November Year B 09
Click on any date to go to the Thought for that Day
| Liturgical Season | Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
| 31st Week in Ordinary Time B |
1 or All Saints |
2 or All Souls |
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 32nd Week in Ordinary Time B | 8 |
9 or Dedication Lateran Bas |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 33rd Week in Ordinary Time B | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 34th Week in Ordinary Time B |
22 Christ the King |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
|
For 1st Week in Advent C see December page |
29
see December page |
30 see December page |

Feast of All Saints B (November 1)
Prayers this week:
Let us all
rejoice in the Lord and keep festival in honour of all the saints. Let us
join with the angels in joyful praise to the Son of God.
Father, all-powerful and ever-living God, today we rejoice in the holy
men and women of every time and place. May their prayers bring us your
forgiveness and love.
We ask this
through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one
God for ever and ever.
(November 1) Feast of All Saints
The earliest certain observance of a feast in honour of all the saints is an
early fourth-century commemoration of "all the martyrs." In the
early
seventh century, after successive waves of invaders plundered the catacombs,
Pope Boniface IV gathered up some 28 wagonloads of bones and re-interred them
beneath the Pantheon, a Roman temple dedicated to all the gods. The pope
rededicated the shrine as a Christian church. According to Venerable Bede,
the pope intended "that the memory of all the saints might in the future be
honoured in the place which had formerly been dedicated to the worship not
of gods but of demons" (On the Calculation of Time). But the rededication of
the Pantheon, like the earlier commemoration of all the martyrs, occurred in
May. Many Eastern Churches still honour all the saints in the spring, either
during the Easter season or immediately after Pentecost. How the Western
Church came to celebrate this feast in November is a puzzle to historians.
The Anglo-Saxon theologian Alcuin observed the feast on November 1 in 800,
as did his friend Arno, Bishop of Salzburg. Rome finally adopted that date
in the ninth century.
“After this I had a vision of a great multitude, which no one could count,
from every nation, race, people, and tongue. They stood before the throne
and before the Lamb, wearing white robes and holding palm branches in their
hands.... [One of the elders] said to me, ‘These are the ones who have
survived the time of great distress; they have washed their robes and made
them white in the blood of the Lamb’” (Revelation 7:9,14).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Revelation 7:2-4, 9-14; Ps
24:1bc-6; 1 John 3:1-3; Matthew 5:1-12a
When Jesus saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His
disciples came to him, and he began to teach them, saying:
Blessed are the
poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who
mourn, for they will be comforted. Blessed are the meek, for they will
inherit the earth. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for
righteousness, for they will be filled. Blessed are the merciful, for they
will be shown mercy. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God. Blessed
are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and
falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be
glad, because great is your reward in heaven
(Matthew 5: 1-12a)
All the saints I remember on one occasion I was in a church with many people
praying there, and a person came in also to pray. I noticed that he walked
up to the front and, by-passing the Tabernacle and all else, went to the
statue of a saint that was there in this church. There he prayed to that
saint, and did so, I presume, with much faith. I am sure that our Lord,
present in his entire humanity and divinity in the Blessed Sacrament, smiled
kindly — as it were. He had been passed by as had the greatest of saints
(Mary and Joseph)
whose statues were also there and with considerable
prominence. The saint whom the person was venerating and to whom he was
praying might himself have felt a little heavenly embarrassment for being
the object of religious devotion while Christ himself was ignored. But God
would have viewed kindly the limitations of the one praying, and would
surely have been gracious in answering that person’s persistent prayer. The
point I am making is that while the saints are the best members of Christ’s
own family, they themselves point to Christ. The intent of the saint, both
while here on earth and now in heaven, is to bring us to him. It is well
known that numerous Protestant bodies will not allow for Saints as explained
by the Catholic Church in her doctrine and prayer. For his part, while the
Catholic regards the Protestant position on saints to be doctrinally
mistaken, he readily allows that the Reformers of the time may have been
reacting against misguided practices of poorly-instructed Catholics.
Undoubtedly at the time some members of the faithful, when venerating and
praying to this or that saint, in effect saw little role for Christ. This
was an error and it had to be corrected. The saint is one who is fully
immersed in Christ, living in union with him and in obedience to the Father,
and for whom Christ is the one and only Lord of lords. Christ is the object,
the heart and the soul of the whole of the Christian religion. At the same
time other divinely-appointed elements of religion are present, and among
those elements are the saints.
There is a profound bond existing between all members of the Church due to their common life in Christ. Due to this divine life in Christ springing from their baptism they share in the faith, in the sacraments — especially the Eucharist, in the various charisms of the Holy Spirit, and in numerous other spiritual gifts. At the root of this communion of all those who are in Christ and his Church is the life of love, love for God and love for neighbour. This bond of love deriving from union with Jesus spans both the visible and invisible world. We share our union with Christ with those with us on earth, with those in heaven, and with those being purified in Purgatory. The Church encourages us to pray to the saints our elder brothers and sisters in the Lord, and most especially to the one who transcends all others in her love for Jesus her divine Son. I am referring to Mary the mother of Christ, the sinless virgin assumed body and soul into heaven in glory. We have a profound bond with her who is our mother, and with all those in heaven. We are all members of Christ’s family. Christ said that he regarded those who hear the word of God and keep it as his brother and sister and mother. Today is the feast of all the Saints, meaning by this all those now with Christ in heaven. They have been purified — either in this life or in Purgatory — from their sins and are now in heaven face-to-face with God. They are supremely happy and not a tear can be found there. Their lot, with life’s testing now over, is one of unending bliss. They wish to aid us by their prayers to lead a holy life here on earth and so to join them in the life to come. It is a good thing to pray to those among the Saints to whom we are drawn. The Church strongly recommends it, and venerates the Saints in her liturgy throughout the year. The one among them to whom we ought pray most — as ever, after Christ himself — is Mary, the mother of our Lord who, by his gift, is our heavenly mother too. Of course, we must not obscure the face of Christ, but this is the last thing which the saints themselves would like to see happen.
It is an explicit point of the Christian Creed that there is
a great communion among all those in Christ. We believe in the communion of
saints. The New Testament — especially the Letters of St Paul — speaks of
Christians who live their faith as being “the saints.” The word means “holy
ones.” Their holiness comes from their baptism and their living in union
with Jesus. While the Church has formally canonized certain men and women
for their exceptionally holy lives and has laid it down that these persons
are now in heaven, these are not the only ones in heaven. We may trust that
heaven already abounds with souls who had been faithful to Christ during
life, including many of our deceased relatives and friends. Their
purification from sin is over. Let us love those who have gone before us
into heaven. Let us pray to them, learn from them, and in Christ, finally
join them.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, no.
946-962 (Communion of saints)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You, favourite son of God, should live and feel our fraternal spirit, but
without familiarities.
(The Way, no.948)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter ALL MEN
ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
In whom shall I put my faith, Lord? In whom but You? You are the truth which
does not deceive and cannot be deceived. Every man, on the other hand, is a
liar, weak, unstable, and likely to err, especially in words, so that one
ought not to be too quick to believe even that which seems, on the face of
it, to sound true. How wise was Your warning to beware of men; that a man's
enemies are those of his own household; that we should not believe if anyone
says: "Behold he is here, or behold he is there."
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a powerful passage from an 1849 discourse, John
Henry Newman speaks of the Christian
Saints, both how they differ, but, most importantly, what they
have in common: ‘they track out for us the way which leads heavenward’.
Kings have descended from their thrones, bishops have given
up their rank and influence, the learned have given up their pride of
intellect, to become poor monks … to rise and pray while others slept, to
mortify the tongue with silence and the limbs with toil, and to
avow
an unconditional obedience to another. In early times were the Martyrs, many
of them girls and even children, who bore the most cruel, the most
prolonged, the most diversified tortures, rather than deny the faith of
Christ. Then came the Missionaries among the heathen … risking and perhaps
losing their lives in the attempt to extend the empire of their Lord and
Saviour, and who, whether living or dying, have by their lives or by their
deaths succeeded in bringing over whole nations into the Church. Others have
devoted themselves in the time of war or captivity, to the redemption of
Christian slaves …; others to the care of the sick in pestilences, or in
hospitals; others to the instruction of the poor; others to the education of
children; others to incessant preaching and the duties of the confessional;
others to devout study and meditation; others to a life of intercession and
prayer.
Very various are the Saints, their very variety is a token of God’s
workmanship; but however various, and whatever was their special line of
duty, they have been heroes in it; they have attained such noble
self-command, they have so crucified the flesh, they have so renounced the
world; they are so meek, so gentle, so tender-hearted, so merciful, so
sweet, so cheerful, so full of prayer, so diligent, so forgetful of
injuries; they have sustained such great and continued pains, they have
persevered in such vast labours, they have made such valiant confessions,
they have wrought such abundant miracles, they have been blessed with such
strange successes, that they have been the means of setting up a standard
before us of truth, of magnanimity, of holiness, of love. [...]
They are always our standard of right and good; they are raised up to be
monuments and lessons, they remind us of God, they introduce us into the
unseen world, they teach us what Christ loves, they track out for us the way
which leads heavenward.
(Reference: John Henry Newman,
Discourses addressed to Mixed Congregations (1849) Discourse no. 5,
p. 100-102)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thirty-first Sunday in
Ordinary Time B
Entrance Antiphon Cf. Ps 38 (37):
22-23 Forsake me not, O Lord, my God; be not far from me! Make haste and
come to my help, O Lord, my strong salvation!
Collect Almighty and merciful God, by whose gift your faithful offer you right
and praiseworthy service, grant, we pray, that we may hasten without stumbling
to receive the things you have promised. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your
Son, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for
ever and ever.
click on centre arrow
Scripture today: Deut 6:2-6; Psalm 18: 2-3, 3-4,
47, 51; Hebrews 7: 23-28; Mark 12: 28b-34
One of the scribes came to Jesus and
asked him, "Which is the first of all the commandments?" Jesus replied, "The
first is this: Hear, O
Israel!
The Lord our God is Lord alone! You shall love the Lord your God with all your
heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength. The
second is this: You shall love your neighbour as yourself. There is no other
commandment greater than these." The scribe said to him, "Well said, teacher.
You are right in saying, 'He is One and there is no other than he.' And 'to love
him with all your heart, with all your understanding, with all your strength,
and to love your neighbour as yourself' is worth more than all burnt offerings
and sacrifices." And when Jesus saw that he answered with understanding, he said
to him, "You are not far from the kingdom of God." And no one dared to ask him
any more questions. (Mark 12:28b-34)
Love
Our passage today is from the Gospel of St Mark. Jesus had just proven to the
Sadducees from the Book of Exodus that the dead rise again, and another great
question was now put to him: which is the “first of all the commandments?” (Mark
12:28). In the Gospel of St Matthew, when the Pharisees heard of his silencing
the Sadducees, they came together hoping themselves to defeat our Lord in
debate. In our Gospel today from St Mark, it was one of the “scribes” who put
the question to our Lord (Mark 12:28), while in
Matthew
it is a “lawyer” from the Pharisees who asked it (Matthew 22:35). In Mark today
the question is, which is the “first” command “of all” (prōtē pántōn),
while in Matthew it is, which is the “great command” (megálē entolē)?
These are but slight differences in the question, and in both Gospels our Lord
replies by instantly citing two or three sentences from the scrolls of the
inspired writers: Deuteronomy 6: 4-5 and Leviticus 19:18. It is obvious that
among the mass of commands and prescriptions that pervade the inspired writings,
especially the Pentateuch, these two or three sentences could pass somewhat
unnoticed. One gathers from our Lord’s criticisms of the scribes, the lawyers
and the Pharisees that they did indeed pass somewhat unnoticed. These persons
were particular about ritual washings while being neglectful of justice and
mercy. It is yet another reminder that the Sacred Scriptures required
interpretation and guidance in understanding where lay the root of the matter.
In fact, there were numerous other texts of the inspired writings which required
interpretation, most notably those that spoke of the Prophet to come, the
Messiah, the Son of Man, the Servant of Yahweh, and the coming of God’s kingdom
through his chosen people. All of these things in the nature of the case
necessitated interpretation, but who was to be the authoritative Interpreter? As
the Ethiopian said to Philip when asked if he understood the words of the
Prophet that he was reading, how can I, unless some man show me? (Acts 8:31).
Jesus Christ is the key to the Scriptures. It was similar with respect to the
Law of God. Was there a key as to what was “first” and “great” in the Law?
Even humanly, our Lord’s answer must have been most impressive. Without a
moment’s delay, he put his finger on the key sentences in the whole body of the
Law. The Law of God, he showed, was declared by the Inspired Writings to be a
law of love. All the commandments of God, be they major or minor, permanent or
temporary, were to be lived in a spirit of love and were to serve a life of
love. That love in the first instance was to be love for God, and secondly love
for neighbour. I doubt that in the religions of the classical era there was this
key of love, serving as key to the whole. For that matter, while it was in the
Inspired Writings, it was often missed. Jesus Christ placed it in the absolute
forefront and gave to it the status of being the one thing necessary amid all
that was expected. The Law of God commanded love, love of God and love of
neighbour. Further, the love that God commanded was not merely a love that
fulfilled his commands as they were recorded. It was to be a total love. God was
to be loved “with all your heart and with all your soul, and with all your
strength” (Deuteronomy 6:5). I am not sure that any of the ancient religions
required such a love for any of the gods, indeed I am not sure that there was
any requirement that the gods be loved as such at all. They had to be obeyed and
kept satisfied, but in the case of the one and only God of Israel, he was to be
loved totally: “with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind and
with all your strength.” This is a very high religion indeed, and it came from
God, not from man. It revealed man’s true vocation and the constant expectation
that lay before him for all the days of his life. It is magnificent, and in
terms of an understanding of man, it is exciting. We have much to be excited
about when it comes to the meaning of life. If this is what we are supposed to
be about, then life is worthwhile. This is what our Lord highlights in answer to
the question: which command in the divine Law is the first and great command?
But there remained the problem of its possibility. Ordinary man, broken man, man
sunk in sin, was commanded to be holy. Indeed, another key sentence of the
Writings was precisely that: Therefore, be holy to me because I, the Lord am
holy (Leviticus 20:26). Granted the Fall of man, is this not impossible? To
this, Christ had his answer, and he himself was that answer.
God the Son became man in order to redeem man from the sin which prevented him
from keeping the Law of God which was a law of love ― total love. He redeemed us
by taking sin upon his shoulders and expiating for the sin of the world. He
gives to us a share in his divine Spirit, so that we may set out on the greatest
adventure of all: the total love of God. This is the purpose of life, and we
must run that race so as to win. We can get there if we set our minds on it, and
it is made possible by the power of Christ’s grace. Let us set out to love God,
then, with Christ as our model and our wherewithal. He beckons us on, and he
will carry us there, if we truly put our shoulder to the wheel.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no.1822-1829 (Charity)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
The commemoration of the Faithful Departed (Nov. 2)
(November 2) The Faithful Departed
The Church has encouraged prayer for the dead from the earliest times as an
act of Christian charity. "If we had no care for the dead," Augustine noted,
"we would not be in the habit of praying for them." In the early Middle Ages
monastic communities began to mark an annual day of prayer for the departed
members. In the middle of the 11th century, St. Odilo, abbot of Cluny
(France), decreed that all Cluniac monasteries offer special prayers and
sing the Office for the Dead on November 2, the day after the feast of All
Saints. The custom spread from Cluny and was finally adopted throughout the
Roman Church. The theological underpinning of the feast is the
acknowledgment of human frailty. Since few people achieve perfection in this
life but, rather, go to the grave still scarred with traces of sinfulness,
some period of purification is necessary before a soul comes face-to-face
with God. The Council of Trent affirmed this purgatory state and insisted
that the prayers of the living can speed the process of purification.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 3:1-9; Psalm 23:1-6;
Romans 5:5-11 or Rom 6:3-9; John 6:37-40
Jesus said, All that the Father
gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.
For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him
who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none
of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. For my
Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him
shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.
(John 6: 37-40)
Sin and the Beyond
There are a whole range of starting points in human thought upon which
different philosophies are built. For instance, one starting point is the
perception of a lack of ultimate substance in the things of experience. That
is to say, everything changes, comes and goes, and cannot be relied upon.
Another starting point is the experience of communion and love. Another is
the sense of one’s own self as the one immediate and certain reality. A
philosophy arises from basic perceptions of reality that form the ground of
a
thinker’s entire perspective. In the nineteenth century, John Henry Newman
understood the fact of sin as a primary facet of human life and therefore of
reality. It was, he thought, a basic starting point of any true philosophy.
This is a very interesting observation because it places the natural
experience of an offended God at the root of human reflection. This is not
the moment to digress into the development of a philosophy. But Newman’s
observation reminds us of the basic fact of sin. It is a fact that stares
man in the face and around which life revolves in his search for happiness.
That having been said, it is also paradoxically the case that the fact of
sin is widely missed in human thought. It is rare to find it occupying a
pivotal place in philosophy. Ethics — and therefore unethical behaviour — occupies a central place, but not sin. Sin is that wrongdoing which involves
offending a holy God, and Newman’s point is that this sense of an offended
God is a primary datum of experience. Indeed, we might add, this natural
sense of an offended God accompanies sinful man throughout the short span of
his life. It opens him to the wondrous news of the Gospel that there is a
Redeemer who has come to be his Brother, Friend and Sanctifier. The good
news of Christ is that, due to the gift of grace, man’s obviously sinful
state can be combated and gradually overcome. He, man, can become holy to
his core, and a true image of his all-holy Redeemer. Mary, the utterly
sinless mother of Christ, is the living icon of the power of grace to
preserve man from sin.
This is the drama and issue of human life: the contest between sin and
holiness in the heart of man. There is need for a philosophy which sets this
basic issue at the foundation of experience and makes it the ground of
thought and of religion. It is the issue that remains at the forefront of
life right to the end. At the last, man goes out from this life with the
contest resolved one way or the other. His course is set forever, depending
on which has prevailed. However, it is also a fact of experience that while
in ultimate terms the contest is resolved at his death, clearly for those
whose hearts have been won to holiness, the work is not yet over. People die
being good, or desiring to be good — but they are not yet completely good.
They are in God’s camp and behind the Standard of Christ, but there is much
to be done in their hearts before they can be admitted forever into the
shining and lovely presence of the all-holy God. They are still soiled and
scarred by the ravages of sin and require a deep cleansing, a purification
of all the sinful grime so deeply ingrained in the structure of the soul.
The good news is that after death the saving grace of Christ continues
actively to sanctify the one who has died in Christ but who is not yet
entirely holy. Those who die in Christ, those who die on the side of
goodness, will receive the mercy of a complete cleansing — deeply painful
but joyous — with the knowledge that God is their future. All this means
that a complete sanctification is ahead for the one who dies in Christ, but
who is not yet entirely holy. With this Purgatory over, eternal joy will be
theirs. It is a dogma of the Church that, following death, the righteous are
purified of the remnants and results of sin to the extent necessary. Whether
this takes the equivalent of a period of time we are not certain. What is
certain is that those in Christ here on earth and those already in heaven
can intercede for those in Purgatory and hasten the purification they are
undergoing. We can and should pray for the faithful departed. We can have
Masses celebrated for their speedy entry into the presence of God. Those in
Purgatory depend on our prayers, and on All Souls Day the entire Church
prays for their rapid entry into eternal bliss.
St Thomas More, Lord Chancellor of England and martyr of the Church under
King Henry VIII, placed powerful emphasis on works of charity towards the
dead. We should pray for them, have masses said for them, offer up our
sacrifices and penances for them, looking on them as our needy brothers and
sisters. They await our charity. More wrote powerfully of the gratitude they
will feel towards us when, due to our prayers, they enter the presence of
God forever. There they will be our heavenly intercessors while we make our
way through life and, in our turn, come to depend on them for prayers during
our own purification in Purgatory. Let us pray each day for the souls in
Purgatory.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To aspire to positions in any apostolic undertaking is a useless thing in
this life, and a danger for the next.
If it's what God wants, you will be called. And then you ought to accept.
But don't forget that wherever you are you can and you must become a saint,
for that is why you are there.
(The Way, no.949)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
I have been taught to my own cost, and I hope it has given me greater
caution, not greater folly. "Beware," they say, "beware and keep to yourself
what I tell you!" Then while I keep silent, believing that the matter is
secret, he who asks me to be silent cannot remain silent himself, but
immediately betrays both me and himself, and goes his way. From tales of
this kind and from such careless men protect me, O Lord, lest I fall into
their hands and into their ways. Put in my mouth words that are true and
steadfast and keep far from me the crafty tongue, because what I am not
willing to suffer I ought by all means to shun.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O God of the Spirits of all flesh, O Jesu, Lover of souls, we recommend unto
Thee the souls of all those Thy servants, who have departed with the sign of
faith and sleep the sleep of peace. We beseech Thee, O Lord and Saviour,
that, as in Thy mercy to them Thou
becamest man, so now
Thou wouldest hasten the time, and admit them to Thy presence above.
Remember, O Lord, that they are Thy creatures, not made by strange gods, but
by Thee, the only Living and True God; for there is no other God but Thou,
and none that can equal Thy works. Let their souls rejoice in Thy light, and
impute not to them their former iniquities, which they committed through the
violence of passion, or the corrupt habits of their fallen nature. For,
although they have sinned, yet they always firmly believed in the Father,
Son, and Holy Ghost; and before they died, they reconciled themselves to
Thee by true contrition and the Sacraments of Thy Church. [...]
Come to their assistance, all ye Saints of God; gain for them deliverance
from their place of punishment; meet them, all ye Angels; receive these holy
souls, and present them before the Lord.
Eternal rest give to them, O Lord. And may perpetual light shine on them.
May they rest in peace. Amen.
JHN,
from Meditations and Devotions (1893)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the
thirty-first week in Ordinary Time B-2
Entrance Antiphon Cf. Ps 38 (37):
22-23 Forsake me not, O Lord, my God; be not far
from me! Make haste and come to my help, O Lord, my strong salvation!
Collect
Almighty and merciful God, by whose gift your faithful offer you right and
praiseworthy service, grant, we pray, that we may hasten without stumbling to
receive the things you have promised. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever
and ever.
click on centre arrow
Scripture: Philippians 2:1-4;
Psalm 131:1bcde, 2, 3; Luke 14:12-14
On
a Sabbath Jesus went to dine at the home of one of the leading Pharisees. He
said to the host who invited him, “When you hold a lunch or a dinner, do not
invite your friends or your brothers or sisters or your relatives or your
wealthy neighbours, in case they may invite you back and you have repayment.
Rather, when you hold a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the
blind; blessed indeed will you be because of their inability to repay you. For
you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.”
(Luke 14:12-14)
Life to come
The world understands that the service of others is a
noble value, and the service of the poor and those in special need is especially
noble. Mother Teresa of Calcutta commanded the respect of the world precisely
because of her unstinting and constant service of the poor, and her ability to
draw others into that service. Her motive was manifestly love for God, and
within a few years of her death she was beatified by Pope John Paul II, having
satisfied all the Church’s tests of a heroic religious spirit. Fred Hollows
(1929 – 1993)
became
known for his work in restoring eyesight to countless thousands of people. It
has been said that more than one million people in the world can see today
because of initiatives he instigated. I have read that while he briefly studied
in a seminary, for a while in the 1950s and 1960s he was a member of the
Communist Party. He was famous for his service of those in need, especially
indigenous people. In 2006 he was named one of the "100 most influential
Australians" by The Bulletin magazine. His beliefs were not
religious ― in 1991 he was named Humanist of the Year, and on his death the
Chief Minister of the ACT (Australia), Rosemary Follett, described Hollows as
"an egalitarian ... who believed in no power higher than the best expressions of
the human spirit found in personal and social relationships." If Follett’s
summation was correct, the highest power for Hollows was not God but man at his
best. But he did great good in life, serving those in need and drawing others
into that service. An intriguing question is, why do what is good, and why serve
others nobly? What is it that leads a person to do things which all regard as
admirable? Clearly very different motives can lead to a similar set of actions
that are adjudged to be good and which truly benefit others. At the same time,
all recognize that while the benefits to others may be similar, the motives
themselves may be less than worthy. A person who serves the poor simply because
he “gets a kick out of it” is less admirable than one who does so out of genuine
love for them. So, motives are important and they vary in moral worth. Man is
called to do what is good and to serve others nobly, but also to do it for the
best reasons.
For the religious person, especially the person who adheres to revealed
religion, the highest and indeed the most necessary motive for everything in
life is to please God. If there is a God ― as there most assuredly is ― then the
most pressing thing of all is so to live as to please him. When Christ was being
baptized in the river Jordan, a voice was heard from heaven saying, “This is my
beloved Son in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3: 17). Jesus Christ did
everything to please his heavenly Father, and he was perfectly pleasing to him.
We are called to follow him. So it is love for God which inspires the religious
person, and in particular the Christian, to do what is right and good ― and
especially to serve others nobly. The greatest Christians have been persons who
have loved their neighbour, most especially the one in need. Christ held up for
imitation the Good Samaritan who stopped before the one in need, and at his own
expense and time, took care of him. But of course, to do things for love of God
means thinking beyond this world alone. If this passing world is all that one
thinks there is, then of course one’s motives will be profoundly different from
those of the person who is quite sure that there is another, eternal world. John
Henry Newman wrote towards the end of his life that the first principle of
religion is the thought of a judgment as contained in the feeling of the
conscience. That is to say, God begins to be a living reality to us when we
think of the account we shall have to render of our obligations. What are those
obligations? Our best knowledge of our obligations comes from God himself. He
has revealed what we must do, and in the 25th Chapter of St Matthew’s Gospel our
Lord speaks of our duties to our neighbour in need. There will be a final,
general Judgment, and it will turn on how we have helped our brother, especially
the least. “I assure you, as often as you did it for one of the least of my
brothers, you did it for me” (Matthew 25:40). The one who loves God and Christ
his divine Son will always remember that there will come a judgment, and to the
extent that he has been merciful, so will mercy be shown to him.
So it is that in our Gospel today our Lord invites his audience to have a mind
primarily to the poor and the neglected. That no recompense is forthcoming for
such a concern is a cause for rejoicing, for recompense will come at the
resurrection of the righteous. He tells them that “when you hold a banquet,
invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind; blessed indeed will you be
because of their inability to repay you. For you will be repaid at the
resurrection of the righteous” (Luke 14:12-14).
Let us think beyond this brief, temporal life to life eternal, life with God
forever. If anything is likely to spur one on to a good, holy, noble and
self-sacrificing life, it is surely this.
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the thirty first week in Ordinary Time
(November 3) St. Martin de Porres (1579-1639)
"Father unknown" is the cold legal phrase sometimes used on baptismal records.
"Half-breed" or "war souvenir" is the cruel name inflicted by those of "pure"
blood. Like many others, Martin might have grown to be a bitter man, but he did
not. It was said that even as a child he gave his heart and his goods to the
poor and despised. He was the illegitimate son of a freed woman of Panama,
probably black but
also
possibly of Native American stock, and a Spanish grandee of Lima, Peru. Martin
inherited the features and dark complexion of his mother. That irked his father,
who finally acknowledged his son after eight years. After the birth of a sister,
the father abandoned the family. Martin was reared in poverty, locked into a low
level of Lima’s society. When he was 12, his mother apprenticed him to a
barber-surgeon. He learned how to cut hair and also how to draw blood (a
standard medical treatment then), care for wounds and prepare and administer
medicines. After a few years in this medical apostolate, Martin applied to the
Dominicans to be a "lay helper," not feeling himself worthy to be a religious
brother. After nine years, the example of his prayer and penance, charity and
humility led the community to request him to make full religious profession.
Many of his nights were spent in prayer and penitential practices; his days were
filled with nursing the sick and caring for the poor. It was particularly
impressive that he treated all people regardless of their colour, race or status.
He was instrumental in founding an orphanage, took care of slaves brought from
Africa and managed the daily alms of the priory with practicality as well as
generosity. He became the procurator for both priory and city, whether it was a
matter of "blankets, shirts, candles, candy, miracles or prayers!" When his
priory was in debt, he said, "I am only a poor mulatto. Sell me. I am the
property of the order. Sell me." Side by side with his daily work in the
kitchen, laundry and infirmary, Martin’s life reflected God’s extraordinary
gifts: ecstasies that lifted him into the air, light filling the room where he
prayed, bilocation, miraculous knowledge, instantaneous cures and a remarkable
rapport with animals. His charity extended to beasts of the field and even to
the vermin of the kitchen. He would excuse the raids of mice and rats on the
grounds that they were underfed; he kept stray cats and dogs at his sister’s
house. He became a formidable fundraiser, obtaining thousands of dollars for
dowries for poor girls so that they could marry or enter a convent. Many of his
fellow religious took him as their spiritual director, but he continued to call
himself a "poor slave." He was a good friend of another Dominican saint of Peru,
Rose of Lima (August 23).
