of Friars Minor. As spiritual director to St. Teresa, Peter encouraged her in promoting the Carmelite reform. His preaching brought many people to religious life, especially to the Secular Franciscan Order, the friars and the Poor Clares. He was canonized in 1669.
    “I do not praise poverty for poverty's sake; I praise only that poverty which we patiently endure for the love of our crucified Redeemer and I consider this far more desirable than the poverty we undertake for the sake of poverty itself; for if I thought or believed otherwise, I would not seem to be firmly grounded in faith" (Letter of Peter to Teresa of Avila).
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow


 

Scripture today:   Romans 6:19-23;   Psalm 1:1-4 and 6;   Luke 12:49-53 

Jesus said, I have come to bring fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is completed! Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law. (Luke 12: 49-53)

The truth    It is often thought that philosophy is a discipline of the university alone. By that I mean that philosophical issues and a philosophical consideration of those issues is considered to be the business of departments of philosophy or those who are their products. It is deemed that the ordinary person, the ordinary family man, the ordinary worker or professional, is scarcely caught up in such matters. In fact, the establishment of departments of philosophy in Anglo-Saxon universities considerably postdated the rise of the discipline itself. Philosophers were writing in England who had little connection with the universities. This was to be expected, for philosophical questions underpin every position the ordinary person takes. One of the most characteristic issues of the modern mind is that of the status of his knowledge and, especially, of his basic convictions: are they, and can they be said to be, objective? If all are agreed on something, the question scarcely arises. Let us say that the whole country is agreed that an economic downturn or upturn is in process as the case may be. In such a setting, no one would think of asking whether man’s opinions and convictions can be properly regarded as objective. But consider matters of religion, where there is no such agreement. The community of nations includes a vast spectrum of religious belief, and in the typical secular society every man’s street includes those of deeply divergent religious convictions. A courteous tolerance is imperative for social order and if the rights of others are to be respected. But the ordinary man in this pluralist setting can be induced to think that all talk of objective truth is a fruitless fancy. By this I mean, not that he thinks that it is merely difficult to attain to religious truth (which it is), but that there is no such thing as objective truth. All there can be said to be is, personal opinion. As theologian Cardinal Avery Dulles once said, Religion tends to be regarded as a purely subjective preference, a mere matter of taste or custom, incapable of making objective truth-claims.

This is one of the challenges the proclamation of the person and teaching of Christ faces in the modern world. The baptized Christian, and the Church of which he is called to be a member, will not allow that “truth” is relative to each person and that therefore it does not represent a moral obligation on the one to whom it appeals. This is an illustration of the fact that the Christian religion does indeed involve fundamental philosophical positions which are opposed to certain other philosophical positions. The Church has in the past condemned various philosophical views and systems because ultimately they endanger man’s salvation. The famous Syllabus of Errors (1864) of Pope Pius IX (now beatified), a document much lampooned at the time and even now, included condemnations of certain philosophical positions. The implicit and scarcely conscious view of many that truth in religion is a phantom must be confronted, if Christ and his Church is to be known and accepted by modern man. This is a direct implication of our Gospel today, in which our Lord warns that he and his revelation will be a cause of profound discomfort in society. “Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law” (Luke 12: 49-53). Our Lord was saying to his disciples that central to their mission is the conviction and the teaching that the truth (about him) is absolutely objective and that it imposes a moral obligation of assent. They must expect that the proclamation of this as the objective truth will arouse the ire of many in society. Our Lord warns explicitly of the division that the Truth about him will cause, even, at times, within the family circle.

During the early stages of his Passion, Christ came face to face with the Empire as represented by Pilate. We may say it was a confrontation with the gentile world. As one having worldly power, Pilate questioned him about his identity and mission. Christ replied by referring to the objective truth. For this was I born, he said to Pilate, to bear witness to the truth and those who are of the truth listen to my voice. He had said to his own disciples that he was the way, the truth and the life. Pilate responded with a rhetorical question: “What is truth?” Let us proclaim it in our hearts and, to the extent our circumstances allow, from the housetops: Christ is the truth!
                                                              (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Try to live in such a way that you can voluntarily deprive yourself of the comfort and ease you wouldn't like to see in the life of another man of God.

Remember that you are the grain of wheat the Gospel speaks of. If you don't bury yourself and die, there will be no harvest.
                                                      (The Way, no.938)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter  
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

The time will come when Christ, the Teacher of teachers, the Lord of angels, will appear to hear the lessons of all -- that is, to examine the conscience of everyone. Then He will search Jerusalem with lamps and the hidden things of darkness will be brought to light and the arguings of men's tongues be silenced.
                                                (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Have we any right to take it strange, if, in this English land, the spring-time of the Church should turn out to be an English spring, an uncertain, anxious time of hope and fear, of joy and suffering,—of bright promise and budding hopes, yet withal, of keen blasts, and cold showers, and sudden storms?

                           
   JHN, from the sermon ‘The Second Spring’ (1852)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Friday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time

(October 23) St. John of Capistrano (1386-1456)
It has been said the Christian saints are the world’s greatest optimists. Not blind to the existence and consequences of evil, they base their confidence on the power of Christ’s redemption. The power of conversion through Christ extends not only to sinful people but also to calamitous events. Imagine being born in the fourteenth century. One-third of the population and nearly 40 percent of the clergy were wiped out by the bubonic plague. The Western Schism split the Church with two or three claimants to the Holy See at one time. England and France were at war. The city-states of Italy were constantly in conflict. No wonder that gloom dominated the spirit of the culture and the times. John Capistrano was born in 1386. His education was thorough. His talents and success were great. When he was 26 he was made governor of Perugia. Imprisoned after a battle against the Malatestas, he resolved to change his way of life completely. At the age of 30 he entered the Franciscan novitiate and was ordained a priest four years later. His preaching attracted great throngs at a time of religious apathy and confusion. He and 12 Franciscan brethren were received in the countries of central Europe as angels of God. They were instrumental in reviving a dying faith and devotion. The Franciscan Order itself was in turmoil over the interpretation and observance of the Rule of St. Francis. Through John’s tireless efforts and his expertise in law, the heretical Fraticelli were suppressed and the "Spirituals" were freed from interference in their stricter observance. He helped bring about a reunion with the Greek and Armenian Churches, unfortunately only a brief arrangement. When the Turks captured Constantinople in 1453, he was commissioned to preach a crusade for the defense of Europe. Gaining little response in Bavaria and Austria, he decided to concentrate his efforts in Hungary. He led the army to Belgrade. Under the great General John Junyadi, they gained an overwhelming victory, and the siege of Belgrade was lifted. Worn out by his superhuman efforts, Capistrano was an easy prey to the infection bred by the refuse of battle. He died October 23, 1456. On the saint's tomb in the Austrian town of Villach, the governor had this message inscribed: "This tomb holds John, by birth of Capistrano, a man worthy of all praise, defender and promoter of the faith, guardian of the Church, zealous protector of his Order, an ornament to all the world, lover of truth and religious justice, mirror of life, surest guide in doctrine; praised by countless tongues, he reigns blessed in heaven." That is a fitting epitaph for a real and successful optimist.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Romans 7:18-25a; Psalm 119:66, 68, 76, 77, 93, 94; Luke 12:54-59

Jesus said to the crowd: When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, 'It's going to rain,' and it does. And when the south wind blows, you say, 'It's going to be hot,' and it is. Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don't know how to interpret this present time? Why don't you judge for yourselves what is right? As you are going with your adversary to the magistrate, try hard to be reconciled to him on the way, or he may drag you off to the judge, and the judge turn you over to the officer, and the officer throw you into prison. I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny. (Luke 12: 54-59)

The great sign    In his book, A History of Apologetics, Cardinal Avery Dulles speaks with praise of the Christian apologetics mounted by some Anglican authors against the prevailing deism during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Deism typically allowed a religion based on rational consideration of the world of Nature. Nature was the voice of its creator, and reason was the instrument that attains its religious meaning. Nature constituted a natural revelation and was a reliable basis of religion, whereas supernatural and historical revelation was ultimately doubtful. Its basis was faith, and faith in the final analysis was not reasonable. There were various answers to this, but one famous one — noted by Dulles in his historical survey — was that of Anglican Bishop Joseph Butler (1692-1752), entitled The Analogy of Religion. The work had a considerable influence on John Henry Newman, later Cardinal, during the height of his Anglican years. Butler’s pivotal point is that there is a likeness between the course and constitution of the world and the doctrines of religion — suggesting that the Author of nature is the same as the Author of the doctrines of religion, both natural and revealed. This is not the place to discuss this as an argument supporting revealed religion — in any case it assumes that the audience accepts a creator God who is the author of nature. My point is to highlight the analogy Butler sees between the course and constitution of the world and the doctrines revealed by God. I believe this very point is implied in so many of our Lord’s parables. The same God, who reveals himself and his plan above all in Christ and his teaching, is the God who rules the world — and the world can be thus seen as illustrating certain of revealed doctrines. Our Lord himself draws on what happens in the world to illustrate the doctrines he is revealing. There is something of a likeness there that we can advert to, which will help us realize with greater effect the doctrine being considered.

Consider the doctrine of the judgment of God. In our Gospel today our Lord says that people can see the signs of a coming change in the weather, but do not notice the signs given by God of his coming judgment. “Jesus said to the crowd: When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, 'It's going to rain,' and it does. And when the south wind blows, you say, 'It's going to be hot,' and it is. Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don't know how to interpret this present time?” What is our Lord referring to here, and that his audience is incapable of interpreting from the signs available? He provides an illustration, this time not from the workings of the world, but from ordinary social and civil life. It is the imminent threat of civil judgment and punishment. Everyday life suggests the imperative of reconciling to one’s obligations in order to avoid this most certain judgment. “Why don't you judge for yourselves what is right? As you are going with your adversary to the magistrate, try hard to be reconciled to him on the way, or he may drag you off to the judge, and the judge turn you over to the officer, and the officer throw you into prison. I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny” (Luke 12: 54-59). On the way to the court, all the signs indicate that you may be found guilty and thrown into prison. So, you ought know you had best be reconciled with your adversary on the way so as to avoid this. Our Lord is saying, just so — see the signs! Be reconciled to God and keep his commandments! In the concrete this means, hear the saving news of the Gospel and receive with obedience and joy the tidings of Christ and his revelation. Do not truculently refuse Christ, for he is the great sign from God of his saving plan. He is the sign that reveals and indeed embodies it, for in seeing him we see the Father. As the Father said from the cloud on the mountain, this is my beloved Son. Listen to him!

Let us bow in spirit before Jesus Christ our Lord and our divine Friend. He is the manifestation of God and his divine plan. He is the Sign of all signs, the Notice of what is coming. By receiving him into our hearts, we embrace the life that will be ours hereafter, life divine, live abundant, life everlasting. He is the image of the unseen God, God incarnate, the term of all human longing and striving. Let us not be so foolish as to do what the prudent man would not do in ordinary life, ignoring this sign and gift that has been bestowed on us by our loving God.
                                                                (E.J.Tyler)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be men and women of the world, but don't be worldly men and women.
                                                           (The Way, no.939)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter   
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

I am He Who in one moment so enlightens the humble mind that it comprehends more of eternal truth than could be learned by ten years in the schools. I teach without noise of words or clash of opinions, without ambition for honour or confusion of argument.
                                                                 (Continuing)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Truth is opposed not only by direct contradictions which are unequivocal, but also by such pretences as are of a character to deceive men at first sight, and to confuse the evidence of what alone is divine and trustworthy.

                                                 JHN, from Difficulties of Anglicans (1850)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Saturday of the twenty ninth week in Ordinary Time

(October 24) St. Anthony Claret (1807-1870)
   The "spiritual father of Cuba" was a missionary, religious founder, social reformer, queen’s chaplain, writer and publisher, archbishop and refugee. He was a Spaniard whose work took him to the Canary Islands, Cuba, Madrid, Paris and to the First Vatican Council. In his spare time as weaver and designer in the textile mills of Barcelona, he learned Latin and printing: the future priest and publisher was preparing. Ordained at 28, he was prevented by ill health from entering religious life as a Carthusian or as a Jesuit, but went on to become one of Spain’s most popular preachers. He spent 10 years giving popular missions and retreats, always placing great emphasis on the Eucharist and devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Her rosary, it was said, was never out of his hand. At 42, beginning with five young priests, he founded a religious institute of missionaries, known today as the Claretians. He was appointed to head the much-neglected archdiocese of Santiago in Cuba. He began its reform by almost ceaseless preaching and hearing of confessions, and suffered bitter opposition mainly for stamping out concubinage and giving instruction to black slaves. A hired assassin (whose release from prison Anthony had obtained) slashed open his face and wrist. Anthony succeeded in getting the would-be assassin’s death sentence commuted to a prison term. His solution for the misery of Cubans was family-owned farms producing a variety of foods for the family’s own needs and for the market. This invited the enmity of the vested interests who wanted everyone to work on a single cash crop—sugar. Besides all his religious writings are two books he wrote in Cuba: Reflections on Agriculture and Country Delights. He was recalled to Spain for a job he did not relish—being chaplain for the queen. He went on three conditions: He would reside away from the palace, he would come only to hear the queen’s confession and instruct the children and he would be exempt from court functions. In the revolution of 1868, he fled with the queen’s party to Paris, where he preached to the Spanish colony. All his life Anthony was interested in the Catholic press. He founded the Religious Publishing House, a major Catholic publishing venture in Spain, and wrote or published 200 books and pamphlets. At Vatican I, where he was a staunch defender of the doctrine of infallibility, he won the admiration of his fellow bishops. Cardinal Gibbons of Baltimore remarked of him, "There goes a true saint." At the age of 63, he died in exile near the border of Spain.
   Queen Isabella II once said to Anthony, "No one tells me things as clearly and frankly as you do." Later she told her chaplain, "Everybody is always asking me for favours, but you never do. Isn't there something you would like for yourself?" He replied, "Yes, that you let me resign." The queen made no more offers.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:   Romans 8:1-11;   Psalm 24:1b-6;    Luke 13:1-9 

Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. Jesus
answered, Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them— do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Then he told this parable: A man had a fig-tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but did not find any. So he said to the man who took care of the vineyard, 'For three years now I've been coming to look for fruit on this fig-tree and haven't found any. Cut it down! Why should it use up the soil?' 'Sir,' the man replied, 'leave it alone for one more year, and I'll dig round it and fertilise it. If it bears fruit next year, fine! If not, then cut it down.' (Luke 13: 1-9)

Suffering and sin     In the last decade of the twentieth century and the first decade of the twenty first, Peter Singer has been considered as one of Australia’s foremost public intellectuals. He occupied stellar positions in academic philosophy in both Australia and the United States, specialising in applied ethics and approaching ethical issues from a secular preference utilitarian perspective, of which he is a leading exponent. In common with other utilitarians, he believes that right action is that which produces the most favourable results for those who are involved. Singer interprets “the good” as being the satisfaction of each person’s preferences, and a right action is that which leads to this satisfaction. Thus there is nothing that is “good” (or bad) in itself except for the person’s resulting state of mind. I mention Singer only to quote what he said on one occasion about God and creation. Singer was asked on television if he believes in God, and he smilingly dismissed such an idea. There cannot be a God because the obvious mess everywhere precludes such a proposition. There is too much suffering, too much evil, too much disorder for this world to be the work of an all-powerful, all-wise, and all-holy Creator — which is what God is supposed to be. Of course, there is nothing very original about this remark, which is not to say that it is not a telling one. There are so many things in life which we, from our perspective, find very puzzling indeed in view of the fact that all is in the hands of a loving creator. The man of religion believes in God with conviction, but that does not eliminate his problems with the state of the world. The man without religion likewise has his problems with the state of the world, and these problems can lead him to reject or ignore God. The evil, the suffering and the disorder are just that — they constitute a problem which in philosophical discourse is typically called the problem of evil. I can think of one prominent anthropologist who wrote that indigenous religions could be understood and described in terms of the answer their myths and rituals give to this problem of evil.

In our gospel passage today, our Lord is informed of an injustice of which there are countless instances in the great course of human history. “Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices.” The Roman procurator had massacred several persons in the Temple itself. The Jew would not call into question the very existence of God because of his allowing this injustice to happen — as might the modern man. Rather, typically he thought that such a tragic mishap was due to the victim’s own sin. Sin ultimately brings the punishment of God, and so, he thought, what one suffers in this world is due to one’s own sin. Further, the suffering in this world is proportionate to the degree of one’s sins. Suffering, then, is a personal punishment for sin. The greater the suffering, the greater a sinner must the sufferer be. But no, our Lord tells them. Just because sin ultimately attracts divine punishment and, with it, suffering, this does not mean that all suffering is in fact a divine punishment for the one who is suffering. It certainly does not mean that the suffering a person undergoes in this life is an indicator of the scale of his sin when compared to the sin of others. “Jesus answered, Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish” (Luke 13: 1-9). Our Lord does not, here in this scene, explain why God allowed those who suffered this injustice inflicted on them by Pilate. He does say, though, that it is an indicator of the punishment that will fall on the unrepentant sinner. “I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.” Of ourselves, we cannot plumb to its depths the reason why a good and all powerful God allows people to suffer — although, actually, much has been revealed by God about this. But our Lord does make it clear that God wants the evil and suffering of the world to remind us of the ultimate suffering that will be ours if we do not repent of our sins. That is to say, God will judge and condemn the unrepentant.