In 1962, Pope John XXIII remarked at the canonization of Martin: "He excused
the faults of others. He forgave the bitterest injuries, convinced that he
deserved much severer punishments on account of his own sins. He tried with all
his might to redeem the guilty; lovingly he comforted the sick; he provided
food, clothing and medicine for the poor; he helped, as best he could, farm
labourers and Negroes, as well as mulattoes, who were looked upon at that time
as akin to slaves: thus he deserved to be called by the name the people gave
him: 'Martin of Charity.'" (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today:
Romans 12:5-16ab; Psalm 131:1bcde, 2, 3; Luke 14:15-24
When one of those at the table with
Jesus heard this, he said to Jesus, Blessed is the man who will eat at the feast
in the kingdom of
God. Jesus replied: A certain man was preparing a great
banquet and invited many guests. At the time of the banquet he sent his servant
to tell those
who had been invited, 'Come, for everything is now ready.' But they all alike
began to make excuses. The first said, 'I have just bought a field, and I must
go and see it. Please excuse me.' Another said, 'I have just bought five yoke of
oxen, and I'm on my way to try them out. Please excuse me.' Still another said,
'I have just got married, so I can't come.' The servant came back and reported
this to his master. Then the owner of the house became angry and ordered his
servant, 'Go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in
the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame.' 'Sir,' the servant said, 'what
you ordered has been done, but there is still room.' Then the master told his
servant, 'Go out to the roads and country lanes and make them come in, so that
my house will be full. I tell you, not one of those men who were invited will
get a taste of my banquet.'
(Luke 14: 15-24)
The grand invitation
The scene of our Gospel passage today is
still that of our Lord dining in the home of one of the leading Pharisees.
Before his hosts Jesus has calmly flouted the strictures of the Pharisees in
respect to healing on the Sabbath. Before the eyes of his silent critics he has
summarily healed a man with dropsy, and they are unable to answer his challenge
about his action. He then proceeds to comment on their seeking the important
places at the table, and on their having invited to the meal only their friends
and the rich and well-regarded. When you are invited seek rather the lower
places, our Lord comments — perhaps with a smile — and in any case
invite
the poor and the sick to your feasts. In this way your reward will be great when
the just rise again. At the mention of the resurrection of the just, one of the
guests sighs before our Lord at the thought of heaven: “ Blessed is the man who
will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God.” Our Lord takes up the point but
turns it to his theme that those who have been invited — and it is a warning to
those before him — must not feel cocksure of a place there. The resurrection of
the just will indeed be a banquet to which “many guests” have been invited. “A
certain man was preparing a great banquet and invited many guests. At the time
of the banquet he sent his servant to tell those who had been invited, 'Come,
for everything is now ready.'” The servants carrying news of the invitation, of
course, had been the prophets right up to John. The supreme messenger of the
invitation was the one before them, Jesus of Nazareth. But time and again the
invitation had been ignored. “They all alike began to make excuses. The first
said, 'I have just bought a field, and I must go and see it. Please excuse me.'
Another said, 'I have just bought five yoke of oxen, and I'm on my way to try
them out. Please excuse me.' Still another said, 'I have just got married, so I
can't come.' The servant came back and reported this to his master.” The point
is simple, that God had invited his people to a wondrous future, but many had
failed to respond.
The warning develops in the parable.
Those who had been invited but who had not responded would be passed over. The
master of the banquet is determined to fill his house with guests. The banquet
will proceed and it will be filled. Some of those, who from the first had been
invited, will not be there and the fault will be entirely theirs. The parable,
then, tells us of the tremendous responsibility of each person to hear the
invitation to come to God and participate in his plan. That plan is centred on
the person and teaching of Jesus Christ. A vast prospect hangs in the balance of
each invitee’s response. On the one hand there is joy and happiness inside the
house, while on the other there is darkness and grief outside. Which is it to
be? In any case the mighty plan of God to save the world will proceed. God is
resolved to fill his house, even if many refuse the invitation to come. Christ
points to the coming Church with its universal mission to all the nations. “Then
the owner of the house became angry and ordered his servant, 'Go out quickly
into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in the poor, the crippled, the
blind and the lame.' 'Sir,' the servant said, 'what you ordered has been done,
but there is still room.' Then the master told his servant, 'Go out to the roads
and country lanes and make them come in, so that my house will be full.'”
(Luke 14: 15-24) Just before he ascended
into heaven our Lord said to his disciples, “Go to the whole world and make
disciples of all the nations, baptizing them and teaching them to observe all
that I have commanded you.” The banquet of heaven will be the joy of being with
the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit for ever. It is the universal call of
every man and woman to goodness. All have this destiny, but it depends on each
person’s response to the invitation when it comes. Those who hear Christ’s word
and his teaching have before them the explicit invitation. Those who do not,
will hear this call of God and Christ in other ways — muffled by comparison,
perhaps, but nevertheless there. Cardinal Newman once described the conscience
as “the aboriginal vicar of Christ.” God means all men to be saved, and Christ
is the one and only way to the Father.
Every day passes rapidly, as does every
hour, every minute and every second. Life is short. But that is not the end of
the story, for eternity is very long. Each man and woman will live forever. In
ten million years, the eternity of each of us will still be only beginning. No
matter at what point in the future we care to place ourselves, our eternity will
only be starting. How terrible the thought of being cast outside because we
failed to respond to the invitation during this brief span! So then, now I
begin! Yes, this very minute, now I begin! No time is to be wasted.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are working for Christ and imagine that a position of responsibility is
anything but a burden, what disillusionment awaits you!
(The
Way, no.950)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The
Forty-Fifth Chapter
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE
BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
Oh, how good and how peaceful it is to be silent about others, not to believe
without discrimination all that is said, not easily to report it further, to
reveal oneself to few, always to seek You as the discerner of hearts, and not to
be blown away by every wind of words, but to wish that all things, within and
beyond us, be done according to the pleasure of Thy will.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It
is surely not true that benevolence is the only, or the chief, principle of our
moral nature. To say nothing of the notion of duty to an Unseen Governor,
implied in the very authoritativeness with which conscience dictates to us – a
notion which suggests to the mind that there is, in truth, some object more
“desirable in its own nature” than “the general happiness” of mankind.
JHN, from the University sermon ‘On Justice, as a
Principle of Divine Governance’ (1832)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the thirty first week in Ordinary Time
(November 4) St. Charles Borromeo (1538-1584)
The name of St. Charles Borromeo is associated with reform. He lived during the
time of the Protestant Reformation, and had a hand in the reform of the whole
Church during the final years of the Council of Trent. Although he belonged to
Milanese nobility and was
related
to the powerful Medici family, he desired to devote himself to the Church. When
his uncle, Cardinal de Medici, was elected pope in 1559 as Pius IV, he made
Charles cardinal-deacon and administrator of the Archdiocese of Milan while he
was still a layman and a young student. Because of his intellectual qualities he
was entrusted with several important offices connected with the Vatican and
later appointed secretary of state with responsibility for the papal states. The
untimely death of his elder brother brought Charles to a definite decision to be
ordained a priest, despite relatives’ insistence that he marry. Soon after he
was ordained a priest at the age of 25, he was consecrated bishop of Milan.
Because of his work at the Council of Trent, he was not allowed to take up
residence in Milan until the Council was over. Charles had encouraged the pope
to renew the Council in 1562 after it had been suspended for 10 years. Working
behind the scenes, St. Charles deserves the credit for keeping the Council in
session when at several points it was on the verge of breaking up. He took upon
himself the task of the entire correspondence during the final phase. Eventually
Charles was allowed to devote his time to the Archdiocese of Milan, where the
religious and moral picture was far from bright. The reform needed in every
phase of Catholic life among both clergy and laity was initiated at a provincial
council of all the bishops under him. Specific regulations were drawn up for
bishops and other clergy: If the people were to be converted to a better life,
the had to be the first to give a good example and renew their apostolic spirit.
Charles took the initiative in giving good example. He allotted most of his
income to charity, forbade himself all luxury and imposed severe penances upon
himself. He sacrificed wealth, high honours, esteem and influence to become
poor. During the plague and famine of 1576, he tried to feed 60,000 to 70,000
people daily. To do this he borrowed large sums of money that required years to
repay. Whereas the civil authorities fled at the height of the plague, he stayed
in the city, where he ministered to the sick and the dying, helping those in
want. Work and the heavy burdens of his high office began to affect his health.
He died at the age of 46. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 13:8-10; Psalm 112:1b-2,
4-5, 9; Luke 14:25-33
Large crowds were travelling with Jesus,
and turning to them he said: If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father
and mother,
his
wife and children, his brothers and sisters— yes, even his own life— he cannot
be my disciple. And anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my
disciple. Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Will he not first sit down
and estimate the cost to see if he has enough money to complete it? For if he
lays the foundation and is not able to finish it, everyone who sees it will
ridicule him, saying, 'This fellow began to build and was not able to finish.'
Or suppose a king is about to go to war against another king. Will he not first
sit down and consider whether he is able with ten thousand men to oppose the one
coming against him with twenty thousand? If he is not able, he will send a
delegation while the other is still a long way off and will ask for terms of
peace. In the same way, any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot
be my disciple. (Luke 14: 25-33)
Discipleship
Eudemus of Rhodes was one of Aristotle’s
pupils. He edited his famous teacher’s work and made it more easily accessible.
Living from 370 BC until about 300 BC, he was a philosopher and historian of
science. He collaborated so closely with his master that he was regularly called
Aristotle's "companion" rather than his "disciple." Discipleship is part of
human history, for there have always been masters with their disciples. During
the second decade of the nineteenth century in England, John Henry Newman was
changing
from Evangelicalism to High Church Anglicanism. But a new stage in his life was
reached when Hurrell Froude drew him to John Keble. In a sense Newman then
became a disciple of Keble’s, while in time outclassing his one-time master in
the power and depth of his thought. Newman himself became a master with many
ardent disciples, and the driving force of the Oxford Movement. As I say, it is
a feature of the history of mankind that there have been numerous masters with
their disciples and we see it also in the history of God’s chosen people. The
prophet Isaiah (spanning the late eighth and early seventh century B.C) had
disciples. We read in Isaiah 8:16-18 the prophet directing: “Bind up the
testimony and seal up the law among my disciples. I will wait for the Lord, who
is hiding his face from the house of Jacob.” Some scholars propose that the
disciples of Isaiah formed an Isaian school. Presumably most of the prophets had
their disciples and those disciples had influence on those around them. John the
Baptist had many disciples. Our Lord’s first and most important disciples were
drawn from some of John’s, and others of John’s disciples were encountered by
the infant Church in its missionary work far and wide. Our Lord had very many
disciples. Some were Apostles, many followed him to the end, and some fell away.
There is, however, at least one feature of what Christ expected of his disciples
that absolutely distinguishes him from other masters. What is this feature to
which am I referring?
Aristotle had been a disciple of Plato — though he moved away from his master in his thought. But Plato would never have
expected unqualified devotion to his own person from his disciples. Nor did
Aristotle expect this of his disciples. Nor, of course, did Keble expect this of
Newman — such an expectation would have been preposterous. Isaiah would have
expected from his disciples a heart open to the word of God and a readiness to
follow his — Isaiah’s — guidance. So would have John the Baptist of his
disciples. But neither would have expected an ardent devotion to his own person.
This was understood to be reserved for God. The prophet merely pointed to God
and announced his word. John described himself as being merely a voice crying in
the wilderness. The case is altogether different with Jesus Christ. He expected
of his disciples a total devotion both to his word and to his person. In this he
claimed a status altogether unique, transcending all other masters before and
after him. We read that “Large crowds were travelling with Jesus, and turning to
them he said: If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his
wife and children, his brothers and sisters— yes, even his own life— he cannot
be my disciple” (Luke 14: 25-33). Our Lord
puts his point graphically — his disciple must act as if he were “hating” his
closest relatives, which is to say placing devotion to himself far ahead of
devotion to any other. His interests are to dwarf in importance the interests of
all others, were they to be in conflict. If this is not the case, a person
cannot be counted as his disciple. Moreover, “anyone who does not carry his
cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.” This is a remarkable statement, for
it alludes to crucifixion. Our Lord did refer to his crucifixion with his close
disciples during his public ministry and his allusions were often not
understood. In our passage today our Lord alludes to the cross even before the
crowds. Anyone who wishes to be his disciple must be prepared to follow him,
carrying his cross, even to the point of crucifixion. It is a serious business
being a disciple of Christ.
All this is to say that we must enter
into the Christian life with a lot of deliberation and be as cognisant as
possible of its demands. Our Lord asks for a total love and a full-hearted
obedience. He is expecting us to love and serve him as we would God — and for
this simple reason that he, our brother and redeemer, is God. Let us deliberate
carefully, then. “Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Will he not first
sit down and estimate the cost to see if he has enough money to complete it? For
if he lays the foundation and is not able to finish it, everyone who sees it
will ridicule him.” Let us resolve to give all it takes. It will mean giving our
all. Ah! It is worth it!
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are working for Christ and imagine that a position of responsibility is
anything but a burden, what disillusionment awaits you!
(The Way, no.950)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Fifth Chapter
ALL MEN ARE NOT TO BE BELIEVED, FOR IT IS EASY TO ERR IN SPEECH
THE DISCIPLE
How conducive it is for the keeping of heavenly grace to fly the gaze of men,
not to seek abroad things which seem to cause admiration, but to follow with
utmost diligence those which give fervour and amendment of life! How many have
been harmed by having their virtue known and praised too hastily! And how truly
profitable it has been when grace remained hidden during this frail life, which
is all temptation and warfare!
(Concluded)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Church of England has been the instrument of Providence in conferring great
benefits on me.
JHN, from the Apologia pro Vita Sua (1865 Edition)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the thirty first week in Ordinary Time
(November 5) Venerable Solanus Casey (1870-1957)
Barney Casey became one of Detroit’s best-known priests even
though he was not allowed to preach formally or to hear confessions! Barney came
from a large family in Oak Grove, Wisconsin. At the age of 21, and after he had
worked as a logger, a hospital orderly, a
streetcar
operator and a prison guard, he entered St. Francis Seminary in Milwaukee—where
he found the studies difficult. He left there and, in 1896, joined the Capuchins
in Detroit, taking the name Solanus. His studies for the priesthood were again
arduous. On July 24, 1904, he was ordained, but because his knowledge of
theology was judged to be weak, Father Solanus was not given permission to hear
confessions or to preach. A Franciscan Capuchin who knew him well said this
annoying restriction "brought forth in him a greatness and a holiness that might
never have been realized in any other way." During his 14 years as porter and
sacristan in Yonkers, New York, the people there recognized him as a fine
speaker. "For, though he was forbidden to deliver doctrinal sermons," writes his
biographer, James Derum, "he could give inspirational talks, or feverinos, as
the Capuchins termed them" (18:96). His spiritual fire deeply impressed his
listeners. Father Solanus served at parishes in Manhattan and Harlem before
returning to Detroit, where he was porter and sacristan for 20 years at St.
Bonaventure Monastery. Every Wednesday afternoon he conducted well-attended
services for the sick. A co-worker estimates that on the average day 150 to 200
people came to see Father Solanus in the front office. Most of them came to
receive his blessing; 40 to 50 came for consultation. Many people considered him
instrumental in cures and other blessings they received. Father Solanus’ sense
of God’s providence inspired many of his visitors. "Blessed be God in all his
designs" was one of his favourite expressions.
The many friends of Father Solanus helped the Capuchins begin a
soup kitchen during the Depression. Capuchins are still feeding the hungry there
today. In 1946 in failing health, he was transferred to the Capuchin novitiate
in Huntington, Indiana, where he lived until 1956 when he was hospitalized in
Detroit. He died on July 31, 1957. An estimated 20,000 people passed by his
coffin before his burial in St. Bonaventure Church in Detroit. At the funeral
Mass, Father Gerald, the provincial, said: "His was a life of service and love
for people like me and you. When he was not himself sick, he nevertheless
suffered with and for you that were sick. When he was not physically hungry, he
hungere with people like you. He had a divine love for people. He loved people
for what he could do for them —and for God, through them." In 1960 a Father
Solanus Guild was formed in Detroit to aid Capuchin seminarians. By 1967 the
guild had 5,000 members—many of them grateful recipients of his practical advice
and his comforting assurance that God would not abandon them in their trials. He
was declared Venerable in 1995.
James Patrick Derum, his biographer, writes that eventually Father Solanus was
weary from bearing the burdens of the people who visited him. "Long since, he
had come to know the Christ-taught truth that pure love of God and one’s
fellowmen as children of God are in the final event all that matter. Living this
truth ardently and continuously had made him, spiritually, a free man—free from
slavery to passions, from self-seeking, from self-indulgence, from
self-pity—free to serve wholly both God and man" (The Porter of St.
Bonaventure’s, page 199). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 14:7-12; Psalm 27:1bcde,
4, 13-14; Luke 15:1-10
Now the tax collectors and sinners were
all gathering round to hear Jesus. But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law
muttered, This
man welcomes sinners, and eats with them. Then Jesus told them
this parable: Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does
he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep
until he finds it? And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders
and goes home. Then he calls his friends and neighbours together and says,
'Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.' I tell you that in the same way
there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over
ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent. Or suppose a woman has
ten silver coins and loses one. Does she not light a lamp, sweep the house and
search carefully until she finds it? And when she finds it, she calls her
friends and neighbours together and says, 'Rejoice with me; I have found my lost
coin.' In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the
angels of God over one sinner who repents.
(Luke 15: 1-10)
God the Shepherd
It is well-known among anthropologists that in traditional
native religions the high god, the principal deity, tends to withdraw from view
after the initial work of creation. Thereafter the scene tends to be left to
lesser spirits, and it is with these inferior beings that man deals. The high
god is a remote and withdrawn deity. The Vedic, Buddhist, and Jain religions
share cultural roots in north-eastern India and both the Buddha and Mahavira
hailed from this region. It is doubtful that these great Asian religious
founders
had any clear notion of a supreme deity who actively loves man. Man
seeks the Absolute, rather than the Absolute seeking man. Indeed Buddha seems to
have been firm that to achieve salvation, one did not have to accept the
existence of God. I can think of one modern British scholar of Buddhism who
maintains with great erudition that Buddhism rejects the notion of a loving
Creator. There is no doubt about the monotheism of Islam, but the
Judaeo-Christian observer would hesitate with its image of Allah. Man is called
to surrender to Allah with all his heart. Allah is absolute Master and Lord. He
is not the Husband of a chosen people referred to by the prophets prior to Jesus
Christ, the Husband yearning for fidelity from Israel who is his chosen spouse.
Least of all is he the ‘dear, dear Father’ revealed by Jesus Christ, the One we
are to address as Abba! The God whom Jesus Christ revealed to man and whose
revelation he commissioned his Church to bring to all the nations, is a God who
lovingly and anxiously seeks man out. He is consumed with love for man, a love
far exceeding man’s ordinary experience. That is to say, the Christian religion
has brought to the world a revelation from God and an image of him that is
unique in its overwhelming stress on divine love. God is love. That is his most
complete definition. For many religions this would reduce God to something less
than the One who is utterly transcendent and beyond the world. But no. Such is
the surprise of God. God is love in his essence and life — being a communion in
love of three divine persons who are each the one only God — and he is love in
his involvement with man and the world.
In our Gospel today our Lord, the Son of God made man
— Oh, wonder of wonders! — speaks of what the transcendent God is like. God — the high god of the native
peoples, the Absolute who is obscurely sought by Hinduism and Buddhism, the One
whom every man vaguely seeks and in whom lies his only true happiness — is the
joy and fulfilment of man’s heart. This one God, in whose hand is held our vast
and mighty universe, gazes on every man and woman with a yearning and
compassionate love. He is Father to each of us in a sense we can scarcely
imagine, precisely because of the infinite power of his love. The world throbs
with love and it throbs with hate. The love that is found in the world — that
love which exists between man and wife, between parents and children, between
friend and friend, and occasionally even between enemies — all this love is as
nothing compared with the love which the Creator of all has for each person he
sustains in existence. It is a love which seeks each out, pursuing him silently,
discreetly, unrelentingly. It is a love which will never give up and which is
determined to prevail. Ultimately, though, it is a love that can be rejected and
if it is rejected it will be to the sorrow of the mighty Father who is our
Creator. God is love, and our Lord shows this in his parable of our Gospel
passage today (Luke 15: 1-10). God is like
the shepherd, one of whose sheep has strayed. “Suppose one of you has a hundred
sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open
country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? And when he finds it, he
joyfully puts it on his shoulders and goes home. Then he calls his friends and
neighbours together and says, 'Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.' I
tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one
sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to
repent.” God will rejoice if we turn back to him, and our turning back to him
will be the result of his loving pursuit of us. Moreover, the whole of heaven is
filled with this divine love that anxiously pursues wayward and sinful man. Just
as God will rejoice, so will all of heaven. This is what the Creator of the
world is like. He loves us dearly.
It is one of the features of spiritual maturity to be able to look back on life
and see, amid the many bad experiences, the hand of a loving and very particular
Providence. God has pursued us with his love amid the cruelty and
thoughtlessness of others and amid our own many failings too. He is like the
good shepherd going after the stray, or like the woman searching every nook and
cranny of her home till she finds the lost coin. As the years pass we must place
ourselves more and more deeply in the care of our heavenly Father. Let us do
this, determined withal to obey him in all the little and ordinary duties of
life. Thus will we reach our true homeland.
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To be in charge of an apostolic undertaking demands readiness to suffer
everything, from everybody, with infinite charity.
(The Way, no.951)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter
TRUST IN GOD
AGAINST SLANDER
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, stand firm and trust in Me. For what are words but words? They fly
through the air but hurt not a stone. If you are guilty, consider how you would
gladly amend. If you are not conscious of any fault, think that you wish to bear
this for the sake of God. It is little enough for you occasionally to endure
words, since you are not yet strong enough to bear hard blows.
(Continuing)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the present fashion to call Zeal by the name of intolerance, and to
account intolerance the chief of sins; that is, any earnestness for one opinion
above another concerning God’s nature, will, and dealings with man,—or, in other
words, any earnestness for the Faith once delivered to the Saints, any
earnestness for Revelation as such. Surely, in this sense, the Apostles were the
most intolerant of men.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Christian Zeal’ (1834)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the thirty first week in Ordinary Time
(November 6) St. Nicholas Tavelic and Companions (d.
1391)
Nicholas and his three companions are among the 158
Franciscans who have been martyred in the Holy Land since the friars became
custodians of the shrines in 1335. Nicholas was born in 1340 to a wealthy and
noble family in Croatia. He joined the Franciscans and was sent with Deodat of
Rodez to preach in Bosnia. In 1384 they volunteered for the Holy Land missions
and were sent there. They looked after the holy places, cared for the Christian
pilgrims and studied Arabic. In 1391 Nicholas, Deodat, Peter of Narbonne and
Stephen of Cuneo decided to take a direct approach to converting the Muslims. On
November 11, 1391, they went to the huge Mosque of Omar in Jerusalem and asked
to see the Qadi (Muslim official). Reading from a prepared statement, they said
that all people must accept the gospel of Jesus. When they were ordered to
retract their statement, they refused. After beatings and imprisonment, they
were beheaded before a large crowd. Nicholas and his companions were canonized
in 1970. They are the only Franciscans martyred in the Holy Land to be
canonized.
In the Rule of 1221, Francis wrote that the friars going to the
Saracens (Muslims) "can conduct themselves among them spiritually in two ways.
One way is to avoid quarrels or disputes and 'be subject to every human creature
for God's sake' (1 Peter 2:13), so bearing witness to the fact that they are
Christians. Another way is to proclaim the word of God openly, when they see
that is God's will, calling on their hearers to believe in God almighty, Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit, the Creator of all, and in the Son, the Redeemer and
Saviour, that they may be baptized and become true and spiritual Christians"
(Ch. 16). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 15:14-21; Psalm 98:1-4;
Luke 16:1-8
Jesus told his disciples: There was a
rich man whose manager was accused of wasting his possessions. So he called him
in and asked
him, 'What is this I hear about you? Give an account of your
management, because you cannot be manager any longer.' The manager said to
himself, 'What shall I do now? My master is taking away my job. I'm not strong
enough to dig, and I'm ashamed to beg—I know what I'll do so that, when I lose
my job here, people will welcome me into their houses.' So he called in each one
of his master's debtors. He asked the first, 'How much do you owe my master?'
'Eight hundred gallons of olive oil,' he replied. The manager told him, 'Take
your bill, sit down quickly, and make it four hundred.' Then he asked the
second, 'And how much do you owe?' 'A thousand bushels of wheat,' he replied. He
told him, 'Take your bill and make it eight hundred.' The master commended the
dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly. For the people of this world
are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light.
(Luke 16: 1-8)
Being shrewd
Karl Marx
was obviously inspired by the thought of justice and prosperity being brought to
the oppressed masses. The analysis by Engels of the condition of the working
classes horrified him. Religion, he thought, was a bad dream, a distraction from
the real business of life which was to attain material prosperity. Religion was
an opiate, dulling the pain of the oppressed with the thought of a higher
happiness. As it turned out, as an economic strategy — setting aside deeper
considerations — communism proved to be profoundly
misguided. In its various
oppressions, it ignored the right to personal freedom involving individual
initiative and recompense (profit) for one’s own labour. But there is this to be
said, that a religious person could take a cue from Marxism in its setting of
clear goals and resolutely using the means to attain them. The economic opponent
of Marxism, classic capitalism, was equally intent on material prosperity and,
for its part, it regarded religion not as an opiate but as irrelevant. Typically
it sought its goals, not as if God was an enemy, but as if God did not exist. In
purely economic terms capitalism was much more successful than Marxism but at
enormous cost to those without capital. It was a different form of oppression.
But once again the religious person could take a cue from capitalism in its
setting of goals and in its resolutely applying the means to attain them. The
radical mistake of both Marxism and capitalism lay in its blindness to the
transcendent. God was not at the heart of the endeavour, which was his proper
place, for he is at the heart of the universe and of every slither of it. All
things are sustained by the finger of God and if his law is opposed or
disregarded, then a vast unravelling is set in place. This is the obvious lesson
of the Fall of Adam and Eve, and that Fall is iconic of the fundamental issues
in true prosperity. If man is to flourish, God must be listened to and obeyed.
That having been said, the man of religion — which should be every man — must
beware. Yes, he has the light to see that man’s true calling is to God. But is
he working at it, shrewdly applying the means to attain his goals?
If a man sets out to be rich, he simply must set goals and shrewdly identify the
means to attain them. If a company is to flourish, its board must have a very
good strategy especially in times of uncertainty. Marxism, for instance, was not
a very good strategy, even for its own purposes. Many people have been very
successful and though favourable circumstances played a part, so did strategy
and their hard work. This is the point that Everyman, the Everyman of all times
and places, ought take to heart. All must have a strategy and all must put in
consistent work. I am referring here to the work of attaining our true end.
Whatever be a person’s place in the economic race of human society, whatever be
his capital, whatever be his labour, whatever be his accomplishments or lack of
them, every person on the face of the earth has a tremendous work ahead of him.
If he fails in that work he has lost everything. There is a tremendous prize for
everyone, a prize within the reach of the highest and the lowest, and everything
that a person does in life ought be part of his strategy to reach that goal. It
is the true treasure in the field, the pearl of great price. It is not a
treasure that is reserved for the few who may have special resources or
abilities and perhaps especially favourable circumstances to assist them.
Whatever be the circumstances and whatever be the gifts and resources a person
is born with, the treasure is meant to be theirs. God has from before the
foundation of the world chosen each for the enjoyment of that everlasting
treasure. The treasure is union with Christ here and hereafter. But he must work
at it. He must shrewdly set the goal which God has set for him, and he must
select the means which God has revealed are necessary to attain it. That goal is
personal holiness in Christ. It is a daily work, and those successful in the
things of this world can be a lesson to those who are aware that man’s true
treasure is God. In our Gospel today, our Lord warns all that “the people of
this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of
the light” (Luke 16: 1-8).
Jesus Christ is the greatest Teacher of mankind, but compare his
teachings with, say, those of so many philosophers. Compare them with the
teachings of Aristotle. One thing that distinguishes the sayings of Christ is
their amazing simplicity. Even the highest mysteries are expressed in a wondrous
simplicity of expression. Our Lord’s teaching in today’s Gospel is profound and
simple. You have been given the light. I am your true happiness. Heaven is your
homeland. Learn from those who attain their worldly goals to work shrewdly to
attain your heavenly goals. Take the means to live in me and resolutely run the
race to the finish. Reach your true end. Do not squander the light.
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In apostolic work there can be no excuse for disobedience, nor for insincerity.
Remember that simplicity is not imprudence, nor indiscretion.
(The Way, no.952)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter
TRUST IN GOD AGAINST SLANDER
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
And why do such small matters pierce you to the heart, unless because you are
still carnal and pay more heed to men than you ought? You do not wish to be
reproved for your faults and you seek shelter in excuses because you are afraid
of being despised. But look into yourself more thoroughly and you will learn
that the world is still alive in you, in a vain desire to please men. For when
you shrink from being abased and confounded for your failings, it is plain
indeed that you are not truly humble or truly dead to the world, and that the
world is not crucified in you.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We must believe something; the difference between religious men and others is,
that the latter trust this world, the former the world unseen.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Faith and Experience’ (1838)
---------------Back
to index for this month---------------------------Back to
index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the thirty first week in Ordinary Time
(November 7) St. Didacus (1400-1463)
Didacus is living proof that God "chose what is foolish in the
world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame
the
strong" (1 Corinthians 1:27). As a young man in Spain, Didacus joined the
Secular Franciscan Order and lived for some time as a hermit. After Didacus
became a Franciscan brother, he developed a reputation for great insight into
God’s ways. His penances were heroic. He was so generous with the poor that the
friars sometimes grew uneasy about his charity. Didacus volunteered for the
missions in the Canary Islands and laboured there energetically and profitably.