Let us remember that it is the Saviour who utters these words about the judgment that will fall on the sinner who refuses to repent. He himself took the part of sinners and on his shoulders was laid the burden of the sins of the world. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, and he did this precisely by his suffering. Thus has suffering been transformed into a means of redemption. Furthermore, the Christian is invited by his Lord to come and follow him. This means dying with him so as to share in his resurrection, and to bring a share in his resurrection to others. Suffering is now the greatest means of good, provided we suffer with Christ. Let us then do as he says and take up our cross every day and follow in his footsteps.
                                                       (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't forget that unity is a sign of life: to disunite means putrefaction — a clear sign of being a corpse.
                                              (The Way, no.940)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ  BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter  
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

I am He Who teaches man to despise earthly possessions and to loathe present things, to ask after the eternal, to hunger for heaven, to fly honours and to bear with scandals, to place all hope in Me, to desire nothing apart from Me, and to love Me ardently above all things. For a certain man by loving Me intimately learned divine truths and spoke wonders. He profited more by leaving all things than by studying subtle questions.

                                               (Continuing)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christianity is not a matter of opinion, but an external fact, entering into, carried out in, indivisible from, the history of the world.

                               JHN, from Difficulties of Anglicans (1850)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time B

(October 25) St. Antônio de Sant’Anna Galvão (1739-1822)
   God’s plan in a person’s life often takes unexpected turns which become life-giving through cooperation with God’s grace. Born in Guarantingueta near São Paulo (Brazil), Antônio attended the Jesuit seminary in Belem but later decided to become a Franciscan friar. Invested in 1760, he made final profession the following year and was ordained in 1762. In São Paulo, he served as preacher, confessor and porter. Within a few years he was appointed confessor to the Recollects of St. Teresa, a group of nuns in that city. He and Sister Helena Maria of the Holy Spirit founded a new community of sisters under the patronage of Our Lady of the Conception of Divine Providence. Sister Helena Maria’s premature death the next year left Father Antônio responsible for the new congregation, especially for building a convent and church adequate for their growing numbers. He served as novice master for the friars in Macacu and as guardian of St. Francis Friary in São Paulo. He founded St. Clare Friary in Sorocaba. With the permission of his provincial and the bishop, he spent his last days at the "Recolhimento de Nossa Senhora da Luz," the convent of the sisters’ congregation he had helped establish. He was beatified in Rome on October 25, 1998, and canonized in 2007.
   During the beatification homily, Pope John Paul II quoted from the Second Letter to Timothy (4:17), "The Lord stood by me and gave me strength to proclaim the word fully," and then said that Antônio "fulfilled his religious consecration by dedicating himself with love and devotion to the afflicted, the suffering and the slaves of his era in Brazil." The pope continued, "His authentically Franciscan faith, evangelically lived and apostolically spent in serving his neighbour, will be an encouragement to imitate this ‘man of peace and charity.’" 
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:  Jeremiah 31:7-9;   Psalm 126:1-6;   Hebrews 5:1-6;  Mark 10:46-52 

Then they came to Jericho. As Jesus and his disciples, together with a large crowd, were leaving the city, a blind man, Bartimaeus (that is,
the Son of Timaeus), was sitting by the roadside begging. When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to shout, Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me! Many rebuked him and told him to be quiet, but he shouted all the more, Son of David, have mercy on me! Jesus stopped and said, Call him. So they called to the blind man, Cheer up! On your feet! He's calling you. Throwing his cloak aside, he jumped to his feet and came to Jesus. What do you want me to do for you? Jesus asked him. The blind man said, Rabbi, I want to see. Go, said Jesus, your faith has healed you. Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus along the road. (Mark 10: 46-52)

The holy name    It is a commonplace observation that modern Western society and culture is secular. That is to say, at the very least, it does not have a religious face. An observer, gazing at its public institutions and its public conversation, would not be led to think of God. Its life, its laws and its literature hum with incessant activity without reference to a transcendent reality on which it acknowledges dependence. That is the broad picture, but it varies greatly in its spectrum. The United States, though secular, has a much more religious culture than does Britain, and both have a more religious culture than do certain European countries. It could be argued that Australia is among the most secular countries in the world, even though a considerable portion of its citizens are religious and there is a great vitality among certain of its religious bodies and institutions. Nevertheless the culture is a secular one, and this culture is a challenge to religion. There are some obvious indicators of this secular character. How rare it is for a public official to acknowledge personal belief in God, let alone belief in Jesus Christ as the saviour from sin! Were a prime minister or other minister of Government to refer publicly to such matters in a personal way it would, I surmise, bring immediate notoriety. While the fact of crime and wrongdoing is constantly referred to and governments readily place law and order on their agendas, is “sin” ever found in public discourse? It is not. It would be a profound embarrassment to colleagues if a Government minister were to mention “sin” seriously. The fact is that the public canvassing of such matters as “sin” and, say, “Jesus as the Saviour from sin,” would probably be inappropriate — and the reason is precisely that the public culture is profoundly secular. The present secular character of Western culture has been centuries in the making. European culture was once professedly Christian. All this is to say that the Christian has a great mission ahead of him, and that mission is to bring forward in social and public discourse the name of Jesus. That name is the name that is now not mentioned — Jesus and his mission to deliver all men from sin.

In this sense our Gospel today (Mark 10:46-52) has a special relevance for the modern world, a world so profoundly influenced by Western secular culture. Jesus was passing by in the midst of a thronging crowd. We may perhaps see in that scene elements of every time and place. The crowds flow on in the great river of human societies, and in the midst of the river is the One who brings life to all. A river proverbially brings life, but in fact there is but one element in the river of humanity which brings true life, and that is the man Jesus. He has come to bring life, life in abundance, eternal life, life divine. The blind man learns that Jesus of Nazareth is in the midst of the throng of humanity passing him by and immediately he raises his voice stridently and allows nothing and no one to muffle it. “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” Let that cry be a symbol of the mission ahead of the modern Christian. The name of Jesus Christ has to be uttered and heard. His mission has to be proclaimed. The name means, “God saves!” At the annunciation the angel Gabriel gave this very name to him, a name coming from heaven. It expresses his unique identity and his unique mission to save his people from their sins. The salvation of the human race is dependent on him alone. One of the characteristic assumptions of a secular culture, though unmentioned and almost unconscious, is that, just as there is wrongdoing but no sin, so there is no need of salvation from sin. It is allowed that man needs rescuing from various evils — illness, disease, natural catastrophes, hunger, illiteracy, unethical and criminal behaviour — but not from “sin.” Least of all is it admitted that the “sin” which is said to afflict him is the most profound of his afflictions, indeed the one from which spring the others and the one which will damn him forever if it remains unchecked. Modern secular man makes no acknowledgment of needing a Saviour from sin. The world needs, then, to hear that cry of the blind man resounding in the public square, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!”

As St Paul writes in one of his Letters, the name of Jesus is above every other name. As Peter bore witness before the Sanhedrin, there is no other name under heaven by which we can be saved (Acts 4:12), and as our Lord himself said, no one comes to the Father except through me. Let us pronounce this holy name frequently, every day of our lives. Let us so live that this name will be honoured and glorified not only in the hearts of men but by societies, cultures and by, indeed, the whole world. For, as Jesus Christ himself said, all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to him. He is the King of kings and the Lord of lords. By this name do we live!
                                                                         (E.J.Tyler)

Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, no.430-435
(The name of Jesus)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obedience, the sure way. Unreserved obedience to whoever is in charge, the way of sanctity. Obedience in your apostolate, the only way: for, in a work of God, the spirit must be to obey or to leave.
                                                                 (The Way, no.941)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Third Chapter   
BEWARE VAIN AND WORLDLY KNOWLEDGE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

To some I speak of common things, to others of special matters. To some I appear with sweetness in signs and figures, and to others I appear in great light and reveal mysteries. The voice of books is but a single voice, yet it does not teach all men alike, because I within them am the Teacher and the Truth, the Examiner of hearts, the Understander of thoughts, the Promoter of acts, distributing to each as I see fit.
                                                                        (Concluded)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The following short passage from an early essay of John Henry Newman’s on miracles talks of their nature and meaning and highlights the ‘miraculous’ nature of Christian revelation itself:

A Revelation, that is, a direct message from God to man, itself bears in some degree a miraculous character; inasmuch as it supposes the Deity actually to present Himself before His creatures, and to interpose in the affairs of life in a way above the reach of those settled arrangements of nature, to the existence of which universal experience bears witness. And as a Revelation itself, so again the evidences of a Revelation may all more or less be considered miraculous. Prophecy is an evidence only so far as foreseeing future events is above the known powers of the human mind, or miraculous. In like manner, if the rapid extension of Christianity be urged in favour of its divine origin, it is because such extension, under such circumstances, is supposed to be inconsistent with the known principles and capacity of human nature. And the pure morality of the Gospel, as taught by illiterate fishermen of Galilee, is an evidence, in proportion as the phenomenon disagrees with the conclusions of general experience, which leads us to believe that a high state of mental cultivation is ordinarily requisite for the production of such moral teachers. It might even be said that, strictly speaking, no evidence of a Revelation is conceivable which does not partake of the character of a Miracle; since nothing but a display of power over the existing system of things can attest the immediate presence of Him by whom it was originally established; or, again, because no event which results entirely from the ordinary operation of nature can be the criterion of one that is extraordinary.

(Reference: John Henry Newman, Two Essays on Biblical and Ecclesiastical Miracles (1870) Essay no. 1, ‘The Miracles of Scripture’, p. 6-7)


 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Monday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time

(October 26) Blessed Contardo Ferrini (1859-1902)
Contardo Ferrini was the son of a teacher who went on to become a learned man himself, one acquainted with some dozen languages. Today he is known as the patron of universities. Born in Milan, he received a doctorate in law in Italy and then earned a scholarship that enabled him to study Roman-Byzantine law in Berlin. As a renowned legal expert, he taught in various schools of higher education until he joined the faculty of the University of Pavia, where he was considered an outstanding authority on Roman law. Contardo was learned about the faith he lived and loved. "Our life," he said, "must reach out toward the Infinite, and from that source we must draw whatever we can expect of merit and dignity." As a scholar he studied the ancient biblical languages and read the Scriptures in them. His speeches and papers show his understanding of the relationship of faith and science. He attended daily Mass and became a lay Franciscan, faithfully observing the Third Order rule of life. He also served through membership in the Society of St. Vincent de Paul. His death in 1902 at the age of 43 occasioned letters from his fellow professors that praised him as a saint; the people of Suna where he lived insisted that he be declared a saint. Pope Pius XII beatified Contardo in 1947.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today: Romans 8:12-17;   Psalm 68:2 and 4, 6-7ab, 20-21;    Luke 13:10-17 

On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues, and a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years.
She was bent over and could not straighten up at all. When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, Woman, you are set free from your infirmity. Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and praised God. Indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, the synagogue ruler said to the people, There are six days for work. So come and be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath. The Lord answered him, You hypocrites! Doesn't each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out to give it water? Then should not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her? When he said this, all his opponents were humiliated, but the people were delighted with all the wonderful things he was doing. (Luke 13: 10-17)

Christ and Satan     Our scene today finds us “in one of the synagogues,” and Jesus is teaching there. It is the Sabbath, the day of the Lord when God’s chosen people gathered in his presence to hear the word of the Lord. Our Lord is teaching. Consider the marvel of that very fact! The congregation is gazing on God incarnate, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity become man. This, I suggest, ought be the abiding wonder of the Gospel scenes. The people mixed familiarly with this marvellous man. They heard his voice, they watched his expressions, they caught his eyes, they were captivated by his speech, they gazed upon the moral beauty of his person. So authentic and total was the incarnation that the majority did not yet perceive his lofty and transcendent identity. But there he was, the beloved Son of the Father, the Lord God himself. We read that “the people were delighted with all the wonderful things he was doing.” But now, during the course of his address, our Lord noticed a woman who had been crippled for eighteen years. The Greek text of the Gospel, explaining her condition, says that she had been having “a spirit of infirmity for eighteen years, bending over double and quite unable to straighten up.” Notice that Luke has firm details about the facts of her case. We are not told her age, but we are told exactly how long she had been in her physical condition. It had been going on for eighteen years. Luke had obviously obtained his information from those who knew the facts of her situation well. Moreover, Luke — physician as he was — adds a detail. It is that her physical condition involved “a spirit.” There was a demonic agency involved in some sense in her pitiable condition, “a spirit of infirmity.” Seeing her, our Lord’s heart was filled with compassion and, finishing his address, he called her forward from the congregation. There she stood, bent over, perhaps leaning on some support. Before them all, our Lord forthwith released her from her infirmity. Our Lord’s power and mercy was manifested, and the longstanding and crippling burden of the woman was gone. Radiant, she stood erect.

In his ensuing clash with the jealous synagogue official who was routed in the encounter, our Lord makes a remark about the woman that provokes further thought. He said before them all that it was Satan who had held her bound all those years. “Does not each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out to give it water? Then should not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her?” (Luke 13: 10-17). Somehow Satan had been very much involved in her sad affliction, and this had been going on long before our Lord arrived on the scene of her life. Our Lord does not specify in what sense Satan had held her bound, and we may suppose that Luke, the physician for St Paul, would have been interested to know. But we have it on the word of our Lord that Satan had been cruelly at work on her. Our Lord does not say that Satan’s was the only influence. But it is clear that among all the factors that had contributed to her physical condition, Satan was an active element. We remember how Satan successfully encouraged Adam and Eve’s revolt against God which brought to pieces the resplendent condition in which they had come from the divine hand. In that ultimate sense Satan had held bound not only this poor woman but the rest of mankind who inherited a broken human nature. But our Lord’s words imply more than this. Elsewhere in the Gospels, we read that our Lord expelled a demon from a boy who had been in his hopeless condition for a long time. Clearly, there could not have been moral fault in the boy. So it is that as we think of the broad sweep of human history, with its wars, its oppression, its fire and fury and mayhem, our Lord’s words about this poor woman suggest a strong demonic element in many of the catastrophes of human history. The inexorable rise of a murderous Nazism had, assuredly, much of the demonic in it. We may imagine the crackling laughter of Satan as the thundering fireball of Genghis Khan’s forces burst forth from Mongolia and reduced to smoke, blood and rubble the cities and peoples in their path.

In our Gospel scene today, Christ confronts Satan and expels him from the scene. He departs, cowering and full of hate. And so the battle continues to the end of human history when God will be shown as the Conqueror. There are thus two great Standards before us, the Standard of Christ and the standard of Satan. Let us take our place with Christ and fight with him against all that smells and smacks of Satan. Our weapons are those of Christ, and the route we follow is his. We follow in his footsteps as he makes his way to the point of victory, which is Calvary. Let us be up and doing, then!
                                                                              (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bear in mind, son, that you are not just a soul who has joined other souls in order to do a good thing.

That is a lot, but it's still little. You are the Apostle who is carrying out an imperative command from Christ.
                                          (The Way, no.942)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Fourth Chapter       
DO NOT BE CONCERNED ABOUT OUTWARD THINGS

THE VOICE OF CHRIST

MY CHILD, there are many matters of which it is well for you to be ignorant, and to consider yourself as one who is dead upon the earth and to whom the whole world is crucified. There are many things, too, which it is well to pass by with a deaf ear, thinking, instead, of what is more to your peace. It is more profitable to turn away from things which displease you and to leave to every man his own opinion than to take part in quarrelsome talk. If you stand well with God and look to His judgment, you will more easily bear being worsted.
                                                          (Continuing)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Jesus] is our best friend … the only real Lover of our souls—He takes all means to make us love Him in return, and He refuses us nothing if we do.

                  JHN, from Meditations and Devotions (1893)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Tuesday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time

(October 27) Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza (c. 1200-1271)
Dominicans honour one of their own today, Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza. This was a man who used his skills as a preacher to challenge the heresies of his day. Bartholomew was born in Vicenza around 1200. At 20 he entered the Dominicans. Following his ordination he served in various leadership positions. As a young priest he founded a military order whose purpose was to keep civil peace in towns throughout Italy. In 1248, Bartholomew was appointed a bishop. For most men, such an appointment is an honour and a tribute to their holiness and their demonstrated leadership skills. But for Bartholomew, it was a form of exile that had been urged by an antipapal group that was only too happy to see him leave for Cyprus. Not many years later, however, Bartholomew was transferred back to Vicenza. Despite the antipapal feelings that were still evident, he worked diligently—especially through his preaching—to rebuild his diocese and strengthen the people’s loyalty to Rome. During his years as bishop in Cyprus, Bartholomew befriended King Louis the Ninth of France, who is said to have given the holy bishop a relic of Christ’s Crown of Thorns. Bartholomew died in 1271. He was beatified in 1793. 
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today: Romans 8:18-25; Psalm 126:1b-6; Luke 13:18-21 

Jesus asked, What is the kingdom of God like? What shall I compare it to? It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his garden. It grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air perched in its branches. Again he asked, What shall I compare the kingdom of God to? It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into a large amount of flour until it worked all through the dough. (Luke 13: 18-21)

Kingdom and Church     In October of 2009 there was a presentation (Compass) by Australian ABC television on the Sydney Anglicans. It showed its impressive evangelical dynamism, the active involvement of youth, and the thought and perspective of its current Archbishop. What was particularly manifest in the Anglicanism of Sydney was the centrality of Scripture. It was shown to be an Evangelical diocese and this meant that the all-important issue was the proclamation of the message of Scripture, as it is understood by evangelical Anglicanism. It was clear that Sydney Anglicanism in the main stood in the tradition of English Puritanism, in which all that truly matters is the word of God. The Archbishop was interviewed at length during the programme and the Church and its institutions were viewed as an adjunct to the word as proclaimed by its ministers. Sydney Anglicanism strongly resisted movements which undermine the clear teaching of Scripture. The observer would notice, though, that in the Evangelical scheme everything hinges on the individual interpreter of Scripture. His personal judgment on the teaching of Scripture is pivotal. The notion of a definite, structured, divinely instituted Church which guides the reader is discounted. While the Evangelical would strongly deny that theirs is ultimately a subjectivist principle, it is obviously the seed of profound divergences in Christianity. What one man or body accounts to be the clear teaching of Scripture, another will in all sincerity contradict. When it becomes accepted in society that the Christian religion is a vast cluster based on various and conflicting interpretations of a sacred text, then it is a short step to a widespread assumption that Christ came to begin nothing more than a movement. He began a movement in history of those who prize the recorded text of his words and make it their business to shape their lives according to their reading of this sacred text. But Christ did not come to begin a movement of those who look to an inspired text. He came to establish a definite and structured Kingdom, the life of which would be nourished by this sacred text, but not reducible to the individual’s reading of it.