He was also the superior of a friary there. In 1450 he was sent to Rome to
attend the canonization of St. Bernardine of Siena. When many friars gathered
for that celebration fell sick, Didacus stayed in Rome for three months to nurse
them. After he returned to Spain, he pursued a life of contemplation full-time.
He showed the friars the wisdom of God’s ways. As he was dying, Didacus looked
at a crucifix and said: "O faithful wood, O precious nails! You have borne an
exceedingly sweet burden, for you have been judged worthy to bear the Lord and
King of heaven" (Marion A. Habig, O.F.M., The Franciscan Book of Saints, p.
834). San Diego, California, is named for this Franciscan, who was canonized in
1588.
"He was born in Spain with no outstanding reputation for
learning, but like our first teachers and leaders unlettered as men count
wisdom, an unschooled person, a humble lay brother in religious life. [God chose
Didacus] to show in him the abundant riches of his grace to lead many on the way
of salvation by the holiness of his life and by his example and to prove over
and over to a weary old world almost decrepit with age that God's folly is wiser
than men, and his weakness is more powerful than men" (Bull of Canonization).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Romans 16:3-9, 16, 22-27; Psalm
145:2-5, 10-11; Luke 16:9-15
Jesus said, I tell you, use worldly
wealth to gain friends for yourselves, so that when it is gone, you will be
welcomed into eternal
dwellings.
Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and
whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. So if
you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you
with true riches? And if you have not been trustworthy with someone else's
property, who will give you property of your own? No servant can serve two
masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted
to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money. The
Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus. He said
to them, You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God
knows your hearts. What is highly valued among men is detestable in God's sight.
(Luke 16: 9-15)
Money
There is a vast industry
designed to ensure the comfortable retirement of the older population. There is
the pension, but people are nevertheless urged to prepare well for this final
stage of life, by contributing well to their superannuation, by looking after
their health, by getting regular exercise, and in general by saving up their
finances for it. People are even urged to take out an insurance for their own
burial. A lot of time has to be put into considering whether it is financially
wise to buy into a retirement home, or to have a
more independent and private
arrangement. Financial planning for the sunset of life is necessary in modern
society. Of course, all through life there has to be financial planning. The
fact is that so much of individual, social, national and international life is
take up in the pursuit of money and economic prosperity. Now, it could be argued
that, notwithstanding the terrible poverty of considerable portions of the
globe, there never has been a time of such material prosperity for so many. The
obvious question is, how ought all this be used, especially when so many have
little or nothing — and certainly no way to prepare for the future? In this
respect, our Lord puts a special twist on the question of the use of our
material means to prepare for the future. He asks, what about the future beyond
this life? How are you using your financial means to prepare for that? That is
surely a pivotal question because this life is brief, and any years of
retirement will also be very brief. But the next life will be eternal, and this
eternity will depend on the use we make of the material means that have come our
way. This is surely a matter of ordinary common sense, but so many do not
consider this because they have little faith in the word of Christ. As I say,
our Lord puts a twist on this. Gain for yourselves friends with the money you
have, he says, so that you will be welcomed into your eternal homeland
(Luke 16: 9-15). What does he mean? He means
that we ought use our money to serve the needs of others (and so to “make
yourselves friends”) in such a way that God will be pleased with us.
The best way to prepare for our real future
— which is in heaven — is to love
our neighbour as Christ has loved us. As St Paul writes in one of his Letters,
though he was rich, Christ became poor in order that we might be rich. Our true
“retirement” — let us say — is in heaven, which in any case is in just a little
while. All our life we ought be preparing for that, and our utmost concern for
our children ought be that they, too, reach that final goal. As our Lord says
elsewhere in the Gospel, what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world
and loses his soul? In one of his parables he tells the story of the successful
farmer who has a string of bumper crops, so much so that he simply has nowhere
to store all the grain. So he builds much larger barns, and places his abundant
produce in them, and settles back with a great sense of security. He is prepared
for the years to come. But all the while God has — as we might say — been
shaking his head. You fool! You have this day alone left to you, and what use
will all this be to you thereafter? The implication is that he should have been
using his wealth to provide security for himself in the hereafter. How could he
have done this? His wealth would have been of eternal use to him if he had
helped the poor and, in general, had supported the advancement of God’s reign in
the hearts of men. Our Lord says, “use worldly wealth to gain friends for
yourselves, so that when it is gone, you will be welcomed into eternal
dwellings.” The money you have is actually in itself little in the sight of God.
However much it is, absolutely speaking it is little when compared with the real
wealth he wants to give you. Well now, if you cannot be trusted with what is in
reality a pittance, how can you expect the real wealth that God wants to give
you? That wealth is the divine life of union with Jesus both here and hereafter.
Our Lord is drawing parallels between the affairs of this life and those of the
next. Very ominously, he warns that we cannot be the slave of money and material
goods, and at the same time slaves of God. We must choose.
So then, let us resolve to use the money and material wealth that come our way
— and there is nothing wrong with making plenty of money — in a fashion that
pleases God. What is wrong is, not making money and even plenty of it, but using
it in a way that displeases God. If we are blessed with talent and opportunity
for the making of plenty of money, we must remember that it is God who has
placed this in our hands. He expects it to be used truly wisely — which is to
say, in the light of his will, of his judgment, and of the eternity which will
follow his judgment. That is to say, we ought use our material goods to fulfill
God’s will, especially in the service of neighbour. In this way we shall be
making friends, and will be received into our true homeland.
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are under an obligation to pray and sacrifice yourself for the person and
intentions of whoever is 'in charge' of your apostolic undertaking. If you are
careless in fulfilling this duty, you make me think that you lack enthusiasm for
your way.
(The Way, no.953)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter
TRUST IN GOD AGAINST SLANDER
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
Listen to My word, and you will not value ten thousand words of men. Behold, if
every malicious thing that could possibly be invented were uttered against you,
what harm could it do if you ignored it all and gave it no more thought than you
would a blade of grass? Could it so much as pluck one hair from your head?
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whatever our Lord said or did upon earth was strictly and literally the word and
deed of God Himself.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Humiliation of the Eternal Son’ (1835)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thirty second Sunday of Ordinary Time B
Prayers this week:
Let
my prayer come before you, Lord; listen, and answer me.
(Psalm
87:3)
God of power
and mercy, protect us from all harm. Give us freedom of spirit and health in
mind and body to do your work on earth.
We ask this
through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God
for ever and ever.
(November 8) Blessed John Duns Scotus (c. 1266-1308)
A humble man, John Duns Scotus has been one of
the most influential Franciscans through the centuries. Born at Duns in the
county of Berwick, Scotland, John was descended from a wealthy farming family.
In later years he was identified as John Duns Scotus
to
indicate the land of his birth; Scotia is the Latin name for Scotland. John
received the habit of the Friars Minor at Dumfries, where his uncle Elias Duns
was superior. After novitiate John studied at Oxford and Paris and was ordained
in 1291. More studies in Paris followed until 1297, when he returned to lecture
at Oxford and Cambridge. Four years later he returned to Paris to teach and
complete the requirements for the doctorate. In an age when many people adopted
whole systems of thought without qualification, John pointed out the richness of
the Augustinian-Franciscan tradition, appreciated the wisdom of Aquinas,
Aristotle and the Muslim philosophers—and still managed to be an independent
thinker. That quality was proven in 1303 when King Philip the Fair tried to
enlist the University of Paris on his side in a dispute with Pope Boniface VIII.
John Duns Scotus dissented and was given three days to leave France. In Scotus’s
time, some philosophers held that people are basically determined by forces
outside themselves. Free will is an illusion, they argued. An ever practical
man, Scotus said that if he started beating someone who denied free will, the
person would immediately tell him to stop. But if Scotus didn’t really have a
free will, how could he stop? John had a knack for finding illustrations his
students could remember! After a short stay in Oxford he returned to Paris,
where he received the doctorate in 1305. He continued teaching there and in 1307
so ably defended the Immaculate Conception of Mary that the university
officially adopted his position. That same year the minister general assigned
him to the Franciscan school in Cologne where John died in 1308. He is buried in
the Franciscan church near the famous Cologne cathedral. Drawing on the work of
John Duns Scotus, Pope Pius IX solemnly defined the Immaculate Conception of
Mary in 1854. John Duns Scotus, the "Subtle Doctor," was beatified in 1993.
Father Charles Balic, O.F.M., the foremost 20th-century
authority on Scotus, has written: "The whole of Scotus's theology is dominated
by the notion of love. The characteristic note of this love is its absolute
freedom. As love becomes more perfect and intense, freedom becomes more noble
and integral both in God and in man" (New Catholic Encyclopedia,
Vol. 4, p. 1105). Intelligence hardly guarantees holiness. But John Duns Scotus
was not only brilliant, he was also humble and prayerful—the exact combination
St. Francis wanted in any friar who studied. In a day when French nationalism
threatened the rights of the pope, Scotus sided with the papacy and paid the
price. He also defended human freedom against those who would compromise it by
determinism. Ideas are important. John Duns Scotus placed his best thinking at
the service of the human family and of the Church. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: 1 Kgs 17:10-16; Ps
146:7-10; Heb 9:24-28; Mark 12:38-44 or 12:41-44
As he taught, Jesus said, Watch out for
the teachers of the law. They like to walk around in flowing robes and be
greeted in the market-places, and have the most important seats in the
synagogues and the places of honour at banquets. They devour widows' houses and
for a show make lengthy prayers. Such men will be punished most severely. Jesus
sat down opposite the place where the offerings were put and watched the crowd
putting their money into the temple treasury. Many rich people threw in large
amounts. But a poor widow came and put in two very small copper coins, worth
only a fraction of a penny. Calling his disciples to him, Jesus said, I tell you
the truth, this poor widow has put more into the treasury than all the others.
They all gave out of their wealth; but she, out of her poverty, put in
everything— all she had to live on. (Mark 12: 38-44)
Loving the poor
Sir David
Attenborough, the famous producer of natural history documentaries, once
declared himself to be an agnostic. He did not know if there is a God. When
asked why his profound familiarity with the wonderful world of nature did not
lead him to the Author of nature, he pointed to the cruelty he saw everywhere in
nature. The helpless are attacked and devoured. There is ruthless cruelty by the
strong over the weak. Nature does not reflect mercy to the needy — which is what
we expect of God. Now, setting
aside the question of how that pattern
in nature is to be
interpreted, we would surely have to allow that a similar impression could be
gained from the human scene. While there have been wonderful exceptions, is not
neglect and oppression of the needy and the poor an ingrained feature of much of human
history? Prescinding from the dictates of Judaeo-Christian revelation, consider
a few examples. India is arguably the most religious nation in the world. The
religious imagination pervades that vast and teeming people, illustrating the
claim that man is, above all, a religious being by nature. He yearns for the
Transcendent, the Ultimate, and wishes to be one with it. But look at India’s
abominable caste system and the abiding treatment of its Untouchables! The
elimination of this despicable attitude to the poorest has proved to be an
enormous challenge. All through history the afflicted have been neglected. For
long centuries, slavery — accompanied by great cruelty to slaves — has marred
civilization and it has been tolerated by religious societies, including even
Christian. In the modern era, millions of the most helpless are routinely
snuffed out of their struggle for life by abortion, and this cruelty is
sanctioned by legislation. The list could go on and on. The point I am making
here is that while man may be instinctively religious, he can be instinctively
cruel and neglectful of the poor. If man does not check himself by reference to
his higher moral instincts, he will not love the poor but rather will be deeply
irritated by them. Further, he will even tend to exploit the poor.
Man’s religious life tends to proceed on a sphere distinct from concern for the
poor. By nature man longs for the God who is beyond, while tending to neglect
the poor man who is right here. In revealed religion, this absolutely will not
do. When Cain killed his brother Abel, he incurred the wrath of God. When Moses
received the Ten Commandments on Sinai, it was discovered that the first three
governed our relations with God, while the remaining seven, our relations with
man. The prophets inveighed against a religion of splendid ritual and sacrifices
in the midst of a blithe oppression of the poor. I hate such sacrifices, Yahweh
God said. To be religious, one had also to be deeply concerned for the poor.
Jesus Christ, the image of the unseen God, showed that God identifies with the
poor. In his ministry our Lord loved the poor, understanding by this term the
person in genuine need. He was profoundly merciful. He saw the widow of Nain
and, feeling profoundly sorry for her, raised her son to life. He responded to
need everywhere, pointing withal to the greatest misery of all, the misery of
sin. It was this pitiable condition which he had come to do away with. Christ
showed the unlimited love of God for the one who is poor. In our Gospel today
(Mark 12: 38-44) our Lord condemns the
experts in the law for, among other things, their lack of concern for the poor.
“They devour widows' houses and for a show make lengthy prayers. Such men will
be punished most severely.” He notices with a special love the poor and
suffering individual. He stopped in the crowd when the poor woman touched his
cloak for a healing. He wanted to have contact with her. In our Gospel today he
sees the poor widow putting in to the Treasury all she had to live on. He holds
her up for imitation. Christ loved the poor, and he requires of his disciples
that they love the poor. At the Last Judgment (Matthew 25:40) he will say to
every man and woman that whatever we have done to the least person, has been
done to him.
Love for the poor must distinguish the Christian life, and the saints have been
shining examples of this Christian spirit. The very phrase, “being very
Christian,” has come to mean being very concerned for the needy. Love for the
poor is manifested on a variety of fronts, in the struggle against material
poverty and also against the many forms of cultural, moral and religious
poverty. The spiritual and corporal works of mercy and the numerous charitable
institutions of the centuries all show the preferential love for the poor which
characterizes the spirit of Christ and his disciples. Let us then pray for the
grace to love the poor and to show God’s mercy towards them.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no.2443-2449 (Love for the poor)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be particularly respectful to whoever is in charge, whenever he consults you and
you have to contradict his opinions. And never contradict him in the presence of
those who are subject to him, even if he is in the wrong.
(The Way, no.954)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter TRUST IN GOD
AGAINST SLANDER
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
He who does not keep his heart within him, and who does not have God before his
eyes is easily moved by a word of disparagement. He who trusts in Me, on the
other hand, and who has no desire to stand by his own judgment, will be free
from the fear of men. For I am the judge and discerner of all secrets. I know
how all things happen. I know who causes injury and who suffers it. From Me that
word proceeded, and with My permission it happened, that out of many hearts
thoughts may be revealed. I shall judge the guilty and the innocent; but I have
wished beforehand to try them both by secret judgment.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a famous passage from his Discourses to
Mixed Congregations, quoted in the Catechism of the Catholic Church,
John Henry Newman describes the
dangers of ‘notoriety’ – valuing fame for its own sake.
Newman’s remarks have a powerful contemporary ring to them. There is only one
way is a way to escape this risk – the Catholic faith:
Wealth is one idol of the day, and notoriety is a second. I am not speaking, I
repeat, of what men actually pursue, but of what they look up to, what they
revere. Men may not have the opportunity of pursuing what they admire still.
Never could notoriety exist as it does now, in any former age of the world; now
that the news of the hour from all parts of the world, private news as well as
public, is brought day by day to every individual, as I may say, of the
community, to the poorest artisan and the most secluded peasant, by
processes
so uniform, so unvarying, so spontaneous, that they almost bear the semblance of
a natural law. And hence notoriety, or the making a noise in the world, has come
to be considered a great good in itself, and a ground of veneration. Time was
when men could only make a display by means of expenditure; and the world used
to gaze with wonder on those who had large establishments, many servants, many
horses, richly-furnished houses, gardens, and parks: it does so still, that is,
when it has the opportunity of doing so: for such magnificence is the fortune of
the few, and comparatively few are its witnesses. Notoriety, or, as it may be
called, newspaper fame, is to the many what style and fashion, to use the
language of the world, are to those who are within or belong to the higher
circles; it becomes to them a sort of idol, worshipped for its own sake, and
without any reference to the shape in which it comes before them. It may be an
evil fame or a good fame; it may be the notoriety of a great statesman, or of a
great preacher, or of a great speculator, or of a great experimentalist, or of a
great criminal; of one who has laboured in the improvement of our schools, or
hospitals, or prisons, or workhouses, or of one who has robbed his neighbour of
his wife. It matters not; so that a man is talked much of, and read much of, he
is thought much of; nay, let him even have died justly under the hands of the
law, still he will be made a sort of martyr of. … For the question with men is,
not whether he is great, or good, or wise, or holy; not whether he is base, and
vile, and odious, but whether he is in the mouths of men, whether he has centred
on himself the attention of many, whether he has done something out of the way,
whether he has been (as it were) canonised in the publications of the hour.
[...]
But
oh! what a change, my brethren, when the good hand of God brings them by some
marvellous providence to the pit’s mouth, and then out into the blessed light of
day! what a change for them when they first begin to see with the eyes of the
soul, with the intuition which grace gives, Jesus, the Sun of Justice; and the
heaven of Angels and Archangels in which He dwells; and the bright Morning Star,
which is His Blessed Mother; and the continual floods of light falling and
striking against the earth, and transformed, as they fall, into an infinity of
hues, which are His Saints; and the boundless sea, which is the image of His
divine immensity; and then again the calm, placid Moon by night, which images
His Church; and the silent stars, like good and holy men, travelling on in
lonely pilgrimage to their eternal rest! [...]
And such as this in its measure is the contrast, to which the awakened soul is
witness, between the objects of its admiration and pursuit in its natural state,
and those which burst upon it when it has entered into communion with the Church
Invisible, when it has come “to Mount Sion, and to the city of the Living God,
the heavenly Jerusalem, and to a company of many thousand Angels, and to the
Church of the first-born, who are enrolled in heaven, and to God the Judge of
all, and to the spirits of the just now perfected, and to Jesus the Mediator of
the New Testament” [Heb 12: 21-24]. From that day it has begun a new life … a
change there will be in its views and estimation of things, as soon as it has
heard and has faith in the word of God, as soon as it understands that wealth,
and notoriety, and influence, and high place, are not the first of blessings and
the real standard of good; but that saintliness and all its attendants,—saintly
purity, saintly poverty, heroic fortitude and patience, self-sacrifice for the
sake of others, renouncement of the world, the favour of Heaven, the protection
of Angels, the smile of the Blessed Virgin, the gifts of grace, the
interpositions of miracle, the intercommunion of merits,—that these are the high
and precious things, the things to be looked up to, the things to be reverently
spoken of.
(Reference: John Henry Newman,
Discourses addressed to Mixed Congregations (1849) Discourse no. 5, p.
90-94)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the
thirty-second week in Ordinary Time B-2
Entrance Antiphon Cf.
Ps 88 (87): 3
Let my prayer come into your presence. Incline your ear to my cry for help, O
Lord.
Collect Almighty and merciful God, graciously
keep from us all adversity, so that, unhindered in mind and body alike, we may
pursue in freedom of heart the things that are yours. Through our Lord Jesus
Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever.
click on centre arrow
Scripture today: Titus 1:1-9;
Psalm 24:1b-2, 3-4ab, 5-6; Luke 17:1-6
Jesus
said to his disciples, “Things that cause sin will inevitably occur, but woe to
the one through whom they occur. It would be better for him if a millstone were
put around his neck and he be thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of
these little ones to sin. Be on your guard! If your brother sins, rebuke him;
and if he repents, forgive him. And if he wrongs you seven times in one day and
returns to you seven times saying, ‘I am sorry,’ you should forgive him.” And
the Apostles said to the Lord, “Increase our faith.” The Lord replied, “If you
have faith the size of a mustard seed, you would say to this mulberry tree, ‘Be
uprooted and planted in the sea,’ and it would obey you.”
(Luke 17:1-6)
Sin
Having arrived on the island of St Helena, Napoleon Bonaparte spent
the remaining six years of his life as a bored and deluded captive. He demanded
to be addressed as Emperor, refusing to accept any communication addressed to
“General Bonaparte.” He imposed rigid court etiquette on his French entourage.
He later spent each day in his zinc-lined bath, refreshed with hot water to
relieve the agonies of stomach cancer, from which he died in May of 1821. Bored
to the limit, he played the martyr and attempted to foster the
myth
of an Emperor wronged by a petty English bureaucrat. What did Bonaparte regard
as his life’s achievement? Whatever it was, it had little to do with pleasing
God. “Sin” loomed scarcely at all for the grand man, for whom the worst calamity
was not “sin” but his temporal misfortune. Thirty-eight years later in a tiny
village of France, the country Bonaparte had masterfully dominated, lay a 73
year-old dying parish priest. The priest had a European reputation, but of a
very different kind from that of the Emperor who had caused so many deaths
because of his ambition. That priest was the famed Cure of Ars, Jean Vianney.
One of his intimates present at his bedside doubted that the Cure had ever
committed a deliberate venial sin (Trochu, El Cura de Ars, 1984,
p.644). Sixteen years later, away in England, a particularly close friend of
Blessed John Henry Newman had just died near Birmingham. His name was Father
Ambrose St John, Newman’s fellow-Oratorian and a convert to the Catholic Faith
like himself . His death devastated Newman, who was assured by the one attending
Ambrose at the last that “his soul was ripe for heaven.” Newman wrote that
Ambrose St John believed that “since the time he became a priest, he had not
committed a mortal sin.” The point here is that while sin mattered little to the
one, it mattered enormously to the two others. “Sin” is scarcely a fact for
secular man, of which Bonaparte was a notable specimen. Napoleon accepted that
there was “a God” (of sorts), but his “God” did not matter or count. What
mattered was making the best of this world, and he was the judge of what was
best. By contrast, God was everything to St John Vianney and to Father Ambrose
St John, and “sin” was the worst of calamities, to be resisted tooth and nail to
the end.
Inasmuch as the universe proceeds in its history and development according to
its own vast array of laws, one might make a case for saying that most things
that happen occur by necessity, or by good or bad luck. I can see how this could
be argued because much that happens is the result of the playing out of the laws
of the world ― and these laws are of various kinds and operate at various
levels. But one great fact puts paid to this sweeping scheme (of necessity and
luck), and that is free choice. Man knows he possesses the gift of free choice,
and has the responsibility that accompanies this. He is aware of objective moral
obligation. He is obliged to do certain things, things that are good, and he is
obliged to avoid other things, things that are bad. He is morally obligated, and
yet he is free to contravene his moral obligations. He can sin. Man ― the man
with a lively and properly functioning conscience ― knows that he sins. “Sin” is
the one thing that every man and woman, whose conscience is alive, knows must be
avoided. His distinctive gift, the gift of freedom, must be exercised constantly
in avoiding “sin” ― not just in acquiring possessions, status and power. True
greatness will be attained not merely in dominating the world around him, but in
avoiding “sin.” The principal goal of life is to please God and to avoid
displeasing him. The more complete the attainment of this particular goal, the
greater the person becomes precisely as a person. Other goals may be attained,
but if this goal is neglected, let alone completely lost, then all is as nothing
in ultimate terms. So it is that Jesus Christ in our Gospel today refers to the
calamity of sin and leading others into sin. Jesus said to his disciples,
“Things that cause sin will inevitably occur, but woe to the one through whom
they occur. It would be better for him if a millstone were put around his neck
and he be thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to
sin. Be on your guard!” (Luke 17:1-6). When
Christ stood before the highest persons of the nation ― the Sanhedrin and the
high priest ― their rank as such meant little to him. When he stood before
Pontius Pilate, the representative of the Empire, his political power as such
meant little. What mattered was sin. “That is why,” he said, “the ones who
handed me over have the greater guilt” (John 19:11).
There comes a point in every person’s brief life when one thing just has to
happen, if he is to get on in a true sense. He must understand that the one
thing that matters is his recognition of God and the imperative of pleasing him.
This means striving to do his will and to avoid committing sin ― “sin” being
none other than displeasing God by doing what is evil in God’s sight. That is
what matters. Closely following this, it must be recognized as a priority that
it is a terrible thing to lead others in the direction of sin, and it is a grand
and wonderful thing to lead them in the direction of obeying God. Let us get our
priorities right then, and make these things the foundation of our lives.
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome (November 9)
(November 9) Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome
Most Catholics think of St. Peter’s as the pope’s main church, but this is not
so. St. John Lateran is the pope’s church, the cathedral of the Diocese of Rome
where the Bishop of Rome presides. The first basilica on the site was built in
the fourth century when Constantine donated land he had received from the
wealthy Lateran family. That structure and its successors suffered fire,
earthquake and the ravages of war, but the Lateran remained the church where
popes were consecrated until the popes returned from Avignon in the 14th century
to find the church and the adjoining palace in ruins. Pope Innocent X
commissioned the present structure in 1646. One of Rome’s most imposing
churches, the Lateran’s towering facade is crowned with 15 colossal statues of
Christ, John the Baptist, John the Evangelist and 12 doctors of the Church.
Beneath its high altar rest the remains of the small wooden table on which
tradition holds St. Peter himself celebrated Mass.
Unlike the commemorations of other Roman churches (St. Mary Major, August 5;
Sts. Peter and Paul, November 18), this anniversary is a feast. The dedication
of a church is a feast for all its parishioners. In a sense, St. John Lateran is
the parish church of all Catholics, because it is the pope's cathedral. This
church is the spiritual home of the people who are the Church.
"What was done here, as these walls were rising, is reproduced when
we bring together those who believe in Christ. For, by believing they are hewn
out, as it were, from mountains and forests, like stones and timber; but by
catechizing, baptism and instruction they are, as it were, shaped, squared and
planed by the hands of the workers and artisans. Nevertheless, they do not make
a house for the Lord until they are fitted together through love" (St.
Augustine, Sermon 36). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Ezechiel 47:1-2, 8-9, 12; Psalm 46:2-3, 5-6, 8-9; 1 Cor
3:9c-11, 16-17; John 2:13-22
When it was almost time for the Jewish
Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the temple courts he found men selling
cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he
made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and
cattle; he scattered the coins of the money-changers and overturned their
tables. To those who sold doves he said, Get these out of here! How dare you
turn my Father's house into a market! His disciples remembered that it is
written: Zeal for your house will consume me. Then the Jews demanded of him,
What miraculous sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?
Jesus answered them, Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three
days. The Jews replied, It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and
you are going to raise it in three days? But the temple he had spoken of was his
body. After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had
said. Then they believed the Scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.
(John 2:13-22)
God-with-us
Among
the most interesting and popular of series on television are programs portraying
archaeological digs. Every so often there is a new find in the pyramids of
Egypt. Archaeologists are constantly discovering new sites in the British Isles.
In Australia, Aboriginal carvings and remains come to light, putting further
back the eras of Aboriginal settlement on the continent. It is taken for granted
by those following the discipline that the researchers will presume the
importance of religion, which is to say, ritual and religious myth. If something
cannot be easily categorized (as, say, a weapon, or an ornament, or some
implement of everyday use) then it will be
presumed to have a religious
significance. From primal man up to the most advanced societies (in
archaeological terms) a religious perspective is assumed even by the atheistic
or agnostic archaeologist to be fundamental. Perhaps the most characteristic
feature of human societies is the temple, the shrine, the religious site or
locale of the presence of the deity. It is the means whereby the deity — whether
minor or major — can in some sense be encountered. Thus does man typically
think. He thinks of his gods, and he wants to be on good relations with them.
The testimony of history and the human sciences is that the spirit of man yearns
for the divine, and hopes that the divine will come to him. I suggest it is in
this context that we ought understand the Judaeo-Christian revelation. God has
made man to long for him, a longing which has been deeply frustrated by the
original Fall, but which remains nevertheless. He longs for God, and prays
repeatedly for his assistance. The remarkable thing is that out of history has
come the testimony that God has intervened and chosen to stay with man. He has
spoken to certain chosen ones, and has abided with a chosen people. He spoke to
Abraham, Isaac, Jacob. He promised to be with them and to regard their
descendants as his own people. He spoke to Moses and the prophets, and promised
to abide with his people as would a Husband with his spouse.
This was the meaning of that great institution, the Temple of Jerusalem. It was
the heart of the nation because therein, in some altogether special way, abode
the God of Israel. How Jesus Christ must have loved the Temple of Jerusalem! It
was the house of his heavenly Father. In our Gospel passage today we see him
making a whip of cords and physically driving all the buyers and sellers from
the Temple precincts (John 2:13-22). It was
his Father’s house! His action reinforces a signal testimony to the world
offered by the revealed religion of Israel, that the great God had come to abide
personally among men. The longings of the human heart as evidenced in the
cultures and societies of the world, were in this way answered. God had come and
had chosen to stay. But our passage tells us of a presence of God among us that
was more wondrous still. We read that “the Jews demanded of him, What miraculous
sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this? Jesus answered
them, Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days. The Jews
replied, It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to
raise it in three days? But the temple he had spoken of was his body.” The
physical person of Jesus was the temple of God. Let us consider the marvel of
this. If we look to the heavens with any understanding of the findings of
astronomy, we cannot but take our breath away at the thought that this is the
work of one only God. One almighty Being holds this ever-so-vast universe in his
hands. He is, as he revealed to Moses at the Burning Bush, the one who is. He is
pure, pure Being without any qualification or limitation. The mystery of
mysteries is that he, the great God, became man. Jesus Christ, a definite and
therefore limited man, was the unlimited God incarnate. The second divine
person, retaining his divine nature, took to himself a limited human nature. And
so there walked the earth one who was God, and he it was who cleansed the Temple
on this occasion. He himself was the Temple par excellence, and he had come to
stay.
This same Jesus in all his human and divine reality abides now in the Church his
body. Those who believe in him may encounter him in the life of the Church,
especially in her preaching, teaching and her Sacraments. The greatest presence
of God among men is the person of Jesus Christ, and the greatest presence of
Jesus Christ among men is in the Eucharist. When we think of Jesus we ought
think of the Eucharist, because Jesus here on earth is especially the
Eucharistic Jesus. The Eucharistic Jesus abides in our churches, and there our
hearts have their true object. On the Feast of the Dedication of the Basilica of
John Lateran, let us renew our love for the Eucharistic Jesus, and for our
churches where the Eucharistic Jesus constantly awaits us.
(E.J.Tyler)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In your apostolic undertaking don't fear the enemies 'outside', however great
their power. This is the enemy most to be feared: your lack of 'filiation' and
your lack of 'fraternal' spirit.
(The Way, no.955)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter
TRUST
IN GOD AGAINST SLANDER
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
The testimony of man is often deceiving, but My judgment is true -- it will
stand and not be overthrown. It is hidden from many and made known to but a few.
Yet it is never mistaken and cannot be mistaken even though it does not seem
right in the eyes of the unwise.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This then is the special glory of the Christian Church, that its members do not
depend merely on what is visible, they are not mere stones of a building, piled
one on another, and bound together from without, but they are one and all the
births and manifestations of one and the same unseen spiritual principle … they
are members of the Body of Christ. … This is the fruitful Vine, and the rich
Olive tree upon and out of which all Saints, though wild and barren by nature,
grow, that they may bring forth fruit unto God.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Communion of Saints’ (1837)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the thirty second week in Ordinary Time
(November 10) Saint Leo the Great, pope and doctor of
the Church
With apparent strong conviction of the importance of the Bishop of Rome in the
Church, and of the Church as the ongoing sign of Christ’s presence in the world,
Leo the Great displayed endless dedication as pope. Elected in 440, he worked
tirelessly as "Peter’s
successor,"
guiding his fellow bishops as "equals in the episcopacy and infirmities." Leo is
known as one of the best administrative popes of the ancient Church. His work
branched into four main areas, indicative of his notion of the pope’s total
responsibility for the flock of Christ. He worked at length to control the
heresies of Pelagianism, Manichaeism and others, placing demands on their
followers so as to secure true Christian beliefs. A second major area of his
concern was doctrinal controversy in the Church in the East, to which he
responded with a classic letter setting down the Church’s teaching on the two
natures of Christ. With strong faith, he also led the defence of Rome against
barbarian attack, taking the role of peacemaker. In these three areas, Leo’s
work has been highly regarded. His growth to sainthood has its basis in the
spiritual depth with which he approached the pastoral care of his people, which
was the fourth focus of his work. He is known for his spiritually profound
sermons. An instrument of the call to holiness, well-versed in Scripture and
ecclesiastical awareness, Leo had the ability to reach the everyday needs and
interests of his people. One of his sermons is used in the Office of Readings on
Christmas. It is said of Leo that his true significance rests in his doctrinal
insistence on the mysteries of Christ and the Church and in the supernatural
charisms of the spiritual life given to humanity in Christ and in his Body, the
Church. Thus Leo held firmly that everything he did and said as pope for the
administration of the Church represented Christ, the head of the Mystical Body,
and St. Peter, in whose place Leo acted. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 2:23–3:9; Psalm
34:2-3, 16-19; Luke 17:7-10
Jesus said, Suppose one of you had a
servant ploughing or looking after the sheep. Would he say to the servant when
he comes in from the field, 'Come along now and sit down to eat'? Would he not
rather say, 'Prepare my supper, get yourself ready and wait on me while I eat
and drink; after that you may eat and drink'? Would he thank the servant because
he did what he was told to do? So you also, when you have done everything you
were told to do, should say, 'We are unworthy servants; we have only done our
duty.'
(Luke 17:7-10)
Duty
At various times I have come across
persons who regret that they have the religious duties that are theirs. They
envy those with fewer and less demanding duties. Such a person may be, say, a
Catholic. He knows that as a Catholic he has various duties to fulfil, and he
observes that many non-Catholics do not see themselves as having as many
religious duties as he. The non-Catholic may not feel himself required to attend
worship every Sunday. He may see himself as having less demanding requirements
in certain other spheres of
life. This person who envies the other with fewer
duties is reluctant about duty, he wishes to be rid of it, and cannot be said to
love it. Duty is not for him a friend. Now, it is well to ponder often on the
sheer phenomenon of duty in our daily experience. From our earliest years of
conscious and reflective thought, we sense duty. I do not refer simply to
external impositions which, if they are not respected, bring sanctions. After
all, a school bully may demand of others that they do this or that, and he may
get compliance because of the threats he makes. But none of those who comply
would regard their compliance as a duty. It is merely expedient. The demand
coming from other sources may, however, be perceived precisely as a duty — such
as the demand by school authorities that there be no bullying. The sanctions
which bullying attracts may result in compliance for reasons primarily of
expedience, but all know that this compliance cannot be reduced to expedience.
This is because the demand in this case is also seen as representing a duty.
Duty cannot be reduced to expedience, even though we may recognize that the
fulfilment of our duty is also expedient for our happiness. There is something
ultimate about the quality of duty because there is something ultimate about the
dignity of the one to whom one has the duties — be that person God, or one’s
fellows. There is this, too. Duty is not like an unpleasant acquaintance or even
an enemy. It is a true friend, and while love for it is not just a matter of
utility, still, as with any good friend, love for it will lead to our real
happiness.
Deep within his soul man senses duty. It
abides within, and abides constantly. It does not glare menacingly at man, but
while being severe it smiles with the promise of brightness ahead. More, man
senses a greater Presence within duty. This Presence summons him to love
precisely through his obedience to duty. That is to say, in the dictate of the
conscience, the prudent man senses the echo of the voice of God. Our sense of
duty is our most natural step to God, and, if we respect the demands of duty — not with a weary reluctance or as a mere expedient, but for love
— it will take
us higher and higher. In our Gospel today, our Lord surely suggests these
ultimate rewards of doing one’s duty. “So you also, when you have done
everything you were told to do, should say, 'We are unworthy servants; we have
only done our duty'” (Luke 17:7-10). Our
Lord’s words intimate that the fulfilling of one’s duty for love of the God who
summons in the duty, will bring happiness aplenty. Such a person will not need
further rewards for his happiness. All this is to say that a life of obedience
to God in the fulfilment of one’s duties of state will bring a profound
happiness in itself. A girl marries early and leaves the home of her happy
childhood to embark on her life’s work, being wife and mother. She lives out her
long life in the one small locality, bearing up with her difficult husband and
disappointing children. She humbly and consistently lives a life of duty, happy
withal. She prays daily, she is cheerful, she makes allowances for the
unreasonable thoughtlessness of many around her — in a word, she strives to fulfill her duty in life. She does all this because she wants to love and serve
God. Her duty brings her peace and a great heart. She finally reaches her end
and is buried with her relatives, her grave hardly distinguished. But she became
a great soul and was recognized as such. She had done no more than her duty, and
her duty had led her to happiness and to sanctity, humble, hidden but real. Duty
is our best friend. It is the touch of God’s finger bringing light for the
journey ahead and constituting our natural stairway to heaven.
We are unworthy servants. We have done
no more than our duty. The greatest saints have had that to say, and if anyone
at the end of life is able to say this, that person has reached his term. John
Henry Newman was prepared to go a long way in accepting Darwin’s theory of
evolution, but he drew the line at duty. The human being is distinguished by his
conscience, by his sense of duty. Let us resolve to do our duty, the duties of
every day which God has pleased to give us, knowing that our happiness and
flourishing, here and hereafter, will come from their loving fulfilment.
(E.J.Tyler)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I well understand your being amused by the slights you receive — even though
they come from influential enemies — as long as you can feel united to your God
and to your brothers in the apostolate. Slighted ? So what!
(The Way, no.956)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter TRUST IN GOD
AGAINST SLANDER
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
To Me, therefore, you ought to come in every decision, not depending on your own
judgment. For the just man will not be disturbed, no matter what may befall him
from God. Even if an unjust charge be made against him he will not be much
troubled. Neither will he exult vainly if through others he is justly acquitted.
He considers that it is I Who search the hearts and inmost thoughts of men, that
I do not judge according to the face of things or human appearances. For what
the judgment of men considers praiseworthy is often worthy of blame in My sight.
(Continuing)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miracles have a tendency to rouse conscience, to awaken to a sense of
responsibility, to remind of duty, and to direct the attention to those marks of
divine government already contained in the ordinary course of events.
JHN, from ‘The Miracles of Scripture’ (1825-6)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the thirty second week in Ordinary Time
(November 11) Saint Martin of Tours, bishop
(316?-397)
A conscientious objector who wanted to be a monk; a monk who was maneuvered into
being a bishop; a bishop who fought paganism as well as pleaded for mercy to
heretics—such was Martin of Tours, one of the most popular of saints and one of
the first not to be a
martyr. Born of pagan parents in what is now Hungary and
raised in Italy, this son of a veteran was forced to serve in the army against
his will at the age of 15. He became a Christian catechumen and was baptized at
18. It was said that he lived more like a monk than a soldier. At 23, he refused
a war bonus and told his commander: "I have served you as a soldier; now let me
serve Christ. Give the bounty to those who are going to fight. But I am a
soldier of Christ and it is not lawful for me to fight." After great
difficulties, he was discharged and went to be a disciple of Hilary of Poitiers
(January 13). On a bitterly cold day, a famous legend goes, Martin met a poor
man, almost naked, trembling in the cold and begging from passersby at the city
gate. Martin had nothing but his weapons and his clothes. He drew his sword, cut
his cloak into two pieces, gave one to the beggar and wrapped himself in the
other half. Some of the bystanders laughed at his now odd apearance; others were
ashamed at not having relieved the man's misery. That night in his sleep Martin
saw Christ dressed in the half of the garment he had given away, and heard him
say, "Martin, still a catechumen, has covered me with is garment." He was
ordained an exorcist and worked with great zeal against the Arians. He became a
monk, living first at Milan and later on a small island. When Hilary was
restored to his see after exile, Martin returned to France and established what
may have been the first French monastery near Poitiers. He lived there for 10
years, forming his disciples and preaching throughout the countryside. The
people of Tours demanded that he become their bishop. He was drawn to that city
by a ruse—the need of a sick person—and was brought to the church, where he
reluctantly allowed himself to be consecrated bishop. Some of the consecrating
bishops thought his rumpled appearance and unkempt hair indicated that he was
not dignified enough for the office. Along with St. Ambrose (December 7), Martin
rejected Bishop Ithacius’s principle of putting heretics to death—as well as the
intrusion of the emperor into such matters. He prevailed upon the emperor to
spare the life of the heretic Priscillian. For his efforts, Martin was accused
of the same heresy, and Priscillian was executed after all. Martin then pleaded
for a cessation of the persecution of Priscillian’s followers in Spain. He still
felt he could cooperate with Ithacius in other areas, but afterwards his
conscience troubled him about this decision. As death approached, his followers
begged him not to leave them. He prayed, "Lord, if your people still need me, I
do not refuse the work. Your will be done."
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 6:1-11;
Ps 82:3-4, 6-7; Luke 17:11-19
Now
on his way to Jerusalem, Jesus travelled along the border between Samaria and
Galilee. As he was going into a village, ten men who had leprosy met him. They
stood at a distance and called out in a loud voice, Jesus, Master, have pity on
us! When he saw them, he said, Go, show yourselves to the priests. And as they
went, they were cleansed. One of them, when he saw he was healed, came back,
praising God in a loud voice. He threw himself at Jesus' feet and thanked him—
and he was a Samaritan. Jesus asked, Were not all ten cleansed? Where are the
other nine? Was no-one found to return and give praise to God except this
foreigner? Then he said to him, Rise and go; your faith has made you well.
(Luke 17: 11-19)
God is very personal
Throughout the history of Western
thought there have been numerous variants of the argument that posits a First
Cause of our changing, contingent, varied and ordered world. From Plato and
Aristotle to Plotinus to Avicenna and on to Aquinas the argument has been worked
and reworked. It was Aristotle who gave the discussion a special early impetus,
but as Newman remarks in an important sermon of April 1830 (‘The Influence of
Natural and Revealed Religion’) the philosophical notion of the First Cause held
by the ancients
was of a divine Principle rather than of a living Agent. It tended to be an
abstraction rather than a concrete person. This observation reminds us of the
difficulty inherent in a religion that depends on creation alone for its inspiration.
There are so many good things man finds himself blessed with, but these good
things alone will probably leave him with but a shadowy impression of the unseen
Donor. By intervening in history and entering into a dialogue with specific
persons, God has projected himself into our lives and on to our minds in a very
personal way. He, the Author of all that is, has presented himself to man as a
living Being with his own personal identity. He is not just the Principle of
things. Indeed, he even became man. As Pope Benedict XVI put it, Jesus Christ is
his face. From that point, there has never been anything of remoteness about God
in his relations with us. He deals with us in a very personal way, and invites a
personal response on our part to what he does for us. It is not as if, finding
ourselves blessed with good things we feel grateful as a result, but, because
the great Donor seems virtually anonymous, we carry on regardless. There is
nothing anonymous about the Donor of all that we have received. He is Yahweh
God, the one who is, who has become man in the person of Jesus Christ. He has
been touched, heard and seen. Now, observe how Jesus Christ, the Son of the
living God, bestowed good things — beyond what could be expected of mere nature,
on those who needed them. He made it all very personal.
What do I mean by this? Notice what
happened in our Gospel passage today. Our Lord was travelling along the border
between Samaria and Galilee and he was accosted by a band of lepers. From the
distance which they were required to maintain, they appealed to him for pity,
for mercy. Immediately he told them to go and present themselves to the priest,
at which they departed and in the process were healed. We notice the pure
liberality of Jesus. He gives on request, unless there is a positive reason for
not doing so. But he gives not as if he were a mere Principle or Source of
things, in the way one might go to the tap and turn it on for the water that is
needed. He is not just some impersonal Cause of good things, access to which one
might be lucky enough through circumstances to possess. He is a real, living
person who chooses to give what persons have need of and ask for. Moreover, he
expects, as would any living person, some appropriate response to him who is the
giver. He expects appreciation and acknowledgment. He expects us to recognize
that he is the source of the good things we have been given. He expects us to
thank him, and indeed, to praise him. He wants us to come to him and ask for
what we need. In fact, he wants to be our Friend. He does not want us to carry
on in life as if whatever good things have come our way have come from some
impersonal Force beyond, a Force or Cause which is shadowy and which can hardly
be expected to make much difference to the way things are in fact found to be.
So it is that, while all it took was a word from Christ to effect the complete
physical transformation of the condition of twelve lepers, our Lord expected
them to be grateful. God is a living, real, and profoundly interested Person.
Jesus is the image of the unseen God, and his response to the Samaritan leper
reveals the attitude of the infinite God. “Were not all ten cleansed? Where are
the other nine? Was no-one found to return and give praise to God except this
foreigner? Then he said to him, Rise and go; your faith has made you well”
(Luke 17: 11-19).
The Christian religion is a very
personal matter between us, considered individually and as a people, and the
living triune God. God is not just the benevolent Ultimate, the Absolute, the
Principle of all things. He has a face, and that face is Jesus. He smiles, he
laughs, he listens, he watches, he actually laid down his own life for each of
us. He freely died that we might live forever. He wants a personal relationship
with each of us. He calls us not servants, but his friends. The Creator of the
universe is my Friend, indeed my Father and my Brother. Let us resolve to
cultivate a deep friendship with God by knowing, loving and serving Jesus
Christ.
(E.J.Tyler)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I frequently compare our apostolic work to an engine: gears, pistons, valves,
bolts.
Well, charity — your charity — is the lubricant.
(The Way, no.957)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Sixth Chapter TRUST IN GOD
AGAINST SLANDER
THE DISCIPLE
O Lord God, just Judge, strong and patient, You Who know the weakness and
depravity of men, be my strength and all my confidence, for my own conscience is
not sufficient for me. You know what I do not know, and, therefore, I ought to
humble myself whenever I am accused and bear it meekly. Forgive me, then, in
Your mercy for my every failure in this regard, and give me once more the grace
of greater endurance. Better to me is Your abundant mercy in obtaining pardon
than the justice which I imagine in defending the secrets of my conscience. And
though I am not conscious to myself of any fault, yet I cannot thereby justify
myself, because without Your mercy no man living will be justified in Your
sight.
(Concluded)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unbelief
indeed, considers itself especially rational, or critical of evidence; but it
criticizes the evidence of Religion, only because it does not like it, and
really goes upon presumptions and prejudices as much as Faith does, only
presumptions of an opposite nature.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Love the Safeguard of Faith against Superstition’ (1839)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the thirty second week in Ordinary Time
(November 12) Saint Josaphat, bishop and martyr
(1580?-1623)
In 1967, newspaper photos of Pope Paul VI
embracing Athenagoras I, the Orthodox patriarch of Constantinople, marked a
significant step toward the healing of a division in Christendom that has
spanned more than nine centuries. In 1595, when today’s saint
was
a boy, the Orthodox bishop of Brest-Litovsk (famous in World War I) in Belarus
and five other bishops representing millions of Ruthenians, sought reunion with
Rome. John Kunsevich (Josaphat became his name in religious life) was to
dedicate his life and die for the same cause. Born in what was then Poland, he
went to work in Wilno and was influenced by clergy adhering to the Union of
Brest (1596). He became a Basilian monk, then a priest, and soon was well known
as a preacher and as an ascetic. He became bishop of Vitebsk (now in Russia) at
a relatively young age, and faced a difficult situation. Most monks, fearing
interference in liturgy and customs, did not want union with Rome. By synods,
catechetical instruction, reform of the clergy and personal example, however,
Josaphat was successful in winning the greater part of the Orthodox in that area
to the union. But the next year a dissident hierarchy was set up, and his
opposite number spread the accusation that Josaphat had "gone Latin" and that
all his people would have to do the same. He was not enthusiastically supported
by the Latin bishops of Poland. Despite warnings, he went to Vitebsk, still a
hotbed of trouble. Attempts were made to foment trouble and drive him from the
diocese: A priest was sent to shout insults to him from his own courtyard. When
Josaphat had him removed and shut up in his house, the opposition rang the town
hall bell, and a mob assembled. The priest was released, but members of the mob
broke into the bishop’s home. He was struck with a halberd, then shot and his
body thrown into the river. It was later recovered and is now buried in St.
Peter’s Basilica in Rome. He was the first saint of the Eastern Church to be
canonized by Rome. His death brought a movement toward Catholicism and unity,
but the controversy continued, and the dissidents, too, had their martyr. After
the partition of Poland, the Russians forced most Ruthenians to join the Russian
Orthodox Church.
The seeds of separation were sown in the fourth century when the
Roman Empire was divided into East and West. The actual split came over
relatively unimportant customs (unleavened bread, Saturday fasting, celibacy).
No doubt the political involvement of religious leaders on both sides was a
large factor, and doctrinal disagreement was present. But no reason was enough
to justify the present tragic division in Christendom, which is 64 percent Roman
Catholic, 13 percent Eastern Churches (mostly Orthodox) and 23 percent
Protestant, and this when the 71 percent of the world that is not Christian
should be experiencing unity and Christ-like charity from Christians!
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 7:22b–8:1; Psalm
119:89-91, 130, 135, 175; Luke 17:20-25
Once,
having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus
replied, The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, nor
will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is,' because the kingdom of God is
within you. Then he said to his disciples, The time is coming when you will long
to see one of the days of the Son of Man, but you will not see it. Men will tell
you, 'There he is!' or 'Here he is!' Do not go running off after them. For the
Son of Man in his day will be like the lightning, which flashes and lights up
the sky from one end to the other. But first he must suffer many things and be
rejected by this generation. (Luke 17: 20-25)
The Kingdom
I remember the
exultation of his followers when Francois Mitterrand won the Presidency of
France. A new period in French life was about to start! But somehow the lustre
began to fade. Time and again there is great excitement all over a nation when a
party captures Government. The same thing can be seen even when a dictatorial
party wins a democratic election and slowly manipulates the processes so as to
entrench its power for long years ahead. Its followers can be filled with
enthusiasm for the utopia that
is promised. Enormous atrocities can be
perpetrated for the sake of a utopia, imagined as a regime of material and
political prosperity. The French Revolution exploded on the scene with the
promise of liberty, equality and fraternity for all in a nation in which all
were to be citizens equally. Citoyens! What in fact took shape was a terrible
ogre, a monster with blood and flesh dripping from its vast mouth. Terror was in
every neighbourhood and the guillotine became a famed household word. Out of its
jaws came the thunder of Bonaparte, and Europe was filled with carnage, fire and
sword. It began with the dream of a utopia for this world. A century later
another utopia was imposed: that of the Russian Revolution with its millions of
dead strewn in its wake. Long, long before, God himself had promised a Kingdom.
At the dawn of human history, God had promised that the descendant of the woman
would crush the serpent’s head. Abraham was promised that all the nations of the
earth would be blessed through him. The prophets saw it coming, — a little here,
a little there, and gradually the picture formed. A Messiah was coming, one who
would fulfil what God had promised for the people and for the world. But how was
this interpreted? All too often it was understood as an earthly utopia. Indeed,
there are still those who, accepting the revelation that preceded Christ, take
the divine promises to mean a world of peace and prosperity here and now. The
notion of a Messiah, dead on the cross and calling on all to follow in his
footsteps, is a foolishness to them.
In our Gospel today our Lord is asked — by the Pharisees
— when the Kingdom of
God would come. They knew it would come and the acceptance of historical
revelation involves accepting this hope. John the Baptist appeared in the
wilderness calling on all to repent, and to prepare the way for the Lord, for he
was coming. He pointed to Jesus as God’s Man, his Anointed one, the Messiah.
Then John’s star was removed from sight and Christ stood forth as the light that
had suddenly arrived. He called on all to repent, for the Kingdom of God was at
hand. When, then, the Pharisees asked, would it come? The problem with the
Pharisees as with so many, was their very notion of the Kingdom of God. Our Lord
said to them that it is not as you think it to be. “The kingdom of God does not
come with your careful observation, nor will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There
it is,' because the kingdom of God is within you.” The Kingdom of God is within
you! What would the Pharisees have made of this? We read in the Gospel of St
John of one of the Pharisees who came to Jesus by night to be instructed by him.
He was Nicodemus, a secret but faithful disciple, and to him our Lord spoke of
the Kingdom of God (John 3). You have to be born again, our Lord said, otherwise
you cannot enter the Kingdom of God. It will mean being born of water and the
Holy Spirit. Importantly, our Lord went on to tell him that he himself must be
lifted up, that those who believe in him may not perish but have life
everlasting (John 3: 14). In our Gospel today, having replied to the Pharisees,
our Lord speaks to his disciples. Before his glory, the Son of man “must suffer
many things and be rejected by this generation” (Luke
17: 20-25). The Kingdom of God is not a utopian kingdom of this
world. It involves crucifixion. A person will enter the Kingdom or Rule of God
when he follows Christ along that road for love of him. The Rule or Reign of God
is found and embodied in the person of Jesus Christ, and one enters this Kingdom
by entering into union with him. It is this Kingdom which will triumph.
Man’s best happiness here consists in union with Jesus Christ. He is the key and
the meaning of the universe. He is the grand linchpin, and we reach the heart of
reality by entering into an undying friendship with him, whatever be the cost.
The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected in order to enter his
glory. The Glory and the Utopia will come, but only through union with him. What
he asks is that, for love of him, we renounce ourselves and take up our cross
every day and follow in his footsteps. Then comes the Glory. That is what the
Kingdom is, and it is found in the person of Jesus, who himself is found in his
Church. Go to him, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get rid of that 'self-satisfied air' which isolates your soul from the souls
that approach you. Listen to them. And speak with simplicity; only thus will
your work as an apostle grow in extent and fruitfulness.
(The Way, no.958)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Seventh Chapter
EVERY TRIAL MUST BE BORNE FOR THE SAKE OF ETERNAL LIFE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, do not let the labours which you have taken up for My sake break you,
and do not let troubles, from whatever source, cast you down; but in everything
let My promise strengthen and console you. I am able to reward you beyond all
means and measure.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the Church does not speak, others will speak instead.
JHN, From Loss and Gain (1848)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the thirty second week in Ordinary Time
(November 13) Saint Frances Xavier Cabrini, virgin (1850-1917)
Frances Xavier Cabrini was the first United States citizen to be canonized. Her
deep trust in the loving care of her God gave her the
strength to be a valiant
woman doing the work of Christ. Refused admission to the religious order which
had educated her to be a teacher, she began charitable work at the House of
Providence Orphanage in Cadogno, Italy. In September 1877, she made her vows
there and took the religious habit. When the bishop closed the orphanage in
1880, he named Frances prioress of the Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart.
Seven young women from the orphanage joined with her. Since her early childhood
in Italy, Frances had wanted to be a missionary in China but, at the urging of
Pope Leo XIII, Frances went west instead of east. She travelled with six sisters
to New York City to work with the thousands of Italian immigrants living there.
She found disappointment and difficulties with every step. When she arrived in
New York City, the house intended to be her first orphanage in the United States
was not available. The archbishop advised her to return to Italy. But Frances,
truly a valiant woman, departed from the archbishop’s residence all the more
determined to establish that orphanage. And she did. In 35 years Frances Xavier
Cabrini founded 67 institutions dedicated to caring for the poor, the abandoned,
the uneducated and the sick. Seeing great need among Italian immigrants who were
losing their faith, she organized schools and adult education classes. As a
child, she was always frightened of water, unable to overcome her fear of
drowning. Yet, despite this fear, she travelled across the Atlantic Ocean more
than 30 times. She died of malaria in her own Columbus Hospital in Chicago.
At her canonization on July 7, 1946, Pius XII said, "Although her constitution
was very frail, her spirit was endowed with such singular strength that, knowing
the will of God in her regard, she permitted nothing to impede her from
accomplishing what seemed beyond the strength of a woman."
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 13:1-9; Psalm 19:2-5ab;
Luke 17:26-37
Jesus said, Just as it was in the days
of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. People were eating,
drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the
ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all. It was the same in the days of
Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building.
But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulphur rained down from heaven and
destroyed them all. It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is
revealed. On that day no-one who is on the roof of his house, with his goods
inside, should go down to get them. Likewise, no-one in the field should go back
for anything. Remember Lot's wife! Whoever tries to keep his life will lose it,
and whoever loses his life will preserve it. I tell you, on that night two
people will be in one bed; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will
be grinding grain together; one will be taken and the other left. Where, Lord?
they asked. He replied, Where there is a dead body, there the vultures will
gather. (Luke 17: 26-37)
The Judgment
I am not sure whether there has ever
been an international study of the effect of the installation of road cameras on
reducing speeding on the roads. In Australia the fines are hefty and after a few
infringements the license is lost for a period. This can lead to immense
inconvenience and even to the loss of a person’s job — if his job depends on his
having his license. Being caught by the camera can be plain unlucky. A person
can be distracted from watching his speedometer for just a few seconds and then
quickly recover
his attention, but by then it could be too late. His foot has
relaxed down a little on his accelerator, his car has exceeded the limit, and he
has been caught. For all the camera knows he was caught speeding over a
distance, whereas his speeding was but momentary. All of that said, I am sure
that for lots of good and careful drivers, the threat of fines and loss of
license makes them doubly careful. Perhaps they choose to take the one route to
their workplace so as to be entirely familiar with all road cameras to be
encountered. The point is that penalties change behaviour, and the whole of
life, from childhood to the grave, illustrates this. There is the constant
prospect of reward or punishment ahead, depending on our behaviour now. This
pattern in life ought prompt man to expect that, if there be an Afterlife ahead,
the nature of it will depend on his behaviour now. As it has turned out, this is
one of the most prominent features of revealed religion. God has revealed that
following death there is a divine judgment, and following that, there will be
either Heaven or Hell. What it is to be for each individual will depend on his
behaviour — his thoughts, his words and his actions — now. God will reward and
he will punish. The revelation of God’s judgment became clearer and more fulsome
as divine revelation unfolded in the course of sacred history. That is to say,
what Christ reveals of the judgment of God on virtue and on sin far exceeds what
was revealed before him. Our Lord is very clear. Remember Lot’s wife! She was
engulfed because she disobeyed.
Just as it is foolish to disregard the
sanctions imposed on those who exceed the speed limit, so it is foolish to
disregard the divine sanctions on our actions. In our Gospel today, our Lord is
obviously referring to the final coming of the Son of Man when he will judge the
living and the dead. “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in
the days of the Son of Man. People were eating, drinking, marrying and being
given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and
destroyed them all. It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and
drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. But the day Lot left Sodom,
fire and sulphur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. It will be just
like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed. On that day no-one who is on
the roof of his house, with his goods inside, should go down to get them.
Likewise, no-one in the field should go back for anything. Remember Lot's wife!”
(Luke 17: 26-37). Every man and woman will
see that day and will be caught up in it for good or ill. The principal thing,
in the last analysis, will be this divine Judgment. Man’s ultimate happiness
will depend on how he is judged by God, and God is a moral Judge. He judges
according to the goodness or evil of our deeds. The secular man, who lives as if
God did not exist, is living far from the true reality of things. Every one of
us is a heart-beat away from the most awful thing of all, the all-searching
judgment of God. Notice how, when a person is caught having committed a grave
crime, his apprehension mounts as the date of his trial approaches? Yet every
moment of our lives we inexorably approach the judgment of God. It is
unavoidable, for time is carrying us along. We cannot stop, we cannot turn back.