It is clear from the Gospels that Christ came establishing a Kingdom, which is none other than God’s promised rule. It consists in union with Jesus who is its King, and all those who are in union with him. It is also clear from the Gospels that this divine Kingdom is inextricably bound up with the Church. The Church is the locale of this Kingdom, the means of entry to it, and the instrument of its growth and spread. As we read in the Gospel of St Matthew, Christ appointed one to be the visible rock on which he would build this Church, and to him he gave the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven. That rock was Simon Peter, the first of the holders of the Keys. Christ the King thus appointed a prime minister to govern this Church in his name. It is the bearer of the Kingdom. Peter would bind and loose, his decisions would be ratified in heaven, and the powers of Hell would never prevail. The point is that Christ did not present a text for his disciples to bring to the world. He entrusted not a text to them but his very self. It is he who is brought to the world by his Church. In him is present the Kingdom, and entry into the Kingdom comes from union with him, and that is achieved by means of his body the Church. Christ and union with him is the Kingdom, and the Church is his body. The Church is Christ’s direct creation and precedes the inspired text of the Gospels and the New Testament. The Twelve and all the disciples were to bring him to the world, making disciples of all the nations. The inspired text arose from within the Church as the Church’s Book to help nourish all her children. There is a further point. It is clear that our Lord taught that this divine Kingdom here on earth would grow and develop. As we read in today’s Gospel passage, “What is the kingdom of God like? What shall I compare it to? It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his garden. It grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air perched in its branches” (Luke 13: 18-21). Thus the Church, central to the mission of Christ and his Kingdom, develops in history. It is not a static reality, but in its various features develops, including in its doctrine which is none other than her official understanding and teaching of the word of her divine Master.

As we think of our Lord’s words on the Kingdom and its growth, let us think of the Church which is Christ’s grand instrument of the presence and advancement of this Kingdom. Let us love the Church and understand that in her we find all that Christ bestowed on his faithful. It is in the Church and by her teaching that the inspired text is truly understood. It is in the Church’s Sacraments and life that the person of her Lord is encountered. Let us never in our hearts say, Christ and his word, yes! But the Church, no! Rather, Christ my Lord and the Church, yes! Christ with the Church, Christ in the Church, Christ through the Church, yes and always!
                                                                  (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be careful that contact with you doesn't make people feel like that person who once exclaimed (and not without reason): 'I'm sick of these righteous types!...'
                                                          (The Way, no.943)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Fourth Chapter   
DO NOT BE CONCERNED ABOUT OUTWARD THINGS

THE DISCIPLE

To what have we come, Lord? Behold, we bewail a temporal loss. We labor and fret for a small gain, while loss of the soul is forgotten and scarcely ever returns to mind. That which is of little or no value claims our attention, whereas that which is of highest necessity is neglected -- all because man gives himself wholly to outward things. And unless he withdraws himself quickly, he willingly lies immersed in externals.
                                                 (Concluded)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That a certain system, called Catholicism, was the religion of the whole of Christendom, not many centuries after the Christian era, and continued to be mainly identified with the Gospel, whether with or without certain additions, at least down to the Reformation, is confessed by all parties.

                                        
(JHN, from ‘‘The Theology of St Ignatius’’ 1839)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Wednesday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time B-2

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:   Ephesians 6: 1-9;    Psalm 144;     Luke 13: 22-30

Jesus went through the towns and villages, teaching as he made his way to Jerusalem. Someone asked him, "Lord, are only a few people
going to be saved?" He said to them, "Make every effort to enter through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to. Once the owner of the house gets up and closes the door, you will stand outside knocking and pleading, 'Sir, open the door for us.' "But he will answer, 'I don't know you or where you come from.' "Then you will say, 'We ate and drank with you, and you taught in our streets.' "But he will reply, 'I don't know you or where you come from. Away from me, all you evildoers!' "There will be weeping there, and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, but you yourselves thrown out. People will come from east and west and north and south, and will take their places at the feast in the kingdom of God. Indeed there are those who are last who will be first, and first who will be last." (Luke 13: 22-30)

Struggle to enter!    There have been doctrinal “earthquakes” in the Christian world, just as there have been earthquakes in the material, physical world. Perhaps the first such doctrinal “earthquake” occurred in the fourth century. That earthquake was Arianism. The Alexandrian priest Arius declared that Christ, the Son of God did not always exist, but was created by—and is therefore distinct from and inferior to—God the Father. Appealing to Christ’s statement that “the Father is greater than I,” he claimed that the Son was not unbegotten. Speaking of the criticism he was attracting, he wrote that “we are persecuted because we say that the Son has a beginning, but that God is without beginning” (Letter from Arius to the Arian Eusebius of Nicomedia). So, of course, Christ was not God. This heresy, condemned at Nicea and subsequently, struck at the deepest nerve of the Christian religion, for it denied the divinity of Jesus Christ. There were various storms across the centuries following Arius, including the gradual separation of the Eastern Church from the See of Rome. But the next great doctrinal earthquake occurred with the declarations of the Augustinian priest Martin Luther, followed by the writings of John Calvin. A central doctrine in their system was that God's pardon for sinners is granted to and received through faith alone, understood as excluding all "works." Christ's righteousness is imputed (i.e., attributed) by God to the believing sinner. Luther and Calvin excluded all human works (except the works of Jesus Christ, which form the basis of justification) from the pardon of justification. So "faith alone" ― sola fide ― is a foundation of Protestantism. According to Martin Luther, justification by faith alone is the article on which the Church stands or falls. Justification is entirely the work of God. Now, this doctrine can actually be interpreted in a way that is close to Catholic doctrine, but as it was understood and promoted in the sixteenth century, and perceived by the Catholic Church, it was explicitly condemned by the Council of Trent. Trent insisted that justification is preserved and increased through good works. Both grace and the effort of man ― his “works” ― were necessary for sanctification, which is not just “attributed.” We must “work” at our salvation in fear and trembling, as St Paul writes.

In our Gospel today (Luke 13: 22-30) our Lord directs that we “struggle” to enter through the “narrow door” (agonizesthe eiselthein dia tees stenees thuras) The Greek word which Matthew uses for “struggle” or “strive” is agonizesthe, and it is imperative. It is not just a suggestion, an invitation or a mere indicative. It is imperative for the disciple and the one who is to enter the kingdom of God that he “struggle” to enter. The struggle that is involved in agonizesthe is like that of engaging in an athletic contest. It involves dread. All of one’s powers are at work in order to succeed. It is to fight, to struggle, to strive. It is like a tremendous wrestling match or fight, in which one struggles against the opponent. In the command to enter by the narrow gate (eiselthate dia tees stenes pulees) as reported by St Matthew (7:12-14) in his Sermon on the Mount, this word to “struggle” is not used. It is reported by Luke and seems meant to bring out Christ’s meaning more clearly. The disciple must actively grapple with all difficulties to the best of his powers so as to enter by the narrow door. In St Luke’s account of Christ’s greatest struggle, his Passion, the word appears again, this time as the noun. In the Garden, Christ kneels down and prays that the cup be removed from him. He was in an agoonia, and prayed the more earnestly (Luke 22: 42-44). The contest was great and his sweat appeared as drops of blood that fell to the earth. Christ was in a fight, and he was striving to prevail ― and an angel of the Lord appeared to him supporting him in the struggle. He was fighting against his revulsion at all that was soon to come, grappling to the point of death ― and in the struggle, in the agoonia, he conquered. The word is not used in Matthew’s account of the episode in the Garden (26: 38-44), nor is it used in Mark (14: 33-40) whose account is closer to Matthew’s anyway. Nor is it used by John in his account (18:1-12). Perhaps Luke, writing for a more overtly Gentile and Greek readership, used this word to convey the notion of “struggle” more vividly. The point is that in Christ’s command in our Gospel today, we have much “work” to do in entering the kingdom of heaven. We must struggle as in a mortal contest, grappling with opponents that mean to prevail over us. Our model is Christ, who struggled and prevailed.