The destination is getting nearer and nearer. We shall all most certainly
arrive, and when that moment comes it will be all over. Then, nothing further
can be done. The books will be opened and everything laid bare. Then the
sentence will be pronounced: it will be, Come! or it will be, Go!
St John Fisher was Bishop of Rochester
in the time of King Henry VIII and Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, to
which university post he was re-elected annually for ten years and then
appointed for life. He was martyred by Henry VIII for his defence of the Church
and her teachings. He kept a human skull before him as he worked — it reminded
him of the judgment of God. What must sinful man do? He should acknowledge his
sinfulness and repeatedly ask pardon of God in the ways taught to us by Christ
and his Church. That said and done, he should trust in the mercy and goodness of
God. With this thought in mind, let us take our stand with Jesus, trusting in
his love and his sacrifice for our sins. That is the way to prepare for God’s
judgment.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contempt and persecution are blessed signs of divine predilection, but there is
no proof and sign of predilection more beautiful than this: to pass unnoticed.
(The Way, no.959)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Seventh Chapter
EVERY TRIAL MUST BE BORNE FOR THE SAKE OF ETERNAL LIFE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
You will not labour here long, nor will you always be oppressed by sorrows. Wait
a little while and you will see a speedy end of evils. The hour will come when
all labour and trouble shall be no more. All that passes away with time is
trivial.
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No doctrine is defined till it is violated.
JHN, from An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (1845)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the thirty second week of Ordinary Time
(November 14) St. Gertrude (1256?-1302)
Gertrude, a Benedictine nun in Helfta (Saxony), was one of the great mystics of
the 13th century. Together with her friend and teacher St. Mechtild, she
practiced a spirituality called "nuptial mysticism," that is, she came to see
herself as the bride of Christ. Her spiritual life was a deeply personal union
with Jesus and his Sacred Heart, leading her into the very life of the Trinity.
But this was no individualistic piety. Gertrude lived the rhythm of the liturgy,
where she found Christ. In the liturgy and Scripture, she found the themes and
images to enrich and express her piety. There was no clash between her personal
prayer life and the liturgy.
"Lord, you have granted me your secret friendship by opening
the sacred ark of your divinity, your deified heart, to me in so many ways as to
be the source of all my happiness; sometimes imparting it freely, sometimes as a
special mark of our mutual friendship. You have so often melted my soul with
your loving caresses that, if I did not know the abyss of your overflowing
condescensions, I should be amazed were I told that even your Blessed Mother had
been chosen to receive such extraordinary marks of tenderness and affection"
(Adapted from The Life and Revelations of Saint Gertrude).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Wisdom 18:14-16; 19:6-9; Psalm
105:2-3, 36-37, 42-43; Luke 18:1-8
Then Jesus told his disciples a parable
to show them that they should always pray and not give up. He said: In a certain
town there was a judge who neither feared God nor cared about men. And there was
a widow in that town who kept coming to him with the plea, 'Grant me justice
against my adversary.' For some time he refused. But finally he said to himself,
'Even though I don't fear God or care about men, yet because this widow keeps
bothering me, I will see that she gets justice, so that she won't eventually
wear me out with her coming!' And the Lord said, Listen to what the unjust judge
says. And will not God bring about justice for his chosen ones, who cry out to
him day and night? Will he keep putting them off? I tell you, he will see that
they get justice, and quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find
faith on the earth? (Luke 18: 1-8)
Prayer of petition
From
time immemorial man has engaged with the unseen powers who are understood to
control, to a greater or lesser extent, the course of the world. For thousands
of years the Australian Aborigines performed ceremonies invoking mythic beings,
and by this means gained access to the spiritual powers of the Dreaming. The
ceremonies enabled participants to enter into the ongoing renewal of the
Dreaming on which life and the world depended. So it has been across the teeming
ocean of human life. Prayer and ritual
is characteristically a feature of human
society. Man has been convinced that the course of the world depended on higher
powers and that these same powers could be brought over to his side. They could
be placated and made friendly by the ceremonies — though often they were
friendly in the first place. The secular student typically regards this image of
the deity as a mere projection by religious man of his inner desires or
experience of life. But it could be viewed more profoundly as a dim perception
by man of something of the real and objective Other. When he addressed the
Australian Aborigines at Alice Springs in 1986, Pope John Paul II said that “for
thousands of years” they had fashioned their culture, and that “during all this
time, the Spirit of God has been with you.” The Pope said that “Your "Dreaming",
which influences your lives so strongly that, no matter what happens, you remain
for ever people of your culture, is your own way of touching the mystery of
God’s Spirit in you and in creation. You must keep your striving for God and
hold on to it in your lives.” The point here is that man is a being of prayer
and religion, even though this can deform and degenerate into magic and
religious manipulation. Now, God, who created man with a religious instinct for
him, has intervened in history and revealed his plan for man. What does he — made man in Christ
— say to us about our prayer? Our Gospel today is very clear
about one point.
Our Lord encourages us to pray for all that we need. Apart from anything, this
sets a divine seal on the fact that in all places and at all times man has
prayed. Christ in effect says, it is very good that you have prayed. It is what
you ought be doing. But of course God has now revealed himself in person, and so
we have all the more reason to pray with all our heart. We can pray with real
light, all the while following divine instructions. In our Gospel passage today,
our Lord tells us another thing about prayer. It is that we should pray
persistently for what we need. Our Lord gives an illustration drawn from
everyday life. It is the picture of the unjust judge who is badgered by the poor
widow to grant her rights. She wore him down, and he granted her request. Even
if a person is not loving and thoughtful, even if he is unjust, sheer
persistence will make him get up and grant a petition — if only to be rid of the
importunate petitioner. We see ongoing prayer in human societies and in fallen
man — well then, how much more ought we pray in ongoing fashion to our loving
and all-powerful Father in heaven! Our Lord is inviting us to be importunate
with God. “And the Lord said, Listen to what the unjust judge says. And will not
God bring about justice for his chosen ones, who cry out to him day and night?
Will he keep putting them off? I tell you, he will see that they get justice,
and quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the
earth?” (Luke 18: 1-8). The teaching of
Christ about the prayer of petition as expressed in this passage is that we
should persist in asking for what we need. But all too often we simply lack the
faith to persist in prayer. We give up on God because he delays or seems not to
be answering our prayer. We think he does not care, or that he cannot give what
we are asking for, or it may even become clear that we doubt the reality of God
anyway. If we truly believe that God is God, then we shall believe that the one
to whom we are praying is all-loving, all-powerful and all-wise. If our prayer
is not answered in the precise way we wish, it must be because God is answering
it in a better way. We must not give up on God.
If there is something important to pray for, and if in the presence of God we
genuinely think our asking for it would not displease him, then we ought pray
for it. If it continues to seem to be the will of God that we ask him for this
favour, then we ought continue to ask for it. We ought humbly persist. If
nothing results, we ought persist in faith, unless it becomes manifest that it
is not according to the will of God that we pray for it. We ought pray
persistently and not lose heart. If in the event the favour is not granted, we
may be sure that it is in our best interest that we not receive that favour, and
that God will answer our prayer in a much better way.
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just as the clamour of the ocean is made up of the noise of each one of its
waves, so the sanctity of your apostolate is made up of the personal virtues of
each one of you.
(The Way, no.960)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Seventh Chapter EVERY TRIAL MUST
BE BORNE FOR THE SAKE OF ETERNAL LIFE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
What you do, do well. Work faithfully in My vineyard. I will be your reward.
Write, read, sing, mourn, keep silence, pray, and bear hardships like a man.
Eternal life is worth all these and greater battles. Peace will come on a day
which is known to the Lord, and then there shall be no day or night as at
present but perpetual light, infinite brightness, lasting peace, and safe
repose. Then you will not say: "Who shall deliver me from the body of this
death?" nor will you cry: "Woe is me, because my sojourn is prolonged." For then
death will be banished, and there will be health unfailing. There will be no
anxiety then, but blessed joy and sweet, noble companionship.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Prophet is one who comes from God, who speaks with authority, who is ever one
and the same, who is precise and decisive in his statements, who is equal to
successive difficulties, and can smite and overthrow error. Such has the
Catholic Church shown herself in her history, such is she at this day.
JHN, from ‘Mysteries of Nature and of Grace’ (1849)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thirty third Sunday of Ordinary Time B
Prayers this week:
The
Lord says: my plans for you are peace and not disaster; when you call to me, I
will listen to you, and I will bring you back to the place from which I exiled
you.
Father of all
that is good, keep us faithful in serving you, for to serve you is our lasting
joy.
We ask this
through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God
for ever and ever.
(November 15) St. Albert the Great (1206-1280)
Albert the Great was a 13th-century German Dominican who influenced decisively
the Church's stance toward Aristotelian philosophy
brought
to Europe by the spread of Islam. Students of philosophy know him as the master
of Thomas Aquinas. Albert’s attempt to understand Aristotle’s writings
established the climate in which Thomas Aquinas developed his synthesis of Greek
wisdom and Christian theology. But Albert deserves recognition on his own merits
as a curious, honest and diligent scholar. He was the eldest son of a powerful
and wealthy German lord of military rank. He was educated in the liberal arts.
Despite fierce family opposition, he entered the Dominican novitiate. His
boundless interests prompted him to write a compendium of all knowledge: natural
science, logic, rhetoric, mathematics, astronomy, ethics, economics, politics
and metaphysics. His explanation of learning took 20 years to complete. "Our
intention," he said, "is to make all the aforesaid parts of knowledge
intelligible to the Latins." He achieved his goal while serving as an educator
at Paris and Cologne, as Dominican provincial and even as bishop of Regensburg
for a short time. He defended the mendicant orders and preached the Crusade in
Germany and Bohemia. Albert, a Doctor of the Church, is the patron of scientists
and philosophers. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 12:1-3; Psalm 16:5,
8-11; Hebrews 10:11-14, 18; Mark 13:24-32
Jesus said, in those days, following
that distress, 'the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light;
the stars will fall from the sky,
and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.' At that time men will see the Son of
Man coming in clouds with great power and glory. And he will send his angels and
gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of
the heavens. Now learn this lesson from the fig-tree: As soon as its twigs get
tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. Even so, when you
see these things happening, you know that it is near, right at the door. I tell
you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these
things have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never
pass away. No-one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven,
nor the Son, but only the Father. (Mark 13:24-32)
The Last Judgment
A person
has applied for an advertised position, the upshot of which he knows will have a
profound effect on his life. He has sent his curriculum vitae and the
accompanying references, and very soon he must present himself before the
selecting panel for his interview. The panel will make a judgment on his
suitability over other candidates. The day looms and he prepares anxiously. So
much will depend on it. Or again, after a few years of grinding and difficult
work, a Ph.D. candidate is still uncertain of his thesis. But he
must present it
because his time is up. It will now be examined by three judges external to his
University and his concern is considerable. Much depends on the acceptance of
his thesis. His whole career will be affected by it. Or again, a person’s doctor
has told him that there is something wrong with his lungs, and it does not look
good. Indeed, it may be cancer. Tests must be taken, and then sent away for
examination. All this is done and the person’s apprehension grows as the medical
judgment is awaited. There are so many instances in life of a judgment being
made, a judgment on which so much depends. Life is filled with tests, and in
passing one we go on to yet another. In failing one we still have the
opportunity of others. All of life is a scene of trials and tests. Some persons
pass certain tests with distinction and achieve acclaim in certain spheres of
activity. Amid all of this, though, there is a deeper test that most people are
aware of, and that is the test of one’s very humanity. A person may have climbed
from rags to riches, succeeding in test after test in his special line. But, at
a deeper level, those around him know that he is not much of a man after all. He
is self-centred and seems to have little sense of God. That is to say, there is
a deeper test in life that is going on every day, and that is the moral test to
which all are subject. This is the greatest test in life. It is present in all
of life’s tests, and a man’s moral state will show if he is distinguishing
himself in it. The supreme test that life presents is the test as to whether we
are good, not much good, or even bad.
The fact that the life of everyone is made up of tests, especially moral tests,
suggests to ordinary reflection that testing does not end with life. That is to
say, the fact that all our life we are looking ahead to being tested in one
sense or another, ought naturally lead us to expect a test beyond this life.
Moreover, life ought intimate to us that this final test hereafter will be about
the main issue, personal goodness. God has intervened in history to reveal
himself and his plan for us, and at the forefront of his revelation is the
confirmation that life indeed is a trial and that it will be consummated by a
judgment when life is over. As happens so often during life, after life we shall be up for a
judgment. This time, though, it will be the last we shall face. The judgment
following death will determine the course of each soul for all eternity.
Judgment will be pronounced on the one important thing in life: the goodness or
evil of the soul. There will be no escaping the reward or the sentencing as the
case may be. There will be no new opportunity beyond this. We have all this on
the word of Christ as proclaimed by the Church. There will be either Heaven or
Hell for each soul, with a further purification for many who are pronounced to
be saved. But our Lord has also revealed, and he speaks of it in our Gospel
today (Mark 13:24-32), that there will be a
Last Judgment not merely for the individual, but for all together. All mankind
will be gathered before the Judge. The judgment on those who have died will be
confirmed, and the judgment on those still living will be uttered. This time,
though, the resurrected body of each will at once share in the eternal
retribution which the soul received at his or her particular judgment following
death. To that point the soul will have undergone the reward or punishment due
to him, but with this Last Judgment the resurrected body will now share in the
lot of the soul. The whole person, body and soul will be with God forever, or
lost forever, as the case may be. It is an awesome and solemn thought. Eternity
for body and soul will depend on each person’s judgment, which in turn will have
depended on each person’s life.
Christ has gone from sight, but he dwells among us in his body, the Church. As
the Church’s Head he drives the mission of the Church, which is to bring
redemption to all the nations. There is a tremendous urgency about the work, for
each soul is the apple of God’s eye. At death comes the particular judgment of
each. At the end of history Christ will come again — and he refers to it in our
Gospel today. He will come as Judge of the living and the dead, and judgment
will be pronounced on all. The mighty hand of God will cause a final parting of
the ways, some — body and soul — to go up to be with him, and others to go down
to be lost forever. Let us love and serve him, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, no.
1038-1041 (The Last Judgment)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You have got to be a 'man of God', a man of interior life, a man of prayer and
sacrifice. Your apostolate must be the overflow of your life 'within'.
(The Way, no.961)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL
CONSOLATION
The Forty-Seventh Chapter
EVERY TRIAL MUST BE BORNE FOR THE SAKE OF ETERNAL LIFE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
If you could see the everlasting crowns of the saints in heaven, and the great
glory wherein they now rejoice -- they who were once considered contemptible in
this world and, as it were, unworthy of life itself -- you would certainly
humble yourself at once to the very earth, and seek to be subject to all rather
than to command even one. Nor would you desire the pleasant days of this life,
but rather be glad to suffer for God, considering it your greatest gain to be
counted as nothing among men.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a famous passage from his Discourses to Mixed
Congregations, quoted in the Catechism of the Catholic Church,
John Henry Newman describes the dangers
of ‘notoriety’ – valuing fame for its own sake. Newman’s remarks have a
powerful contemporary ring to them. There is only one way is a way to escape
this risk – the Catholic faith:
Wealth is one idol of the day, and notoriety is a second. I am not speaking, I
repeat, of what men actually pursue, but of what they look up to, what they
revere. Men may not have the opportunity of pursuing what they admire still.
Never could notoriety exist as it does now, in any former age of the world; now
that the news of the hour from all parts of the world, private news as well as
public, is brought day by day to every individual, as I may say, of the
community, to the poorest artisan and the most secluded peasant, by processes so
uniform, so unvarying, so spontaneous, that they almost bear the semblance of a
natural law. And hence notoriety, or the making a noise in the world, has come
to be considered a great good in itself, and a ground of veneration. Time was
when men could
only make a display by means of expenditure; and the world used
to gaze with wonder on those who had large establishments, many servants, many
horses, richly-furnished houses, gardens, and parks: it does so still, that is,
when it has the opportunity of doing so: for such magnificence is the fortune of
the few, and comparatively few are its witnesses. Notoriety, or, as it may be
called, newspaper fame, is to the many what style and fashion, to use the
language of the world, are to those who are within or belong to the higher
circles; it becomes to them a sort of idol, worshipped for its own sake, and
without any reference to the shape in which it comes before them. It may be an
evil fame or a good fame; it may be the notoriety of a great statesman, or of a
great preacher, or of a great speculator, or of a great experimentalist, or of a
great criminal; of one who has laboured in the improvement of our schools, or
hospitals, or prisons, or workhouses, or of one who has robbed his neighbour of
his wife. It matters not; so that a man is talked much of, and read much of, he
is thought much of; nay, let him even have died justly under the hands of the
law, still he will be made a sort of martyr of. … For the question with men is,
not whether he is great, or good, or wise, or holy; not whether he is base, and
vile, and odious, but whether he is in the mouths of men, whether he has centred
on himself the attention of many, whether he has done something out of the way,
whether he has been (as it were) canonised in the publications of the hour.
[...]
But oh! what a change, my brethren, when the good hand of God brings them by
some marvellous providence to the pit’s mouth, and then out into the blessed
light of day! what a change for them when they first begin to see with the eyes
of the soul, with the intuition which grace gives, Jesus, the Sun of Justice;
and the heaven of Angels and Archangels in which He dwells; and the bright
Morning Star, which is His Blessed Mother; and the continual floods of light
falling and striking against the earth, and transformed, as they fall, into an
infinity of hues, which are His Saints; and the boundless sea, which is the
image of His divine immensity; and then again the calm, placid Moon by night,
which images His Church; and the silent stars, like good and holy men,
travelling on in lonely pilgrimage to their eternal rest! [...]
And such as this in its measure is the contrast, to which the awakened soul is
witness, between the objects of its admiration and pursuit in its natural state,
and those which burst upon it when it has entered into communion with the Church
Invisible, when it has come “to Mount Sion, and to the city of the Living God,
the heavenly Jerusalem, and to a company of many thousand Angels, and to the
Church of the first-born, who are enrolled in heaven, and to God the Judge of
all, and to the spirits of the just now perfected, and to Jesus the Mediator of
the New Testament” [Heb 12: 21-24]. From that day it has begun a new life … a
change there will be in its views and estimation of things, as soon as it has
heard and has faith in the word of God, as soon as it understands that wealth,
and notoriety, and influence, and high place, are not the first of blessings and
the real standard of good; but that saintliness and all its attendants,—saintly
purity, saintly poverty, heroic fortitude and patience, self-sacrifice for the
sake of others, renouncement of the world, the favour of Heaven, the protection
of Angels, the smile of the Blessed Virgin, the gifts of grace, the
interpositions of miracle, the intercommunion of merits,—that these are the high
and precious things, the things to be looked up to, the things to be reverently
spoken of.
(Reference: John Henry Newman, Discourses addressed to Mixed Congregations
(1849) Discourse no. 5, p. 90-94)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the thirty third week in Ordinary Time
(November 16) St. Margaret of Scotland (1050?-1093)
Margaret of Scotland was a truly liberated woman in the sense that she was free
to be herself. For her, that meant freedom to love God and serve others. Not
Scottish by birth, Margaret was the daughter of Princess Agatha of Hungary and
the Anglo-Saxon Prince Edward
Atheling.
She spent much of her youth in the court of her great-uncle, the English king,
Edward the Confessor. Her family fled from William the Conqueror and was
shipwrecked off the coast of Scotland. King Malcolm befriended them and was
captivated by the beautiful, gracious Margaret. They were married at the castle
of Dunfermline in 1070. Malcolm was good-hearted, but rough and uncultured, as
was his country. Because of Malcolm’s love for Margaret, she was able to soften
his temper, polish his manners and help him become a virtuous king. He left all
domestic affairs to her and often consulted her in state matters. Margaret
tried
to improve her adopted country by promoting the arts and education. For
religious reform, she instigated synods and was present for the discussions
which tried to correct religious abuses common among priests and lay people,
such as simony, usury and incestuous marriages. With her husband, she founded
several churches. Margaret was not only a queen, but a mother. She and Malcolm
had six sons and two daughters. Margaret personally supervised their religious
instruction and other studies. Although she was very much caught up in the
affairs of the household and country, she remained detached from the world. Her
private life was austere. She had certain times for prayer and reading
Scripture. She ate sparingly and slept little in order to have time for
devotions. She and Malcolm kept two Lents, one before Easter and one before
Christmas. During these times she always rose at midnight for Mass. On the way
home she would wash the feet of six poor persons and give them alms. She was
always surrounded by beggars in public and never refused them. It is recorded
that she never sat down to eat without first feeding nine orphans and 24 adults.
In 1093, King William Rufus made a surprise attack on Alnwick castle. King
Malcolm and his oldest son, Edward, were killed. Margaret, already on her
deathbed, died four days after her husband.
"When [Margaret] spoke, her conversation was with the salt of
wisdom. When she was silent, her silence was filled with good thoughts. So
thoroughly did her outward bearing correspond with the staidness of her
character that it seemed as if she has been born the pattern of a virtuous life"
(Turgot, St. Margaret's confessor). (AmericanCatholic.org)
1 Maccab 1:10-15, 41-43, 54-57, 62-63; Ps
119:53, 61, 134, 150, 155, 158; Luke 18:35-43
As Jesus approached Jericho, a blind man
was sitting by the roadside begging. When he heard the crowd going by, he asked
what was happening. They told him, Jesus of Nazareth is passing by. He called
out, Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me! Those who led the way rebuked him
and told him to be quiet, but he shouted all the more, Son of David, have mercy
on me! Jesus stopped and ordered the man to be brought to him. When he came
near, Jesus asked him, What do you want me to do for you? Lord, I want to see,
he replied. Jesus said to him, Receive your sight; your faith has healed you.
Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus, praising God. When all the
people saw it, they also praised God. (Luke 18: 35-43)
Doing one’s best
It is the
last quarter of the nineteenth century. A young couple who live in Camden just
outside Sydney has just bought a property in a fairly remote location in Burragorang Valley. The Valley is not far from them but because of lack of
roads, quite difficult of access. The couple have two infants with one more on
the way. They move down there and over the years that follow they build up the
farm and raise a large family. They love their farm but, as is often said about
Australia, they suffer from the tyranny of
distance. They must do without many
things because those things are far away. The education of the children is less
than it could have been were they elsewhere. They do not have the medical
attention they used to have. It is a great event when a road is built from their
area to the nearest town outside the Valley. In giving this example I am
referring to the fact that ours is an order of reality which is governed by
space and time, and the limitations of space and time deprive us of enjoying
certain benefits. It is a law of our material condition that while we enjoy some
benefits in our existing situation, our enjoyment of many other benefits will
depend on the limitations of time and space being overcome. This applies also to
the benefits of religion. At the dawn of history, God promised redemption from
the Fall of our first parents. The descendant of the woman would crush the
Serpent’s head. But thousands upon thousands of years would pass till the
revelation granted to Abraham, and then the best part of two millennia would
pass till the arrival of the Messiah himself. It seems a slow route to be
following to attain the salvation of the world. But God respects the limitations
and laws of his creation. Blessings reach us amid the limitations of place and
time. In our Gospel today, a blind beggar sits by the roadside begging. He has
been many years in his blindness. He is suddenly fortunate, for he is told that
Jesus of Nazareth is passing by. Now is the time, and he, Jesus, is not far
away! If he does not act now, the time will pass and distance will prevent his
gaining the blessing. So he shouts.
These things are obvious, but they bear consideration. If that beggar had not
been sitting by that roadside at that particular time, and if Jesus had not
chosen to take that route at that point of time, the beggar would have remained
in his blindness. Much depended on a coincidence of factors governing space and
time — all of which, of course, falls within the guiding Providence of God. If
the beggar had not made the very best of his circumstances at that precise
point, nothing would have happened. If the beggar had not inquired from the
passing crowd what it was that was going on, he would not have been led to
impose himself vociferously on the crowd and make his voice heard above the din.
His voice carried, and overcame the distance. Having heard his cries to Jesus,
Christ stopped and directed that the man be brought to him. Then there followed
his complete cure, and his following of Jesus along the road. He became a
disciple — and we might say that a great deal depended on a coming together of
factors of time and place. It also depended on the beggar — and even Christ
himself — making the best use of that propitious moment. This is, we might say,
a picture of the workings of God in the world he has created. There were vast
numbers of persons whom Christ did not reach despite his tremendous efforts,
because though he was God, he took to himself a human nature with all its
limitations. God chose to respect the restraints inherent in his own creative
and redeeming work. But he also maximized its possibilities. Now, what has this
to do with each of us? We too, aware of the constraints of time and place, must
make the very best use of time and place to make Christ our life and the life of
others. Just before he ascended into heaven our Lord entrusted his disciples
with a tremendous responsibility. It was to go to the whole world and make
disciples of all the nations. They were to bring him to all those represented by
the blind man of our Gospel today. We must every day set about maximising both
time and place to tell every man and woman, Come! He is calling you!
Life is short — so time limits us. Space and place also limit our
options. But we must maximise the possibilities as did the blind beggar. This
applies not only to our own benefiting from the blessings of Christ, but also to
our bringing those blessings to others. We have a pressing work to do in life,
the work of God which is — as St John says in his Gospel (ch.6) — to believe in
the One he has sent. Let us do our best to surmount the things that can prevent
us from knowing Christ our life, and that can prevent others from knowing him
too. This is what the blind beggar did, and as a result he followed our Lord
along the road. Let us take our cue from him, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unity. Unity and subjection. What good to me are the loose parts of a clock —
even though they are finely— wrought — if they cannot tell me the time?
(The Way, no.962)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Seventh Chapter
EVERY
TRIAL MUST BE BORNE FOR THE SAKE OF ETERNAL LIFE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
Oh, if these things appealed to you and penetrated deeply into your heart, how
could you dare to complain even once? Ought not all trials be borne for the sake
of everlasting life? In truth, the loss or gain of God's kingdom is no small
matter.
(Continuing)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mary … is pre-eminently faithful to her Lord and Son. Let no one for an instant
suppose that she is not supremely zealous for His honour, or, as those who are
not Catholics fancy, that to exalt her is to be unfaithful to Him. Her true
servants are still more truly His. Well as she rewards her friends, she would
deem him no friend, but a traitor, who preferred her to Him. As He is zealous
for her honour, so is she for His.
JHN, from Meditations and Devotions (1893)
A people’s religion is ever a corrupt religion, in spite of the provisions of
Holy Church. If she is to be Catholic, you must admit within her net fish of
every kind, guests good and bad, vessels of gold, vessels of earth.
JHN, from A Letter Addressed to the Rev. E. B. Pusey (1865)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the thirty third week in Ordinary Time
(November 17)
Saint Elizabeth of Hungary, religious (1207-1231)
In her short life Elizabeth manifested such great love for the poor and
suffering that she has become the patroness of
Catholic charities and of the
Secular Franciscan Order. The daughter of the King of Hungary, Elizabeth chose a
life of penance and asceticism when a life of leisure and luxury could easily
have been hers. This choice endeared her in the hearts of the common people
throughout Europe. At the age of 14 Elizabeth was married to Louis of Thuringia
(a German principality), whom she deeply loved; she bore three children. Under
the spiritual direction of a Franciscan friar, she led a life of prayer,
sacrifice and service to the poor and sick. Seeking to become one with the poor,
she wore simple clothing. Daily she would take bread to hundreds of the poorest
in the land, who came to her gate. After six years of marriage, her husband died
in the Crusades, and she was grief-stricken. Her husband’s family looked upon
her as squandering the royal purse, and mistreated her, finally throwing her out
of the palace. The return of her husband’s allies from the Crusades resulted in
her being reinstated, since her son was legal heir to the throne. In 1228
Elizabeth joined the Secular Franciscan Order, spending the remaining few years
of her life caring for the poor in a hospital which she founded in honor of St.
Francis. Elizabeth’s health declined, and she died before her 24th birthday in
1231. Her great popularity resulted in her canonization four years later.
Elizabeth understood well the lesson Jesus taught when he
washed his disciples' feet at the Last Supper: The Christian must be one who
serves the humblest needs of others, even if one serves from an exalted
position. Of royal blood, Elizabeth could have lorded it over her subjects. Yet
she served them with such a loving heart that her brief life won for her a
special place in the hearts of many. Elizabeth is also an example to us in her
following the guidance of a spiritual director. Growth in the spiritual life is
a difficult process. We can play games very easily if we don't have someone to
challenge us or to share experiences so as to help us avoid pitfalls.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: 2 Maccabees 6:18-31; Psalm 3:2-7; Luke 19:1-10
Jesus entered Jericho and was passing through. A man was there by the name of
Zacchaeus; he was a chief tax collector and was wealthy. He wanted to see who
Jesus was, but being a short man he could not, because of the crowd. So he ran
ahead and climbed a sycamore-fig tree to see him, since Jesus was coming that
way. When Jesus reached the spot, he looked up and said to him, Zacchaeus, come
down immediately. I must stay at your house today. So he came down at once and
welcomed him gladly. All the people saw this and began to mutter, He has gone to
be the guest of a 'sinner'. But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, Look,
Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have
cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount. Jesus
said to him, Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a
son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost.
(Luke
19: 1-10)
Conversion
In 2009 Pope Benedict XVI declared the year to be a Year of
the Priesthood. He proposed that the Church contemplate especially Saint John
Vianney, the famous Cure of Ars in nineteenth century France. The Cure of Ars
has been declared by the Church to be patron saint of parish priests. I can
remember some fifty years ago a priest who went on to be the Provincial superior
of his religious order. He himself had never served a term working in a parish,
and he took
St John Vianney as his patron saint. The fact is that the Cure of
Ars was a remarkable religious prodigy. He was a great saint and from his
backwater parish he had a remarkable reputation and influence. Archbishop
Ullathorne of Birmingham once visited his parish to speak with the Cure, and he
saw numerous people sleeping in the fields awaiting their turn to go to
Confession. Now, if one reads the story of his life — and there are several — a
notable thing about him is that from his earliest years he had a remarkable
propensity for religious faith. He received his First Holy Communion with the
most profound reverence. I am not aware that there was what we would normally
call "a conversion" in his life. Doubtless, all through his life there were
daily "conversions" from sin and he was acutely aware of sin in his life, as are
all the saints. But there was no notable turning point because he always seemed
to be growing in grace. The case is very different with vast numbers of good and
holy persons. Due to the grace of God, they undergo conversions. Archbishop
Ullathorne himself underwent a conversion while at Mass in Memel (Autobiography,
p.34). His famous and brilliant friend, John Henry Newman, underwent a profound
conversion at age 15 (Apologia, p.4). St Paul underwent a conversion on
the way to Damascus. Augustine underwent his conversion after years of sin and
heresy. The fact is that God calls people to himself in thousands of varied ways. Our
Gospel today gives us one of those ways and it certainly involved a dramatic
conversion.
Imagine our Gospel scene. Zacchaeus was a chief tax collector of Jericho and had done extremely well, but had compromised himself seriously and repeatedly in the business of garnering his wealth. Would anyone have regarded him as having spiritual potential? Scarcely, and yet there was something in him that drew him in a spiritual direction, for he was anxious to see Jesus. He ran ahead of where Jesus was going, for he could not catch a glimpse of him for the crowd. Jesus was holy. He exercised the power of God. He was a great prophet. God was in him. So Zacchaeus ran ahead and climbed the tree which he could see Jesus would be approaching. It is a beautiful scene, but something much more beautiful was about to happen. Our Lord did not just deal with crowds — he dealt with individuals. On one occasion he was pressed by the crowd while on his way to heal someone who was seriously ill. Suddenly he stopped and asked who touched him. Everything came to a halt and Jesus carefully looked around, his penetrating gaze searching the crowd. Someone had touched him, and as a result, had been healed. The unknown woman came forward and then received the loving assurance of Jesus that her faith had saved her. Christ is interested in each individual. And so it was that, as Jesus moved along with the crowd around and behind him, he suddenly stopped and looked up. A smile came across his face as he addressed the chief tax collector by name. He had immediately plumbed the heart of Zacchaeus and asked him to come down from the tree, for he was to dine in his house that day. Zacchaeus clambered down, with his heart in a process of profound change. The fact that Zacchaeus’s name is given suggests that he became a faithful disciple, and it all began with this dramatic conversion. What does this tell us? It tells us that Christ can change the life of anyone if there is but an opening. He can change our lives too, if like Zacchaeus, we truly want to see him. Every saint is a model for all of us but there is something special that the converted saint offers us. It is the lesson that grace can overcome sin.
Let us place ourselves in the company of Zacchaeus and run ahead, as it were,
to see Jesus. Let us climb that tree and receive the loving gaze of Jesus Christ
as he asks us to come down and receive him into the house of our soul. Let us
receive him every day, for he wants to abide with us constantly. He asks that,
like Zacchaeus, we renounce sin and make him our Friend. He asks for ongoing
conversion from sin, all sin. His love will enable us to do this, because with
his love has come grace, that grace that changes the heart of the sinner and
sets him on the path of sanctity.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May I never see 'cliques' developing in your work. It would make a mockery of
the apostolate: for if, in the end, the 'clique' got
control of a universal undertaking, how quickly that universal undertaking
would be reduced to a clique itself!
(The Way, no.963)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuing The Imitation of Christ BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Seventh Chapter
EVERY TRIAL MUST BE BORNE FOR THE
SAKE OF ETERNAL LIFE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
Lift up your countenance to heaven, then. Behold Me, and with Me all My
saints. They had great trials in this life, but now they rejoice. They are
consoled. Now they are safe and at rest. And they shall abide with Me for all
eternity in the kingdom of My Father.
(Concluded)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man seems to die and to be no more, when he is but quitting us, and is really
beginning to live. Then he sees sights which before it did not even enter into
his mind to conceive, and the world is even less to him than he to the world.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The Lapse of Time’ (1832)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the thirty third week in Ordinary Time
(November 18) Dedication of St. Peter and St. Paul
St. Peter’s Basilica
is probably the most famous church in Christendom. Massive in scale and a
veritable museum of art and
architecture,
it began on a much humbler scale. Vatican Hill was a simple cemetery where
believers gathered at St. Peter’s tomb to pray. In 319 Constantine built on the
site a basilica that stood for more than a thousand years until, despite
numerous restorations, it threatened to collapse. In 1506 Pope Julius II ordered
it razed and reconstructed, but the new basilica was not completed and dedicated
for more than two centuries. St. Paul’s Outside the
Walls stands
near
the Abaazia delle Tre Fontane, where St. Paul is believed to have been beheaded.
The largest church in Rome until St. Peter’s was rebuilt, the basilica also
rises over the traditional site of its namesake’s grave. The most recent edifice
was constructed after a fire in 1823. The first basilica was also Constantine’s
doing. Constantine’s building projects enticed the first of a centuries-long
parade of pilgrims to Rome. From the time the basilicas were first built until
the empire crumbled under “barbarian” invasions, the two churches, although
miles apart, were linked by a roofed colonnade of marble columns.
“It is extraordinarily interesting that Roman
pilgrimage began at an…early time. Pilgrims did not wait for the Peace of the
Church [Constantine’s edict of toleration] before they visited the tombs of the
Apostles. They went to Rome a century before there were any public churches and
when the Church was confined to the tituli [private homes] and the catacombs.
The two great pilgrimage sites were exactly as today—the tombs, or memorials, of
St. Peter upon the Vatican Hill and the tomb of St. Paul off the Ostian Way” (H.V.
Morton, This Is Rome). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: 2 Maccabees 7:1, 20-31; Psalm
17:1bcd, 5-6, 8b and 15; Luke 19:11-28
While they were listening to this, he
went on to tell them a parable, because he was near Jerusalem and the people
thought that the kingdom of God was going to appear at once. He said: A man of
noble birth went to a distant country to receive for himself a kingdom and then
to return. So he called ten of his servants and gave them ten minas. 'Put this
money to work,' he said, 'until I come back.' But his
subjects hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, 'We don't want this
man to be our king.' He was made king, however, and returned home. Then he sent
for the servants to whom he had given the money, in order to find out what they
had gained with it. The first one came and said, 'Sir, your mina has earned ten
more.' 'Well done, my good servant!' his master replied. 'Because you have been
trustworthy in a very small matter, take charge of ten cities.' The second came
and said, 'Sir, your mina has earned five more.' His master answered, 'You take
charge of five cities.' Then another servant came and said, 'Sir, here is your
mina; I have kept it laid away in a piece of cloth. I was afraid of you, because
you are a hard man. You take out what you did not put in and reap what you did
not sow.' His master replied, 'I will judge you by your own words, you wicked
servant! You knew, did you, that I am a hard man, taking out what I did not put
in, and reaping what I did not sow? Why then didn't you put my money on deposit,
so that when I came back, I could have collected it with interest?' Then he said
to those standing by, 'Take his mina away from him and give it to the one who
has ten minas.' 'Sir,' they said, 'he already has ten!' He replied, 'I tell you
that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has
nothing, even what he has will be taken away. But those enemies of mine who did
not want me to be a king over them— bring them here and kill them in front of
me.' After Jesus had said this, he went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem.
(Luke 19: 11-28)
The End
It is well recognized that in structuring his Gospel, Luke brought out
the climactic character of the Passion and Death of Christ. Our Lord’s final
journey up to Jerusalem is given special emphasis, and important teachings are
placed in the course of that journey — as he approaches Jericho, as he leaves
Jericho, and so on, as the case may be. In our Gospel passage today “he went on
to tell them a parable, because he was near Jerusalem and the people thought
that the kingdom of God was going to appear at once.” It seems
that there was
something about our Lord’s manner and teaching that suggested that “the kingdom
of God” was imminent. They had formed the impression that the kingdom of God was
about to appear — that is, immediately. As Jerusalem was approached, there was
mounting expectation. A little later in the chapter, our Lord approaches the
city seated on a colt and is acclaimed of his disciples. They welcome him as the
King who had been promised. All this is to say that our Lord had connected his
entry into Jerusalem and what would then follow, with the coming of the Kingdom.
That general point had been conveyed, even though its detail had been — as usual
— misinterpreted. This does remind us of the central role of the Passion and
Death of the Lord in the coming of the Kingdom. By means of it, Jesus would, to
use the imagery he employs in his parable, go away and be appointed King. Then
he would return. That return would occur in multiple senses. He would return at
his Resurrection. He would return in his gift of the Holy Spirit to his Church
at Pentecost, to remain with the Church in the power of the Spirit to the end.
Finally, he would return on the clouds of heaven at his final coming to judge
the living and the dead. But the climax of his life and the beginning of the
Kingdom would be achieved by his Passion and Death. It was necessary that he
suffer in order to enter his glory as King of kings and Lord of lords. The
people had not appreciated the Passion, but they had picked up that the Kingdom
was near at hand.
However, it was not as they thought. They thought that very soon, they too would
experience the glory if they followed him now with acclaim. But no, there was
much work ahead for the servants of the King — and it was to be real,
industrious, fruitful work. They had to put their heads down and enter into the
task, for the man of noble birth would come back as King and demand an account.
That is, they had to work with energy and effect for the Kingdom, if they wanted
to participate in its glory. And so, while in the parable the man of noble birth
goes to a far country to receive for himself the kingdom, prior to his leaving
he entrusts his servants with his money (Greek: mna). With that
money they were to gain more for the King. We read that “A man of noble birth
went to a distant country to receive for himself a kingdom and then to return.
So he called ten of his servants and gave them ten minas. 'Put this money to
work,' he said, 'until I come back.'” Now, we notice in the parable that there
are two groups of persons whom the man of noble birth leaves behind as he goes
forth to receive the kingship. There are his servants to whom he entrusts his
funds, and there are citizens who hate him and who, when he has gone, refuse to
accept his authority. Thus, in very simple terms, is the world divided. There
are the servants of Christ, and there are those who do not accept him. St John,
in the Prologue of his Gospel, speaks of the Word coming to his own, and his own
not receiving him. But to those who do receive him he gives the power to become
children of God. In the famous Spiritual Exercises of St Ignatius
Loyola there is the very important meditation on the Two Standards, the Standard
of Christ and the Standard of Satan. Those citizens who do not accept him will
be condemned when he returns. But the servants too, must face a judgment at his
return. Their judgment will be on the industry with which they have served the
interests of the King, and that judgment will affect all the servants down to
the least. The servant who had done nothing with his master’s money would lose
everything.
Our Lord is saying that he, and he alone, is the King. He will come to judge
all. Those who wilfully and knowingly refuse his authority will be condemned. It
will be a sentence of death. But those servants of his who accept his authority
as King and who have been entrusted with the promotion of his Kingdom in their
everyday lives, will also face a tribunal. Their judgment will concern the use
they have made of the treasure they were given. Let us then use every day of our
lives to serve Christ our Lord and to enhance his lordship in the world — for he
is coming. When he comes, there will be a solemn judgment, and then his kingdom
will have no end.
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'There are so many ways', you told me dejectedly. There need to be many; so that
each soul can find its own in that wonderful variety.
Bewildered? Make your choice once and for all: and the bewilderment will turn
into certainty.
(The Way, no.964)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter THE DAY OF
ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
O MOST happy mansion of the city above! O most bright day of eternity, which
night does not darken, but which the highest truth ever enlightens! O day, ever
joyful and ever secure, which never changes its state to the opposite! Oh, that
this day shine forth, that all these temporal things come to an end! It envelops
the saints all resplendent with heavenly brightness, but it appears far off as
through a glass to us wanderers on the earth. The citizens of heaven know how
joyful that day is, but the exiled sons of Eve mourn that this one is bitter and
tedious.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberalism in religion is the doctrine that there is no positive truth in
religion, but that one creed is as good as another, and this is the teaching
which is gaining substance and force daily. It is inconsistent with any
recognition of any religion, as true. It teaches that all are to be tolerated,
for all are matters of opinion. Revealed religion is not a truth, but a
sentiment and a taste; not an objective fact, not miraculous; and it is the
right of each individual to make it say just what strikes his fancy.
JHN, from the ‘Biglietto Speech‘ (1879)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the thirty third week in Ordinary Time
(November 19) St. Agnes of Assisi 1197-1253
Agnes was the sister of St. Clare and her first follower. When Agnes left home
two weeks after Clare’s departure, their family attempted to bring Agnes back by
force. They tried to drag her out of the monastery, but all of a sudden her body
became so heavy that several knights could not budge it. Her uncle Monaldo tried
to strike her but was temporarily paralyzed. The knights then left Agnes and
Clare in peace. Agnes matched her sister in devotion to prayer and in
willingness to endure the strict penances which characterized their lives at San
Damiano. In 1221 a group of Benedictine nuns in Monticelli (near Florence) asked
to become Poor Clares. St. Clare sent Agnes to become abbess of that monastery.
Agnes soon wrote a rather sad letter about how much she missed Clare and the
other nuns at San Damiano. After establishing other Poor Clare monasteries in
northern Italy, Agnes was recalled to San Damiano in 1253 when Clare was dying.
Agnes followed Clare in death three months later. Agnes was canonized in 1753.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: 1 Maccabees 2:15-29; Psalm
50:1b-2, 5-6, 14-15; Luke 19:41-44
As Jesus approached Jerusalem and saw the city, he wept over it and said, If
you, even you, had only known on this day what would bring you peace— but now it
is hidden from your eyes. The days will come upon you when your enemies will
build an embankment against you and encircle you and hem you in on every side.
They will dash you to the ground, you and the children within your walls. They
will not leave one stone on another, because you did not recognise the time of
God's coming to you.
(Luke 19: 41-44)
The heart of Christ
Consider the mythical gods of Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek, Roman and, say,
Nordic religions. Religious myth is an important part of the life of man, and
its meaning is the object of unending research. Consider the mythical figure of
Baiame (or Daramulan) of the traditional Aboriginal
religion of South East Australia, as reported by Howitt in the nineteenth
century. Baiame is impressive. But of course, philosophy at its
best — for example, the thought of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and the best
systems that built
on their foundations
— attained far more to the truth of God
than did religious myth. St Augustine considered Christianity as the successor,
not of the religions of the ancient world, but of its philosophy. But for all
its achievements, philosophy, of itself, also has serious limitations — especially, say, in envisaging God as a living person. Consider the conclusion
of philosophy that the ultimate Foundation of this ever-changing world is pure
Act, a simple actuality that excludes all potential. This provides an ultimate
Principle accounting for a transient and changing world, but how is man to
imagine or even conceive of this Principle as a living Person, with whom he can
enter into some form of communion? Of course, this could be discussed in
philosophical fashion at great length. My point here is that man longs for
communion, and for all his best efforts, he could not apprehend God adequately
as a living Person without the decisive help of God himself. Somehow he needs to
encounter God, and not just reason to him. Enter the living God on this
difficult scene. He takes his place on the very stage of human history, and does
so as a concrete, living man. He can be heard, seen and touched. He can be
imagined. This is the living God of all creation, pure Being, and the abiding
Cause of all limited being. He takes on a shape, and he has a face. He can be
approached with the utmost ease and befriended, and he means to befriend man. He
appears as every bit a man, indeed he is fully and completely human in a way we
are not — in the sense that there is no sin to spoil and warp his humanity. Just
as he is utterly divine, so he is utterly human. In our Gospel today, he beholds
the city of his love and considers its moral and spiritual state. Contemplating
it, he breaks down in tears.
It is well to consider the implications of our scene in which the Son of God
weeps. It is now no longer difficult for man to apprehend the living God as a
real person. We are speaking here of a man whose spirit has depths beyond our
imagining. The power, the resources and the life of the heart of Jesus Christ
far exceed anything of our experience. In his spirit, Jesus Christ had strength
and love that towered beyond compare. Here we see the sensitivity and feeling
that marked this unique man of the ages. He beholds Jerusalem which he is soon
to enter, and he weeps over its sin and hardness of heart. If Christ wept over
Jerusalem, how he must have wept over Judas, a disciple of his special choice!
We read that on an earlier occasion Christ was in confrontation with the leaders
of the Jews, this time over his imminent action of healing on the Sabbath.
Christ asked them to answer his question. They refused, because they knew they
would be forthwith defeated in debate. They would not engage, so as not to be
exposed to the light of his words. We read that Christ looked around on them in
anger, and proceeded to cure the person on the Sabbath. Christ, full of holy
love, was angry. We have here a living Person, one who was truly human, and one
who has made it easy to imagine God as a living person. At the time of our
Gospel scene today, which is to say just before his final entry into Jerusalem — but reported in a different Gospel
— Christ goes to the tomb of Lazarus his
friend. We read that before he raised him from the tomb, he wept. This is the
living God who invites us to be his friend. Let us often think of Christ in
tears over fallen, wayward, stubborn, sinful man. Christ weeps for each one of
us, and with his tears rolling down his strong face he calls us to him. He said
of Jerusalem that he had wished to gather its children to him as a hen gathers
its chicks under its wings, but they refused. What we are speaking of here is
the living heart of God. Jesus Christ reveals to us that God has a heart. He is
not just the Principle behind all things, but the Person we have been made to
relate to.
Let us place ourselves in the Gospel scene of today
(Luke 19: 41-44), and near to Jesus Christ as he beholds the city of
his love. That city had been the love of God’s heart for centuries — and his
Temple, his abode among his chosen people, was there. Jesus Christ gazes on the
city and he weeps. He has a great heart and that same heart loves you and me.
Let us be devoted to the heart of Christ and let us, by the power of grace,
strive to model our hearts on his. Learn from me, he said, for I am gentle and
humble of heart. That is what grace can do — it can transform us into his
likeness.
(E.J.Tyler)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rejoice, when you see others working in good apostolic activities. And ask God
to grant them abundant grace and that they may respond to that grace.
Then, you, on your way: convince yourself that it's the only way for you.
(The Way, no.965)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter
THE DAY OF ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
The days of this life are short and evil, full of grief and distress. Here man
is defiled by many sins, ensnared in many passions, enslaved by many fears, and
burdened with many cares. He is distracted by many curiosities and entangled in
many vanities, surrounded by many errors and worn by many labours, oppressed by
temptations, weakened by pleasures, and tortured by want.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Church is the oracle of religious truth, and dispenses what the apostles
committed to her in every time and place. We must take her word, then, without
proof, because she is sent to us from God to teach us how to please Him; and
that we do so is the test whether we be really Catholics or no.
JHN, from the Discourse ‘The Glories of Mary for the Sake of Her Son’ (1849)
---------------Back
to index for this month---------------------------Back to
index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the thirty third week in Ordinary Time
(November 20) St. Rose Philippine Duchesne (1769-1852)
Born in Grenoble, France, of a family that was among the new rich, Philippine
learned political skills from her father and a love of the poor from her mother.
The dominant feature of her temperament was a strong and dauntless will, which
became the material — and the
battlefield — of
her holiness. She entered the convent at 19 and remained despite their
opposition. As the French Revolution broke, the convent was closed, and she
began taking care of the poor and sick, opened a school for street urchins and
risked her life helping priests in the underground. When the situation cooled,
she personally rented her old convent, now a shambles, and tried to revive its
religious life. The spirit was gone, and soon there were only four nuns left.
They joined the infant Society of the Sacred Heart, whose young superior, St.
Madeleine Sophie Barat, would be her lifelong friend. In a short time Philippine
was a superior and supervisor of the novitiate and a school. But her ambition,
since hearing tales of missionary work in Louisiana as a little girl, was to go
to America and work among the Indians. At 49, she thought this would be her
work. With four nuns, she spent 11 weeks at sea en route to New Orleans, and
seven weeks more on the Mississippi to St. Louis. She then met one of the many
disappointments of her life. The bishop had no place for them to live and work
among Native Americans. Instead, he sent her to what she sadly called "the
remotest village in the U.S.," St. Charles, Missouri. With characteristic drive
and courage, she founded the first free school for girls west of the
Mississippi. It was a mistake. Though she was as hardy as any of the pioneer
women in the wagons rolling west, cold and hunger drove them out — to Florissant,
Missouri, where she founded the first Catholic Indian school, adding others in
the territory. "In her first decade in America, Mother Duchesne suffered
practically every hardship the frontier had to offer, except the threat of
Indian massacre — poor lodging, shortages of food, drinking water, fuel and money,
forest fires and blazing chimneys, the vagaries of the Missouri climate, cramped
living quarters and the privation of all privacy, and the crude manners of
children reared in rough surroundings and with only the slightest training in
courtesy" (Louise Callan, R.S.C.J., Philippine Duchesne). Finally, at 72, in
poor health and retired, she got her lifelong wish. A mission was founded at
Sugar Creek, Kansas, among the Potawatomi. She was taken along. Though she could
not learn their language, they soon named her "Woman-Who-Prays-Always." While
others taught, she prayed. Legend has it that Native American children sneaked
behind her as she knelt and sprinkled bits of paper on her habit, and came back
hours later to find them undisturbed. She died in 1852 at the age of 83.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture: 1 Maccabees 4:36-37, 52-59; 1
Chronicles 29:10bcd-12bcd; Luke 19:45-48
Then
Jesus entered the temple area and began driving out those who were selling. It
is written, he said to them, 'My house will be a house of prayer'; but you have
made it 'a den of robbers'. Every day he was teaching at the temple. But the
chief priests, the teachers of the law and the leaders among the people were
trying to kill him. Yet they could not find any way to do it, because all the
people hung on his words. (Luke 19: 45-48)
Christ our Priest
Our brief Gospel scene today depicts an event of high drama.
Christ had arrived in the city. His journey to Jerusalem is one of the
structural planks of St Luke’s Gospel. On his journey to the city much teaching
was given, and the arrival is a climax of the Gospel. In the city Christ would
offer the great sacrifice of his life which would redeem the world. It is to be
noted that Christ never in this Gospel calls himself a priest because,
obviously, such a statement would place him within the ranks of the Jewish
priesthood. His high priesthood was new and the sacrifice of his life for the
sins of the people and all mankind would be the supreme act of his priesthood.
So then, Christ has entered the city riding the colt as the prophet had
foretold. He enters, acclaimed as prophet and Messiah-king who comes in the name
of the Lord. But, unknown to the people, he was also entering the holy city as
priest, mankind’s high priest about to offer sacrifice. What does he do? He
immediately enters the Temple and shows that he is Master of the Temple, filled
with zeal for the worship of God. We read that “Jesus entered the temple area
and began driving out those who were selling. It is written, he said to them,
'My house will be a house of prayer'; but you have made it 'a den of robbers'.”
Who were the masters of the Temple? They were the priests, and here our Lord is
taking charge of the Temple — he physically expels all commercial activity.
Nothing but worship, teaching and prayer is allowed. Then he himself sets up,
teaching the word of God every day. All this is under the very nose of the chief
priests and the scribes and the chief men of the people. He acts with an
authority he has not obtained from anyone — it is authority he possesses from
God. It is a signal, to be understood in the future, that here was the true high
priest ordained by God, and his offering of sacrifice was imminent. In the
Gospel of St John, this symbolic action occurs at the outset of our Lord’s
ministry (2:14), and in that scene our Lord is even more explicit: he states
that his own body is the Temple. Our Lord is filled with the awareness that he
is mankind’s priest and victim.
It would be an interesting thing to analyse the popular image of Jesus of
Nazareth. I suspect it is that of a great prophet. When our Lord asked his
disciples who men said he was, he was told that they thought of him as a great
prophet: John the Baptist come back, or one of the great prophets back with them
again. I think that generally mankind would still imagine him as a great prophet
and teacher of religion. Our Lord then asked his disciples who they themselves
thought he was. Peter spoke up: he was the Messiah, and indeed the Son of the
Living God. It was a splendid avowal, a remarkable perception that actually came
from God. God the Father had revealed to Simon the true identity of Jesus of
Nazareth, and our Lord immediately went on to appoint Simon to be the Rock on
which he would build his Church. But there was a further dimension to our Lord’s
identity and mission which had not yet been explicitly acknowledged, but which
our Lord then alludes to. The Son of Man, he told them, must suffer greatly and
be rejected and put to death. Having no idea as yet of Christ being priest and
victim, Simon Peter reacted strongly at such a thought. He was severely rebuked
by our Lord and accused of being a Satan — showing just how central to his
identity and mission his sacrifice was. He had come to offer a great sacrifice,
the sacrifice of his life. That is to say — though our Lord did not put it in
these terms — he had come as high priest and victim. He was Prophet, King and,
notably, Priest. The priesthood of Christ was fundamental to his identity and
mission. In our Gospel today (Luke 19: 45-48),
our Lord takes command of the Temple and sets up there. He is acting as the
Priest of God who has responsibility for mankind’s worship of the Father. Soon
he would offer the perfect sacrifice which would reconcile man to God and take
away the sin of the world. He would act as supreme Pontiff, bringing man’s gifts
to God and God’s gifts to man. Though the leaders could not touch him because of
the people, our Lord as priest-victim would place himself in their hands.
Let us pray for the grace to appreciate the priesthood of Jesus Christ. This
priesthood he shares with all those who are baptized into him. All the baptized
faithful posses what the Church calls the common priesthood, while the ordained,
by the singular grace of ordination, share in the ministerial priesthood. The
two are different in kind and not merely in degree, but each is just a share in
the priesthood of Jesus Christ. He is our one and only high priest, and by his
sacrifice the world was redeemed. Let us take our stand with him, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You show bad spirit if it hurts you to see others work for Christ without regard
for what you are doing. Remember this passage in Saint Mark: 'Master, we saw a
man who is not one of us casting out devils in your name; and because he was not
one of us we tried to stop him.' But Jesus said, 'You must not stop him: no one
who works a miracle in my name is likely to speak evil of me. Anyone who is not
against us is for us'.
(The Way, no.966)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter THE
DAY OF ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
Oh, when will these evils end? When shall I be freed from the miserable slavery
of vice? When, Lord, shall I think of You alone? When shall I fully rejoice in
You? When shall I be without hindrance, in true liberty, free from every
grievance of mind and body? When will there be solid peace, undisturbed and
secure, inward peace and outward peace, peace secured on every side? O good
Jesus, when shall I stand to gaze upon You? When shall I contemplate the glory
of Your kingdom? When will You be all in all to me? Oh, when shall I be with You
in that kingdom of Yours, which You have prepared for Your beloved from all
eternity?
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Religion is based upon the sense of sin; it recognizes the disease, but
it cannot find, it does but look out for the remedy. That remedy, both for guilt
and for moral impotence, is found in the central doctrine of Revelation, the
Mediation of Christ.
JHN, from An Essay in aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the thirty third week in Ordinary Time
(November 21) The Presentation of the Blessed Virgin
Mary
Mary’s presentation was celebrated in Jerusalem in the sixth
century. A church was built there in honour of this mystery. The Eastern Church
was more interested in the feast, but it does appear in the West in the 11th
century. Although the feast at times disappeared from
the
calendar, in the 16th century it became a feast of the universal Church. As with
Mary’s birth, we read of Mary’s presentation in the temple only in apocryphal
literature. In what is recognized as an unhistorical account, the
Protoevangelium of James tells us that Anna and Joachim offered Mary to God in
the Temple when she was three years old. This was to carry out a promise made to
God when Anna was still childless. Though it cannot be proven historically,
Mary’s presentation has an important theological purpose. It continues the
impact of the feasts of the Immaculate Conception and of the birth of Mary. It
emphasizes that the holiness conferred on Mary from the beginning of her life on
earth continued through her early childhood and beyond.
"Hail, holy throne of God, divine sanctuary, house of glory,
jewel most fair, chosen treasure house, and mercy seat for the whole world,
heaven showing forth the glory of God. Purest Virgin, worthy of all praise,
sanctuary dedicated to God and raised above all human condition, virgin soil,
unploughed field, flourishing vine, fountain pouring out waters, virgin bearing
a child, mother without knowing man, hidden treasure of innocence, ornament of
sanctity, by your most acceptable prayers, strong with the authority of
motherhood, to our Lord and God, Creator of all, your Son who was born of you
without a father, steer the ship of the Church and bring it to a quiet harbour"
(adapted from a homily by St. Germanus on the Presentation of the Mother of
God). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: 1 Maccabees 6:1-13; Psalm 9:2-4
and 6, 16 and 19; Luke 20:27-40
Some of the Sadducees, who say there is
no resurrection, came to Jesus with a question. Teacher, they said, Moses wrote
for us that if a man's brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man
must marry the widow and have children for his brother. Now there were seven
brothers. The first one married a woman and died childless. The second and then
the third married her, and in the same way the seven died, leaving no children.