When an Anglican, John Henry Newman was challenged by the Evangelical Samuel Wilberforce (before he became Bishop of Oxford) over his lack of emphasis, in his sermons, on the all-important work of the Holy Spirit in the Christian life. Newman replied by saying that the work of the Holy Spirit was absolutely essential and it was presumed in his sermons. What was commonly lacking, he replied, was an emphasis on what we must do if the work of the Holy Spirit was to have its effect. Grace works in and through our own efforts, initiating them, sustaining them, bringing them to their end. But we must struggle and strive. Let us do that, then!

                                                                        (E.J.Tyler)
 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Saints Simon and Jude, Apostles
(2009 — Wednesday of the thirtieth week)

(October 28) Saints Simon and Jude, Apostles
   Jude is so named by Luke and Acts. Matthew and Mark call him Thaddeus. He is not mentioned elsewhere in the Gospels, except, of course, where all the apostles are mentioned. Some scholars hold that he is not the author of the Letter of Jude. Actually, Jude had the same name as Judas Iscariot. Probably because of the disgrace of that name, it was shortened to "Jude" in English translation. Simon is mentioned on all four lists of the apostles. On two of them (e.g., Luke's) he is called "the Zealot." The Zealots were a Jewish sect that represented an extreme of Jewish nationalism. For them, the messianic promise of the Old Testament meant that the Jews were to be a free and independent nation. God alone was their king, and any payment of taxes to the Romans—the very domination of the Romans—was a blasphemy against God. No doubt some of the Zealots were the spiritual heirs of the Maccabees, carrying on their ideals of religion and independence. But some were a little similar to modern terrorists. They raided and killed, attacking both foreigners and "collaborating" Jews. They were chiefly responsible for the rebellion against Rome which ended in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Our Simon the Apostle became an ardent lover and Apostle of Jesus Christ, a great saint, as did Jude his companion.
   "Just as Christ was sent by the Father, so also he sent the apostles, filled with the Holy Spirit. This he did so that, by preaching the gospel to every creature (cf. Mark 16:15), they might proclaim that the Son of God, by his death and resurrection, had freed us from the power of Satan (cf. Acts 26:18) and from death, and brought us into the kingdom of his Father" (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy).
(AmericanCatholic)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today: Ephesians 2:19-22; Psalm 19:2-5; Luke 6:12-16  

One of those days Jesus went out to a mountain to pray, and spent the whole night praying to God. When morning came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also designated apostles: Simon (whom he named Peter), his brother Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon who was called the Zealot, Judas son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor. (Luke 6: 12-16)

Betrayal     Our Gospel scene today is a momentous one in our Lord’s public ministry, which is already well in process and many disciples are following him. The implacable hostility of the scribes and Pharisees has begun and it will not abate till our Lord is dead on the Cross. Our Lord could see the final upshot and he now takes a decisive step, the establishment of the Twelve from among his disciples. They will constitute the foundation of his Church, and a little later from among these Twelve he would appoint Simon to be the Rock on which the enduring structure would stand. The seriousness of this step is shown in the fact that, as we are told, “Jesus went out to a mountain to pray, and he spent the whole night in prayer to God.” He, divine Son of the Father, spent the whole night in prayer before taking this step. He was contemplating the Church his creation, and praying for its mission in the long history of the world. He was founding a dynasty, a Kingdom that would never end. He had before him those whom he was about to appoint as its foremost officers, its founding generals. He would be with them and with his Church to the end of the age. Bonaparte attempted to found an empire at the beginning of the nineteenth century that would outshine all previous empires. Marching on Europe and overwhelming formidable enemies, he installed his family members on various European thrones. But as is the case with earthly kingdoms, it came to its end. In his particular case it was a rapid and ignoble ruin that left him with nothing. But Christ was establishing the Messianic Kingdom that would last forever and would triumph in complete glory. He knew exactly what was best, and he could not make a mistake. As St John points out, he knew what was in a man. He knew his men, and he chose them with great care and decision.

Yet — we might wonder — he chose Judas! I do not refer, of course, to Judas the son of James, whose feast we celebrate today. I refer to Iscariot. Our Gospel passage tells us that “when morning came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also designated apostles: Simon (whom he named Peter), his brother Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon who was called the Zealot, Judas son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor” (Luke 6: 12-16). Judas turned out so very badly. The inspired authors of the Gospels did not hesitate to include this seemingly embarrassing fact that one who lived in such intimacy with Jesus, one who was chosen personally by our Lord himself, turned his back on his wondrous Master and betrayed him. Did Jesus of Nazareth make a serious mistake? Surely he could have chosen instead, say, Matthias, who would, after his ascension into heaven, replace Judas Iscariot as one of the Twelve. We read that Matthias was among the disciples who had been with our Lord from the baptism of John right to his ascension (Acts 1:21-22). Perhaps Matthias had been present among the disciples when from their number our Lord chose Judas. Perhaps Judas had even been near Matthias at the moment of his being chosen. What an honour had come to Judas! Our Lord had made no mistake. Judas was the man intended by God from all eternity to be one of the Twelve. He could have been a great saint, with his day celebrated in the Church’s Liturgical Year till the end of the world — like his namesake Judas the son of James. But he opened his heart to Satan, and Satan carried him off. Imagine the profound concern of Christ as he saw this happening! It is the mystery of sin and we must all of us take notice. St Paul writes in one of his Letters that we have been chosen by God from before the foundation of the world to be in Jesus Christ, holy and full of love in his sight. This is the deliberate choice by God of each of us. But we can fall away if we do not guard our hearts from sin. We can deliberately turn from Christ and, indeed, be damned forever. How is it that God can choose one who, in the event, himself chooses to reject his call? It is the mystery of God creating persons with free will and able to sin.

Let us ponder on the tragic significance of the mention of Judas in the inspired text. He was the traitor. On one occasion two of the Twelve approached our Lord to ask for places at his right and his left in his Kingdom. Our Lord countered with a more fundamental question. Could they drink his cup? We can, they said. Our Lord proceeded to promise that they would drink his cup. But elsewhere (John 6:70) he describes Judas, whom he had deliberately chosen to be his special companion and collaborator. He was, he said, a devil. Let each of us take heed, and every day renew our stand with Jesus, affirming our choice for him and our renunciation of sin and Satan.
                                                                  (E.J.Tyler)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You must inspire others with love of God and zeal for souls, so that they in turn will set on fire many more who are on a third plane and each of these latter spread the flame to their professional companions.

What a lot of spiritual calories you need! And what a tremendous responsibility if you let yourself grow cold! And — I don't even want to think of it — what a terrible crime if you were to give bad example!
                                                 (The Way, no.944)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Fifth Chapter 
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH

THE DISCIPLE

GRANT me help in my needs, O Lord, for the aid of man is useless. How often have I failed to find faithfulness in places where I thought I possessed it! And how many times I have found it where I least expected it! Vain, therefore, is hope in men, but the salvation of the just is in You, O God. Blessed be Your name, O Lord my God, in everything that befalls us.
(Continuing)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is plain every great change is effected by the few, not by the many; by the resolute, undaunted, zealous few.


            JHN, from the sermon ‘Witnesses of the Resurrection’ (1831)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Thursday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time

(October 29) St. Narcissus of Jerusalem (d. 215)
Life in second- and third-century Jerusalem couldn’t have been easy, but St. Narcissus managed to live well beyond 100. Some even speculate he lived to 160. Details of his life are sketchy, but there are many reports of his miracles. The miracle for which he is most remembered was turning water into oil for use in the church lamps on Holy Saturday when the deacons had forgotten to provide any. We do know that Narcissus became bishop of Jerusalem in the late second century. He was known for his holiness, but there are hints that many people found him harsh and rigid in his efforts to impose church discipline. One of his many detractors accused Narcissus of a serious crime at one point. Though the charges against him did not hold up, he used the occasion to retire from his role as bishop and live in solitude. His disappearance was so sudden and convincing that many people assumed he had actually died. Several successors were appointed during his years in isolation. Finally, Narcissus reappeared in Jerusalem and was persuaded to resume his duties. By then, he had reached an advanced age, so a younger bishop was brought in to assist him until his death.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow



 

Scripture today: Romans 8:31b-39; Psalm 109:21-22, 26-27, 30-31; Luke 13:31-35 

At that
time some Pharisees came to Jesus and said to him, Leave this place and go somewhere else. Herod wants to kill you. He replied, Go tell that fox, 'I will drive out demons and heal people today and tomorrow, and on the third day I will attain my end.' But for today and tomorrow and the next day I must keep going — for surely no prophet can die outside Jerusalem! O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing! So be it! Your house will be left to you. I tell you, you will not see me again until you say, 'Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.' (Luke 13:31-35)

Success     Peter the Great demonstrated a far-sighted vision for Russia and many have maintained that it was he who set the nation on the road to being a modern state. Many other examples could be given of persons who, having attained great prominence in society and with the forces of society now at their command, displayed great insight and ability. In such cases, though, their civil powers and their achievements — for good or for ill — depended on their securing and retaining positions of influence and even dominance. Peter the Great was impressive precisely as one who was in full mastery and seen to be so. So too with Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar long before him — without their military and political power to impose themselves, what would they have been or done? Their success was visible and enforceable. Thus, we may say, it has always been. Success is deemed to be visible success and failure is visible failure. In modern societies the influence of the media is proverbial. When Pope Paul VI visited Sydney at the end of 1970, among the groups he addressed were the journalists. He told them they were world power number one. Now, in the media’s presentation of the world, politics and economics, there is nothing like success to be successful, and there is nothing like failure to be a failure. However, all this can be a house of cards, for all the props of success in these terms can suddenly crumble, and this we often see. A question we should ask is, Is there a success which is not dependent on social approval, adulation or coercion? Indeed, is there a success which comes forth from evident failure? In a word, is there a success which is open to anyone, in any and every circumstance? Can a person be successful in the midst of a very ordinary life, or a life of manifest failures, or even opprobrium? To answer such a question we may think the matter through in a philosophical fashion, or look to examples. Both are important, but examples convince and inspire the imagination to action.

In our Gospel passage today (Luke 13:31-35), the Pharisees come to Jesus and urge him to flee because Herod was after him. Perhaps the Pharisees had been told this by the Herodians, and we have instances in the Gospels of the Pharisees and the Herodians colluding in their opposition to Jesus — though there were Pharisees who were secret believers, such as Nicodemus. Perhaps the Pharisees of our Gospel passage today were testing the courage of Jesus, or hoping to see him on the run. Christ knows that the forces against him were growing and closing in on him. As he would say to the Twelve at the Last Supper, the Prince of this world was on his way. Our Lord’s seeming success was draining away, and the spectre of failure in visible terms was looming large. Let us notice, though, there is no panic in Christ, no confusion, no radical change of course in order to retrieve a crumbling dream. On the contrary, the vision splendid grows as the apparent failure grows. Success looms in proportion to the looming failure. He can see, he knows, and he teaches, that it is “failure” that will give him the victory. His rejection by those who matter is the way his mission will attain its end. It is precisely the Cross which will take him and all others to Glory. No matter what the circumstances might be, Christ possessed the key to success. It had nothing to do with visible success, approval, adulation or the possession of the means of influence and command. This is a resounding message to the ordinary man of history, the man of numerous failures and disappointments, the man who has nothing of the means of success as ordinarily regarded. Herod was after him, but Christ knew that this mattered little. What mattered was doing the will of his heavenly Father and completing the work he — he, not others — gave him to do. “Go tell that fox, 'I will drive out demons and heal people today and tomorrow, and on the third day I will attain my end.'” His end — his success — is attained by doing the will of his Father.

Let us not be distracted in ways we may not fully realize by the standards of the world. Let us not allow to lurk deep within our imaginations an image of success in life that is worldly, dependent on what is seen and approved by others. Let us look to Christ and his pre-eminent example. The only success that matters here and hereafter is that which is accounted such by God, who sees all. Success is the success which Christ sought and most assuredly attained, and he did this in the midst of seeming failure. Indeed, his “failure” was an integral element in his success. He had to undergo the Cross in order to enter his Glory — and to bring all others into Glory with him. Let us, then, for love of him take up our cross every day and follow closely in his footsteps.
                                                                  (E.J.Tyler)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It shows a bad disposition if you listen to God's word with a critical spirit.
                                                         (The Way, no.945)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE    INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Fifth Chapter  
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH

THE DISCIPLE

We are weak and unstable, quickly deceived and changed. Who is the man that is able to guard himself with such caution and care as not sometimes to fall into deception or perplexity? He who confides in You, O Lord, and seeks You with a simple heart does not fall so easily. And if some trouble should come upon him, no matter how entangled in it he may be, he will be more quickly delivered and comforted by You. For You will not forsake him who trusts in You to the very end.
                                                                (Continuing)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ignorance is the root of all littleness; he who can realise the law of moral conflicts, and the incoherence of falsehood, and the issue of perplexities, and the end of all things, and the Presence of the Judge, becomes, from the very necessity of the case, philosophical, long-suffering, and magnanimous.

                                            JHN, from Lectures on the Present Position of Catholics in England (1851)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Friday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time

(October 30) St. Alphonsus Rodriguez (c. 1533-1617)
Tragedy and challenge beset today’s saint early in life, but Alphonsus Rodriguez found happiness and contentment through simple service and prayer. Born in Spain in 1533, Alphonsus inherited the family textile business at 23. Within the space of three years, his wife, daughter and mother died; meanwhile, business was poor. Alphonsus stepped back and reassessed his life. He sold the business and, with his young son, moved into his sisters’ home. There he learned the discipline of prayer and meditation. Years later, at the death of his son, Alphonsus, almost 40 by then, sought to join the Jesuits. He was not helped by his poor education. He applied twice before being admitted. For 45 years he served as doorkeeper at the Jesuits’ college in Majorca. When not at his post, he was almost always at prayer, though he often encountered difficulties and temptations. His holiness and prayerfulness attracted many to him, including St. Peter Claver, then a Jesuit seminarian. Alphonsus’s life as doorkeeper may have been humdrum, but he caught the attention of poet and fellow-Jesuit Gerard Manley Hopkins, who made him the subject of one of his poems. Alphonsus died in 1617. He is the patron saint of Majorca.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow

 

Scripture today:   Romans 9:1-5;   Psalm 147:12-15, 19-20;    Luke 14:1-6 

One Sabbath, when Jesus went to eat in the house of a prominent Pharisee, he was being carefully watched. There in front of him was a man suffering from dropsy. Jesus asked the Pharisees and experts in the law, Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath or not? But they remained silent. So he took the man, healed him and sent him away. Then he asked them, If one of you has a son or an ox that falls into a well on the Sabbath day, will you not immediately pull him out? To this they could find no answer. (Luke 14: 1-6)

Brother to all     There are a few details in our Gospel passage today (Luke 14: 1-6) which help us appreciate the manner, the style and the very person of our Lord. It is a Sabbath day, and the Synagogue service is over. We may presume it is our Lord who was the reader and speaker at the Synagogue. A classic description of our Lord teaching in a synagogue is given earlier in this very Gospel by St Luke. At the start of his public ministry and following his baptism and his rejection of the temptations of Satan, Jesus returns to Galilee and in due course to his home town of Nazareth (Luke 4: 16). We are told that “he went into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day and stood up to read.” The book of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him, and “when he had opened the book, he found the place” he was looking for, and read it to the people assembled. Then, we are told, “he closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant, and sat down.” Then he began to speak on his theme, and the people were riveted by his discourse. That description we could take as applying to the numerous times he spoke in the various Synagogues, including on the Sabbath of our Gospel passage today. The service being over, the people went their ways back to their homes or to activities of Sabbath rest. For instance, we read that on one Sabbath our Lord was walking with his disciples through the cornfields, and they began to pick ears of corn. Presumably this happened following the Sabbath service. That is to say, our Lord was observing the Sabbath rest with a stroll through the fields with his disciples. Again, on a separate occasion (Mark 1:29) following his address and exorcism in the Synagogue at Capernaum, he and his closest disciples immediately went to the home of Simon and Andrew. There he cured Simon’s mother-in-law of her fever, and she rose up and served them. So it was in Simon’s house that they rested. On the Sabbath of our Gospel passage today, our Lord is invited to the home of a leading Pharisee. The Pharisee, hospitable to his honoured guest, watched him closely.

At times we can form the impression that there was something of a war between Jesus and all the Pharisees. Not so, it seems. John tells us in his Gospel (3:1) that Nicodemus was a Pharisee, a leading Jew. He was a disciple and came to Jesus by night for instruction — secretly, for fear of his colleagues. Joseph of Arimathea was, it seems, a member of the Sanhedrin and yet a secret disciple of Jesus. It looks as if the Pharisees formed the strongest knot of opposition to Jesus but this does not mean that all were opposed to him, nor that they were opposed to him to an equal degree. We read in John 12: 42 that “there were many of the rulers who believed in him, but because of the Pharisees did not acknowledge this.” In any case, we read of our Lord dining in the homes of Pharisees on different occasions. Whatever about their attitude to our Lord, it was plain to them that he himself was entirely open to their advances. He responded to their invitations and they felt able easily to approach him, if often only to attack him. All of this tells us of the heart of Jesus himself and of the style of his ministry. He was open to all. He sought all. He wished to save all, including those who were making his ministry more and more difficult. He loved all with a divine love, a love that opposed sin nevertheless, and exposed it in order to bring forth repentance. He sought out all, from the smallest to the most important. On one occasion word came from a centurion, asking that he come to heal his servant. Our Lord rose and made his way towards the centurion’s dwelling. Our Lord invited himself to dine in the home of a leading tax collector, Zacchaeus. On the request of the ruler of a Synagogue, Jairus, he went to heal his daughter. We remember the simple courtesy with which he addressed Pilate during his Passion. The point is that our Lord came to serve those who held prominent positions and those that did not — to bring life, life in abundance to all. Today his contact is with the leading Pharisee, another day it is with a poor unknown woman who is healed by her grasping at his garment. Jesus Christ is brother to all.