Finally, the woman died too. Now then, at the resurrection whose wife will she
be, since the seven were married to her? Jesus replied, The people of this age
marry and are given in marriage. But those who are considered worthy of taking
part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be
given in marriage, and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels.
They are God's children, since they are children of the resurrection. But in the
account of the bush, even Moses showed that the dead rise, for he calls the Lord
'the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'. He is not the
God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive. Some of the
teachers of the law responded, Well said, teacher! And no-one dared to ask him
any more questions. (Luke 20: 27-40)
Resurrection
Josephus informs us in his work,
The Jewish War (recounting the Jewish revolt against Rome, 66-70 AD),
that there were “three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the
first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third
sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essenes.” He tells us
that the Sadducees did not allow “the belief of the immortal duration of the
soul, and the punishments and rewards in Hades.” This is corroborated Matthew
22:23 and its parallel passage
in our Gospel today from Luke 20:27-40. It is
mentioned again by Luke in his Acts of the Apostles 23:8, when St Paul exploits
the division between the Pharisees and Sadducees on this point to extricate
himself from accusations of the Jews. The fact is that the beliefs of mankind on
the Afterlife display a bewildering variety. Zoroastrianism had a judgment after
death followed by reward or punishment. Ancient Egyptian religion is impressive
in its insistence on an ethically based judgment after death, and there are some
who regard the Egyptians as having pioneered the notion of an afterlife
judgment. In traditional Australian Aboriginal religion it seems that at death
the true soul returns to the eternal Dreaming, where in some sense it resided
prior to birth. The list of beliefs that have marked man’s idea of the Afterlife
goes on, but what is clear is that while generally man looks forward to an
Afterlife in some sense, its nature is clouded in obscurity. The Sadducees of
our Gospel today (Luke 20: 27-40) emphasised
the first five books of the Bible (as being, presumably, the primitive
revelation), and, like the ancient Hebrews, emphasized the present. God's
rewards and punishments were given now in this life. Now, modern secular man
typically goes an important step further. Nature is all there is. There is no
Supernatural. His philosophy is Naturalism. Rewards and punishments, then, can
occur only in this life. Let us regard the confrontation between Christ and the
Sadducees as, in a sense, involving modern man. Modern man has an ingrained
assumption that makes it difficult to him to take seriously any talk of a
resurrection.
Our Lord is clear and adamant. There is
a resurrection from the dead. There will be a judgment on each and every person
following his death. For those “considered worthy” of the age to come and of the
rising to life with God, the glory of heaven will not be simply a continuation
of this life, for they will no longer die. And so there will be no more marriage
and married life as such, but in that respect all will be like the angels, for
death will have gone forever. It is worth pondering the thought that the glory
of heaven will be free of all that pertains to death. There will be nothing that
hints of the breakdown or reduction of life. Christ said that he came to bring
life, life in abundance, and this gift of life will reach its zenith in the
presence of God in heaven. Our Lord points out to the Sadducees that it was
alluded to by Yahweh God himself in his meeting with Moses from the Burning
Bush, when he described himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This was
from one of the five books they accepted. God was referring to living persons,
for he was not a God of lifeless remains. It meant that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
were alive when God spoke to Moses, although the fullness of their life in God
would come with the sacrifice of Christ. What this means is that we ought think
often and deeply of what our Lord has revealed of the resurrection from the
dead. An eternity of bliss awaits the one who is faithful to God. The bliss will
be total and it will be unceasing. This is because it will involve the direct
sight of God and unimaginable union with him. The one in heaven will be enfolded
in a divine embrace that will immerse him in the infinite love of God. The smile
of God will never fade and an eternity of joy will be ahead. Never will there be
a tear to dampen the happiness of every soul who has been taken to glory.
Moreover, the day will arrive when each soul will be reunited to the body and
thus will happiness be complete. The resurrection is a tremendous thought. It
ought be at the forefront of our lives till the end. What a tragedy not to be
judged worthy of it! The thought of the resurrection from the dead ought impel
us to believe in Christ and to share in his saving mission.
Christ often urges us to pray with
faith. Ask, and you will receive, he says. What better thing to ask for than
that we be saved, and that those for whom we have some responsibility be saved
too? Is not this the greatest favour to be asked for, and would it not be the
greatest catastrophe to lose it? We ought pray to Christ and to those who are
now in heaven that we may join them there. Let us pray to Mary the mother of
Christ too, that she will pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.
(E.J.Tyler)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All that exterior activity is a waste of time, if you lack Love. It's like
sewing with a needle and no thread.
What a pity if in the end you had carried out 'your' apostolate and not 'his'
apostolate!
(The Way, no.967)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter THE
DAY OF ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
I am left poor and exiled in a hostile land, where every day sees wars and very
great misfortunes. Console my banishment, assuage my sorrow. My whole desire is
for You. Whatever solace this world offers is a burden to me. I desire to enjoy
You intimately, but I cannot attain to it. I wish to cling fast to heavenly
things, but temporal affairs and unmortified passions bear me down. I wish in
mind to be above all things, but I am forced by the flesh to be unwillingly
subject to them. Thus, I fight with myself, unhappy that I am, and am become a
burden to myself, while my spirit seeks to rise upward and my flesh to sink
downward. Oh, what inward suffering I undergo when I consider heavenly things;
when I pray, a multitude of carnal thoughts rush upon me!
(Continuing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As neither the local rulers nor the pastors of the Church are impeccable in act
nor infallible in judgment, I am not obliged to maintain that all ecclesiastical
measures and permissions have ever been praiseworthy and safe precedents.
JHN, from the ‘Preface to the Third Edition’ of the Prophetical Office of the
Church (1877)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
The
Solemnity of Christ the King
B
(34th Sunday of Ordinary Time)
(November 22) St. Cecilia (3rd century)
Although
Cecilia is one of the most famous of the Roman martyrs, the familiar stories
about her are apparently not founded on authentic material. There is no trace of
honour being paid her in early times. A fragmentary inscription of the late
fourth century refers to a church named after her, and her feast was celebrated
at least in 545. According to legend, Cecilia was a young Christian of high rank
betrothed to a Roman named Valerian. Through her influence Valerian was
converted, and was martyred along with his brother. The legend about Cecilia’s
death says that after being struck three times on the neck with a sword, she
lived for three days, and asked the pope to convert her home into a church.
Since the time of the Renaissance she has usually been portrayed with a viola or
a small organ. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 7:13-14; Psalm 93:1,
1-2, 5; Revelation 1:5-8; John 18:33b-37
Pilate asked Jesus, Are you the king of
the Jews? Is that your own idea, Jesus asked, or did others talk to you about
me? Am I a Jew? Pilate replied. It was your people and your chief priests who
handed you over to me. What is it you have done? Jesus said, My kingdom is not
of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the
Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place. You are a king, then! said
Pilate. Jesus answered, It is you who say it. In fact, for this reason I was
born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on
the side of truth listens to me. (John 18: 33b-37)
The Truth
It is possible, for considerable periods
of one’s life, to be living on the surface of things. Life can be made to
consist in the pursuit of this or that interest or distraction, based on mere personal preference. In this case, life is
lived and developed on the basis of what happens to attract. Those
attractions can be massive and lead to enormous activity, but in the
final analysis their basis can be mere preference. But if a person reflects more
profoundly, it ought become clear to
him that if he is to be truly and fully
himself, he must not spend his life simply acting on personal preference. At the
heart of being the person he discovers himself to be, is the call of duty. It is
not mere preference but duty which — if he has developed an inner sensitivity to
it — touches and beckons his deepest self. He senses that the path of duty is
the way to his truest happiness and the flourishing of his best self. Very many
ignore the call of duty and choose the path of preference, but they do so to
their ultimate cost. Duty is at the heart of authentic human experience, and a
man’s sense of duty constitutes a moment of choice in his road ahead. What will it be?
Duty will be hard and narrow, but it will lead to abundant life. Mere preference
will be broad and perhaps exciting, but its end will be an arid desert. Now, if
a person stands and contemplates the duty which sweetly and sternly summons him,
he notices that in fact it is the summons of truth. It is what is true that
constitutes the duty of every life. Every person is called to sincerity and
truthfulness in acting and speaking. Everyone has the duty to seek the truth, to
adhere to it and to order his life in accordance with its demands. He finds
that if he tries always to be true and faithful to the truth as it seems to him,
then he flourishes in his being. If he abandons the demands of truth and acts
merely on personal preference irrespective of what the truth of the situation
may be, then he gradually crumbles as a person. But as Pilate asked the Man before
him, What is truth? Where is it? Is it just a phantom?
There are elements of the truth
everywhere, and massive attempts have been made by seekers of the truth to
attain it. Many have, to a greater or lesser extent, been successful, and
mankind has benefited accordingly. But what of the whole of truth, and in
particular the source and the heart of truth? Of course, no one can attain all
possible elements of the truth as represented by, say, the libraries and wise
men of the world. But is there some way of being in intimate union with the
heart, soul and source of all truth, and then of surrendering oneself to the
duty of loving and serving it? This would obviously bring the greatest possible
flourishing to the human spirit and the perfection of his being — because man
knows he is made for duty, duty to the truth. The good news of the Gospel is
that in Jesus Christ the whole of God’s truth has been made manifest. He is “the
Truth.” Christ formally stated that he is the Way, the Truth and the Life. In
him the fullness of the godhead abides bodily. To know him is to know the Truth.
All that is true, be it visible or invisible, has its source in him. All of duty
is, then, founded in his person, for all of duty is founded in the Source of
truth and being. To discover the person of Jesus Christ is to have found the
Source of all that we are called to do and be. Any person who is of the truth
and who accepts the fundamental duty to live according to it, and not according
to mere preference, comes to him. Thus it is that our Lord responds to Pilate
with the simple yet profoundly significant words: “for this reason I was born,
and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the
side of truth listens to me” (John 18: 33b-37).
The fundamental vocation of every person is to hear the word of Christ, to
perceive it as the truth, to live according to it, and to bear witness to it before men. The Christian is
called to bear witness to Christ as the Truth in every field of his activity,
both public and private, and also, if necessary, with the sacrifice of his life.
Martyrdom is the supreme act of witness to the truth, and is the greatest fulfilment of
duty. In this, Christ is our exemplar.
Let us in our hearts place ourselves
before the person of Jesus Christ as he utters the words spoken to Pilate. What
is truth? Supremely and fundamentally, truth is that which comes from God — and
God, God the Son, is Jesus Christ. I am the truth, he says, and I bear witness
to the truth — that truth which is me and my teaching. All violations of the
truth, such as lying, slander, flattery, whatever it may be, strike at the
person and law of Jesus Christ. Because he is the Truth, he is also our Way and
our Life. Let us then resolve to place him at the centre of our life and to hear
our duty as it is expressed in his word. This will be the source of our unending
happiness.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: The Catechism of the Catholic Church,
no.2471-2492 (Bearing witness to the truth)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joyfully I bless you, son, for that faith in your mission as an apostle which
inspired you to write: 'There's no doubt about it: the future is certain,
perhaps in spite of us. But it's essential that we should be one with the Head —
'ut omnes unum sint, that all be one!' — through prayer and sacrifice.
(The Way, no.968)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter THE DAY OF
ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
O my God, do not remove Yourself far from me, and depart not in anger from Your
servant. Dart forth Your lightning and disperse them; send forth Your arrows and
let the phantoms of the enemy be put to flight. Draw my senses toward You and
make me forget all worldly things. Grant me the grace to cast away quickly all
vicious imaginings and to scorn them. Aid me, O heavenly Truth, that no vanity
may move me. Come, heavenly Sweetness, and let all impurity fly from before Your
face.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In late 1842 John Henry Newman preached a
series of sermons on the relation of Christianity to Judaism, and on the
nature and mission of the Church. We publish here an extract from
‘The Christian Church an Imperial Power‘ in
which Newman explains that whilst Christ is ‘invisible’, governing his Church
from heaven, his Kingdom on earth may be seen and found:
When [Christ] was ascending, He said, “All power is given unto Me in heaven, and
in earth.” We believe in His power in heaven, but, strange to say, it is usual
with us to grudge Him His power upon earth. We believe that He exercises His
powerful intercession with the Father in heaven; but we seem to think that the
Mediator has no earthly kingdom. As God indeed, of course, we accord Him a rule
upon earth; but that rule He had from the time He created land and sea, and all
things therein. But on His resurrection as Mediator, a kingdom was given unto
Him; do we believe that He has a kingdom?
We
know what is meant by a kingdom. It means a body politic, bound together by
common laws, ruled by one head, holding intercourse part with part, acting
together. We know what is meant by the kingdom of Chaldea, or of Persia, or of
Rome, which the Prophet Daniel mentions; do we believe that Christ now has a
kingdom, as those earthly powers once had? “Yes;” we reply, “He has a kingdom;
it is an invisible kingdom.” An invisible kingdom on earth? what is meant by an
invisible kingdom? A kingdom is an organized body: do we mean then a secret
society? no; what we really mean by the words is, that He has no earthly kingdom
at all. We admit a truth and explain it away. We explain away His words into a
mere metaphor, as when we speak of the animal kingdom, or the vegetable kingdom.
When we say that Christ has an invisible kingdom, we mean, I suppose, that He
has servants on earth, and gives them laws; that He interposes in the world’s
history, and punishes the guilty; but all this surely He did before He came in
the flesh; and all this surely does not come up to the idea, does not answer to
the name, of kingdom. It is as unmeaning to speak of an invisible kingdom on
earth, as of invisible chariots and horsemen, invisible swords and spears,
invisible palaces: to be a kingdom at all it must be visible, if the word has
any true meaning.
But it may be said, that Christ Himself, the King, is invisible, and therefore
His kingdom may well be invisible also. It is true, He is the invisible King of
a visible kingdom; for it does not at all follow, because a monarch is withdrawn
from view, that therefore His kingdom
must
cease to be a fact in the face of day also. It is seldom that the monarch of any
kingdom is seen, and then not by many, except on certain occasions. Kings are
within their palaces, yet their power is in the public world. It is seldom they
rule by themselves; they rule by instruments. Such is Christ’s mode of
governing; He is away; He has not resigned His rule; He does not simply abandon
it to His servants: but still He rules through His appointed servants, and has
committed His subjects to them. He resembles earthly sovereigns, not only in
having a kingdom, but in His mode of governing it.
Now this description of Christ’s kingdom is what He gives us of it Himself. “The
kingdom of heaven,” He says, “is as a man travelling into a far country, who
called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods. And unto one he gave
five talents, to another two, and to another one.” [Matt. 25:14-15] Another
parable, spoken in warning, represents the officers of the kingdom under the
image of a steward: “Who then is that faithful and wise steward, whom his lord
shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due
season?” [Luke 12: 42]
So much is spoken in general; but next who are spoken of as the rulers in the
kingdom, Christ’s viceroys? the Twelve Apostles, and first of all Peter. To him
our Lord addressed these wonderful words: “I say unto thee, That thou art Peter,
and upon this rock I will build My Church; and the gates of hell shall not
prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven:
and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever
thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” [Matt. 16: 18-19] By the
“Church” must be meant a community or polity of men, and you see that St. Peter
had the keys of this Church or kingdom, or the power of admitting into it, and
excluding from it: and besides that, an awful power of binding and loosing,
about which it does not fall within our present subject to inquire.
(Reference: John Henry Newman, Sermons bearing on Subjects of the Day
(1843) Sermon no. 16, p. 219-222)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Monday of the thirty fourth week in Ordinary Time
(November 23) Blessed Miguel Agustín Pro (1891-1927)
¡Viva Cristo Rey! (Long live Christ the King) were the last
words Father Pro uttered before he was executed for being a Catholic
priest
and serving his flock. Born into a prosperous, devout family in Guadalupe de
Zacatecas, he entered
the
Jesuits in 1911 but three years later fled to Granada, Spain, because of
religious persecution in Mexico. He was ordained in Belgium in 1925. He
immediately returned to Mexico, where he served a Church forced to go
“underground.” He celebrated the Eucharist clandestinely and ministered the
other sacraments to small groups of Catholics. He and his brother Roberto were
arrested on trumped-up charges of attempting to assassinate Mexico’s president.
Roberto was spared but Miguel was sentenced to face a firing squad on November
23, 1927. His funeral became a public demonstration of faith. He was beatified
in 1988. In 1927 when Father Miguel Pro was executed, no one could have
predicted that 52 years later the bishop of Rome would visit Mexico, be welcomed
by its president and celebrate open-air Masses before thousands of people. Pope
John Paul II made additional trips to Mexico in 1990, 1993 and 1999. Those who
outlawed the Catholic Church in Mexico did not count on the deeply rooted faith
of its people and the willingness of many of them, like Miguel Pro, to die as
martyrs.
During his homily at the beatification Mass, Pope
John Paul II said that Father Pro “is a new glory for the beloved Mexican
nation, as well as for the Society of Jesus. His life of sacrificing and
intrepid apostolate was always inspired by a tireless evangelizing effort.
Neither suffering nor serious illness, neither the exhausting ministerial
activity, frequently carried out in difficult and dangerous circumstances, could
stifle the radiating and contagious joy which he brought to his life for Christ
and which nothing could take away (see John 16:22). Indeed, the deepest root of
self-sacrificing surrender for the lowly was his passionate love for Jesus
Christ and his ardent desire to be conformed to him, even unto death.”
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 1:1-6, 8-20; Daniel
3:52-56; Luke 21:1-4
As he looked up, Jesus saw the rich
putting their gifts into the temple treasury. He also saw a poor widow put in
two very small copper coins. I tell you the truth, he said, this poor widow has
put in more than all the others. All these people gave their gifts out of their
wealth; but she out of her poverty put in all she had to live on.
(Luke 21: 1-4)
Giving all
The scene of our Gospel passage
(Luke 21: 1-4) is the Temple of Jerusalem,
and our Lord has arrived in Jerusalem, cleansed the Temple of its commercial
traffic, and imposed a regime of prayer and teaching in its precincts. The
hostility of the chief priests, the scribes and other prominent persons is
intense (19:47; 20:19), but they are helpless before the admiration of the
people for Jesus. While our Lord continues to teach in the Temple, the bulk of
the chapter prior to our passage today is given over to the attempts
by the
chief priests, the scribes as well as the Sadducees to confront him or trap him
in his teaching. He sovereignly confutes them all, leaving some in admiration
(20:39) and others conclusively cowed in debate before him (20:40). Despite
this, the hostility of the leaders remains implacable. In our Gospel passage
today our Lord is there, Master of the Temple and Teacher of the truth of God.
He “looks up,” and observes the rich as they cast their gifts into the treasury.
His eye catches “a certain poor widow” who dropped in two small coins. Now, the
word for “poor” here (Greek: penichran) signifies one for whom
life is a struggle (21:2). But we notice that when our Lord draws the attention
of his disciples to this widow (21:3), he himself describes her poverty by means
of a more drastic word — she is ptoke, one who is in abject
poverty, a virtual beggar, one in danger of starvation. The two small coins she
gave to the treasury were two lepta. The lepton was the smallest Jewish bronze
coin. F. W. Madden in his History of Jewish Coinage (Reprint 1967,
p.296-302) tells us that it was worth about one eighth of a cent of his day. It
must have been something like the old farthing — or, I suppose, less than the
modern single cent. In any case, it had scarcely any value. Presumably St Luke
was drawing on the Gospel of St Mark (12: 41-44) for this incident, and Mark’s
Gospel is recognized as being the account of St Peter. So we may take it that
the eye-witness source for our event here is Simon Peter who may have been next
to our Lord as he pointed to the widow and spoke of her.
Now, in drawing attention to her, our
Lord was not just speaking of generosity in the matter of giving to the Temple
treasury. He was speaking of generosity: the remarkable generosity to God of one
who had virtually nothing. It is to be remembered that while the rich person can
be profoundly attached to his wealth, the poor person can also be profoundly
attached to the little he has. He can be found clinging on to it for dear life.
But this destitute widow was not attached to anything. She was attached only to
God, and she wanted to give to God all she had. She was a widow, and possibly
bereft of relatives and support. She had her two small coins, and anyone would
have expected her to carefully husband any small means that came her way. But no
— she, elderly and without support, gave it to God and trusted in him alone. It
was yet another example of the holiness that was indeed to be found in the
chosen people of God — and the Gospels give us other examples of this holiness.
Holiness of a kind was seen even outside the chosen people. Our Lord said, in
astonishment, that he had not seen in Israel the faith that he encountered in
the centurion who had asked him to cure his servant. Here, though, our Lord
holds aloft before his disciples the magnificence of the poor widow. Simon Peter
took careful note of it, related the event in his preaching, and perhaps
directed that it be included in Mark’s Gospel. This gift of all that we are and
all we have is the ideal for every disciple of Christ. Our Lord said on one
occasion that no one could be his disciple unless he gives up all his
possessions. He meant that his disciples must be like the poor widow, and give
all to God. We must devote all our mind, heart, soul and strength to Jesus. It
means doing our very best in the fulfilment of God’s will every day. There is a
particular application of this which comes to mind as we think of the context of
this event. The context, as we saw, was Christ’s conflict with the leaders due
to his bearing witness to the truth of God. For our part, we are called to give
our best in bearing witness to the truth of Christ. This we do in our homes, at
our work, among our friends and associates.
Let us resolve to love Jesus Christ and
to do our best for him. It is often said that love is not just a feeling — in
fact feelings can be largely absent. I remember one person who, for five years,
went to visit his mother in hospital. She never knew him, because her mind had
gone. Love is not a feeling, it is a decision. Let us make the decision to love
Jesus, and to show our love by giving him all we have and all we are. Let us
take to heart the example of the poor widow, for Christ himself has held her up
to his disciples, and through them to the whole Church.
(E.J.Tyler)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Those who, leaving action for others, pray and suffer, will not be noticed here;
but what a radiant crown will be theirs, in the kingdom of Life! Blessed be the
'apostolate of suffering'!
(The Way, no.969)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter THE
DAY OF ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
Pardon me also, and deal mercifully with me, as often as I think of anything
besides You in prayer. For I confess truly that I am accustomed to be very much
distracted. Very often I am not where bodily I stand or sit; rather, I am where
my thoughts carry me. Where my thoughts are, there am I; and frequently my
thoughts are where my love is. That which naturally delights, or is by habit
pleasing, comes to me quickly. Hence You Who are Truth itself, have plainly
said: "For where your treasure is, there is your heart also." If I love heaven,
I think willingly of heavenly things. If I love the world, I rejoice at the
happiness of the world and grieve at its troubles. If I love the flesh, I often
imagine things that are carnal. If I love the spirit, I delight in thinking of
spiritual matters. For whatever I love, I am willing to speak and hear about.
(Continuing)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Lord … can this be the world which Thou hast created, so full of pain and
suffering? Who among the sons of Adam lives without suffering from his birth to
his death? … Why is this, O my God? Why is this, O my soul? Dwell upon it, and
ask thyself, Why is this? Has God changed His nature? … O my God, I know full
well why all these evils are. Thou hast not changed Thy nature, but man has
ruined his own. We have sinned, O Lord, and therefore is this change. All these
evils which I see and in which I partake are the fruit of sin.
JHN, from Meditations and Devotions (1893)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Tuesday of the thirty fourth week in Ordinary Time
(November 24) Saint Andrew Dung-Lac, priest and martyr,
and his companions, martyrs
St. Andrew was one of 117 people martyred in Vietnam between 1820 and 1862.
Members of this group were beatified on four different
occasions
between 1900 and 1951. Now all have been canonized by Pope John Paul II.
Christianity came to Vietnam (then three separate kingdoms) through the
Portuguese. Jesuits opened the first permanent mission at Da Nang in 1615. They
ministered to Japanese Catholics who had been driven from Japan. The king of one
of the kingdoms banned all foreign missionaries and tried to make all Vietnamese
deny their faith by trampling on a crucifix. Like the priest-holes in Ireland
during English persecution, many hiding places were offered in homes of the
faithful. Severe persecutions were again launched three times in the 19th
century. During the six decades after 1820, between 100,000 and 300,000
Catholics were killed or subjected to great hardship. Foreign missionaries
martyred in the first wave included priests of the Paris Mission Society, and
Spanish Dominican priests and tertiaries. Persecution broke out again in 1847
when the emperor suspected foreign missionaries and Vietnamese Christians of
sympathizing with a rebellion led by of one of his sons. The last of the martyrs
were 17 laypersons, one of them a 9-year-old, executed in 1862. That year a
treaty with France guaranteed religious freedom to Catholics, but it did not
stop all persecution. By 1954 there were over a million and a half
Catholics—about seven percent of the population—in the north. Buddhists
represented about 60 percent. Persistent persecution forced some 670,000
Catholics to abandon lands, homes and possessions and flee to the south. In
1964, there were still 833,000 Catholics in the north, but many were in prison.
In the south, Catholics were enjoying the first decade of religious freedom in
centuries, their numbers swelled by refugees. During the Vietnamese war,
Catholics again suffered in the north, and again moved to the south in great
numbers. Now the whole country is under Communist rule. (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 2:31-45; Daniel 3:57-61;
Luke 21:5-11
Some of his disciples were remarking
about how the temple was adorned with beautiful stones and with gifts dedicated
to God. But Jesus said, As for what you see here, the time will come when not
one stone will be left on another; every one of them will be thrown down.
Teacher, they asked, when will these things happen? And what will be the sign
that they are about to take place? He replied: Watch out that you are not
deceived. For many will come in my name, claiming, 'I am he,' and 'The time is
near.' Do not follow them. When you hear of wars and revolutions, do not be
frightened. These things must happen first, but the end will not come right
away. Then he said to them: Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against
kingdom. There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various
places, and fearful events and great signs from heaven.
(Luke 21: 5-11)
The lesson of the Temple
It is difficult for the modern reader to appreciate the magnificence of the
Temple building Herod constructed, nor to appreciate the central place that the
Temple occupied in the ethos of the Jewish nation. It had been a long and
tremendous project, and together with his rebuilding of parts of Jerusalem
(following the attack of 37 BC) it earned for Herod the title of the Great. Our
scene of today’s Gospel has Christ teaching in the Temple as its Master, with
his Passion soon to begin. He has cleansed
its precincts of non-religious
activities and has insisted on religious decorum. The leaders of the people are
helpless before his assertion of authority because of the support of the people
for their great prophet. Soon, as an act of supreme witness, Jesus would deliver
himself into the hands of his enemies. So with the magnificent Temple all around
them, some remarked to our Lord on the beauty of the stonework and the gifts
there that were dedicated to God. It was a sight that moved the human spirit and
lifted it in praise of God. Christ himself loved the Temple — as just mentioned,
he had very recently caused a sensation by single-handedly putting an end to the
busy commerce going on there. The Temple was the House of his Father, and he
insisted it be treated as a place of prayer. But our Lord replied to those about
him that the massive and awesome Temple would in time be nothing but rubble:
“the time will come when not one stone will be left on another; every one of
them will be thrown down” (Luke 21: 5-11).
It was a statement that harkened back to those of the great prophets
who had foretold the destruction of Jerusalem. It would have immediately
reminded our Lord’s listeners of the great destruction of Jerusalem centuries
before, which represented God’s judgment on his people. Our Lord was alluding to
the judgment of God on his people’s sins. Well now, rather than lingering on the
details of our Lord’s description of coming troubles both soon and distant, let
us consider the essential point. The essential point was that all this
magnificence would go because of sin.
St Paul writes in his Letter to the Romans that death entered the world through
one man’s sin, and then spread to the whole human race. Death and all that is
associated with death is ultimately the upshot of sin. The sin of man is, in the
final analysis, the rejection of God and his will. This rejection of God
destroys the linchpin of created reality, and, with the commission of sin, life
unravels. The Scriptures portray this pattern, and the consequences of sin are
seen in Scripture in certain iconic events — such as the destruction of the
Temple in Jerusalem by the Babylonians. Our Lord is pointing to a tremendous
destruction that is coming, which would also be due to sin and infidelity. Just
before he entered the city, he referred to the coming destruction and wept over
what he saw would happen (19:41-44). The cause was his own rejection. We ought
take the historical fact of the destruction of the Temple and the City some
decades later as a sign of the seriousness of the call to accept the person of
Christ. Just before he ascended into heaven, he charged his disciples to go to
the whole world and make disciples of all the nations. Those who believe would
be saved, those who refused to believe would be condemned. The point is that the
issues are ultimately clear-cut and stark, as are the consequences of our
decision. They apply to each individual, and they apply to the world. There will
be a particular judgment for each individual, and there will be a general
judgment for the whole world. All the good things that we see will fall away
before the ultimate issue, which is the acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord. Let
us take our stand with him, then! He is our true rock of security. Our days may
be filled with ordinary things, they may even seem secure, but all that matters
is the full-hearted acceptance of Christ and his will, lived out in the daily
life which the providence of God has made our own. A life which is one of
spectacle alone — symbolized, perhaps, by the beautiful Temple our Lord remarks
upon — will not stand. All that will stand is a life built on the rock of Christ
and his word.
There is one sense in which we must be living constantly in the
present. It is no good at all to be caught up in constant bitter memories or
daydreams of the future. The one real thing is the present and we ought be
trying constantly to make the best of it. We ought live in the present moment.
At the same time, we must live in the present with the revealed future before
us. Our Lord has revealed the future, and it consists of the divine judgment.
Let us bear in mind the lesson of the Temple of Jerusalem so as to gain life
everlasting.
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is true that I have called your discreet apostolate a 'silent and effective
mission.' And I won't go back on what I said.
(The Way, no.970)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Eighth Chapter THE DAY OF
ETERNITY AND THE DISTRESSES OF THIS LIFE
THE DISCIPLE
Blessed is the man who for Your sake, O Lord, dismisses all creatures, does
violence to nature, crucifies the desires of the flesh in fervour of spirit, so
that with serene conscience he can offer You a pure prayer and, having excluded
all earthly things inwardly and outwardly, becomes worthy to enter into the
heavenly choirs.
(Concluded)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In these times especially, we should be on our guard against those, who hope by
inducing us to lay aside our [liturgical] forms, at length to make us lay aside
our Christian hope altogether. This is why the Church itself is attacked,
because it is the living form, the visible body of religion; and shrewd men know
that when it goes, religion will go too. This is why they rail at so many usages
as superstitious; or propose alterations and changes, a measure especially
calculated to shake the faith of the multitude.
From the sermon ‘Ceremonies of the Church’ (1831)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Wednesday of the thirty fourth week in Ordinary Time
(November 25) St. Columban (543?-615)
Columban was the greatest of the Irish missionaries who worked on the European
continent. As a young man who was greatly tormented by temptations of the flesh,
he sought the advice of a religious woman who had lived a hermit’s life for
years. He saw in her
answer a call to leave the world. He went first to a monk
on an island in Lough Erne, then to the great monastic seat of learning at
Bangor. After many years of seclusion and prayer, he travelled to Gaul
(modern-day France) with 12 companion missionaries. They won wide respect for
the rigor of their discipline, their preaching, and their commitment to charity
and religious life in a time characterized by clerical slackness and civil
strife. Columban established several monasteries in Europe which became centres
of religion and culture. Like all saints, he met opposition. Ultimately he had
to appeal to the pope against complaints of Frankish bishops, for vindication of
his orthodoxy and approval of Irish customs. He reproved the king for his
licentious life, insisting that he marry. Since this threatened the power of the
queen mother, Columban was deported to Ireland. His ship ran aground in a storm,
and he continued his work in Europe, ultimately arriving in Italy, where he
found favour with the king of the Lombards. In his last years he established the
famous monastery of Bobbio, where he died. His writings include a treatise on
penance and against Arianism, sermons, poetry and his monastic rule.
Writing to the pope about a doctrinal controversy in
Lombardy, Columban said: “We Irish, living in the farthest parts of the earth,
are followers of St. Peter and St. Paul and of the disciples who wrote down the
sacred canon under the Holy Spirit. We accept nothing outside this evangelical
and apostolic teaching.... I confess I am grieved by the bad repute of the chair
of St. Peter in this country.... Though Rome is great and known afar, she is
great and honoured with us only because of this chair.... Look after the peace
of the Church, stand between your sheep and the wolves.” (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 5:1-6, 13-14, 16-17, 23-28; Daniel 3:62-67; Luke
21:12-19
Jesus said, But before all this, they
will lay hands on you and persecute you. They will deliver you to synagogues and
prisons, and you will be brought before kings and governors, and all on account
of my name. This will result in your being witnesses to them. But make up your
mind not to worry beforehand how you will defend yourselves. For I will give you
words and wisdom that none of your adversaries will be able to resist or
contradict. You will be betrayed even by parents, brothers, relatives and
friends, and they will put some of you to death. All men will hate you because
of me. But not a hair of your head will perish. By standing firm you will gain
life. (Luke 21: 12-19)
Bearing witness
Our Lord has
just foretold the destruction of the glory of Israel, its Temple. Not one stone
will be left upon another — and within a few decades, so it was. His disciples
questioned him more, and his vision of the future broadens beyond the Temple to
the world: Luke records that “the end is not so soon” (21:9). History would
entail great upsets and disturbances: “nation shall rise against nation, and
kingdom against kingdom. Great earthquakes will occur in various places and
famines and plagues. There will be fearful
sights” (21:10-11). And so it has
been — so much so that philosophers have argued that there could not be a God,
for there is manifestly no purpose, no order, no design in the world as it is.
The world is a mess. On the night of November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall--the
symbol of the Cold War division of Europe--came down. It was the culminating
point of the revolutionary changes sweeping east central Europe in 1989. The
collapse of communism in east central Europe and the Soviet Union marked the end
of the Cold War. There was euphoria at the thought of peace — the two Germanys
were united. Then suddenly as if out of nowhere — although there was a long
background to it — the cyclone of Islamic terrorism appeared on the horizon. It
is now a world threat and long-standing democracies are faced with numerous
terrorist cells spawning in their own societies. Suicide bombers are being
groomed across the globe. The very word “martyrdom” — meaning the ultimate
witnesses with one’s life to goodness and truth — is now debased because of
horrifying suicides being given that name. This is to say that there is a
mysterious pattern in human history which our Lord describes in this chapter of
St Luke, a pattern of unending conflict and turbulence. The refrain of
Shakespeare’s witches in Macbeth well describes it: “Double, double toil and
trouble; fire burn, and caldron bubble.” Yet, as our Lord says, the end is not
so soon.
This is the broad context of life for much of mankind. Is there any special word
from Christ to the Christian, to his disciple? Yes — he says that there will be
special and added difficulties for him. He will be hauled before authorities and
persecuted because of faith in Christ his Lord. “Jesus said, But before all
this, they will lay hands on you and persecute you. They will deliver you to
synagogues and prisons, and you will be brought before kings and governors, and
all on account of my name” (Luke 21: 12-19).
So not only does the world rise up, as it were, and toss man to and fro, but the
society of men will make the one who witnesses to the truth of Christ suffer.
There is a strange rebellion at the heart of things. St John tells us in the
Prologue of his Gospel that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us. He came
unto his own, and his own did not receive him. He who is the Way, the Truth and
the Life, was rejected. The pattern our Lord foretells to his own disciples was
in the first instance exemplified in him. He was delivered to the leaders of the
synagogues and cast into prison. He was brought before the governor, the
representative of the Emperor on account of the truth he had revealed. Thus did
he himself bear witness to his truth by his suffering and death. So it will be
for the disciple of Christ, to a greater or lesser extent, depending on vocation
and circumstances. The disciple of Christ can expect difficulties coming from
the world because its condition is one of turbulent instability. He can expect
difficulties coming from society because to one degree or another, in one sense
or another, society is not disposed to accept testimony to Jesus Christ.
Consider the vituperation Cardinal George Pell attracted from politicians in mid
2007. He had repeatedly insisted that no Catholic politician should vote for an
expansion of embryonic stem cell research because of the destruction of the
embryo that this entails. Again, consider the storm that erupted when Pope
Benedict declared during a flight to Africa in 2009 that condoms were not the
answer to AIDS.
There are many Christian positions which will attract persecution. But what does
our Lord say of this persecution? He tells his disciples that this persecution
constitutes an opportunity. It will be the opportunity to bear witness, and help
will come from on high when the time comes. “This will result in your being
witnesses to them. But make up your mind not to worry beforehand how you will
defend yourselves. For I will give you words and wisdom that none of your
adversaries will be able to resist or contradict.” Let us resolve to use the
little occasions of every ordinary day to follow in the footsteps of the Master,
bearing witness to him and his truth in whatever way is appropriate and
possible.
(E.J.Tyler)
Further reading: Catechism of the Catholic Church, no.1816
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think so highly of your devotion to the early Christians that I will do all I
can to encourage it, so that you — like them — will put more enthusiasm each day
into that effective apostolate of discretion and friendship.
(The Way, no.971)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Ninth Chapter
THE DESIRE OF ETERNAL LIFE; THE GREAT REWARDS PROMISED TO THOSE WHO STRUGGLE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
MY CHILD, when you feel the desire for everlasting happiness poured out upon you
from above, and when you long to depart out of the tabernacle of the body that
you may contemplate My glory without threat of change, open wide your heart and
receive this holy inspiration with all eagerness. Give deepest thanks to the
heavenly Goodness which deals with you so understandingly, visits you so
mercifully, stirs you so fervently, and sustains you so powerfully lest under
your own weight you sink down to earthly things. For you obtain this not by your
own thought or effort, but simply by the condescension of heavenly grace and
divine regard. And the purpose of it is that you may advance in virtue and in
greater humility, that you may prepare yourself for future trials, that you may
strive to cling to Me with all the affection of your heart, and may serve Me
with a fervent will.
(Continuing)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As that which is created differs from what is not yet created, so the Christian
differs from the natural man. He is brought into a new world, and, as being in
that new world, is invested with powers and privileges which he absolutely had
not in the way of nature.
JHN, from the sermon ‘The State of Salvation’ (1838)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Thursday of the thirty fourth week in Ordinary Time
(November 26) St. Catherine of Alexandria (c. 310)
According to the Legend of St. Catherine, this young woman converted to
Christianity after receiving a vision. At the age of 18, she debated 50 pagan
philosophers. Amazed at her wisdom and debating skills, they became
Christians—as did about 200 soldiers and members of the emperor’s family. All of
them were martyred. Sentenced to be executed on a spiked wheel, Catherine
touched the wheel and it shattered. She was beheaded. Centuries later, angels
are said to have carried the body of St. Catherine to a monastery at the foot of
Mt. Sinai. Devotion to her spread as a result of the Crusades. She was invoked
as the patroness of students, teachers, librarians and lawyers. Catherine is one
of the 14 Holy Helpers, venerated especially in Germany and Hungary.
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 6:12-28;
Daniel 3:68-74; Luke 21:20-28
Jesus said, When you see Jerusalem being
surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those
who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let
those in the country not enter the city. For this is the time of punishment in
fulfilment of all that has been written. How dreadful it will be in those days
for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land
and wrath against this people. They will fall by the sword and will be taken as
prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles
until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled. There will be signs in the sun,
moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the
roaring and tossing of the sea. Men will faint from terror, apprehensive of what
is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. At that time
they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. When
these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your
redemption is drawing near. (Luke 21:20-28)
Christ our hope
It is generally recognized that many passages of the Gospels
consist of “sayings” of our Lord — statements of his that are strung together
and situated in certain contexts. The present passage would seem to be an
example of this. The context is our Lord speaking in the Temple, in the course
of which he gives his prophecy that it will be destroyed. When would this
happen? some had asked. Our Lord did not choose to answer the question as to the
date, but foretold that the magnificent Temple would be attacked by
armies and
destroyed. That is to say, it would be a repetition of what had happened in the
past. Jerusalem will be “surrounded by armies.” There will be “desolation” and
“great distress in the land and wrath against this people.” Inhabitants “will
fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem
will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the time of the Gentiles are
fulfilled.” In the event, all of this occurred and with a vengeance. Did it have
a meaning, or was it just the way things happened to turn out? It was, of
course, an historical event, the causes of which could be traced in the
processes of history. But it did have a higher meaning. Our Lord says that “this
is the time of punishment in fulfilment of all that has been written.” The
cataclysm was allowed as a judgment of God on sin, and was part of the
fulfilment of prophecy. Now, there is this too. The destruction of Jerusalem
some decades after the death and resurrection of Christ was an event not only
with meaning in itself, but is a grand lesson that holiness and sin have
historical results. Man’s moral life affects the course of history, which lies
in the hands of God who is the moral Ruler and Judge of all. One of the points
that Pope Benedict made in his Encyclical Letter, Caritas in Veritate,
is that the morality of decisions affects the world economy for good or ill as
the case may be. We are reminded by our Gospel today that man is not just the
lord of the manor. He is subject to moral law, and if that law is disregarded,
history will be subject to a judgment.
While the destruction of Jerusalem is a reminder, to anyone of any age, of the
presence in history of the divine judgment, it is also an indicator of what will
come at the end. So it is that our Lord’s piercing and prophetic vision goes
beyond the fall of the city to what we might call the fall of the world. “There
will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in
anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. Men will faint
from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly
bodies will be shaken.” Our Lord tells his listeners that this world will pass
away. The world shares in the fallen character of man, and so it bears death
within its lungs. Of itself it cannot last forever. Just as the city will suffer
its cataclysm, so too will the world. But for those who have striven to be
obedient to God, there is a great hope at hand. They may look ahead with
confidence, for the world has not been left by God in its own inadequacy and
sin. “At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and
great glory. When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your
heads, because your redemption is drawing near” (Luke
21:20-28). The city will fall, and the world will come to its end,
but there is a great Rock upon which every man and woman may take a secure
stand. That Rock is Jesus Christ who suffered and died, and who now abides with
us in his body the Church. He is the Beginning and the End, and in living in
union with him by faith and baptism we live in an ultimate security. Whatever
may happen to us, in the final analysis we shall come to no harm. He is with us
now, and he will be “coming in a cloud with power and great glory.” He will come
to bring redemption. Our Lord’s words in today’s Gospel passage speak of the
presence and results of sin in God’s chosen people and in the entire world. But
they also speak of what God has done about this. He has come and, in Jesus his
Son, has saved his people from their sins.
Our Lord’s words begin on a profoundly sombre note, and they end with a ringing
note of hope. Whatever situation you are in, be faithful to the end! Stay close
to me and walk in my footsteps. No matter what life may bring, place your trust
in me, and at the end your trust will be vindicated. I shall come, and your
redemption will be near at hand. The Christian faith and vision is one of
profound optimism, based on a certain fact. That fact is the person of Jesus
Christ. On him does everything depend, and in clinging to him we shall be secure
and strong, both now and hereafter.
(E.J.Tyler)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When you carry out your 'apostolate of discretion and friendship', do not tell
me you don't know what to say. For, with the psalmist, I will remind you:
Dominus dabit verbum evangelizantibus virtute multa — the Lord places on his
apostles' lips words filled with efficacy.
(The Way, no.972)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Ninth Chapter THE
DESIRE OF ETERNAL LIFE; THE GREAT REWARDS PROMISED TO THOSE
WHO STRUGGLE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
My child, often, when the fire is burning the flame does not ascend without
smoke. Likewise, the desires of some burn toward heavenly things, and yet they
are not free from temptations of carnal affection. Therefore, it is not
altogether for the pure honour of God that they act when they petition Him so
earnestly. Such, too, is often your desire which you profess to be so strong.
For that which is alloyed with self-interest is not pure and perfect.
(Continuing)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Lord, … when He commanded the winds and the sea, said “Why are ye fearful, O
ye of little faith?” [Matt. 8: 26] … Do at least as much as what the disciples
did. They had but little faith, they feared, they had not any great confidence
and peace, but at least they did
not keep away from Christ. They did not sit
still sullenly, but they came to Him. Alas, our very best state is not higher
than the Apostles’ worst state. Our Lord blamed them as having little faith,
because they cried out to Him. I wish we Christians of this day did as much as
this.
John Henry Newman, from the sermon ‘The Omnipotence of God the Reason for Faith
and Hope’ (1848)
--------------------------------------------
When a passage of Scripture, descriptive of God’s dealings with man, is obscure
or perplexing, it is as well to ask ourselves whether this may not be owing to
some insensibility, in ourselves or in our age, to certain peculiarities of the
Divine law or government therein involved. Thus, to those who do not understand
the nature and history of religious truth, our Lord’s assertion about sending a
sword on earth is an obscurity. To those who consider sin a light evil, the
doctrine of eternal punishment is a difficulty.
John Henry Newman, from the sermon ‘Obedience without Love, as instanced in the Character of
Balaam’ (1837)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Friday of the thirty fourth week in Ordinary Time
(November 27) St. Francesco Antonio Fasani 1681-1742
Born and raised Lucera in southeast Italy, Francis Anthony
was a pious and reserved youth who joined the Conventual Franciscans at age
14, in 1695. During the novitiate year he befriended a gregarious novice named
Antonio Lucci who told him that "the fastest way to become a saint was through
laughter." These two young friars remained friends and witnessed the importance
of close fraternal bonds in the sanctification of self and the world. Francis
Anthony served the community as a theology and philosophy professor, a novice
master, and as a minister provincial. He was also a tireless confessor and
minister of compassion among prisoners and those condemned to death. Known as
"Padre Maestro" among the people of Lucera, Francis Anthony was especially
dedicated to his work among the poor and destitute. Likewise, his friend Antonio
was called the "Father of the Poor" when he served as the Franciscan bishop of
Bovino. Saint Francis Anthony Fasani died in 1742 and was canonized in 1986. His
friend Blessed Antonio Lucci died in 1752 and was beatified in 1989.
During his homily at the canonization of Francesco, Pope John Paul
II reflected on John 21:15 in which Jesus asks Peter if he loves Jesus more than
the other apostles and then tells Peter, "Feed my lambs." The pope observed that
in the final analysis human holiness is decided by love. "He [Francesco] made
the love taught us by Christ the fundamental characteristic of his existence,
the basic criterion of his thought and activity, the supreme summit of his
aspirations" (L'Osservatore Romano, vol. 16, number 3, 1986).
(AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 7:2-14; Daniel 3:75-81;
Luke 21:29-33
Jesus told them this parable: Look at
the fig-tree and all the trees. When they sprout leaves, you can see for
yourselves and know that summer is near. Even so, when you see these things
happening, you know that the kingdom of God is near. I tell you the truth, this
generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.
Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.
(Luke 21: 29-33)
The truth
One of the great
events in the history of the Anglican Church was the rise of the Oxford
Movement, beginning formally in 1833. Within a short time John Henry Newman
became its leader, and by 1838 he was the foremost intellectual representative
of what might be called Catholic Anglicanism. His theory was firm and fearless:
Christianity is the religion of the Scriptures and the early Church Fathers, and
it is this that Anglicanism at its best looked to and embodied. For many, Newman
was an oracle in both his defence of
dogmatic religion and in his attack on
Liberalism and Rationalism in religion — which was the forerunner of the
Modernism of the early twentieth century, and the Relativism of our time. But
then, at the height of the Movement, Newman sustained a serious blow. In 1839
Wiseman’s momentous article on St Augustine and the Donatists appeared in the
“Dublin Review,” pressing home the parallel between the Donatists and the
Anglican Church. It was a blow that turned the tide in Newman’s life. Five years
later Newman was moving inexorably towards the Church of Rome, but one thing
that deeply concerned him was that his change might lead to latitudinarianism
and liberalism in some of his previous disciples. He wrote to John Keble that “a
sort of latitudinarianism and liberalism may be the end of those (God forbid
it!) whom I am keeping from Rome” (June, 1844). If the great teacher of
Anglicanism could on his own admission have been in error all along, how could
anyone hope to attain objective religious truth? Was religious truth a mere
phantom, an illusion? In the event some did indeed become liberals in religion — such as Mark Pattison (1813-1884). Why do I mention this example of people
losing faith because, as they saw it, there was no one whom they could trust as
an authority in respect to the truth? It is meant as an illustration. It is yet another reminder of
the wonder of Jesus Christ. He is the one person in human history who claimed to
have the fullness of truth, who possessed it, and who asked for complete faith in
himself. By trusting in him we possess the truth that saves.
In our Gospel today our Lord makes a claim that no prophet had made: “I tell you
the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things
have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass
away” (Luke 21: 29-33). Consider those
words, Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away. I
have referred to Newman. In a lecture given in 1852 (Discourse 8, Idea of
a University) he refers to Aristotle as the master philosopher: “He is
the oracle of nature and of truth,” Newman writes, so much so that “we men
cannot help, to a great extent, being Aristotelians.” Even if we grant that,
still, Aristotle would never have claimed that “heaven and earth will pass away,
but my words will never pass away.” No man of sense would ever make such an
audacious assertion — no man, except the Man who is God become man. One man has
appeared on the stage of human history who is all that man aspires to know and
love, such that eternal life consists in knowing him. As our Lord said in his
prayer to his heavenly Father during the Last Supper, “Eternal life is this, to
know you, Father, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.” Jesus Christ is the
absolute Rock of certitude for every man and woman of history. The task of each
person is to turn to this Rock, and to build the house of life upon it. As our
Lord said elsewhere in the Gospel, the sensible man is the one who builds his
house on rock so that when the floods, the wind and the rain come, the house
will stand. That sensible man is the one who hears the word of God as uttered by
Christ his divine Son, and puts it into practice. There is nothing more certain
than the person and word of Jesus Christ. Religion is not just a feeling. It
involves knowledge of objective reality. The ultimate reality on which
everything else depends is God, and God has revealed himself in his incarnate
Son. We should resolve to live in him, knowing that in doing this we rest
absolutely secure in the truth. This is precisely what Newman strove to do and
succeeded so resoundingly in doing.
Let us resolve to base our lives on the person and the truth of Jesus Christ.
“For this I came into the world,” he declared to Pontius Pilate, “to bear
witness to the truth, and those who are of the truth listen to my voice.” His
word will never pass away. Where, then, is Jesus Christ, and where is his word
to be heard? Jesus Christ abides in his body the Church which he founded on the
Apostle Peter. His word is present in the Church’s teaching, that teaching
uttered in his name. We know where to go, and to whom we ought listen. Let us
begin, then!
(E.J.Tyler)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those well-timed words, whispered into the ear of your wavering friend; the
helpful conversation that you managed to start at the right moment; the ready
professional advice that improves his university work; the discreet indiscretion
by which you open up unexpected horizons for his zeal. This all forms part of
the 'apostolate of friendship.'
(The Way, no.973)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Ninth Chapter
THE DESIRE OF ETERNAL LIFE; THE GREAT REWARDS PROMISED TO THOSE WHO STRUGGLE
THE VOICE OF CHRIST
Ask, therefore, not for what is pleasing and convenient to yourself, but for
what is acceptable to Me and is for My honour, because if you judge rightly, you
ought to prefer and follow My will, not your own desire or whatever things you
wish.
(Continuing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is no new thing then with the Church, in a time of confusion or of anxiety,
when offences abound, and the enemy is at her gates, that her children, far from
being dismayed, or rather glorying in the danger, as vigorous men exult in
trials of their strength—it is no new thing, I say, that they should go forth to
do her work, as though she were in the most palmy days of her prosperity.
JHN, from the discourse ‘Prospects of the Catholic Missioner’ (1849)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------
Saturday of the thirty fourth week in Ordinary Time
Prayers this week:
The
Lamb who was slain is worthy to receive strength and divinity, wisdom and power
and honour: to him be glory and power for ever.
(Revelation 5:12; 1:6)
Almighty and
merciful God, you break the power of evil and make all things new in your Son
Jesus Christ, the King of the universe. May all in heaven and earth acclaim your
glory and never cease to praise you.
We ask this
through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God
for ever and ever.
(November 28) St. James of the Marche (1394-1476)
James was born in the Marche of Ancona, in central Italy
along the Adriatic Sea. After earning doctorates in canon and civil law at the
University of Perugia, he joined the Friars Minor and began a very austere life.
He fasted nine months of the year; he slept three hours a night. St. Bernardine
of Siena told him to moderate his penances. James studied theology with St. John
of Capistrano. Ordained in 1420, James began a preaching career that took him
all over Italy and through 13 Central and Eastern European countries. This
extremely popular preacher converted many people (250,000 at one estimate) and
helped spread devotion to the Holy Name of Jesus. His sermons prompted numerous
Catholics to reform their lives and many men joined the Franciscans under his
influence. With John of Capistrano, Albert of Sarteano and Bernardine of Siena,
James is considered one of the "four pillars" of the Observant movement among
the Franciscans. These friars became known especially for their preaching. To
combat extremely high interest rates, James established montes pietatis
(literally, mountains of charity) — non profit credit organizations that lent
money at very low rates on pawned objects. Not everyone was happy with the work
James did. Twice assassins lost their nerve when they came face to face with
him. James was canonized in 1726.
"Beloved and most holy word of God! You enlighten the hearts of the
faithful, you satisfy the hungry, console the afflicted; you make the souls of
all productive of good and cause all virtues to blossom; you snatch souls from
the devil’s jaw; you make the wretched holy, and men of earth citizens of
heaven" (Sermon of St. James). (AmericanCatholic.org)
Scripture today: Daniel 7:15-27; Daniel 3:82-87;
Luke 21:34-36
Jesus said to his disciples, Be careful,
or your hearts will be weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the
anxieties of life, and that day will close on you unexpectedly like a trap. For
it will come upon all those who live on the face of the whole earth. Be always
on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to
happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man.
(Luke 21: 34-36)
Vigilance There is an
expression, “the Law of the Jungle.” It more or less means that animals prey on
other animals, and there is no mercy shown. The serpent strikes when it can, and
the rodent is taken. Then the reptile too is attacked and killed by an eagle or
some other bird of prey. The same pattern is present in the world of the sea,
and in his turn man preys on animals whether they be of the land or the sea.
Those that are prey must be constantly on the look-out because they sense they
are vulnerable and can be taken by anything
that approaches. Thus it is that
birds will immediately fly away at the approach of man or animal. There is a
pattern of constant hazard for all of life. In the world of man, while human
ingenuity is able to build up networks and systems of protection, still, great
hazards remain. Without warning an electrical fire breaks out in a home and the
elderly resident is killed. Numerous shoppers are going about their business in
a large mall, and suddenly there is a vast explosion. A suicide bomber has
struck, and numerous people lie dead, and many more are maimed and seriously
injured. A war is in progress in Afganistan, and suddenly there is a roadside
explosion. The armoured vehicle is smashed to pieces, and despite constant
vigilance, four young soldiers in the prime of life have died. Vigilance is
required everywhere. A person gets into his car to drive to work. He says his
customary prayer for safe driving, but fifteen minutes later a drunken driver
smashes into his vehicle and leaves him seriously injured. So it is that we
gradually learn — though some do not seem to learn it — that we who exist, need
not exist. We can very easily lose the life which has been granted to us. If we
are imprudent and lacking vigilance, we can have life snatched from our
possession. But there is this to remember. While the loss of life, health or
possessions is itself an evil to be guarded against, what follows after that
loss is far more awesome. I refer to the judgment of God.
In our Gospel today our Lord instructs his disciples to be “always on the
watch.” There is nothing new about this advice in view of the constant
vulnerability of all things to serious hazard. What is distinctive is its
reference to a hazard of far greater proportions than anything that meets the
eye. It is a hazard for the one who, as it were, goes to sleep on the job of
being a true disciple of Christ and an obedient child of God. “Jesus said to his
disciples, Be careful, or your hearts will be weighed down with dissipation,
drunkenness and the anxieties of life, and that day will close on you
unexpectedly like a trap. For it will come upon all those who live on the face
of the whole earth. Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to
escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the
Son of Man” (Luke 21: 34-36). We can be like
the young animal that wanders from its den, lacking all vigilance as to the
dangers that are imminent. We can be like the young soldier who fails to take
constant precautions. Suddenly he is snatched from his company and becomes a
hostage, finally being killed by his crazed captors despite a ransom being paid.
The danger our Lord is referring is that of falling into sin, of being ensnared
by attachments to enjoyment and ease or concern for material prosperity, and
losing interest in God and his holy will. Then suddenly, blissfully unconcerned
about the essential vulnerability of human life, the unrepentant sinner is
called from this life. Indeed, he might suddenly die precisely because of his
dissipated and sinful life. He has lost his life, but more awesomely, he now
stands before the Son of Man who is his Judge. There is no recourse from the
judgment, no second chance, no one to appeal to, no one who can help. All is
laid bare and the divine scrutiny is absolute and immediate. It will be plain
what the sentence must be. Eternity will yawn before the soul, and how paltry
will seem the brief and sinful enjoyments of the moment during life! So, our
Lord warns, be always on the watch!
It is an excellent rule of thumb to begin each day remembering that there is no
absolute reason why that day may not be the last. There are too many cases
constantly occurring of persons whose day was their last, and it was their last
unexpectedly. There was no warning, and they had to pass immediately to the
judgment of God. In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet’s father has been murdered
without warning and his ghost comes back to his son to bemoan his present lot.
He had lost his life, all unprepared. So then, let us be constantly loving and
serving Christ, and vigilant against all that might lead us away from him.
(E.J.Tyler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'The dinner-table apostolate': it is the old hospitality of the Patriarchs,
together with the fraternal warmth of Bethany. When we practise it, we seem to
glimpse Jesus there, presiding, as in the house of Lazarus.
(The Way, no.974)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing
The Imitation of Christ
BOOK THREE
INTERNAL CONSOLATION
The Forty-Ninth Chapter
THE DESIRE OF ETERNAL LIFE; THE GREAT REWARDS PROMISED TO THOSE WHO STRUGGLE

THE VOICE OF CHRIST
I know your longings and I have heard your frequent sighs. Already you wish to
be in the liberty of the glory of the sons of God. Already you desire the
delights of the eternal home, the heavenly land that is full of joy. But that
hour is not yet come. There remains yet another hour, a time of war, of labour,
and of trial. You long to be filled with the highest good, but you cannot attain
it now. I am that sovereign Good. Await Me, until the kingdom of God shall come.
(Continuing)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God is not a hard master to require belief, without affording grounds for
believing; only follow your own sense of right, and you will gain from that very
obedience to your Maker, which natural conscience enjoins, a conviction of the
truth and power of that Redeemer whom a supernatural message has revealed; do
but examine your thoughts and doings; do but attempt what you know to be God’s
will, and you will most assuredly be led on into all the truth.
JHN, from the sermon ‘Inward Witness to the Truth of the Gospel’ (1825)
---------------Back to index for this month---------------------------Back to index to Liturgical Days---------