This is what God is like. He is not a God who is remote and withdrawn. He is not a God who threatens the helpless. He is a God who loves and is entirely accessible. If we place the image of the divine as it is in the Christian religion next to that of Islam, Hinduism, and so many of the religions of traditional indigenous societies, what stands out is the extraordinary accessibility of God. God in Christian revelation loves man. He inclines towards him and seeks him out. He is like a good shepherd. He is our Father. We can turn to him and depend on his love. Let us see our Lord’s dining with the leading Pharisee in our Gospel today as all of a piece with this wondrous revelation.
                                                                           (E.J.Tyler)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want to give yourself to God in the world, rather than being scholarly (women needn't be scholars: it's enough for them to be prudent) you must be spiritual, closely united to our Lord by prayer: you must wear an invisible cloak that will cover each and every one of your senses and faculties: praying, praying, praying; atoning, atoning, atoning.
                                                                (The Way, no.946)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ    BOOK THREE     INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Fifth Chapter    
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH

THE DISCIPLE


Rare is the friend who remains faithful through all his friend's distress. But You, Lord, and You alone, are entirely faithful in all things; other than You, there is none so faithful.
                                                          (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To the narrow-minded and the bigoted the history of the Church for eighteen centuries is unintelligible and useless; but where there is Faith, it is full of sacred principles, ever the same in substance, ever varying in accidentals, and is a continual lesson of “the manifold Wisdom of God.”

                         JHN, from the University sermon ‘Wisdom, as Contrasted with Faith and with Bigotry’ (1841)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------

 

Saturday of the thirtieth week in Ordinary Time

(October 31) St. Wolfgang of Regensburg (c. 924-994)
Wolfgang was born in Swabia, Germany, and was educated at a school located at the abbey of Reichenau. There he encountered Henry, a young noble who went on to become Archbishop of Trier. Meanwhile, Wolfgang remained in close contact with the archbishop, teaching in his cathedral school and supporting his efforts to reform the clergy. At the death of the archbishop, Wolfgang chose to become a Benedictine monk and moved to an abbey in Einsiedeln, now part of Switzerland. Ordained a priest, he was appointed director of the monastery school there. Later he was sent to Hungary as a missionary, though his zeal and good will yielded limited results. Emperor Otto II appointed him Bishop of Regensburg (near Munich). He immediately initiated reform of the clergy and of religious life, preaching with vigor and effectiveness and always demonstrating special concern for the poor. He wore the habit of a monk and lived an austere life.
The draw to monastic life never left him, including the desire for a life of solitude. At one point he left his diocese so that he could devote himself to prayer, but his responsibilities as bishop called him back. In 994 he became ill while on a journey; he died in Puppingen near Linz, Austria. His feast day is celebrated widely in much of central Europe. He was canonized in 1052.
(AmericanCatholic.org)

click on centre arrow


 

Scripture today: Romans 11:1-2a, 11-12, 25-29; Psalm 94:12-15, 17-18; Luke 14:1.7-11 

One Sabbath, when Jesus went to eat in the house of a prominent Pharisee, he was being carefully watched. When he noticed how the
guests picked the places of honour at the table, he told them this parable: When someone invites you to a wedding feast, do not take the place of honour, for a person more distinguished than you may have been invited. If so, the host who invited both of you will come and say to you, 'Give this man your seat.' Then, humiliated, you will have to take the least important place. But when you are invited, take the lowest place, so that when your host comes, he will say to you, 'Friend, move up to a better place.' Then you will be honoured in the presence of all your fellow guests. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted. (Luke 14: 1, 7-11)

Being humble        In a certain sense, it is not difficult being religious. By that I mean that there is an instinctive tendency in the heart of man to seek the divine — often referred to as the numen by anthropologists and sociologists — and to strive to be pleasing to him. His displeasure is feared, and his favour is sought by observance of the rites and by behaviour that is understood to be required by him. So widespread is the evidence of this in human societies that many have chosen to regard man as a religious animal. The hypothesis of evolution would presumably regard religious practice as a distinctive marker of the appearance of man in the process. Once human societies appear in archaeological, literary or other indicators, so do religious rites. The people’s myths are populated by their deities. In this sense, the revealed religion of Abraham, Moses and the prophets was, in the best sense of the word, profoundly natural, while in its doctrine and central rites being divinely revealed. It fulfilled man’s natural tendencies and yearnings while actually excelling them. There is this to be noticed, though. While religion tends to pervade man’s culture and society because it is so natural to him (excepting modern secular cultures), at the same time there tends to be a divorce between religious practice and man’s best moral instincts. In practising his religion man tends to remain proud, selfish, lazy. Indeed, his religion can very easily become a channel for these immoral tendencies to gain expression. In indigenous societies religious leaders and certain groups can impose their power through the religion, as can be the tendency in any society. That is to say, the core of man’s heart — his will — can become and remain irreligious in the midst of all his religious practice. Secretly he can be worshipping himself while sacrificing to the gods. This brings us to our Gospel passage today, which places us once again in the scene of the chasm between our Lord and many religious professionals of the chosen people of God. They professed to practice revealed religion, but their hearts were far from being pleasing to God.

Our Lord has been invited to the house of a leading Pharisee. Others of his party and experts in the law have also been invited, and they are observing our Lord narrowly. It is the Sabbath day, and before their eyes he has healed someone of their affliction — thus calmly flouting yet another of their fussy and burdensome impositions. As was often the case, they had been unable to answer his logic. But our Lord then proceeds to expose the moral decay he sees active in them even during the meal. Their religion is largely a means of self-aggrandisement. They wish for the honourable places in the estimation of men. They are not aware of the cancer that is at work in every heart, the cancer of pride and vanity, a spiritual disease that must be identified and attacked. Our Lord, seeing everything and being far more astute than any of those who were crouching to pounce, observed the other guests picking the places of honour at table. Silently, deftly, subtly, each was trying to manoeuvre himself into a position of special respectability. Our Lord had the attention of all, for all were watching him. Do not be vain, he told them. The atmosphere here is one of self-seeking, the seeking of human honours and not the seeking of what was pleasing to God. Perhaps our Lord noticed that this had caused a complication for those managing the dinner. This or that guest had to be asked to move to another position at the table. Rather, our Lord said, abase yourselves before God and be content with whatever place turns out to be yours. Look at what happens even from a human point of view. “When someone invites you to a wedding feast, do not take the place of honour, for a person more distinguished than you may have been invited. If so, the host who invited both of you will come and say to you, 'Give this man your seat.' Then, humiliated, you will have to take the least important place. But when you are invited, take the lowest place, so that when your host comes, he will say to you, 'Friend, move up to a better place.' Then you will be honoured in the presence of all your fellow guests” (Luke 14: 1, 7-11).

Our Lord is saying that religion must be a religion of the heart. The worship of God and the exalting of his person must not be merely a matter of external appearances and objective ritual. It must mark the action of the secret heart of man. In his heart man must seek the lower place before God and others, and in this way serve to glorify and honour God. Seek the lower place, and God will in due course exalt you — when, how and in what sense, we must leave to him. Our example in this, as in everything, is Jesus Christ himself. He humbled himself and was exalted above every other name. Let us then follow in his footsteps of humility of heart and life!
                                                                               (E.J.Tyler)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You were amazed to hear me approve of the lack of 'uniformity' in that apostolate in which you work. And I told you:

Unity and variety. You have to be different from one another, as the saints in heaven are different, each having his own personal and special characteristics. But also as alike one another as the saints, who would not be saints if each of them had not identified himself with Christ.
                                                                       (The Way, no.947)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ   BOOK THREE      INTERNAL CONSOLATION

The Forty-Fifth Chapter    
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH

THE DISCIPLE

Oh, how wise is that holy soul who said: "My mind is firmly settled and founded in Christ." If that were true of me, human fear would not so easily cause me anxiety, nor would the darts of words disturb. But who can foresee all things and provide against all evils? And if things foreseen have often hurt, can those which are unlooked for do otherwise than wound us gravely? Why, indeed, have I not provided better for my wretched self? Why, too, have I so easily kept faith in others? We are but men, however, nothing more than weak men, although we are thought by many to be, and are called, angels.
                                                             (Continuing)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is easy, indeed, for the ruling powers to make a decree, and set religion on high, and extend its range, and herald its name; but they cannot plant it, they can but impose it. The Church alone can plant the Church. The Church alone can found her sees, and inclose herself within walls. None but saintly men, mortified men, preachers of righteousness, and confessors for the truth, can create a home for the truth in any land.

                                            JHN, from the sermon ‘The Gospel Palaces’ (1836)

 

---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------